Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: stephen on May 04, 2009, 04:46:22 PM

Title: NEW JET
Post by: stephen on May 04, 2009, 04:46:22 PM
The Meteor..
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: LLogann on May 04, 2009, 04:49:30 PM
Oh dear..............


Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: StokesAk on May 04, 2009, 04:51:49 PM
It would kind of suck. I heard the Meteor only wnet about 350mph on the deck and becuase of its rarity it would be perked. A P51 could run it down so i doubt many people would fly it. Huge Hanger Queen.
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Spikes on May 04, 2009, 05:01:49 PM
Guns? 20mms? I'd fly it...
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Karnak on May 04, 2009, 05:45:59 PM
It would kind of suck. I heard the Meteor only wnet about 350mph on the deck and becuase of its rarity it would be perked. A P51 could run it down so i doubt many people would fly it. Huge Hanger Queen.
Dunno what numbers your've seen, but the Mk III that would be the one added did something like 440mph on the deck.
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: StokesAk on May 04, 2009, 05:55:07 PM
Ok. The person who told me must have been talking about an eirlier model.
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Karnak on May 04, 2009, 06:25:00 PM
Ok. The person who told me must have been talking about an eirlier model.
Mk I did about 370-380mph on the deck as I recall.
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Kazaa on May 04, 2009, 07:02:23 PM
Would be nice to see the metor in AH2, but it can wait.

(http://www.raf.mod.uk/downloads/wallpapers/1945/meteor3s1024.jpg)
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: MjTalon on May 04, 2009, 07:05:22 PM
just what we need, brits in Hair dryers!  :O :O

 :lol :lol :D

Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: shotgunneeley on May 04, 2009, 10:06:20 PM
Has anyone noticed there has been an influx of threads that have only one sentence stating the wish? How about a little help here Stephen. What information about speed, armament, production numbers, history, influence, and WW2 significance is contained in "The Meteor.."?

Now I want a business memo detailing the problem, the solution, background history, your reasons for proposing this change, and your sources correctly cited in MLA format. 

This assignment is due Wednesday the 6th of May by 1:30 because at that moment I will pass my Technical Writing class and stop caring about what I just wrote.  :P
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: AWwrgwy on May 04, 2009, 10:25:40 PM
Has anyone noticed there has been an influx of threads that have only one sentence stating the wish? How about a little help here Stephen. What information about speed, armament, production numbers, history, influence, and WW2 significance is contained in "The Meteor.."?

Now I want a business memo detailing the problem, the solution, background history, your reasons for proposing this change, and your sources correctly cited in MLA format. 

This assignment is due Wednesday the 6th of May by 1:30 because at that moment I will pass my Technical Writing class and stop caring about what I just wrote.  :P

Hallelujah!!

I've noticed this for quite some time and agree totally.  If the OP of a thread doesn't show some enthusiasm for something, why should I or the developers care?

wrongway
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: frank3 on May 05, 2009, 05:25:32 AM
'New Jet'

I thought the Meteor was rather old?
Bad wish.
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: waystin2 on May 05, 2009, 07:52:05 AM
I would support it's addition to AH. :aok
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: LLogann on May 05, 2009, 10:21:52 AM
I agree as well.  But the good chunk of Meteor time is post-war.  Perhaps it is one of those aircraft that should be excluded from the usage rule.
I would support it's addition to AH. :aok
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: waystin2 on May 05, 2009, 10:33:45 AM
I agree as well.  But the good chunk of Meteor time is post-war.  Perhaps it is one of those aircraft that should be excluded from the usage rule.

I do agree that she kind of falls into that gray area at the end of the war.  But still awesome! :rock
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: stephen on May 06, 2009, 05:42:15 AM
Flamers have very little to work with....hence the short post.

Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Tilt on May 06, 2009, 06:47:47 AM
Prefer the HE 162. At least it saw some combat!
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: expat on May 06, 2009, 08:13:03 AM
so did the meteor , mainly ground attack mind but combat none the less 
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Furball on May 06, 2009, 08:30:07 AM
Prefer the HE 162. At least it saw some combat!

 :huh
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Karnak on May 06, 2009, 09:48:48 AM
Meteor saw far, far more combat than the He162 or the Ta152.
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: wulf31 on May 06, 2009, 11:35:43 PM

The internetz are your friend

Performance listed for Mk I
    * Maximum speed: 410 mph (660 km/h, Mach 0.55) at 10,000 ft (3,050 m)
    * Range: 500 mi (800 km)
    * Service ceiling: 34,000 ft (11,500 m)
    * Rate of climb: 2,155 ft/min (24.6 m/s)
    * Wing loading: 44.9 lb/ft² (149 kg/m²)
    * Thrust/weight: 0.45
    * Time to altitude: 9.0 min to 30,000 ft (9,145 m)
Armament
    * Guns: 4 × 20 mm British Hispano cannons
    * Rockets: Provision for up to 16 × "60lb" 3 in rockets under outer wings

On 20 January 1945, four Meteors were moved to Melsbroek in Belgium. In March, the entire squadron was moved to Gilze-Rijen and, then in April, to Nijmegen. The Meteors flew armed reconnaissance and ground attack operations without encountering any German jet fighters. By late April, the squadron was based at Faßberg, Germany and suffered its first losses when two pilots collided in poor visibility. The war ended with the Meteors having destroyed 46 German aircraft through ground attack and having faced more problems through misidentification as the Me 262 by Allied aircraft and flak than from the Luftwaffe. To counter this, continental-based Meteors were given an all-white finish as a recognition aid.
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Guppy35 on May 07, 2009, 12:36:45 AM
I got to be good friends with a former RAF pilot who flew Meteors with 616 in the summer of 44 til the end of the war.  They spent some of their time in the summer of 44 going around to USAAF bases helping them develop tactics to fight the 262.  They did end up on the continent and he and his Squadron CO in early May brought the first 262s back from Fassberg.  He had some interesting things to say comparing the two.  I'll see if I can dig out the letter from those pre-E-mail days.
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Kazaa on May 07, 2009, 08:19:19 AM
I got to be good friends with a former RAF pilot who flew Meteors with 616 in the summer of 44 til the end of the war.  They spent some of their time in the summer of 44 going around to USAAF bases helping them develop tactics to fight the 262.  They did end up on the continent and he and his Squadron CO in early May brought the first 262s back from Fassberg.  He had some interesting things to say comparing the two.  I'll see if I can dig out the letter from those pre-E-mail days.

 :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O
Title: Re: NEW JET
Post by: Denholm on May 07, 2009, 08:22:30 AM
I would definitely be interested in reading some of those letters, Guppy. :eek: