Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: TwinEng on May 28, 2009, 11:26:32 PM
-
Does anyone have any tidbits as to where Aces High II is going for the future?
Any new vehicles or planes? Any new features in the game itself?
From recent announcements, it would seem that efforts are being made to improve the graphics. But surely there must be things beyond just doing that on the horizon??
Or am I engaging in wishful thinking???
.
-
Well looks like we are getting a remodeled typhoon, and probably some more things.
-
I haven't seen any clues myself, but some people are pretty sure we're getting a Beaufighter.
-
What moot and machfly said.
-
I haven't seen any clues myself, but some people are pretty sure we're getting a Beaufighter.
Jeez I hope so, but I'm not counting on it. If i start a rumor like that will it come true? :)
-
I heard the B-29, panther, a lot of new abilities on the load out pads, FW 190-A9, spitfire XXII, anyone else hear the same :devil
-
Brewster Buffalo
-
We SERIOUSLY need more Japanese aircraft. The early and mid-war stable is practically non-existent. The A6M2 if out-classed in mid-war, but the A6M5 is a bit too late. The A6M3 is much needed as a gap-filler. It's impossible to call them competitive with the late-war American iron, but the Judy and Jill will at least give them SOMETHING that's survivable as far as strike craft go: (especially in FSO and scenarios) the D3A and B5N are basically target practice. The Ki-67 is wholly inappropriate for early and mid-war, so we need the Betty VERY bad. We also at LEAST need the Oscar. A5M would also be invaluable for "Flying Tiger" setups (the Tigers did NOT fight Zeros, at least not until AFTER they were absorbed into the USAAF).
-
The buffalo for sure (they asked for info so they can model it) and the Typhoon remodeled. Anything else is speculation. However, there were some trends in the past. They sometimes add them in 3s, and sometimes one of the 3 is a GV.
Not a constant pattern, mind you, but something to look forward to.
-
I hear we are getting the Opel truck... :noid
-
I hear that HTC's top priority now is to remove the flame dampers from the Mosquitoes and fix its elevator.
-
Oh and we might be given back the H2H (although probably only for subscribers).
-
I heard the B-29, panther, a lot of new abilities on the load out pads, FW 190-A9, spitfire XXII, anyone else hear the same :devil
Yeap I heard that and alos that we will be able to have more then one gunner in out bomber
-
I hear that HTC's top priority now is to remove the flame dampers from the Mosquitoes and fix its elevator.
Now I have to go to my window and look for flying pigs. :rofl
-
Now I have to go to my window and look for flying pigs. :rofl
One does not have to look as far as you think Dave! :rofl
(http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m248/Thunder-Pig/WNC%20Citizens%20Blog/Concepts/FlyingPigs.jpg)
-
i hope that they will bring back H2H
-
G6 A/S
G14 A/S
G10
Make it so.
-
I did a search..... nothing came up....what is H2H?
-
P-61
B-29
109E-1
190D-11
Me 410
-
<---crosses fingers for Beaufighter and Buffalo.
-
We SERIOUSLY need more Japanese aircraft. The early and mid-war stable is practically non-existent. The A6M2 if out-classed in mid-war, but the A6M5 is a bit too late. The A6M3 is much needed as a gap-filler. It's impossible to call them competitive with the late-war American iron, but the Judy and Jill will at least give them SOMETHING that's survivable as far as strike craft go: (especially in FSO and scenarios) the D3A and B5N are basically target practice. The Ki-67 is wholly inappropriate for early and mid-war, so we need the Betty VERY bad. We also at LEAST need the Oscar. A5M would also be invaluable for "Flying Tiger" setups (the Tigers did NOT fight Zeros, at least not until AFTER they were absorbed into the USAAF).
The Flying Tigers definatly flew against Zeros and way before they were absorbed into the 14th AF, infact the Zeros babtisim in combat was in China. Just like the F4u Corsairs most Zeros were land based and many of the Japanese Navy aces never flew ops from carriers. Saburo Sakai never was really assigned to a carrier . I agree that we do need more Japanese planes of which the Ki-43 Oscar makes the most sence to me.
-
I did a search..... nothing came up....what is H2H?
Head to head. They were 8 player arenas hosted on players' end. You could host custom maps and arena settings. One of the best things about H2H was free-for-all setups on tiny cage maps. Non stop furballing action.
-
The Flying Tigers definatly flew against Zeros and way before they were absorbed into the 14th AF, infact the Zeros babtisim in combat was in China. Just like the F4u Corsairs most Zeros were land based and many of the Japanese Navy aces never flew ops from carriers. Saburo Sakai never was really assigned to a carrier . I agree that we do need more Japanese planes of which the Ki-43 Oscar makes the most sence to me.
