The introduction dates should rely on actual combat missions of at least squadron strength.
Originally posted by funkedup:
PS Hohun you have persuaded me. First squadron strength mission in-theater is fine by me. Actually seems to be easier to find than delivery dates in a lot of cases.
Originally posted by -tronski-:
Even worse when people want the date pushed up to when the a/c was still on paper! :D
Tronsky
Originally posted by Karnak
eskimo2, should you chance to revisit this thread,
Are you going by first combat or entering service?
So far as I know, the service entry dates for some of those listed are incorrect. Here's what I think is correct:
U.S.Army:
B-17G ... 6-43 (Basically correct, but the tail turret type and staggered waist guns marks the AH B-17G as a 1944 B-17G)
P-47D-11 ... 1-44 (I recall this from one of the "give the P-47D-11 a paddle bladed prop" threads)
P-51D ... 6-44 (The P-51D didn't even enter production until 2-44. It certainly didn't enter service in 1-44)
British:
Lancaster III ... 3-42 (Basically correct, but the .50 cal tail turret marks the AH Lanc III as a 1944 Lanc III)
Spitfire Mk XIV ... 1-44 (Spitfire Mk XIVs entered service with 610 Squadron on January 3rd, 1944)
Typhoon ... 9-41 (56 Squadron recived Typhoons in September, 1941. The AH Typhoon is canopied like a 1943-145 Typhoon and engined like a 1944 Typhoon)
Japanese:
A6M5b ... 3-44 (The A6M5a entered service in January, 1944. The b a couple of months after)
D3A-1 ... 37
Ki-61-I-KAIc ... 1-44 (The Ho-5 20mm cannon wasn't available in early 1943)
N1K2-J ... 11-44
Originally posted by funkedup
To follow up on your post Sancho, it looks like Kearby's Jugs were D-2's: http://home.att.net/~historyzone/Seversky-Republic6.html (http://home.att.net/~historyzone/Seversky-Republic6.html)
And they were the first Jugs to operate in PTO: http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p47_15.html (http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p47_15.html)
[ 11-01-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]
Originally posted by HoHun
Hi Funked,
>A-2 and earlier used the BMW 801C which ran on B4 fuel (87 octane). A-3 used the 801D which required C3 fuel (100 octane). I think at this time it was the only front line fighter requiring C3 fuel.
Interesting point, I hadn't considered that.
It could be you're right with regard to fuel logistics, but the Fw 190A-3 at that time was not the only fighter to need C3 fuel - the Me 109E-7 and the Me 109F-2 with their DB601N engine also flew on 100 octane.
From what I've read, it was more an engine development problem - the BMW801 was a bit troublesome early on.
Regards,
Henning (HoHun)