Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: wrag on July 14, 2009, 01:03:47 PM

Title: 109G10
Post by: wrag on July 14, 2009, 01:03:47 PM: Needed or change the G6 or G14 to AS configuration..... :O :x :x :x :x
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: vonKrimm on July 14, 2009, 01:10:04 PM: didn't we have the G-10 until like six updates ago? also while their at it, change the spit5b back to the 5c model please.
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: morfiend on July 14, 2009, 01:25:25 PM: Quote from: wrag on July 14, 2009, 01:03:47 PM
Needed or change the G6 or G14 to AS configuration..... :O :x :x :x :x

:aok
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: Motherland on July 14, 2009, 01:26:48 PM: Quote from: vonKrimm on July 14, 2009, 01:10:04 PM
didn't we have the G-10 until like six updates ago?
We had an aircraft named the G-10 with performance of the K-4 and armament options of a late G series fighter.
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: Flipperk on July 14, 2009, 01:50:38 PM: Quote from: wrag on July 14, 2009, 01:03:47 PM
Needed or change the G6 or G14 to AS configuration..... :O :x :x :x :x

too many 109 variations IMHO, need to fill in the rest of the list with all their variations before the 109 list is literally half of the list.
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: wrag on July 14, 2009, 02:04:50 PM: Quote from: Flipperk on July 14, 2009, 01:50:38 PM
too many 109 variations IMHO, need to fill in the rest of the list with all their variations before the 109 list is literally half of the list.

BLASPHEMY :devil

burn the witch! :t
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: Karnak on July 14, 2009, 02:53:11 PM: We do not need the Bf109G-10. It fills literally no hole as it entered service after the Bf109K-4. We do need the Bf109G-6/AS or Bf109G-14/AS though.

Nor do we need the Spitfire Mk Vc, the Spitfire lineup is adequately covered save for possibly the Seafire L.Mk III.
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: vonKrimm on July 14, 2009, 05:08:14 PM: Quote from: Karnak on July 14, 2009, 02:53:11 PM
Nor do we need the Spitfire Mk Vc, the Spitfire lineup is adequately covered save for possibly the Seafire L.Mk III.

Such a Dweebfire H8ter you are. :D
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: slimmer on July 15, 2009, 02:58:14 AM: yes 109 G10 +1
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: Karnak on July 15, 2009, 03:16:05 AM: Quote from: slimmer on July 15, 2009, 02:58:14 AM
yes 109 G10 +1
Why?

Somebody explain why they want this useless aircraft.
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: Noir on July 15, 2009, 06:02:11 AM: Quote from: Karnak on July 15, 2009, 03:16:05 AM
Why?

Somebody explain why they want this useless aircraft.

cause their gunnery sucks, and its always easier to blame the aircraft :t
Title: Re: 109G10
Post by: redwing7 on July 15, 2009, 12:02:27 PM: 109 G10 at the national airforce museum at WPAFB
(http://i493.photobucket.com/albums/rr294/redwingsfan4/DSCI00221.jpg)