Every log and report I've ever seen shows the Tigers engaging: Ki-43s, Ki-27s, Ki-30s, Ki-21s, and Ki-48s, with a couple references to A5Ms, D3As, G3Ms and G4Ms. Not one mention of the A6M.
-
Every log and report I've ever seen shows the Tigers engaging: Ki-43s, Ki-27s, Ki-30s, Ki-21s, and Ki-48s, with a couple references to A5Ms, D3As, G3Ms and G4Ms. Not one mention of the A6M.
I also thought the Flying Tigers faced mostly "Nates", which I believe are Ki27s? Could be wrong might be Ki43s.
-
Ki-27 was the Nate, Ki-43 was the Oscar. The campaign in general was primarily under the IJAAF.
-
The Flying Tigers definatly flew against Zeros and way before they were absorbed into the 14th AF, infact the Zeros babtisim in combat was in China. Just like the F4u Corsairs most Zeros were land based and many of the Japanese Navy aces never flew ops from carriers. Saburo Sakai never was really assigned to a carrier . I agree that we do need more Japanese planes of which the Ki-43 Oscar makes the most sence to me.
The 1st AVG did not engage any Japanese Zeros while the Flying Tigers were an independent (of the USAAF) fighting force. China did send some Zeros (about 15) to help quelch the growing Chinese resistance but those Zeros were withdrawn from China by December 1940 since by that time the Zeros accomplished what they were sent out to do, crush the Chinese air resistance over the front lines.
The AVG, as noted by others in this thread, did encounter the Ki-43 "Oscar" which was basically the IJAAF's version of the Zero, built to similiar specs though the Oscar was more lightweight and even less rugged than the Zero. It also didn't have cannons like the Zero. The air war over China for Japan was also mostly a IJAAF affair with some assistance from the IJN air units from time to time.
ack-ack
-
Oh and we might be given back the H2H (although probably only for subscribers).
I would subscribe for the first time ever if H2H came back from the basement of HTC's office :D
-
Ki-27 was the Nate, Ki-43 was the Oscar. The campaign in general was primarily under the IJAAF.
Well all I can tell you is I knew Dick Rossi and other Flying Tigers that lived in my area. I had on many occasions spoke with Mr's Rossi about his days in the Tigers. Now wheather any Zeros were claimed is one thing but I was told that they were encountered. I also did some research on the subject and there are conflicting reports about zeros being in the area that the Tigers operated in . There defiantly were Zeros in China during the Flying Tiger days but as stated the reports are conflicting. All the occasions that I spoke to Dick his mind was lucid and he was able to recall very small details about his days with them. Some were about Pappy Boyington that were very enlightening.
-
The 1st AVG did not engage any Japanese Zeros while the Flying Tigers were an independent (of the USAAF) fighting force. China did send some Zeros (about 15) to help quelch the growing Chinese resistance but those Zeros were withdrawn from China by December 1940 since by that time the Zeros accomplished what they were sent out to do, crush the Chinese air resistance over the front lines.
The AVG, as noted by others in this thread, did encounter the Ki-43 "Oscar" which was basically the IJAAF's version of the Zero, built to similiar specs though the Oscar was more lightweight and even less rugged than the Zero. It also didn't have cannons like the Zero. The air war over China for Japan was also mostly a IJAAF affair with some assistance from the IJN air units from time to time.
ack-ack
Here is a bit of reading that may shed a little light
The key missing piece is the origin and mission of the found/restored Tainan Kokutai Zero. What was a Zero doing in the area north of Hainan Island. This is supplied by Hata/Izawa: On November 22 a composite fighter squadron attached to the 22nd Air Flotilla HQ was created to support the Singapore operation. Fourteen A6M2s (model 21) of the Tainan Air Group and another 13 A6M2 (21) of the 3rd Air Group departed Tainan and Takao airfields for Saigon via Hainan Island on November 26 and 27. They arrived at Soc Trang, about 150 miles south of Saigon on December 1, 1941. 'En route to their destination, however, two Zero fighters had to make emergency landings on Luichow Peninsula because of foul weather, and two pilots were missing in action.' Page 143-144 of Hata/Izawa.
