Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Pyro on May 12, 2009, 12:51:16 PM

Title: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Pyro on May 12, 2009, 12:51:16 PM

We need volunteers to download and run a test application to give us a broad compatibility test of certain components in the upcoming graphics changes.  The download is about 80 MB.

INSTRUCTIONS

1-  Download and upzip this file:  http://downloads.hitechcreations.com/gtester4.zip It will unzip to a folder called gtester.  You can put this wherever you want it on your computer. 
2-  Shut down any apps that you have open and go into the gtester folder and run the file gtester.exe. 
3-  Note whether it looks like either of the examples below or if it crashes or has any graphic anomalies.  It might be all white for example.
4-  Do not move the view or change sliders or other default settings.
5-  Press escape to go to full screen mode.
6-  Wait 10 seconds and record your frame rate and resolution.
7-  After you've completed the test, you can hole down the right mouse button while moving your mouse to manipulate your view.  Doing that while holding down the shift or control key will manipulate your world position.

Please report your results in this thread in the following format:

Your video card model. 
Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies.
Recorded frame rate from test.  Make sure you are in full screen mode and not windowed mode when you record this.
Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode.

The two screenshots below will show you what you should see.  The first screenshot is the normal mode that most computers will see.  The second screenshot is a low detail mode that you will see if your video does not handle hardware acceleration.  Please limit replies in this thread to test results.  There is a separate discussion thread for everything else  All replies other than test results in this thread will be deleted so that we can easily parse through it.  Thanks for your help!

(http://www.hitechcreations.com/pyro/gtester1.JPG)

(http://www.hitechcreations.com/pyro/gtester2.JPG)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: rob53 on May 12, 2009, 01:16:36 PM

test results.....

Video card model:  Nvidia geForce 9600GT
Ran normal
Frame rate: 60
Resolution:  1784x1004 (32bit) (60hz)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Kazaa on May 12, 2009, 01:27:51 PM

Stock Nvidia 8800GTX, 768MB, 1680x1050, 32 Bit.

Running 150-120FPS, all the sliders are cranked and shaders on.

Running 70-40FPS with 16x AA, all the sliders are cranked and shaders on.

Is the below normal?

(http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n268/Luke_831/Image1-1.png)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: moot on May 12, 2009, 01:42:37 PM

Nvidia XFX 9800GTX+ and GTX+ XXX in SLI
Ran normally except for FPS counter stuck on 0.  FPS seems smooth enough.
0 FPS from the applications' display.  Fraps says 116.
1680x1050 32bpp, default settings.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Kermit de frog on May 12, 2009, 01:50:26 PM

BFG GeForce7950GT OC
Ran Normal  (except got 2 blue triangles on the ground, both near edge of view
Frame Rate: 60
Resolution:1360x768

(http://www.lgmfilms.net/aceshigh/TSS.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: humble on May 12, 2009, 01:52:40 PM

nvidia 8800GTS
260.4 FPS 1280x1024
no anomalies of any type

out of curiosity ran it on my vista and win7 boots as well....

128.97 under vista
118.15 under Win7

I'm a bit surprised it ran worse under 7 then vista since win7 seems to be better optimized for everything else....

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: danny37 on May 12, 2009, 02:01:10 PM

NVIDIA GEFORCE 8300GS
fps only 18, ran normally though-usually get a solid 59-60 fps in game
res-1440x900

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: MjTalon on May 12, 2009, 02:09:07 PM

Nvidia Geforce Fx 5500
Took nearly 1min and a half to go into full screen
FPS. 4 ( usually have all my graphics turned down )
1024x768

(http://i43.tinypic.com/cnxaq.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: lazydog on May 12, 2009, 02:16:30 PM

geforce 9500gt       1920x120
  frame rate at 43

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: DMBEAR on May 12, 2009, 02:16:55 PM

NVidia GeForce 7600 GS
No anomalies
Frame rate: 44.3
Res: 1024 x 768

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: lazydog on May 12, 2009, 02:17:31 PM

sorry 1920x1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Stoney on May 12, 2009, 02:25:10 PM

BFG GeForce 8800GT 512mb
No Anomalies
59.99 Frame Rate
1280X1024 Res

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: JimmyC on May 12, 2009, 02:29:57 PM

Geforce 7900GS
res  1280 x 1024
Framerate  105
no anomalies.... :)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: expat on May 12, 2009, 02:47:56 PM

ATI 4870X2
Resolution 1920 x 1080
FPS 80.29
No problems

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Motherland on May 12, 2009, 03:06:09 PM

NVIDIA 8600GT
Res 1680x1050
FPS 55-45, got as low as 22 when I zoomed out really far.
Had some weird stretching of the mountains in the water reflections near the edges of the screen. Windows 7 doesn't seem to like Print screen though, I'll try it on XP.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Dadano on May 12, 2009, 03:14:18 PM

4870
No problems
69 FPS
1920 x 1080

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Kotari on May 12, 2009, 03:14:38 PM

Geforce 8800GT 1024mb 1920x1200
155fps with default settings on static screen.
90-155fps when panning the view with mouse.
Blue triangles in screen edges when panning, loads the rest of textures in about 20sec after movement stops.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: detch01 on May 12, 2009, 03:17:55 PM

(http://i673.photobucket.com/albums/vv91/aswAH/120509SS.jpg)

Nvidia 8500GT 1GB onboard
1280X960 Resolution
unbelievable frame rate (see TLH corner of the screenie).
Shader on (value 5), reflectivity and bump sliders full to the right.
Screenie taken in fullscreen mode and reduced to 1024X768 with text overlayed in TLH at full res.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Motherland on May 12, 2009, 03:25:16 PM

Here you can see what I'm talking about. The reflection of the mountain starts to stretch outside of the black lines.
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/terrainwierdness.jpg)


Runs slightly faster in XP, but that's to be expected.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: gweibe on May 12, 2009, 03:31:03 PM

NVIDIA 7800GS
FPS: 78
RES: 1600x1200

No anomalies.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: StokesAk on May 12, 2009, 03:36:18 PM

Intel(R) Graphics Media Accelerator Driver
Frame Rate was 22.
It was the 2nd screenshot shown by Pyro.
Will it be gray like this in game also are will HTC make it the same colors just at a lower resolution?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: mensa180 on May 12, 2009, 03:56:49 PM

ATI 4850 512mb
No Anomalies
250 Frame Rate
1440X900 Res

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: USRanger on May 12, 2009, 03:58:15 PM

Nvidia 7800GT
1280x1024
91 fps w/ full reflectivity near the water
No problems

 :aok

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: lothmog on May 12, 2009, 04:01:37 PM

NVIDIA GeForce 6150LE
1440 x 900 Res
FR 8.4
Ran Normal

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: WWhiskey on May 12, 2009, 04:12:14 PM

vista
1600x1200
 ati hd 3650
21.17 frame rate first pic
no problems other than low frame rate!




35 frame rate looking down at ground
normaly 60 fps on game today
getting new card anyway tho

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: moot on May 12, 2009, 04:19:39 PM

My results in this post: http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,264673.msg3296611.html#msg3296611
are still correct with the latest version of the test program as of this post's timestamp.

I've got the same reflection stretching as Motherland here:
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,264673.msg3296740.html#msg3296740

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: detch01 on May 12, 2009, 04:25:58 PM

(http://i673.photobucket.com/albums/vv91/aswAH/Image1.jpg)

Same hardware as before.
FrameRate 30.46 (can I have my old frame rate back please? <g>)
No anomolies
Is looking good  :aok

Cheers,
asw

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: AKDogg on May 12, 2009, 04:31:32 PM

Nvidia 9800GTX+ 512meg
AMD64 4800+ dual core
2 gig of ram
FPS is 120-160+
Res is 1440x990x32
Antialiasing set at 8x
Anisotropic filtering set at 4x

No anomolies

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: FLS on May 12, 2009, 04:40:59 PM

Ati 4870X2   
Normal
78.67 FPS
1920X1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Fencer51 on May 12, 2009, 04:49:40 PM

Nvidia 9800GTX 512MB
148 FPS at 1920x1200
Normal no problems

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: ROX on May 12, 2009, 04:51:45 PM

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
Normal
Frame Rate  109.60
Res  1280 x 800
Windows XP

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Wingnutt on May 12, 2009, 05:38:10 PM

Video card model:  EVGA Geforce 8800GT-SC
No anomolies
Frame rate: 110fps
Resolution:  1920x1200@60hz
Vista64 SP2

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Stixx on May 12, 2009, 05:45:38 PM

Vid Card: EVGA GeForce 6200
Ran normal
FPS: 6.31
Resolution: 1280x1024
XP SP3

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: ImADot on May 12, 2009, 05:47:28 PM

