Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: jolly22 on March 31, 2009, 07:01:44 AM
-
Dimensions:
Length: 83.01ft (25.30m)
Width: 135.17ft (41.20m)
Height: 33.14ft (10.10m)
Performance:
Max Speed: 357mph (575kmh; 310kts)
Max Range: 2,992miles (4,815km)
Rate-of-Climb: 658ft/min (201m/min)
Ceiling: 36,089ft (11,000m; 6.8miles)
Structure:
Accommodation: 10
Hardpoints: 0
Empty Weight: 59,525lbs (27,000kg)
MTOW: 99,208lbs (45,000kg)
Power:
Engine(s): 4 x Wright R-3350-23 Duplex Cyclone 18-cylinder air-cooled turbocharged radial piston engines delivering 2,200hp each
2 x 12.7mm M2 machine guns in nose turret
2 x 12.7mm M2 machine guns in forward dorsal turret
2 x 12.7mm M2 machine guns in rearward dorsal turret
2 x 12.7mm M2 machine guns in tail position
2 x 12.7mm M2 machine guns in ventral turret position
Up to 20,000lbs of internal ordnance
http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=655
-
Ahh... the retarded mutant of the B-26 and B-29
-
:rolleyes:
-
Sounds more like a male porn star than an airplane.
-
Total of 15 became operational before VJ day. An additional 40 TB-32 Trainers were constructed.
But in total only 115 B-32 A/C were built.
Reference: Hamlyn Concise Guide to American Aircraft of World War II by David Mondey
ISBN: 0-7858-1361-6
-
Ahh... the retarded mutant of the B-26 and B-29
More like a mutant variant of the B-24 as it did keep the Davis wing that Consolidated used on the 24s. Of course, there were more mods than that.
-
It is a nice bomber, but only did three sorites during the war.
-
It is a nice bomber, but only did three sorites during the war.
It was a failure and more problematic than the B-29.
ack-ack
-
It was a failure and more problematic than the B-29.
ack-ack
Yea, it look like it had the ability to delivered but the B-29 preformace was to good.
-
ohhhh never looked at that..........thougth it would be a good addition (we need a new bomber)
-
Ahh... the retarded mutant of the B-26 and B-29
:lol
-
Too ugly to be considered for inclusion.
:lol
-
Gnome gusta. :uhoh
-
ohhhh never looked at that..........thougth it would be a good addition (we need a new bomber)
No we don't
-
Yes we do :)
(http://www.panzergeneral.de/images/do217.jpg)
-
Yes we do :)
(http://www.panzergeneral.de/images/do217.jpg)
Winnah!
-
i want dis cuz it wood b kool just a thoght u no cuz dis iz da wislist yo!!!!?:';!1!
(http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/bomber/b47/b47_09.jpg)
-
im tired of flying the same bombers.......some dont even have the load out to take out a hangar!!!!!!!!
-
im tired of flying the same bombers.......some dont even have the load out to take out a hangar!!!!!!!!
Off the top of my head, I can think of no single bomber that cannot take out a hanger by itself. A P-51, properly loaded, can take out a hanger.
wrongway
-
ki67 or an sbd or a tbm just a few
-
i want dis cuz it wood b kool just a thoght u no cuz dis iz da wislist yo!!!!?:';!1!
(http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/bomber/b47/b47_09.jpg)
My dad flew in one of those B-47s, he was with Strategic Air Command.
I was actually born on McDill AFB. in Fla.
He once showed me a picture of me hanging upside down from the bottom of the B-47, I was 1 yo.
Wish I could find that picture. :cry
-
ki67 or an sbd or a tbm just a few
Ki67 and the TBM can both take out a hanger.
My dad flew in one of those B-47s, he was with Strategic Air Command.
I was actually born on McDill AFB. in Fla.
He once showed me a picture of me hanging upside down from the bottom of the B-47, I was 1 yo.
Wish I could find that picture. :cry
IMO its the most beautiful bomber ever. Maybe because its was built like a big fighter.
-
OK,I concede. Out of 13 bombers in game, three cannot kill a hanger by themselves.
SBD
B5N2
D3A1
What a travesty.
wrongway