Now the Luichow Peninsula is the bit that sticks out towards Hainan Island and is due south from Kweilin by about 150-200 miles. The peninsula was not held by the Japanese in 1940-1941, they occupied it during the Ichi-Go operation to drive out the bombers at Kweilin. I still don't know where Teitsan is as it's not on any of my old maps, but from Neumann's own words it must be near the beach opposite Hainan Island on the Luichow peninsula.
There are alot of matches between this story in Hata/Izawa, the info in Mikesh on 1940-1941 Zero operations in China, and in Neumann's story. Right IJNAF air group is involved - Tainan. Which we know from the picture of the Zero being re-reconstucted at Kweilin in Mikesh. Right model - A6M2 model 21. The folding wing tips are seen in the Kweilin picture and others. The Serial number (3372) checks out to a A6M2 model 21. Right area - in proximity to Kweilin. Hata/Izawa and Neumann agree on this point. Mikesh might too if I could find Teitsan on a map. Right kind of landing to produce a relatively undamaged airplane. Hata/Izawa state two A6M2s made a forced landing, Neumann gives more detail adding they or it landed on a beach opposite Hainan. The photo in Mikesh of the Zero at Kweilin shows an undamaged drop tank attached to the rack so I doubt the plane landed wheels up.
More than one airplane is involved so Neumann would have extra parts to file. Hata/Izawa report two missing Zeros not the "MANY ZEROS" cited, but I will return to this point later. Not exactly the right date according to my memory of the post on 'Prizes of War' (Phil Butler) - On or just before December 1, 1941 according to Hata/Izawa not Feb. 1, 1941, from Butler but the quote of Butler, if accruate, contains other errors. The December 1941 date certainly puts the Zeros on the ground and abandoned long enough for the locals to cut up the tires and the planes to become unservicable.
Neither aircraft was lost to enemy action - no AVG shooting down Zeros here. The unit was on a ferry flight to French Indo-China and not involved in operations over China. Which fits with what we know of the historical record. What about the comment attributed to Chennault about the 5-6 Zeros shot down over the last 6-9 months prior to October 1942? What, then about the 'MANY ZEROS' used in the reconstruction and the reference to the aircraft not being mass produced and parts needing filing to fit?
The Japanese lost three planes (Hata/Izawa say 3 or 4) to ground fire in China by September 1941. One, the Chendgu Zero, shot down in May? 1941 must have been in pretty good shape for the Chinese made some good drawings of the plane (absent the tail, which was absent). This same plane was the source of an analysis by the US Naval Attache. These three (or 4) were part of the pre-production group of 15 sent to China for combat tests. These were not mass produced airframes. Now you have five possibly six Zeros to incorporate into the rebuild. Three maybe four of which were shot down, by AA. It may be impossible to completely disprove, but so far I do not see any evidence that proves the AVG shot down A6M2s or otherwise encountered them in combat over China prior to October 1942.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nathan sturman
Subject: Zero absence
Mr Ford,
I have found through a bit of research in the Japanese language accounts here (Akimoto and others' articles) that you are right. In fact, in "the Zero in Mainland China" section of the Maru Mekanik Zero edition (not handy now) it is stated that the first Zero unit back into China was based at Haikou in Hainan in Oct 43, together with some Kates, for air defense, with another unit arriving at Sanai, Hainan, in feb 44. Some airfcraft were detached to the lower Yangzi for collective air defense. And a unit was based at Shanghai's Longhua airport at about that time. The account starts with "although the Zero was absent from Chinese airspace during the first part of the war...."
Thought you would like to know, I'll send the pagination if you haven't yet seen it.
Your work is very good...and interesting. Check on the bit about CAMCO's having built the Hawk IIIs and IIs, I suspect they outfitted the ships and repaired them only. Very few new aircraft were successfully built in China at that time. (The Fuxing stand almost alone.) The factory was bombed before the CW fighter could go into production, one of many clever schemes that went sour on the Chinese. As for Soviet AF in China, they hit Hsinch'u, Taiwan, and were very important for awhile. They left in disgust I understand.
Yours Sincerely,
Nate Sturman
Gunma, Japan
Later:
This replaces what I wrote yesterday, which was off the top of my head: Here is what Akimoto Minoru writes in Maru Meka Zero book:
China mainland:
The Zero wasn't very active here duing the first part of the war, after the navy moved out. But in may of 1943, due to allied air raids, 9 Zeros were depatched to San Ya, Hainan island. These flew cooperative air defense in the Hainan/Canton area. Then on the Oct 1st, 1943 the 254th Wing was formed for air defense activities in the Hainan-Canton vicinity, and based at Haikou, Hainan Island. It was comprised of 24 Zeros and four Carrier Attack planes. (Kates). A detachment of its aircraft were posted to the Yangzi area to participate in joint air defense.