Your video card model: EVGA GeForce GTX260 
No anomalies.
Recorded frame rate from test: 59.90
Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode: 1920x1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Heater on May 12, 2009, 05:52:37 PM

Video card: gtx 280 1GB
Res: 1920 X 1200
Runs normal
Fps: 140
Vista Ultimate 64 Bit

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: SIM on May 12, 2009, 06:09:21 PM

Dual EVGA 8800 GTS(640M) in SLI Mode
Normal Run
Frame Rate: 119.40
Recorded Resolution: 1680 x 1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Greebo on May 12, 2009, 06:10:21 PM

Video card: GTX 260
Res: 1600 x 1200
Runs normal
FPS: 253.00
Windows XP 32 bit SP3

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: SIM on May 12, 2009, 06:12:00 PM

Dual EVGA 8800 GTS(640M) in SLI Mode
Normal Run
Frame Rate: 119.40
Recorded Resolution: 1680 x 1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: WWhiskey on May 12, 2009, 06:13:07 PM

re test new sample
without catalyst control center
ati3650
1600x1200
32 fps

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Rattler on May 12, 2009, 06:18:11 PM

ATI RADEON 9250
RES: 1024 x 768
Windows XP
FPS:34
looks really bad on my machine
(http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/vv302/rattler_254/damn-2.jpg?t=1242170213)
i need a new card i guess

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: smokey23 on May 12, 2009, 06:23:12 PM

XFX 8800GT
ran normally
no anomilies
Res : 1280 X 768
FPS: 161.20 / FPS was 104.23 in the presence of water

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: NOT on May 12, 2009, 06:25:39 PM

Video card: gtx 280 1GB
Res: 1920 X 1200
Runs normal
Fps: 60
Vista Ultimate 64 Bit




NOT

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Damned Goose on May 12, 2009, 06:38:05 PM

Video Card: Radeon 9800 PRo 32 Fps
Resolution 1024 x 768 No anomolies
Windows XP SP3

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Saxman on May 12, 2009, 06:38:27 PM

GeForce GTX 295
Ran normally
No anomalies, all clear
FR: 153fps
Resolution: 1920x1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: PFactorDave on May 12, 2009, 06:38:52 PM

(http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w220/Davis_Andrews/Graphictest1.jpg)

NVidia GeForce 9500GT 1GB
Frame Rate:  56.87
Resolution:  1440 x 900
No anomoilies that I noticed

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: TequilaChaser on May 12, 2009, 06:43:11 PM

Video card: ASUS Ati 3870 512 Meg DDR4  Cat Ver. 8.501 Video Driver
Res: 1280 x 1024
Runs normal / No anomolies
FPS: 148.80
Windows XP 32 bit SP3
(using exact same view as Pyro posted except in FULL SCREEN mode)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: danny37 on May 12, 2009, 06:50:22 PM

ran it again with the updated tester and my pc shutdown and restarted in safe mode.
wth???

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Anaxogoras on May 12, 2009, 07:02:21 PM

Video card: Nvidia 9600 512mb vram
Res: 1280 x 1024
no anomolies
FPS 122.4
Windows XP 32 bit SP3

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: 1701E on May 12, 2009, 07:03:18 PM

GPU:          NVidia GeForce 7900GS
Stability:     Normal
FrameRate:  ~80
Resolution:  1680 x 1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: thndregg on May 12, 2009, 07:07:22 PM

Video Card: ATI 9800 Pro (128mb) -5yr old card.
Framerate @ 1680x1050: 12

Time for a new one. :(

EDIT: Time for new comp. AGP slots are outmoded. :cry

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Roscoroo on May 12, 2009, 07:18:40 PM

W2K,2500+ AMD ,1gb ram
ATI 9600 pro 128 mb

Frame rate 8.05 Res 1200 x 900
Triangle Cnt 257515

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Easyscor on May 12, 2009, 07:19:05 PM

Card: ATI Radeon 9800 Pro (128MB DDR AGP 8x/4x on an ABIT P4 system)
Anomalies: All water was white, I'll post a SS in the other thread
Full Screen Frame Rate: 14.40 at default view location
Resolution: 1280x1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Speed55 on May 12, 2009, 07:24:54 PM

Ati 3870
Normal
60 FPS (monitor refresh rate)
1280 x1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Kazaa on May 12, 2009, 08:02:07 PM

Stock Nvidia 8800GTX, 768MB, 1680x1050, 32 Bit.


I'm running 150-80 FPS at 16xAA now, fraps confirmed

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: HB555 on May 12, 2009, 08:04:58 PM

NVidia GE Force 8800 GTS 512

Normal

116.48

1280 x 1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: OOZ662 on May 12, 2009, 08:15:05 PM

XFX 6800  with Omega Drivers (DxDiag (http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dc3smcbq_147g6dnzdhd))
Ran normally, though load times seemed a bit long. Meh.
Frame Rate of 54.4 solid.
1024x768

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: dunnrite on May 12, 2009, 08:15:36 PM

ATI Radeon X1050

Frame Rate: 3.83

Is this not a good card?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: kvuo75 on May 12, 2009, 08:21:07 PM

nvida 8400gs

22.60fps

1280x800

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: ROC on May 12, 2009, 08:24:30 PM

Nvidia GeForce 9800GT
190.52 Frames @ 1280x960
186.36 Frames @ 1280x1024
211.72 Frames @ 1024x768
222.60 Frames @ 800x600

Quickly loaded, no anomalies, no issues.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Dux on May 12, 2009, 08:52:29 PM

nVidia 295GTX 1792mb GDDR3
WinXP SP3
266 FPS @ 1920x1200
AA set to "let App decide"
No anomalies, beautiful picture

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Jenks on May 12, 2009, 09:18:50 PM

Nvidia GeForce 7800GS
frame rate 75 to 76
1024x768

all seemed normal, windmill was turning

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Hajo on May 12, 2009, 09:23:33 PM

This is not good!

Dual ATI Radeon 4850s running Crossfire
Full Screen Mode Test
Frame rate 17.15 1920X1200 res. Native resolution for Gateway LCD 24 inch monitor.  32 Bit. (set at 1920X1200 in-game always a constant 60FR)
Refresh rate set at 60  max for monitor.

Intel duo 9400 Quad core CPU
4 gig memory DDR 2

Hajo (no anomalies terrain was crisp)

Edit:  Deleted ATI Control Center from startup (task bar) with msconfig.

Much better results!
  FR in Full Screen mode went from 17.15 to 163.8  1920X1200 native resolution with the Crossfired 4850s.
  Refresh for monitor is as stated before 60.

<phew>  Had me concerned for a few minutes  :furious  my fault! 

Don't start ATI Control Center at Boot!   Terrain is crisp and clear!

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: 68falcon on May 12, 2009, 09:48:54 PM

ATI Radeon 4870
Full screen
60 FPS
No anomalies
Looked like example 1

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: maddafinga on May 12, 2009, 09:54:45 PM

Nvidia GeForce 8600GT  1gig DDR2
WinXP SP3
AMD Athalon 64 Dual Core 5200
2 Gigs of system ram

Frame Rate 55
Resolution 1680x1050

Normal pic, no anomalies, windmill turning.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: falcon23 on May 12, 2009, 10:22:53 PM

ATI 4850 ASUS
FR varied from 54-82 depending on where I was..over water was on low end..but the wave movement is SPECTACULAR :aok

I have AA and AF full tilt in my card...
E8400 3.0ghz
WINDOWS XP SP3
Resolution-1280x1024
70HZ..

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: cactuskooler on May 12, 2009, 10:30:05 PM

Your video card model. ------------------ 8800M GTX (Laptop)
Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies. -------------------- Smooth as mothers milk.
Recorded frame rate from test. ------------------- 78.64 fps
Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode. ---------------------- 5040X1050 (3x 1680x1050 with Matrox TH2go)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Banshee7 on May 12, 2009, 10:53:15 PM

Video Card model: 
Ran normal, but low Frame rates, very low, but it looked like first posted screenshot
Recorded Frame Rate:  5.3
Resolution:  1025x768



Where can computer illiterate folsk like me find video card model?  DXDIAG says ATI Radeon X300/X550/X1050 series?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Halo46 on May 12, 2009, 11:16:44 PM

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
FR ~58.9
Res 1280X1024
Very similar to posted image. No problems loading.

(http://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm162/jonjdoe/gtester2009-05-1221-05-57-30.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: trotter on May 12, 2009, 11:17:21 PM

Check PM Banshee

My test:
Video Card Model - NVidia GeForce 6600 GT
Test FPS - 70
Test Resolution - 1024x768

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: betty on May 12, 2009, 11:53:50 PM

63.97 FR
nvidia geforce 7600 gt oc
1024x768 res

that is with all the graphics turned up in the little sliding thingy on the side :)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: eh on May 13, 2009, 12:53:22 AM

FR 65.60
Res 1024x768

Win XP 64 bit
AMD 64 4000+ 2GB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 6800, 256 Mb

Used original test file. Everything looks as it should. Not bad for an old machine.

