Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: wrag on May 30, 2009, 01:46:01 PM
-
If you look elsewhere it's all been said :)
-
YES YES AND YES bring it back! :salute :salute
-
Which one?
G-10/R2
G-10/R5
G-10/R6
G-10/U4
-
Which one?
G-10/R2
G-10/R5
G-10/R6
G-10/U4
:noid
-
:pray +100
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufLPE3aCFU4
-
ok, I'll bite. . .why?
srsly, there are so many planes missing from teh Japanese and Russian plane set, the G14 has all the loadout/fun options and teh K4 is a monster with the 30mm. . . so why add another 109 with this disparatiy?
and don't tell me because it used to be in the game already so its easy enough to re-introduce. . . thats cheating!
-
ok, then we need the B-29.
-
No, we do not need the G-10. We need a Bf109G-6/AS or Bf109G-14/AS, not the Bf109G-10 which entered service after the Bf109K-4.
-
Does the G10 have the same engine as the K4?
-
Does the G10 have the same engine as the K4?
Some yes, some no.
-
ok, I'll bite. . .why?
srsly, there are so many planes missing from teh Japanese and Russian plane set, the G14 has all the loadout/fun options and teh K4 is a monster with the 30mm. . . so why add another 109 with this disparatiy?
and don't tell me because it used to be in the game already so its easy enough to re-introduce. . . thats cheating!
Just look do a look up of 109g10 threads :aok
-
No, we do not need the G-10. We need a Bf109G-6/AS or Bf109G-14/AS, not the Bf109G-10 which entered service after the Bf109K-4.
Already been said just do a lookup of G10 threads :aok
-
Already been said just do a lookup of G10 threads :aok
Yes, I say it in each new redundant thread because the pro-Bf109G-10 people don't seem to get it.
-
Yes, I say it in each new redundant thread because the pro-Bf109G-10 people don't seem to get it.
Oh :lol I get it I just keep putting this request on here because IMHO redundant or not we need a better high end 109 then the K4 limited to that POS 30mm....
-
Oh :lol I get it I just keep putting this request on here because IMHO redundant or not we need a better high end 109 then the K4 limited to that POS 30mm....
Then stop asking for the Bf109G-10. It is useless because it comes in too late for the scenarios it is needed for. We don't need another extremely late high altitude Bf109, we need one that covers the earlier part of the USAAF bomber offensive. Those would be the Bf109G-6/AS or Bf109G-14/AS.
-
You call it a POS? I'm trying to learn it and the K4 now (so when I get back in my 38 I know how to fight the K4 since I know how to fly it). The 30mm seems so lethal...too bad I don't know how to use it right/can't shoot for junk.
-
I'm always for another 109.............
In the immortal words of Stan Lee......
Nuff Said
-
Just to let u know guys, we have the G10 years ago, then they put in the G14 and take out the G10... so no way they are goin to put it in again ^^
-
Then stop asking for the Bf109G-10. It is useless because it comes in too late for the scenarios it is needed for. We don't need another extremely late high altitude Bf109, we need one that covers the earlier part of the USAAF bomber offensive. Those would be the Bf109G-6/AS or Bf109G-14/AS.
Not to hi-jack, but roughly what percentage of AH players participate in FSOs and scenarios?
-
I 'd like the G10 added back it would give me that 20mm option that I have so longed for with the same characteristics that I like so much in the K4.
-
Not to hi-jack, but roughly what percentage of AH players participate in FSOs and scenarios?
Last time I checked there were 450-500 players per FSO IIRC. Since obviously not everybody could make it all the time I would say there are at least 600-700 players who regularly attend FSO, many of them being long time loyal subscribers I would imagine.
-
I 'd like the G10 added back it would give me that 20mm option that I have so longed for with the same characteristics that I like so much in the K4.
No, it wouldn't. The old "Bf109G-10" was not a Bf109G-10. It was a Bf109K-4 with 20mm options. If the Bf109G-10 were added again it would have a top speed of about 425mph and associated performance differences.
-
No, it wouldn't. The old "Bf109G-10" was not a Bf109G-10. It was a Bf109K-4 with 20mm options. If the Bf109G-10 were added again it would have a top speed of about 425mph and associated performance differences.
Absolutely correct and IMHO acceptable but a G6 or G14 AS would also be acceptable.
-
did the aforementioned G6/AS have a 30mm opiton? If so, I am all for it...actually, I am all for another 109...preferrably with a 30mm.
-
did the aforementioned G6/AS have a 30mm opiton? If so, I am all for it...actually, I am all for another 109...preferrably with a 30mm.
Yes, the MK 108 was introduced in August/September of 1943.
-
The G-10/R7 would be fun. A 109 with WGr. air to air mortars.
-
You guys are all SPEIR-heading the issue. What you might want is not best.
-
Yes to the G-10.
-
The G-10/R7 would be fun. A 109 with WGr. air to air mortars.
What's special about the ones on the G-10?
-
why not ask for a 20mm k4 option then?
-
Since the G-10 has unique performance vs other 109s and thousands of them were built, it is a legitimate candidate for inclusion. However, Karnak is right that a 109G-6/AS would be even better for FSO.