Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: DEEC0NX on April 05, 2009, 03:32:45 AM

Title: HELLDIVER
Post by: DEEC0NX on April 05, 2009, 03:32:45 AM
SB2C HELLDIVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SB2C_Helldiver

I think it would be great!!!
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: B4Buster on April 05, 2009, 07:32:42 AM
SB2C HELLDIVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SB2C_Helldiver

I think it would be a great hangarqueen !!!

fixed.

Sorry but I don't think it would see much usage.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Shifty on April 05, 2009, 07:42:20 AM
I'd like to see it added myself one day Deconx.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Saxman on April 05, 2009, 08:33:23 AM
fixed.

Sorry but I don't think it would see much usage.

Scenarios and FSO.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: AWwrgwy on April 05, 2009, 08:56:00 AM
fixed.

Sorry but I don't think it would see much usage.

But it has Da Cannunz.

On a side note, they had a terrible habit of falling apart.   Structural integrity problems.  The tails fell off.  Read of an account where a Marine attack squadron that flew TBMs refused to switch to the Helldiver for this reason.


wrongway
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: B4Buster on April 05, 2009, 09:54:26 AM
don't even really need them for scenarios. I'm all for new planes...I'd want to see this plane added, just not for a number of years. There's many more planes that should come first/be updated
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: jolly22 on April 05, 2009, 10:22:34 AM
I WANT IT!!!!!!!  ITS MY FAVORITE PLANE!!!! :rock
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Shifty on April 05, 2009, 11:08:35 AM
don't even really need them for scenarios.

First combat 1943 over Rabual, they flew in the battles of the Marianas, and Leyte Gulf  and carried out strikes on Formosa.
I'd say they're needed.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Dan216TH on April 05, 2009, 11:32:20 AM
It would be an upgrade to the SBD, I guess well the Pilots who flew them liked the SBD more. but   +1 from me
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Banshee7 on April 05, 2009, 11:44:35 AM
I think this would actually be a good addition for scenarios, FSO, etc...


And guys, you have to realize, there are guys like myself who prefer to fly hangar queens
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Saxman on April 05, 2009, 12:12:32 PM
don't even really need them for scenarios. I'm all for new planes...I'd want to see this plane added, just not for a number of years. There's many more planes that should come first/be updated

Yeah you do. Last combat of the SBD with the fleet carriers was the Battle of the Philippine Sea. Afterwards the SB2C replaced them on the decks of the fleet carriers. I don't even think Dauntlesses were carried aboard the CVEs by then. The remaining SBDs were all operating from USMC units assigned to shore bases.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Yeager on April 05, 2009, 01:16:18 PM
I would love to have a Helldiver in the line up.  I occasionally play with the Dauntless and TBM.......a pair of 20mm cannon would be a much appreciated addition.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: stroker71 on April 05, 2009, 03:30:21 PM
How about a Holy Diver???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIzHK9MkbA8&feature=related
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: B4Buster on April 05, 2009, 06:02:12 PM
Saxman - it's my opinion...please respect it  ;)

There's many more that should come before it.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: trigger2 on April 05, 2009, 06:20:35 PM
don't even really need them for scenarios. I'm all for new planes...I'd want to see this plane added, just not for a number of years. There's many more planes that should come first/be updated

I agree. I'd love to see more carrier based aircraft *cough*Fairey Firefly (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,251751.0.html (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,251751.0.html))*cough* though. This bird, besides FSOs and Screenshots wouldn't see much usage. I think it's one that should be added none-the-less because of the amount that is WAS used, but I believe there is more important aircraft that should be put in/remodeled first.

 :aok
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Shifty on April 05, 2009, 06:26:12 PM
Saxman - it's my opinion...please respect it  ;)

There's many more that should come before it.

Respect is a two way street you didn't show the original poster much respect for his opinion by altering his quote.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2009, 07:20:30 PM
I believe the SB2C-3 corrected most of the problems with the earlier variants and became quite the little power horse of a dive bomber.  Should be added to the game eventually.


ack-ack
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: FYB on April 05, 2009, 07:39:48 PM
No doubt in my mind, NO. Many preferred the Dauntless, a much slower plane, yet much more reliable and better handling then the Helldiver, besides, it'll surely become a hangar queen. I wouldn't fly that thing.

-FYB
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: AWwrgwy on April 05, 2009, 09:15:53 PM
No doubt in my mind, NO. Many preferred the Dauntless, a much slower plane, yet much more reliable and better handling then the Helldiver, besides, it'll surely become a hangar queen. I wouldn't fly that thing.