<EDIT> All is fine except water. It's white.

<EDIT again>  I screwed up. When I moved the vertical slider up, the trees rose from the earth into the sky (the rapture?) and the ground turned white. It wasn't water. If I don't touch anything, as instructed, everything is fine. So how do some dudes see water?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: steely07 on May 13, 2009, 03:28:17 AM

Nvidia 8800 GTS 512
ran normal
1680 x 1050 (native res for my screen)
FPS 122
Win 7 ver 7100, errored on exit (not a real error, just win 7 thinking it was, this is normal without win Me compatibility mode, can attach the event log error if requested, did not happen when "run as administrator")

Also tried in win Me compatibility mode (as us "vista" users run the normal game),
mostly the same results except framerate was only 114, and no error on exit.

Sorry for extra info, just hoping to help :)

Steely

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: SirFrancis on May 13, 2009, 04:51:25 AM

ATI Mobility Radeon X300
no anomalies
Recorded frame rate 4.32
Recorded resolution 1280x800

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Skuzzy on May 13, 2009, 06:20:07 AM

Windows XP w/SP3
ATI/Sapphire Toxic 4850 512MB 4xAA, 0AF
1280x1024
FPS: 214
no issues

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Buzzard7 on May 13, 2009, 06:39:28 AM

Win xp sp3
BFG GF 7300gt
68.4 fps
1024x768

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Wizer on May 13, 2009, 07:30:49 AM

Video Card:  Nvidia GEForce 8500GT
         Ran:  Normal
 Frame Rate:  36.00
 Resolution:  1680 x 1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: LYNX on May 13, 2009, 07:32:58 AM

ATI/Sapphire HD 3850 512MB
1280x1024 full screen
FPS 60
No Issues

Windows XP w/SP3
Monitor at 75hz
AMD Athlon 64 processor 3000+
2.00GHz
1.00GB ram

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: mrmidi on May 13, 2009, 07:33:10 AM

Card -ATI Radeon X1300PRO 256MB
FPS  - 32.0
Display - 1680 x 1050
OS - Windows XP SP3

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: A8balls on May 13, 2009, 09:02:21 AM

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Frame Rate 75
Res 1152X 864
Runs great, looks great.

Frame Rate is 60 with Res set at 1280 X 1024
Runs great, looks great.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: doleboy on May 13, 2009, 09:21:55 AM

Ati Radeon 9500 128MB
Normal
Frame rate 14.2
Res 1024*768

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: sunfan1121 on May 13, 2009, 09:29:45 AM

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS 241 MB
frame rate at 60
looks good.
1784x1004

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Bear69 on May 13, 2009, 10:38:49 AM

Frame rate 132.6 Res 1152 x 864
Nvidia GeForce 8600GTS
Ramn without eny errors normally

Bear69

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: SRD on May 13, 2009, 10:39:54 AM

Windows XP w/SP3
VisionTek Radeon HD 4870 512MB
1680x1050
4xAA, 0AF
FPS: 60
Ran Normal

 :aok

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: RTHolmes on May 13, 2009, 10:45:23 AM

nvidia 9800GT 512MB
normal
216fps
1280x1024



(note how few have posted the info in the format Pyro asked for it - Skuzzy included :lol)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: cos^ on May 13, 2009, 10:50:37 AM

Gfx Card: GeForce FX 5700

OS: Ubuntu Jaunty (9.10) / Wine 1.1.21

Result: Terrain texture missing, objects visible. Seems to work otherwise.

(http://vatnajokull.tunk.org/gtester.png)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Megalodon on May 13, 2009, 11:17:48 AM

E-vga Geforce 7800GS Agp

Frame rate 75 <monitor max> 1024x768 75hz 32 bit color 0 AA
               61.62                                                  8xS AA   

Ran fine on both

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: LLv34_Camouflage on May 13, 2009, 12:00:20 PM

ATI 3850 AGP 512MB
Normal
57.00
1440x900

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Bijl on May 13, 2009, 12:24:18 PM

Video card model: MSI (1462) - 8800GT / 512MB PCIe (Nvidia Driver 181.20)
Run: Awesome
Frame rate: 131.40
Resolution: 3840x1024 (TripleHead2Go)
OS: Windows XP/SP3

 :cool:

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: ink on May 13, 2009, 12:36:47 PM

Graphics card is a MSI ATI R4830 1 gig

Frame rate at 176

screen resolution
1058 - 726

OS
XP home

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: soda72 on May 13, 2009, 01:37:49 PM

Nividia geforce 8600 GTS 256MB
1280x1024  FPS ranged between 76.00 and 114.00
Windows XP

No issues,  water looks great

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: PapaFox on May 13, 2009, 03:02:26 PM

Nvidia 260 GTX Core 216
Ran normally
60 FPS
2560x1600 res

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: SlapShot on May 13, 2009, 03:27:47 PM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Windows XP Pro SP3

Fullscreen mode :
Ran normal ... looks good
1680 x 1050
Frame Rate : 59.93

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: DarkHawk on May 13, 2009, 03:33:54 PM

normal frame rate in game is 50 to 60 fps
ATI radeon x300 epci 128 mb
1280X1024
full hardware accelations

full screen test fraame rate 5.70
tile count 276550
using default settings.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Gianlupo on May 13, 2009, 03:42:13 PM

ATI Radeon X850XT
Win XP Pro SP2 (1 GB ram, shut down everything unnecessary with XP game launcher as I always did before playing, got 23 processes running and 250 MB of RAM used)

Fullscreen ran with anomalies, as you can see in the attached image
Res: 1280x1024
FPS: 7.80!

:cry

(http://i244.photobucket.com/albums/gg32/gianlupo/Gtester.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Mar on May 13, 2009, 03:50:54 PM

On-board video: Intel(R) 82845G/GL/GE/PE/GV Graphics Controller

Ran in low detail, no anomalies
FR 7.95
Res 1024x768

New card: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

Ran normal, no anomalies
FR 24.4
Res 1024x768


Perfectly acceptable for me :)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: j500ss on May 13, 2009, 05:27:52 PM

NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT

1024X768

23 frame rate  :(

Reset NVIDIA control panel to performance and got frame rate of 40, using my aces high settings I get 38 for frame rate

BTW  Vista

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Teebox on May 13, 2009, 05:40:02 PM

GeForce EVGA GTX 260
Windows Vista Home Premium SP1

Ran normal ... Thanks TilDeath!!!
1440x900
Frame Rate : 198

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: JC67 on May 13, 2009, 06:29:31 PM

all i see is green and trees  no fields  new machine time  get 25 fps

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: nikomon on May 13, 2009, 07:08:14 PM

(http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k213/nikomon/nowater.jpg)
NO water for me I guess <stupid computer LOL >

Primary Adapter      
Graphics Card Manufacturer   Built by ATI   
Graphics Chipset   Radeon X1650 Series     
Device ID   71C1   
Vendor   1002   
   
Subsystem ID   1002   
Subsystem Vendor ID   1002   
   
Graphics Bus Capability   AGP   
Maximum Bus Setting   AGP 8X   
   
BIOS Version   009.013.001.016   
BIOS Part Number   133-A676B3-100   
BIOS Date   2007/03/27   
   
Memory Size   512 MB   
Memory Type   DDR2   
   
Core Clock in MHz   601 MHz   
Memory Clock in MHz   398 MHz   


simple .....

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Dadsguns on May 13, 2009, 07:10:57 PM

Video card: Nvidia 9800 GT 1024 MB GDDR3
Res: 1280 x 1024
no anomolies
FPS 155.80
Windows XP SP3

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: DCCBOSS on May 13, 2009, 08:42:59 PM

Nividia 8800 gts E6600 Duo
Resolution 1378x971
Frame Rate 174.26
Everthing seems normal

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: 100Coogn on May 13, 2009, 09:11:45 PM

Nvidia GTS 250  1GB
Normal
110.60 FPS
Resolution 1280 x 1024

100Coogn

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: RedTop on May 13, 2009, 09:41:27 PM

Nvidia 9800gtx
77 fps
1024x768

looked fine

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: ScatterFire on May 13, 2009, 10:04:04 PM

Video card:  945 GMA Intel graphics.  Machine: Lenovo T60 laptop, 2 GB ram, WinXP SP3

Frame Rate 24.47  Res 1280x800

(http://nwnwebsite.no-ip.org/acestest.JPG)

No anomalies noted other than texture loss due to crappy video card.  May not be pretty, but playable.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Slate on May 13, 2009, 10:34:57 PM

          Nvidia Geforce 7300le
           FR 30.45   Res 714x723

          Full screen Res 1024x768
            Got up to FR 217.36 over water or at night
             

              Looks OK Water OK

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Wraith_TMS on May 13, 2009, 10:36:46 PM

As tested with Gtester2:

One Nvidia 7900 GTX (512 mb)
1920 by 1200 resolution
normal mode, 10 second load time
FPS over the canyon: 115.60
FPS over water and terrain: 79.80  ( I had the same white water areas as others reported with Gtester2).

