Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: amariani on July 07, 2009, 08:21:16 AM
-
It would be cool if you could actualy damage a runway!
-
It'll only be cool for one side. Any dweeb with 1 or more bombs can render a small airfield useless.
IMO it would poorly affect the gameplay.
-
Search it, it's been discussed.
-
(http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm134/waystin2/nope_logo2.gif)
-
It would be cool
This reasoning keeps popping up. :huh
-
IIRC it is already modeled in the game and is possible to do, but it takes like 90,000lb of bombs to take it out, and it only stays down for a few minutes...
-
IIRC it is already modeled in the game and is possible to do, but it takes like 90,000lb of bombs to take it out, and it only stays down for a few minutes...
SSHHHH!! The little ones arnt supposed to know that!!!
-
IIRC it is already modeled in the game and is possible to do, but it takes like 90,000lb of bombs to take it out, and it only stays down for a few minutes...
Great now we are going to see hordes of squeekers setting up missions to simultaneously drop every runway in the game... :(
:noid
-
125,000lbs of bombs to kill a runway and it would only be down for one minute. Id love to see hordes a squeakers try to kill them.......more kills for me. :)
-
Great now we are going to see hordes of squeekers setting up missions to simultaneously drop every runway in the game... :(
:noid
If it's anything like mass troop drops, it would probably crash the server.
ack-ack
-
125,000lbs of bombs to kill a runway and it would only be down for one minute. Id love to see hordes a squeakers try to kill them.......more kills for me. :)
Unfortunately it wouldn't take a horde.
Just 3 formations of Lancs would do it!
System: Larry has gleefully landed 9 kills in a 190 of some sort! :rock
-
System: Larry has gleefully landed 9 kills in a 190 of some sort! :rock
Naw 110 or Il2, and only nine? I must have had a bad day. :P
-
Naw 110 or Il2, and only nine? I must have had a bad day. :P
:rofl
-
125,000lbs of bombs to kill a runway and it would only be down for one minute. Id love to see hordes a squeakers try to kill them.......more kills for me. :)
Yess but i can hear the 8 year old armchair generals now... :uhoh
<SQUEEEK> COME ON GUYS JOIN MY MISSION!! SQUEEK! WE NEED TO WIN THE WARR!! <SQUEEEK>
Thats then my brain goes like this :O
And my ears go like this :cry
-
It's the most.... wonderful time.... of. the. yearrrrrrrrr....... :rolleyes:
-
It'll only be cool for one side. Any dweeb with 1 or more bombs can render a small airfield useless.
IMO it would poorly affect the gameplay.
how do you figure that? you can take a plane off out of the hangar across the grass, or avoid the craters all together...
the only people it would be detrimental to would be those who still use automatic takeoff... boo hoo :cry
waaaayyy back craters would damage your aircraft if you drove through them at speed..
so runways were a viable target for attack, but now its better.. instead you just get a mass of low earth lancs and suicide jugs and 38s destroying all the hangars.. which is MUCH more enjoyable. :rolleyes:
-
Hey! I have that quote. :D
To the OP...
1) Did you search? *cough*no*cough*
2) Did you REALLY think through this request? *cough*no*cough*