-FYB

From what I've read, the Dauntless was rock steady in a high angle dive where the Helldiver was squirrely and required trimming on the way down.


wrongway
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Karnak on April 05, 2009, 09:51:22 PM
It would, currently, be useless for scenarios as you idiots who ask for anything American and then just jump to asking for the next anything American when the prior request is granted will never support the addition of the appropriate Japanese opposition, which is notably lacking in AH.  The Japanese navy strike aircraft in AH are currently a 1936 dive bomber and a 1938 torpedo/level bomber, not even the more common 1942 version of the 1936 dive bomber whereas we have a 1943 version of the early war American dive bomber an the 1943 version of the torpedo/level bomber that entered service in 1942.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: FYB on April 05, 2009, 10:28:36 PM
So we all agree, block idiotic demands for American planes that have no use in AH, increase the demand for Japanese, Russian, Australian, and Italian A/C and G/V.

We need something with big guns, fast, sexy, and well armored. Something like:
(http://www.vincelewis.net/myimages28/landkreuzer-bigpic.jpg)
Its real, and it can keep up with that tracked vehicle going 50mph, I'm just guessing that.

-FYB
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Shifty on April 06, 2009, 06:05:12 AM
So we all agree, block idiotic demands for American planes that have no use in AH, increase the demand for Japanese, Russian, Australian, and Italian A/C and G/V.

We need something with big guns, fast, sexy, and well armored. Something like:
(http://www.vincelewis.net/myimages28/landkreuzer-bigpic.jpg)
Its real, and it can keep up with that tracked vehicle going 50mph, I'm just guessing that.

-FYB

No we don't all agree. The guy didn't make an idiotic demand. He stated he'd like to see it in the game.
Who decides an aircraft has no use in AH? You? This is the wishlist forum. Just because somebody wants an American plane in the game doesn't mean they're an idiot.
Just like you jumping on the anti American plane bandwagon doesn't make you cool. I agree there are many planes needed in AH from many countires.
That doesn't mean the SB2C should not be added to the game just because it's American. Geez you fanbois that suggest a persons wish is an idiotic demand then follow up with an
intellegent statement like this... Its real, and it can keep up with that tracked vehicle going 50mph, I'm just guessing that.   :lol
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: B4Buster on April 06, 2009, 07:05:55 AM
Wishlist and agreeing with what someone wants in is always going to be a little bias. We'll agree with a certain plane; to some extent, based on our interests. Now, you Naval aviation guys would love to see the Helldiver added. I say I don't think we need it...There's plenty of planes I or someone else would want added that you gents would say we don't need (another 38 variant for example).

You can't say someone's opinion is wrong because that's exactly what it is...an opinion.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: AWwrgwy on April 06, 2009, 07:54:07 AM
You can't say someone's opinion is wrong because that's exactly what it is...an opinion.

 :rofl

I agree but this hasn't been my experience lately.   :D

My opinion is the Helldiver should have never been built.  But it is based purely on 20/20 hindsight.  It really didn't live up to its expectations and by the time it was available and in service it was no longer needed.  The number built versus the number that were actually used in combat seemed to be a product of savy political manipulation on the part of Curtiss.

I see no pressing "need" for it in game but any new aircraft are always welcome.  More carrier aircraft would be nice and I don't see the Helldiver as being any more of a hanger queen than the SBD or TBM or any other carrier based bomber actually.


wrongway
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: B4Buster on April 06, 2009, 11:05:51 AM
Lol no mine either wrongway, I have to stop myself sometimes and think to myself "practice what you preach".

I'll say again I'm all for new planes. I just think as far as the Helldiver is concerned; SBDs are a fine substitute for now as for as scenarios go, and it wouldn't be used much in the MA. There's no question it would be used more than the SBD...but that's not saying much unfortunately.

[offtopic] wrongway - I wish there was a way to add audio in signatures...that's my favorite clip from Kelley's Heroes [/offtopic]   :lol
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: fudgums on April 06, 2009, 11:13:05 AM
A6M3 first...major gap in between the A6M2 and A6M5. The M3 would solve some mid war PTO warfare
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Slade on April 06, 2009, 11:17:43 AM
+1  :aok
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Marauding Conan on April 06, 2009, 11:51:25 AM
The SB2C had a terrible reputation... (I would not be allowed to say here what SB2C was translated into by its crews). But, you can model all the flaws, by all means add it, but, it would still be a hanger queen... and how would you go about modeling random structural failures?
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 06, 2009, 12:23:02 PM
The SB2C had a terrible reputation... (I would not be allowed to say here what SB2C was translated into by its crews). But, you can model all the flaws, by all means add it, but, it would still be a hanger queen... and how would you go about modeling random structural failures?