However, my usual AH game specs are:

Dual Nvidia 7900 GTX's (running SoftTH in NON-SLI mode, through 3 panels in 3968x1024 resolution), I typically get 20-30 FPS in-game with this setup, using hi-rez packs and 1024 textures.  One card drives the software across 3 panels and the other card, non-SLI'd, is a pass through for the third monitor.  Gtester didn't use this SofTH's software has to be placed in the game folder to work.  Don't know if it matters for the test, but it may under playing conditions.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: fuzeman on May 13, 2009, 11:22:11 PM

Your video card model. Radeon 9800 PRO
Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies. Anomalies in windowed view, link to that: http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d64/fuzeman/Windowedview.jpg
Recorded frame rate from test.  Make sure you are in full screen mode and not windowed mode when you record this.
Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode. Full screen frame rate 14.55 at 1280x960 with no anomalies.

Just noticed there is a gtester1 out, my results are from gtester.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Brooke on May 14, 2009, 12:53:01 AM

Your video card model:  nVidia GeForce 7950 GT
Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies:  Normal.
Recorded frame rate from test:  78.97
Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode:  1024x768

In addition, I run at high-quality image mode for the nVidia card, with antialiasing on 8xS (the highest setting).

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Serenity on May 14, 2009, 02:31:13 AM

ATI Radeon 3800 (I believe...)
Seemed to run in normal quality (The first pic)
FPS was 60.4
Resolution was 1400 x 1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Gianlupo on May 14, 2009, 07:11:08 AM

Quote from: Gianlupo on May 13, 2009, 03:42:13 PM

ATI Radeon X850XT
Win XP Pro SP2 (1 GB ram, shut down everything unnecessary with XP game launcher as I always did before playing, got 23 processes running and 250 MB of RAM used)

Fullscreen ran with anomalies, as you can see in the attached image
Res: 1280x1024
FPS: 7.80!

Run again with gtester2, same results (7.73 fps with res 1280x1024, triangle count 260541, anomalies still showing).

Can Catalyst settings influence the results?

EDIT: with shader turned off, results for fullscreen are:

Normal, no anomalies
Res: 1280x1024
FPS: 60 (I have Vsync on, so, probably it's limiting frame rate at monitor refresh rate)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Skuzzy on May 14, 2009, 07:25:43 AM

ATI X850XT
Normal (hi-res)
FPS: 32.8
1024x768 resolution
Windows XP Pro 32 bit

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Noir on May 14, 2009, 07:36:00 AM

ATI RADEON HD2600XT, 9.4 no catalyst.

38.75FPS
1600x1200
Vista SP2 RC

ran fine with gtester2


here is my DxDiag if needed. http://mapage.noos.fr/rsm/DxDiag.txt (http://mapage.noos.fr/rsm/DxDiag.txt)

(http://mapage.noos.fr/rsm/ahtest.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Ghosth on May 14, 2009, 08:07:01 AM

ATI Radeon HD 2600XT 8.383 no Catalyst

FPS 57.58
1280x1024
XP Pro Corp SP2

Ran fine, no errors, no problems, looks good.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: TheZohan on May 14, 2009, 08:18:55 AM

ATI 4850 512 megs of  DDR3 memory

FR 57.80    1800x1440
FR 65.40    1600x1200
FR 75.60    1280x1024
FR 89.40    1024x768
FR 104.40   800x600


no issues at any resolution

reset settings to performance in ATI control center

results:

FR 141.80    1800x1440
FR 154.00    1600x1200
FR 169.60    1280x1024
FR 178.00    1024x768
FR 179.20    800x600

no issues


windows XP pro VLK sp3 on a X2 7750 kuma @ 2.7mhz

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: SHawk on May 14, 2009, 09:21:30 AM

Nvdia 9800GT O/C
Frame Rate 158.60 Res 1680x1050
XP Pro Service Pack 3
AMD 64 x2 (dual core)6000+
Looks good here

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: 68Raptor on May 14, 2009, 11:02:25 AM

Your video card model.
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GTX+

Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies.
Normal

Recorded frame rate from test.  Make sure you are in full screen mode and not windowed mode when you record this.
84.27

Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode.
1920X1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: FireDrgn on May 14, 2009, 11:22:55 AM

Your video card model.
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GTS

Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies.
 Anomalie/ had a square about 800x800 that was blue ill retest when i get back from work

Recorded frame rate from test.  Make sure you are in full screen mode and not windowed mode when you record this.
59.40
Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode.
1680/1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Delirium on May 14, 2009, 11:38:46 AM

Nvidia GeForce GTX 260

No anomalies.

59.92 (v-sync enabled and using DVI monitor, so pretty much cap'd)

1920x1200 with hi res textures (least I have hi res enabled in the main arena)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: TheflyingElk on May 14, 2009, 12:01:54 PM

Ok Here goes
ATI 9800 xt AGP 256 Ati Tool tray only Driver 4.12
P-4 3.4 system Ram 1.5 Gig

res 1680x1050 FR 13-14
windows XP Home SP 3

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Charge on May 14, 2009, 12:32:59 PM

NVidia GeForce 8800 GT
Normal
Frame rate: 101.83
Res: 1920 x 1200

-C+

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Captfish on May 14, 2009, 12:33:52 PM

Nvidia GeForce 8500gt

Ran normal

FR: 18.4

Res: 1680x1050

XP media center

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: wasq on May 14, 2009, 12:43:54 PM

Radeon 4800 HD
Normal
Frame rate 59.95 (tested also without vsync, then it is 147)
1920x1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: chewie86 on May 14, 2009, 01:24:27 PM

Nvidia 8800GS (iMac)
normal
fr: 85
res: 1920 x 1200
winXp sp2 32bit
 

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: StokesAk on May 14, 2009, 05:47:12 PM

Intel(R) Graphics Media Accelerator Driver (Integrated)

1 anomily: gtester crashed when i opened it.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: killrDan on May 14, 2009, 06:00:01 PM

ATI Radeon HD 2400
FR 24.5 @ 1024 x 768
No Anomalies

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: DREDIOCK on May 14, 2009, 06:12:38 PM

EVGA 512-P3-N801-AR GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card

Normal

Frame rate 220.40

resolution 1400 X 1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Swatch on May 14, 2009, 09:17:27 PM

Video Card:    NVIDIA  GeForce 8800 GT
Ran Normal and Windmill spun smoothly as baby's bottom.
FR:  128.4 @ 1680x1050

Computer Stats:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
2.41Ghz 1.00 GB RAM

Other Notes:
Sliders had absolutely no effect on test view position frame rate.  I consistently saw right around 128 FPS at 1680x1050.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: AKDogg on May 14, 2009, 09:33:42 PM

Nvidia 7600GT 512meg
Normal (hi-res)
FPS: 48.6
1440x900 resolution
Windows 7 RC

My test rig specs:
AMD64 3200+ processor
2 gigs DDR 400
Nvidia 7600GT 512meg
Soundblaster Audigy 2ZS
40 gig WD 7200rpm ATA drive

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: AirFlyer on May 14, 2009, 10:05:55 PM

Your video card model.
Nvidia Geforce 8800 GT

Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies.
Normal

Recorded frame rate from test.  Make sure you are in full screen mode and not windowed mode when you record this.
Windows XP 32-bit - 188.60
Windows 7 32-bit - 100.72

Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode.
1680 x 1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Rash on May 14, 2009, 10:08:28 PM

Nvidia 7600GT
FPS: 81
1280x960 resolution
ran normal

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: shiv on May 14, 2009, 10:24:33 PM

nvidia GEFORCE 9400 GT
FR 51.13
Res 1280 x 720

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Ciaphas on May 14, 2009, 10:34:25 PM

Specs:

Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO
AMD Athlon 64 x2 Dual Core 5800+
4 gigs of Ram

Results:

FPS: 93.80
Res: 1920x1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: skribetm on May 15, 2009, 12:30:40 AM

xfx 4870x2
79fps, 2048x1152

no errors.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2311/3532223347_eff5d3181e_b.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Karnak on May 15, 2009, 12:55:06 AM

Your video card model.  nVidia GeForce 8800 GT 512mb
Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies. Ran in normal mode, no crashes, no anomalies.
Recorded frame rate from test.  133
Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode. 1920x1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: falcon23 on May 15, 2009, 07:36:51 AM

OK,I made some adjustements to my settings in the CCC,got my AA down to like 8x turned of AF,and my FR really shot up..


Your video card model. ASUS "TOP" 4850 512mb

Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies. Ran in normal mode, no crashes, no anomalies.

Recorded frame rate from test.  160

Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode. 1280X1024
 
 

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: lyric1 on May 15, 2009, 08:01:37 AM

Dual 256MB NVIDIA Geforce 7900 GS.

Frame rate 60.00
Res 1024X768

No problems.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Kazaa on May 15, 2009, 08:50:24 AM

Stock Nvidia 8800GTX, 768MB, 1680x1050, XP.

This is my 3rd post lol, I've tweeked my PC.

150FPS with 16xAA, viewing from the default pos lol.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Old Sport on May 15, 2009, 09:11:23 AM

59 FPS
714x728
XP Home 5.1
Pent 4 -  2.4 GHz
1.022 GB Ram
GeForce 7600 GS 256 MB
Directx 9.0c

Took about 20 seconds to finally render on screen when I clicked to start the program.

Looks good, including the water!   <S>

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: kotrenin on May 15, 2009, 10:06:30 AM

NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT
Normal
FR: 86.20
Res: 1680x1050

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2391/3533832156_b747e26835_o.jpg)


Same Video Card
Normal
FR:108
Res: 1280x960

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2363/3533843530_5dc1763fa4_o.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Panzzer on May 15, 2009, 11:05:59 AM

Radeon X1950Pro, 256MB
Ran normal
59.xx fps (vsync on)
1680x1050

Geforce 9600M, 1GB (dedicated)
Ran normal
42.xx fps
1440x900

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: GuyNoir on May 15, 2009, 11:14:31 AM

nvidia GTX 285
Ran normal
177 fps
1920x1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: GreenEagle43 on May 15, 2009, 12:29:27 PM

ok video card-geforce 7300gt  512mb ddr2
ran normal
frame rate-66to80res-1680x1080
triangler cnt-286346

but it would let me take a snap shot (ALT-S)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Bizman on May 15, 2009, 01:35:42 PM

Radeon HD3870 512 mb 2x AA, 4x AF, V-sync on
Ran normal over land, but had horizontal lines when low over water surface, increasing when lower.
Fps 50'ish
1920x1200

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: wasq on May 15, 2009, 03:21:32 PM

Intel GMA950 (integrated)
lowres
fps 14
1024x600

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: flubby on May 16, 2009, 01:38:59 AM

Nvidia 260 GTX, 212 shaders, 55nm.
Driver is 185 WHQL
313 FPS @ 1280*1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: WinGZero on May 16, 2009, 02:18:16 AM

FRAME RATE:132.60
RESOLUTION:1280x960

Video card:NVIDEA 9700GT 512M
CPU:Pen4 3GHz
Memory:2.5GB

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: MrRiplEy[H] on May 16, 2009, 04:27:36 AM

Ati Radeon 4870
Ran fine on default view, texture clipping in sea view in certain view angles
Frame rate 250
Resolution 1920x1200


Image cropped, FYI.

(http://xs139.xs.to/xs139/09206/gfxtest658.png)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: wsveum on May 16, 2009, 04:25:31 PM

When I did the test I got a Frame Rate of 76.69 Res 1920 x 1200 at full screen.
On my Gateway FX 7020 AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core Processor 2.30 GHz
3.00 GB Memory
32 - Bit OS
Windows Vista Home Premium SP1
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
I've not been playing long but I do like what I have seen with the new update. Can not wait to see it in action. Thanks to HTC for all there hard work.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Grind on May 16, 2009, 04:52:10 PM

ATI Radeon 4870 512mb

Ran fine

59.8 - 60.22 FPS

1680x1050 Res

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Boozeman on May 17, 2009, 06:27:43 AM

- Radeon 4670
- No problems
- 1440 x 900
- 125 FPS (45 FPS with 4xAA and 16xAF) 

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Infidelz on May 17, 2009, 07:21:00 AM

I got 60FPS w gtester1 @ 1280x1024 XP

Viewsonic PJ766
NVIDIA 8800 GTS
Core 2 duo 6850
4 gig ram

Seems kind of low to me.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Nifty on May 17, 2009, 09:07:01 AM

nvidia atx260
ran normal, no issues
205 fps at 1600x1200 in full screen with no filtering or antialiasing.
137 fps at 1600x1200 in full screen with 16x anisotropic filtering and 16x AA.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Boozeman on May 17, 2009, 10:17:12 AM

Quote from: Infidelz on May 17, 2009, 07:21:00 AM

I got 60FPS w gtester1 @ 1280x1024 XP

Viewsonic PJ766
NVIDIA 8800 GTS
Core 2 duo 6850
4 gig ram

Seems kind of low to me.

Turn off v-sync.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Forker on May 17, 2009, 10:40:28 AM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
F.R. = 219 (+/- .10 FPS)
Res. = 1680 x 1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: whels on May 18, 2009, 10:18:18 AM

NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX
Normal
Frame Rate  169

Full Screen
Frame Rate  95

Res  1900 x 1280
Windows XP

All worked fine.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Ratpack1 on May 18, 2009, 11:32:32 AM

Card: ATI 4870
Ran like a dream!!! :aok
Frame rate: 60 (I hold all frame rates for any app at 60.)
I use Vista and I like it!
Res: 1680x1050

Can't wait its berry berry nice!

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Flozer on May 21, 2009, 05:02:03 AM

Video card model:  Nvidia Gforce 8600gts
Ran perfectly both views
Frame rate: 327
Resolution:  1360*768

cpu dual 2x3ghz 4gb memory

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: gatt on May 21, 2009, 08:44:24 AM

CPU C2Duo E8600 3.3Ghz
GPU: Geforce 260
Res: 1680x1050
FPS: 280
No problem

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: AirFlyer on May 21, 2009, 12:40:54 PM

Figured I'd post my final results after tweaking my computer some on Win XP 32-bit.

Computer Specs:
GPU: Evga 8800GT 512mb
CPU: Q6600
RAM: 4GB PC2-6400

Did it run normal, low detail, crash, or have any graphic anomalies:
Normal.

Recorded frame rate from test.  Make sure you are in full screen mode and not windowed mode when you record this:
217 Frames per second.

Recorded resolution from frame rate test in full screen mode:
1650x1080

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: bravoa8 on May 21, 2009, 04:15:56 PM

poor results tested with gtester1

FPS:Around 10
Res:1680x1050
problems:had white water
RAM:2.5 GB
Processor:pentium 4
Computer:HP a750y i think
Graphics Card:Some kind of ATI card

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: WWhiskey on May 21, 2009, 04:52:40 PM

Quote from: WWhiskey on May 12, 2009, 04:12:14 PM

vista
1600x1200
 ati hd 3650
21.17 frame rate first pic
no problems

got new card
gt 9800 oc by bfg
1600x1200
frame rate 109.05

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: BuckP on May 22, 2009, 01:16:59 AM

Win XP
Nvidia GeForce 8800GTX
222.4 Frame Rate
1680x1050 Resolution
Normal (no problems)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Baumer on May 22, 2009, 12:46:55 PM

Test #1

• Video Card- NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
• How did it run- Normal no graphics issues
• Resolution- 1680 x 1050
• NVIDIA 3D settings-Anisotropic filtering- OFF, Antialiasing Mode- OFF, Vertical Sync- ON
• Recorded frame rate- 46.54

Test #2 How I run AH currently

• Video Card- NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
• How did it run- Normal no graphics issues
• Resolution- 1680 x 1050
• NVIDIA 3D settings-Anisotropic filtering- OFF, Antialiasing Mode- ON (8x), Vertical Sync- ON
• Recorded frame rate- 30.30

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: dhyran on May 24, 2009, 03:41:21 AM

hi,

got 156 frames in full screen 1680 1080

system
GPU: Evga 9800GTX+ 512mb
CPU: 6850
RAM: 4GB PC2-6400

all fine!  :aok

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Sincraft on May 24, 2009, 11:05:47 AM

8800 gts (g92 core) 512mb ram
e8400 w/ 4 gigs ram

1920x1200

170fps - full screen w/detail

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Darkish on May 25, 2009, 04:06:25 AM

Saphire Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Ran normal, no issues
FPS : 97.4
Res: 1680x1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Tilt on May 25, 2009, 04:59:38 AM

test results.....