In February of 1944, the 256th (Air Defense) Unit was formed at Shanghai Longhua Airfield, with 24 Zeros and 8 Carrier Attack planes, (probably Kates).
And still later:
The account about the Zeros moving back into the Chinese area in late 43/early44 is in Gunyou Ki Meka Siriiz Vol. 5, Zero Sen, Hardcover, in English, listed as Mechanic of World Aircraft, Kojinsha, Tokyo (Tel 03-3265-1864, don't dial that first zero from abroad).
ADVERTISEMENTS
See the Warbird's Bookshelf
Best Sellers - Flying Tigers
Piper Cub - Brewster Buffalo A6M Zero - Flying Wings
Flying Tigers: the history
The Smithsonian Institution Press edition went through seven printings from 1991 to 2001. Now Flying Tigers is available again, revised and updated, from HarperCollins. Find it at Amazon websites in the United States - Britain - France - Germany - Japan - and Canada
Or I'll send an autographed copy for list price plus shipping:
$18.95 US Media Mail
$22.95 US Priority Mail
$29.95 International Mail
PayPal rolls your credit card; I fill the order. You can also write a check. If all else fails, send email and we'll work something out.
also by Dan Ford
Remains: a story of the Flying Tigers (the novel)
The Lady & the Tigers (Olga Greenlaw's 1942 account)
Google links
-
heard we are getting a spit VII and a spit XII.
-
BigPlay,
There was also a tendency during the war for American pilots to report EVERY Japanese single-engine fighter encountered as a "Zero."
-
BigPlay,
There was also a tendency during the war for American pilots to report EVERY Japanese single-engine fighter encountered as a "Zero."
I understand that. I am just repeating what I heard, I wasn't there but there does seem to be comflicting reports about Zero encounters in regards th the Flying Tigers.
-
BigPlay,
There was also a tendency during the war for American pilots to report EVERY Japanese single-engine fighter encountered as a "Zero."
Which would be understandable in the case of the Ki-43, which was basically the IJAAF's version of the IJNAF'a Zero with an almost identicle appearance.
I understand that. I am just repeating what I heard, I wasn't there but there does seem to be comflicting reports about Zero encounters in regards th the Flying Tigers.
I haven't been able to find any reports or combat logs that show any IJNAF units that were operating in the AVG area of operations. All I have been able to find are contacts with IJAAF units and the principal Japanese fighters in this area of operations were the Ki-27 and Ki-43.
I know that some IJNAF units were stationed in the Formosas, but would they be within range to operate in the AVG's area of operations?
I know there is similiar confusion with the RAF Spitfires that took part with the AVG in the defense of Ragoon with claims that the Spitfires were shot down by Zeros in some reports.
ack-ack
-
I have never read any reports that the AVG fought Zeros.
That doesn't mean they didn't.
I've an extensive library and Zeros were never mentioned in any literature that I have in regards to Zeros and the AVG.
-
And back to the main subject of this post,
I know I'm gonna get some static for this one but with all the requests and discussion over another perk bomber for AH (B-29 in particular), I'd hope its not just falling on deaf ears. The game could not only use the 29, but their are other countries in the game (Italy, Japan, Russia, and Germany) which had heavy bombers and regardless of their use in WWII, would also make a good addition to AH and serve to fill in these countries already thin plane sets.
-
Well, the only thing that I see High Tech definitely saying is coming is new terrain. In fact, they have indicated that will be the main focus of the next update. We will get more realistic terrain graphics, and even water that moves.
Who is the person that requested moving water????
.
-
It looks like water movement is only a px shader effect. I'd rather be wrong, but I expect it'll still be the same concrete water, with maybe some wake and splash effects when ditching, similar to the purely esthetic wake at ships' bow.
-
Well all I can tell you is I knew Dick Rossi and other Flying Tigers that lived in my area. I had on many occasions spoke with Mr's Rossi about his days in the Tigers. Now wheather any Zeros were claimed is one thing but I was told that they were encountered. I also did some research on the subject and there are conflicting reports about zeros being in the area that the Tigers operated in . There defiantly were Zeros in China during the Flying Tiger days but as stated the reports are conflicting. All the occasions that I spoke to Dick his mind was lucid and he was able to recall very small details about his days with them. Some were about Pappy Boyington that were very enlightening.
Just out of curiousity, do you mean the AVG, or the 23rd FG?
-
Along with flying piggy's........
The Meteor is in the update coming in 2 weeks.