The early versions of the SB2C had a terrible reputation with those that flew it but that changed with the SB2C-3 which corrected the flaws of the earlier version.  The SB2C-3 would not be a hanger queen in this game.


ack-ack
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Karnak on April 06, 2009, 12:23:48 PM
I would like to clarify my prior statement.  I am not anti-American aircraft because I don't like them,  My suggestions are always rooted in what I think would be best for the game, not what I personally would use.  Adding endless numbers of American aircraft while letting other nation's planesets languish is not good for the game in my opinion.  I have noticed that many posters only ask for American aircraft and never support oposition units, or if they do it is with a tepid "I agree" type of post.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Yeager on April 06, 2009, 01:21:42 PM
Im all for adding new German, American, English, Russian and Japanese military arms.

Save the Italians for last, when there is nothing interesting left to add.

Also, the Helldiver, with two wing mounted 20mm Cannon would quickly eclipse both the Dauntless and Avenger in terms of popularity and use in the MAs.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Karnak on April 06, 2009, 02:52:01 PM
Also, the Helldiver, with two wing mounted 20mm Cannon would quickly eclipse both the Dauntless and Avenger in terms of popularity and use in the MAs.
Only thing that might compete with it would be a B7A2 "Grace", if it were carrier enabled.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: jolly22 on April 06, 2009, 03:59:04 PM
some1 send this post to AH person that add he planes...............this would be a great addition.........and actually it would probably be more popular than the f6f or the seafire.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Karnak on April 06, 2009, 05:21:56 PM
Actually, the Fairey Firefly and B7A2 "Grace" might both give it competition now that I think about it.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Shifty on April 06, 2009, 05:44:23 PM
 Adding endless numbers of American aircraft while letting other nation's planesets languish is not good for the game in my opinion.  

 Agreed. If it flew and fought in WWII I hope it makes it into the game one day regardless of nation. Although I do agree there's so many holes in the Japanese, Italian, and Russian, planesets hopefully those holes will fill first. Although a many of them will turn into hanger queens in the LWA's just like the SB2C. There's much more to this sim than the LWA.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Shifty on April 06, 2009, 05:50:09 PM
The SB2C had a terrible reputation... (I would not be allowed to say here what SB2C was translated into by its crews). But, you can model all the flaws, by all means add it, but, it would still be a hanger queen... and how would you go about modeling random structural failures?

If you're going to want flaws modeled into aircraft a good place to start would be the ME-163.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: ePIC on April 06, 2009, 06:06:26 PM
I would like to see more planes added the Hell Diver would be acceptable.

But honestly I tried my hand at torpdedo bombing and never got close enough to let a fish go Ship ack took me out every time to the point of "why waste a sortie" when you can up a F4U or P51 with a pair of 1000 lb bombs and egress out without a scratch and accomplish the task of sinking CV's or Cruisers.

It would be a good mission or scenario plane.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Rich46yo on April 06, 2009, 06:31:42 PM
Well I'd like to see the Brit. CV aircraft fleshed out a little. Either by a carrier born attack plane, "Firefly", or a later version Seafire. Maybe that late war one with the Griffon engine.

Think about it. Out of three major CV builders and operators in the war we have 4 Japanese CV aircraft included in the game, fighter and Jabo, at least 6 Yank ones, and only 1 Brit one/United Kingdom. Which wasnt really a CV fighter at all.

Other then the D4Y I dont see much else IJN-wise that set has to offer. The exception being possibly an IJN CV itself, which would be awsome. Shokaku class please, or Akagi.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: Karnak on April 06, 2009, 08:28:10 PM
Other then the D4Y I dont see much else IJN-wise that set has to offer. The exception being possibly an IJN CV itself, which would be awsome. Shokaku class please, or Akagi.

IJN CV aircraft:
A6M3
D4Y2
B6N2
B7A2

IJN land based aircraft:]
G4M2
J2M3
N1K1-J
P1Y1

IJN water based:
H8K2
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: whiteman on April 06, 2009, 08:38:15 PM
Would love to see all those japanese planes added, of course with the Hell Diver :D. When ever it gets added I'll make runs with it.
Title: Re: HELLDIVER
Post by: FYB on April 06, 2009, 08:43:32 PM
Would love to see all those japanese planes added, of course with the Hell Diver :D. When ever it gets added I'll make runs with it.
I might fly it if the flaws are removed!  :aok

-FYB