Video card model:  Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Ran normal
Frame rate: 11.69
Resolution:  1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (70Hz)

more info from dxdiag

Time of this report: 5/25/2009, 10:51:52
       Machine name: MAIN
   Operating System: Windows Vista™ Home Premium (6.0, Build 6001) Service Pack 1 (6001.vistasp1_gdr.090302-1506)
           Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: DIXONSXP
       System Model: T9610
               BIOS: Phoenix - AwardBIOS v6.00PG
          Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU    Q6600  @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
             Memory: 3070MB RAM
          Page File: 781MB used, 5558MB available
        Windows Dir: C:\Windows
    DirectX Version: DirectX 10
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
     DxDiag Version: 6.00.6001.18000 32bit Unicode


---------------
Display Devices
---------------
        Card name: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
     Manufacturer: NVIDIA
        Chip type: GeForce 8400 GS
         DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
       Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0422&SUBSYS_0F1F105B&REV_A1
   Display Memory: 1521 MB
 Dedicated Memory: 241 MB
    Shared Memory: 1279 MB
     Current Mode: 1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (70Hz)
          Monitor: Generic PnP Monitor
      Driver Name: nvd3dum.dll,nvwgf2um.dll
   Driver Version: 7.15.0011.7813 (English)
      DDI Version: 10
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
 Driver Date/Size: 9/18/2008 00:55:00, 5963776 bytes


-------------
Sound Devices
-------------
            Description: Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio)
 Default Sound Playback: Yes
 Default Voice Playback: Yes
            Hardware ID: HDAUDIO\FUNC_01&VEN_10EC&DEV_0888&SUBSYS_105B0CEC&REV_1000
        Manufacturer ID: 1
             Product ID: 100
                   Type: WDM
            Driver Name: RTKVHDA.sys
         Driver Version: 6.00.0001.5436 (English)
      Driver Attributes: Final Retail
            WHQL Logo'd: n/a
          Date and Size: 6/22/2007 18:34:12, 1788056 bytes
            Other Files:
        Driver Provider: Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
         HW Accel Level: Basic

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Noir on May 26, 2009, 11:50:21 AM

Quote from: Noir on May 14, 2009, 07:36:00 AM

ATI RADEON HD2600XT, 9.4 no catalyst.

38.75FPS
1600x1200
Vista SP2 RC

ran fine with gtester2


here is my DxDiag if needed. http://mapage.noos.fr/rsm/DxDiag.txt (http://mapage.noos.fr/rsm/DxDiag.txt)

(http://mapage.noos.fr/rsm/ahtest.jpg)

I bought a second HD2600XT and enabled crossfire with the older 8.11 drivers (wont work on that model with the late ones.)

CROSSFIRE ATI RADEON HD2600XT, 8.11 with CCC.

10.7FPS
1600x1200
Vista SP2


Only 10 FPS with 2 cards ! had 38.75 with a single card :noid

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: rkanjl on May 26, 2009, 04:57:38 PM

Downloaded, unzipped and clicked to install .exe file.  Followed instructions to the letter.  Repeated twice and this is as far as I could ever get.  Screen shot shows screen capture program running, only ran it the last time to get a screen capture, loaded just as far before locking up without screen capture prog running.

Video Card:  NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
Processor:  2.4GHz Pentium 4
Memory:  512MB (2X PC2100 DDR 266MHz 256MB)

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3582/3568274790_50b5e59b85.jpg)

rkanjl
(Archangel)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: 10thmd on May 26, 2009, 06:31:37 PM

Video card: Radeon HD 4850
100-120FPS
1280x1024 resolution

Looks Awesome

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: potsNpans on May 27, 2009, 03:56:29 PM

Video Card: 7800GS NVIDIA GFORCE(card settings to max)
Frame Rate: 45 / lose 8 frames viewing water at sea level
Ran Normal
Resolution: 1680 X 1050
3.0 Pent 4
2GB RAM

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Hajo on May 27, 2009, 04:01:40 PM

Noir...running crosssfire make sure you are in STANDARD MODE!  Also make sure you don't have ATI/Catalyst Control Panel running or in task bar.

If you do have Control Panel running.....disable it from booting using msconfig.  Then retake test.

Frame rates will go up.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: xthecatx on May 28, 2009, 04:49:55 AM

Asus  EAh3450
Frame rate 21
Res 1440 x 900
Ran ok normally 60 FR
But did crash when minimized.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: yankedudel on May 28, 2009, 10:58:04 AM

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150 256mb (integrated notebook)
Ran normal, no anomolies
6.57 FPS  :uhoh
1280x1024 resolution through an external monitor.

Ran with FSAutostart and without and same frame rates although moving using the [Ctrl + right click drag] moved smoother without FSAutostart enabled.

Everything looked great including the water!!! :aok

YAF

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Masherbrum on May 28, 2009, 11:05:26 AM

Quote from: Noir on May 26, 2009, 11:50:21 AM

I bought a second HD2600XT and enabled crossfire with the older 8.11 drivers (wont work on that model with the late ones.)

CROSSFIRE ATI RADEON HD2600XT, 8.11 with CCC.

10.7FPS
1600x1200
Vista SP2


Only 10 FPS with 2 cards ! had 38.75 with a single card :noid

Uninstall the ATi Catalyst Control Center and Download/Install Ray Adams' ATi Tray Tools.   

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Noir on May 28, 2009, 12:00:18 PM

see the discussion thread

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Blade on May 29, 2009, 05:41:33 PM

gtester1 :aok
Video card model:ASUS EN8800GT(NVIDIA GeForce8800GT:GDDR3 SDRAM 512MB;Core Clock 600MHz;Memory Clock 900MHz)
Run normal.
Frame rate(Full screen mode;1920x1200):103.28 ~ 139.69
OS:Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit SP2
DirectX 10.0
CPU:Core2Duo E6600(Conroe Core;65nm;Max 2400MHz)
Motherboard:Gigabyte 965P-DS4 rev.3.3(Chipset Intel 965;BIOS F11H)
Memory:PC2-6400(DDR2-SDRAM) 2GBx4 Total 8192MB(DRAM Frq 400MHz Dual Channnel)
(http://tpb8jg.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pbXDG6bkeiwY3xRtnOSFdXWrIA2ddQpN65fet3rVNQvrh5gCh-up7PdqILAZa5D25siM5KRUbzfhxHPJVcBP23g/gtester%202009-05-30%2004-57-13-69.png)
(http://tpb8jg.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pZBPwyXYe6JJ8gV0_YPCIuaBLeGUfZSPlOWNso78C8ufQMNw19UKhZ6J6ij4v8aLlChM_eVXhoFact_7eEZKUDA/gtester%202009-05-30%2004-57-00-99.png)
(http://tpb8jg.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pPxT7BD43QOZRiQ7m9ZJ108fqkjUeULArmSD6nYdjcSx_yRWcLMwqX4wmPVNlal5pPEavKvJnE5XGFwXKsQi4oQ/gtester%202009-05-30%2004-55-54-53.png)
(http://tpb8jg.bay.livefilestore.com/y1p1vX2Kk57eE6D1dwBkWZeLxAD8U8Xo1a93gUDT5ytMfBn__eNVGbKtD3Fm8dbJGeNNxRK3Eil0TJG31wHkLBzmg/gtester%202009-05-30%2004-55-34-25.png)
(http://tpb8jg.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pwe863NiF-g4kvKpDxI1ulzNkFZRGo0km8BKvbSIVQROXp0QGrLS2fV-V4htnBkoDR4OrZrego_ewFaFjn79CQg/gtester%202009-05-30%2005-01-19-83.png)

as information
gtester2 :frown:
(http://tpb8jg.bay.livefilestore.com/y1p1XlSvY5wowqmo_3FkLb68NVCT_UeGLnIH-PRTCQKbWyJl_IDu4g75h-MSqprHifL1c0ht_45LCGw12Wvxs9F3g/gtester%202009-05-30%2004-50-01-24.png)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Blade on May 30, 2009, 10:03:21 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urUtmaGQ3bg&fmt=22 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urUtmaGQ3bg&fmt=22)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: oneway on June 02, 2009, 12:56:51 PM

(http://www.whitneyearnhardt.com/temp/gTest2.png)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: alskahawk on June 03, 2009, 09:56:15 AM

 Frame rate 329 Res 1618 x 1121       Scrolling; 249 FR 
 
Giga EP45-UD3R
E8400 Intel 3.0GHz CPU
4GB Pny Ram
8800GTX




























   

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: gathoo on June 03, 2009, 11:03:16 AM

Gtester1

• Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
• Process: runs normal
• frame rate: 130
• resolution: 1280x1024

(http://www.reichenauer-photography.de/gtester.jpg)

gathoo

Gtester2

• Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
• Process: runs normal
• frame rate: 131
• resolution: 1280x1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: wrag on June 03, 2009, 01:06:28 PM

Card: Nvidia GT 260

Runs: ok

Framerate: 209.40

Res: 1920 x 1080

oops crashed when I went lookin around?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: bravoa8 on June 03, 2009, 04:54:11 PM

Tryed gtester 3 but didnt help any (previously tested w/gtester1)
FPS:11
it crashed when i tryed to make it full screen i couldnt see if it fixed the white water
Res:1680x1050
RAM:2.5 GB
Processor:pentium 4
Video card: ATI Raedon X8600

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Baumer on June 03, 2009, 06:39:12 PM

gtester3 ctd'ed when going to full screen mode (pressing the Esc key).

