Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: jay on July 02, 2009, 08:32:08 AM

Title: P-61 widow maker
Post by: jay on July 02, 2009, 08:32:08 AM: P-61 widow maker guns= 4-20MM in front and a top turrent made of 4-50cals

payload capicity= i dont know

but most people gonna say this plane would be usless without a night time
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: antivortex on July 02, 2009, 08:35:51 AM: 2 weeks...
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: jay on July 02, 2009, 08:44:02 AM: heard about "2 weeks" about then jet made by the horton brothers whats happening in 2 weeks??
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: antivortex on July 02, 2009, 08:45:30 AM: You'll just have to wait and see... start counting.
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: RATTFINK on July 02, 2009, 08:48:28 AM: I'm partial to the search button myself.

As you can see, you are not alone.

<<PLEASE, DO NOT REPLY TO THEIR POSTS>>

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,191820.0.html

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,261688.0.html

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,244907.0.html

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,224218.0.html

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,229717.0.html

etc, etc
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: jay on July 02, 2009, 08:55:24 AM: wouldnt have posted this if i knew there were already that many
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: waystin2 on July 02, 2009, 09:55:57 AM: (http://www.angelzfunnyz.com/Portals/0/Gallery/Album/3/YES%20RACCOON.JPG)
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: Clone155 on July 02, 2009, 07:44:43 PM: The people that are complaining about searching are starting to get annoying (not singling anyone out, there are about 50 of you). Next time I wish for something and someone does that I'm going to find the oldest one I can find on the subject and reply with "Sure why not"
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: Meatloaf on July 02, 2009, 09:45:31 PM: (http://www.streetneeds.com/uploads/twinturbonet/repost.jpg)
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: 1Boner on July 02, 2009, 11:14:02 PM: There are too many other "gaps" that need to be filled first.

Just what we need, more late war American iron!

Its a night fighter, we don't have night!!

Its ugly!!

There weren't enough of them made!

They didn't fly in squadron strength!

Perk it!

Perk it!

Perk it!

Perk it!

Try the search button you dweeb!!

Your spelling sux!

Perk it!

Perk it!

JK. :aok
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: Guppy35 on July 03, 2009, 01:40:13 AM: And if you can't get the name right, you are not allowed to ask for it.
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: trigger2 on July 03, 2009, 01:41:27 AM: Quote from: Clone155 on July 02, 2009, 07:44:43 PM
The people that are complaining about searching are starting to get annoying (not singling anyone out, there are about 50 of you). Next time I wish for something and someone does that I'm going to find the oldest one I can find on the subject and reply with "Sure why not"

The people who don't have the time to, in this case, type "P-61 black widow" or "P-61" or "black widow" into that little box are starting to get annoying... And doing that second part, hope you enjoy PNG, read the rules, "bumping" isn't allowed.

And to the OP...no no no no no!
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: Clone155 on July 03, 2009, 01:56:47 AM: Quote from: trigger2 on July 03, 2009, 01:41:27 AM
The people who don't have the time to, in this case, type "P-61 black widow" or "P-61" or "black widow" into that little box are starting to get annoying... And doing that second part, hope you enjoy PNG, read the rules, "bumping" isn't allowed.

Are you refering to rule #10? let me quote it for you.

10-"Do not punt topics. Punting would be making a non-substantive post for the express purpose of bring the thread to the top of the thread list."

If I were to add to the post "Sure why not", I would be adding a substantive post and agreeing with the thread maker.

This is were I get confused with rule # 3 though.

3-"Do not open a new thread that duplicates a current topic."

If you make a post that duplicates an old topic, is it against the rules? Because it says current

Back on topic, I agree that the P-61 would be an awsome plane to have, but sounds like it needs to be perked.
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: Shifty on July 03, 2009, 05:18:20 PM: Quote from: Guppy35 on July 03, 2009, 01:40:13 AM
And if you can't get the name right, you are not allowed to ask for it.

+1
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: 633DH98 on July 04, 2009, 09:57:29 AM: We already have the "Widowmaker" in the B-26, which could use an update.
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: TwinBoom on July 04, 2009, 10:35:16 AM: Quote from: Guppy35 on July 03, 2009, 01:40:13 AM
And if you can't get the name right, you are not allowed to ask for it.

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :x
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: Hajo on July 05, 2009, 04:11:30 PM: Someone tell him to do a search and find the correct name for the P-61 :aok
Title: Re: P-61 widow maker
Post by: AWwrgwy on July 05, 2009, 05:56:36 PM: Quote from: Hajo on July 05, 2009, 04:11:30 PM
Someone tell him to do a search and find the correct name for the P-61 :aok

Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

wrongway