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Fulmar on June 03, 2009, 07:30:20 PM

gtester3 crashed upon hitting ESC to go full screen.  All main programs were shut down.

Windows XP SP3
C2D E6400 OC'd to 3.2Ghz
4gb DDR2 800
8800 GTS 640mb
X-Fi Fatality
Nvidia Driver 182.08

EDIT: 
Saw post about the crash in other thread...  Maximized Window 1379x981 (Normal 1680x1050)
Max 228 FPS
Min at ground 175 FPS

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Noir on June 04, 2009, 06:09:35 AM

gtester3

Crossfire HD2600XT

80FPS in windowed, crashed when going to full screen.

Faulting application gtester.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4a26deb7, faulting module gtester.exe, version 0.0.0.0, time stamp 0x4a26deb7, exception code 0xc0000005, fault offset 0x0000f1ba, process id 0xb3c, application start time 0x01c9e503f32e0308.
 

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: moot on June 04, 2009, 07:03:10 AM

v3

No anomalies other than the same water reflection stretch (as in this post (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,264673.msg3296740.html#msg3296740)). FPS (maximized window, 1378x1001) in the default view is 148 versus 115 with v2 (erroneous "0 fps" with v1).

AMD64 X2 3600+, pair of SLI'd Nvidia XFX 9800GTX+ 512MB with 178.24 drivers, 4GB DDR2 800, WinXP SP2.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: maik on June 04, 2009, 03:37:49 PM

Win7 RC - 64bit:
nvidia 8800GT
Gtester2:134,80 at 1600x1050
Gtester3 crashed when switching to Fullscreen

Vista SP2 32-Bit:result will be posted tommorrow

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Ghastly on June 06, 2009, 09:34:18 AM

XP SP3/Intel Pentium D 2.8/1.5 GB RAM/
GeForce 6800 Ultra/drvr 84.21

gtester crashes when escape is pressed for fullscreen mode - 0xc0000005@ offset 0x0000f1ba module GTESTER
(this is my older gaming system, not current - I'd be happy to upgrade NVidia drivers to something more current if requested)

94 FPS, looks normal in windowed mode at default res of 715x751

AH 2.12/4 runs normally in full screen mode as "check"

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: wrag on June 06, 2009, 12:23:19 PM

gtester version 3 crashed going to full screen

got a 257.60 fps out of it gt260 vidcard

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Greebo on June 06, 2009, 01:04:10 PM

Gtester 3 results:

Card: GTX 260

Res (default window) 714X743
FPS: 305

Also tried a full screen window as full screen mode crashed.
Res 1298x1121
FPS: 300

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Vadjan-Sama on June 06, 2009, 07:16:55 PM

Gtester 3:

Card: Radeon X1950 512NB
Runs OK
Res 714X750
FPS: 126

Also tried a full screen mode and crashed.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Steve on June 06, 2009, 08:05:17 PM

Gtester 3test results.....

Video card model:  GeForce GTX 285
Ran normal
Frame rate: 277
Resolution:  1618X1121

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Kazaa on June 07, 2009, 06:42:28 AM

lol Steve.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Ruler2 on June 07, 2009, 10:44:25 PM

sorry this isn't really in the right thread,but I couldn't find any.

Does anyone have any idea why my monitor WILL NOT go above 60Hz?  I went to preferences and 60Hz was the only choice I had,even after unclicking the box,are the HP BIOS messing me up or something?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Delirium on June 08, 2009, 07:07:16 AM

See your PMs, I don't want to hijack this thread.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Noir on June 08, 2009, 01:27:28 PM

Quote from: Ruler2 on June 07, 2009, 10:44:25 PM

sorry this isn't really in the right thread,but I couldn't find any.

Does anyone have any idea why my monitor WILL NOT go above 60Hz?  I went to preferences and 60Hz was the only choice I had,even after unclicking the box,are the HP BIOS messing me up or something?

Go to hardware & software section of the forum. Most LCD screens don't go over 60Hz btw.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Baumer on June 09, 2009, 04:36:45 PM

gtester4-

1680 x 1050
15.5 fps with reflections

1680 x 1050
17.2 fps with reflections disabled

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Vulcan on June 09, 2009, 05:19:01 PM

gtester4

Card: 7600GT
Ran normal, no visible errors in both 2D and Stereo 3D mode  :rock
800x600, 58fps
181.22 video drivers with 162.50 Stereo 3D stereo drivers.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Easyscor on June 09, 2009, 05:32:30 PM

gtester4

Full screen, Default Settings:
Frame rates of 12.88 to 12.96 at full screen after 60 seconds.

Same with Reflections off:
Frame rates of 13.47 to 13.52 at full screen after 60 seconds.

I finally see the water.

Still seeing those blue grey pixel anomalies in the lower left of my screen, both in land and water tiles. If Reflections are on, the stretched reflections reported by other simply aren't there, the water continues to the shoreline without the reflections, stretched or otherwise.

Keyboard input was almost nonexistent unless I clicked on the scene in the window first.

Card: ATI Radeon 9800 Pro (128MB DDR AGP 8x/4x on an ABIT P4 system)

Resolution: 1280x1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Motherland on June 09, 2009, 05:54:20 PM

Yikes... down to 22-30 FPS near the water with Gtester 4 with reflections on, 30-40 FPS with them off, with my NVIDIA 8600GT on Windows 7.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Greebo on June 09, 2009, 06:04:45 PM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Video card: GTX 260
Res: 1600x1200
FPS with reflections on: 209FPS
FPS with reflections off: 258FPS

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: wrag on June 10, 2009, 02:52:07 AM

Gtester4

Vid card GTX260

Res 1920x1080

FPS reflect on  151.60

FPS reflect off  195.20

Crashed while looking around did a big jump across the terrain then crashed?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: bravoa8 on June 10, 2009, 09:13:38 AM

gtester4
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3313/3613279993_592e6d72a4_b.jpg)
FPS:5
Gb:about 2.5
Res:1680X1050
processor:pentium 4
Graphic card:ATI Radeon X8600
could see the water but it was really slow and had those blue dots

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: COndor06 on June 10, 2009, 03:32:00 PM

Duel 7900 GT Nvidia cards w/256 ram each
FPS 134
1920X1080

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: texastc316 on June 11, 2009, 03:34:30 AM

(http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm155/jasonthehunted/gtest4.jpg)

ATI radeon HD 3200
1440 x 900
2FPS

Looked good, but, well its fn 2 fps.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: nipper on June 11, 2009, 07:08:25 AM

Radeon HD 4670

1280x1024

Factory settings:
Reflections on: 89.6 fps
Reflections off: 111.6 fps

Custom settings I use for AH
Reflections on: 36.6 fps
Reflections off: 42.26 fps

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: maik on June 11, 2009, 01:32:30 PM

Win7 RC - 64bit:
nvidia 8800GT
Gtester2:134,80 at 1600x1050
Gtester3 crashed when switching to Fullscreen
Gtester4:112,80 at 1600x1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: 2Dizzy on June 11, 2009, 04:17:09 PM

Card: NVidia NX7600GT sli
24 inch Widescreen
1618 x 1121
framerate 146 steady
Smooth graphics, nothing abnormal

Greetz 2Dizzy

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: xStrato on June 11, 2009, 10:19:50 PM

Crashed for me. All I get is a grey window and crash.

Faulting application gtester.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module gtester.exe, version 0.0.0.0, fault address 0x0001f3db.

AMD Quad 3.0GHz
Dual 9800 GT running indepently with two monitors
4 GB RAM
XP Pro SP3
1680 x 1050 main
1440 x 900 secondary

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Skuzzy on June 12, 2009, 06:04:17 AM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Operating System: Windows XP Pro w/SP3
Video card: ATI 4850, AntiAlias forced to 4
Res: 1280x1024
FPS with reflections on: 227FPS
FPS with reflections off: 286FPS

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: RTHolmes on June 12, 2009, 07:42:53 AM

gtester v4:

9800GT 512MB (8xQ AA, settings pretty much maxed)
normal
reflections on: 178fps
reflections off: 208fps
1280x1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: texastc316 on June 12, 2009, 11:21:32 PM

gtester4

150 - 170 default settings
amd 64 X2
WinXP sp3
Geforce 9800gt
4g ram

sigh life is good now

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: gatt on June 13, 2009, 12:47:57 AM

gtester4:

GPU: GeForce260
No anomalies
205fps
1680x1050
CPU: Core2Duo E8600 3.3Ghz
RAM: 3GByte
WinXP Pro SP3

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: RATTFINK on June 13, 2009, 01:45:25 AM

Unmolested

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u7/rattfink31/GraphicTest4un-molested.jpg)





Tweaked :D

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u7/rattfink31/GraphicTest4RATT.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Noir on June 13, 2009, 06:13:38 AM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Operating System: WIndows Vista Business SP2
Video card: ATI HD2600XT*2 in hardware crossfire.
Res: 1280x1024
FPS with reflections on: 10FPS
FPS with reflections off: 17FPS

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: SKColt on June 13, 2009, 08:07:09 AM

Gtester 4

Nvidia  GeForce 9800GT
Normal
112.8 FPS
1920X1200 resolution

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: hawk36 on June 13, 2009, 08:14:26 AM

Video card model:  Nvidia geForce 9600GT
Ran normal
Frame rate: 64
Resolution:  1680x1050 (32bit) (60hz)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: baine1 on June 13, 2009, 03:49:06 PM

Radeon x600 256mb memory
win xp
Pentium 4 3.4ghz
1gb memory
fps 7 1024x768
 

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: 2Slow on June 13, 2009, 06:28:30 PM

eMachine T4892, P4 2.8GHz, 2 GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro AGP, AGP Bus 4X (8X card on 4X slot)
Frame Rate 32 (default view)
1280 X 1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Auger on June 14, 2009, 02:52:54 PM

NVidia 8800GT
Normal
59.8
1680x1050

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Skuzzy on June 14, 2009, 03:26:42 PM

Umhm,,...I think we need the FPS figures for both with and without reflections.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: RATTFINK on June 14, 2009, 04:53:12 PM

You have mine in the pics I posted. :)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Tom082980 on June 14, 2009, 04:55:59 PM

EVGA 9800GTX +  TRI-SLI
Win XP 32bit sp3
3.8ghz intelquadcore
4GB memory
Ran normal
With reflections on fps 270-568 depending on the view point
Without reflections on fps 382-699 depending on view point
22inch monitor res 1680x1050 60hz

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: oboe on June 14, 2009, 08:07:36 PM

Looked normal

Nvidia geForce 7600GS 512 Mb, Resolution:  1280x1024
Pentium Dual Core E5200@2.50 GHz, 2 Gb RAM, Win XP Home Sp 3

Reflections ON Frame rate: 48.8 fps
Reflections Disabled Frame rate: 57.6 fps

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: doleboy on June 15, 2009, 08:07:45 AM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Operating System: Windows XP Home w/SP3
Video card: ATI Radeon 9500 128mb
Res: 1024x768
FPS with reflections on: 12.16FPS
FPS with reflections off: 13.16FPS
 :o

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Skuzzy on June 17, 2009, 04:47:37 PM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Operating System: Windows XP Pro w/SP2
Video card: NVidia 7600GT w/4X Anti-aliasing
CPU: E6300 @ 1.86Ghz
Res: 1024x768
FPS with reflections on: 88FPS
FPS with reflections off: 107FPS

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Lusche on June 17, 2009, 06:44:20 PM

Gtester4 , default & full screen

Windows XP SP2
Nvidia GT 6600
Athlon 64X2 4200
1280x1024

FPS with reflections: 48
FPW without reflections: 57

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: bustr on June 18, 2009, 06:02:33 AM

Gtester4, default & full screen

XP Pro sp3
Core 2Duo E8500 @ 3.16
4G RAM
NVIDIA 9800 GT 512
1680x1050

FPS with reflections - 83.20
FPS without reflections - 91.40

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: bustr on June 18, 2009, 06:24:56 AM

Gtester1

default & full screen

XP Pro sp3
Core 2Duo E8500 @ 3.16
4G RAM
NVIDIA 9800 GT 512
1680x1050

FPS with reflections - 125.80

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Pannono on June 18, 2009, 09:41:26 PM

NVIDIA 6150SE
Normal
Frame Rate: 7.76 (Reflections and No Reflections)
Resolution: 1280x1024

(http://i244.photobucket.com/albums/gg3/Pannono/AHNewTerr.jpg)
(Yes that is the default view)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: mike254 on June 18, 2009, 09:59:00 PM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Operating System: Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Video card: NVidia GeForce GTS 250
CPU: Intel Core I7 920 @ 2.67
Res: 1920x1200
6GB Ram
FPS with reflections on: 178-211 FPS
FPS with reflections off: 261-308 FPS
No anomolies

Nice work BTW!  :aok

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Overlag on June 19, 2009, 08:17:20 AM

AMD X2 4400 @ 2300mhz (100mhz overclock)
Nvidia 8800GTX 768mb
150+ fps at 1680x1050 (no AA or AF)
20-40fps at 1680x1050 (4xAA, 8xAF)
Water disapears at high reflective settings. (unless its reflecting too good and just showing the sky?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Blade on June 20, 2009, 12:44:59 AM

gtester4
Frame Rate 91.74
Res 1920x1200

WIndows Vista 64bit
GeForce 8800GT

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: moot on June 20, 2009, 03:31:55 AM

v4 @ 1680x1050:  100 fps with reflections, 142 without.
AMD64 X2 3600+, pair of SLI'd Nvidia XFX 9800GTX+ 512MB with 178.24 drivers, 4GB DDR2 800, WinXP SP2.

Stretching in reflections is gone.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: dunnrite on June 20, 2009, 09:24:47 AM

V4

FR 2.95
Res 1680x1050
Tri Cnt 288734


ATI Radeon X1050
Vista Home Premium 32 bit

Some trees are white and extend into water.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: MajWoody on June 21, 2009, 12:51:16 AM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Operating System: Windows XP Pro w/SP3
Video card: Radeon x800xt agp 256mb w/2X Anti-aliasing
AMD 3000+ 64 bit
Res: 1024x768
FPS with reflections on: 16 FPS
FPS with reflections off: 18 FPS

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Vulgar on June 22, 2009, 03:45:45 PM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Windows Vista 64 bit
Processor Amd Phenom (tm) 9950 Quad-Core 2.60 Ghz
Graphics Nvidia GTX 260
196 fps with reflections 1280x1024
264 fps without reflections 1280x1024

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Qrsu on June 24, 2009, 12:07:15 PM

GTester 4 results, default view and full screen.

Video card: GeForce 8800 GTS
Res: 1920 x  1080
FPS with reflections on: 105FPS
FPS with reflections off: 140FPS

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Kazaa on June 24, 2009, 01:25:03 PM

This thread is no longer a sticky, beta inc!

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: RATTFINK on June 24, 2009, 01:40:03 PM

Quote from: Kazaa on June 24, 2009, 01:25:03 PM

This thread is no longer a sticky, beta inc!

hmmmmm...  :noid

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Kazaa on June 24, 2009, 01:47:35 PM

I forgot to add "in two weeks"  :lol

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: texastc316 on June 24, 2009, 01:49:36 PM

Well, do you think we ll get some kind of word today?

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Spikes on June 24, 2009, 01:50:12 PM

It IS wednesday...

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: FireDrgn on June 24, 2009, 01:53:38 PM

Pyro just wants to see us fools slobber and druel   a little.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Bruv119 on June 24, 2009, 01:57:52 PM

Quote from: FireDrgn on June 24, 2009, 01:53:38 PM

Pyro just wants to see us fools slobber and druel   a little.

cruel , cruel man.  :cry

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: texastc316 on June 24, 2009, 02:00:26 PM

Its workin. I already changed shirts

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: TwinBoom on June 24, 2009, 08:39:13 PM

GF 8800 GT XXX
(http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/5360/testb.png)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Captfish on June 24, 2009, 11:49:04 PM

 :noid
(http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l191/captfish/haha.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: gpwurzel on June 24, 2009, 11:56:43 PM

Captfish, that is just harsh mate, but funny as anything.

Counting down in, 3, 2, 1 _


Wurzel

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Clone155 on June 24, 2009, 11:59:50 PM

Quote from: Captfish on June 24, 2009, 11:49:04 PM

:noid
(http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l191/captfish/haha.jpg)

That isn't funny... I almost fell outta my chair...

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: MajWoody on June 25, 2009, 12:03:36 AM

Found some weird anomalies shaped like blue upside down trees. (shadows?)


(http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j199/fergy61/GTester4.jpg)

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: zaraza2000 on June 29, 2009, 02:26:21 AM

Quote from: Darkish on May 25, 2009, 04:06:25 AM

Saphire Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Ran normal, no issues
FPS : 97.4
Res: 1680x1050

How did you make it to run on wide screen?
I got same card and trying to set it to 1680x1050, but i still dont get wide screen settings.

Title: Re: Graphics compatibility test - RESULTS THREAD
Post by: Pyro on June 29, 2009, 09:20:46 AM

Thanks, we're done with gtester testing now.  Please see the beta forum for further testing.