Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: newz on July 23, 2009, 06:58:51 PM

Title: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: newz on July 23, 2009, 06:58:51 PM
If you're a HO/Vultch "artist" read no further.

If you're fed up with the constant quake style play in the MA then please read on.

I'm hoping to turn part of the DA into an "honorable" furball area, until such time as
subscriber rooms(like old H2H),become available.
An area where HOing and jumping in on engaged parties is forbidden(unless said "squadie" says it's ok to gang him) .
An area where extended running is considered bad form.

I'm looking for like minded individuals who are more interested in the art of the fight
and could really care less about the "kill".
The idea is to create a DA "squad" where members know they are going into engage
other "squadies" without the slightest fear of being hoed or ganged.
We simply stake out a portion of the DA and conduct our fights there. If outsiders want to
try to ruin our fun we have options.
This would be a "squad" only in name and would have no bearing on any member outside of the DA.
The beauty of this is the built in vox and text comms that come with being in a "squad" as well as
the squad highlight option.

It's worth a try isn't it?
Simply let me know if you'd like to become part of this experiment and I'll send you an invite.



 

Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: The Fugitive on July 23, 2009, 07:18:21 PM
Until there is someone to "patrol" the griefers that will go out of their way to spoil the fun your trying to put together it will never work.

I do wish you well and hope I'm wrong. Good Luck <S>
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Strip on July 23, 2009, 07:22:57 PM
Most would just call "knock it off" if a griefer came in. I do it in the furball lake sometimes.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Vudak on July 23, 2009, 07:27:58 PM
There are usually a group of guys on, depending on the time, already doing this same thing...  If you see a cloud of people at a field, just head on over and ask politely if you can join in on the fun.  

9/10 "griefers" are just confused, and the other one aims worse than me.  Handle them with a long fuse and you'll minimize problems.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Bosco123 on July 23, 2009, 09:18:03 PM
I wouldn't matter. Same story, diffrent place. Every time some one tries something like this, some one will always come in and ruin the fight. I know what this is about, since I was there. All I can say is, don't be a hypocrite in this game. I don't know what you would call the vulch shot on you that I had a HO, because you weren't even in the air. I would have just squeezed me to pieces if that were in, in that IL2. Another thing is, if you don't like the consequences of trying up on a capped field, then don't up, come from a diffrent base and pick of the vulchers.

I don't whine about being picked (unless they asked for it)
I don't whine about being vulched, I do it, no point in it.
I don't HO, and don't like it, so I do whine about that
I try and not to gang, but there are sometimes that it just happens.

Another thing you have to realize newz is, please, PLEASE don't ever take me seriously. I don't play this game serious, and nor do I act like I'm serious. Although it may look like it, I'm just trying to get people pissed off, and it works out pretty well :)

<S>
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 23, 2009, 09:35:14 PM
If you're a HO/Vultch "artist" read no further.

If you're fed up with the constant quake style play in the MA then please read on.

I'm hoping to turn part of the DA into an "honorable" furball area, until such time as
subscriber rooms(like old H2H),become available.
An area where HOing and jumping in on engaged parties is forbidden(unless said "squadie" says it's ok to gang him) .
An area where extended running is considered bad form.

I'm looking for like minded individuals who are more interested in the art of the fight
and could really care less about the "kill".
The idea is to create a DA "squad" where members know they are going into engage
other "squadies" without the slightest fear of being hoed or ganged.
We simply stake out a portion of the DA and conduct our fights there. If outsiders want to
try to ruin our fun we have options.
This would be a "squad" only in name and would have no bearing on any member outside of the DA.
The beauty of this is the built in vox and text comms that come with being in a "squad" as well as
the squad highlight option.

It's worth a try isn't it?
Simply let me know if you'd like to become part of this experiment and I'll send you an invite.



 


you've got a nice idea there. i truly hope you're successful at it.

i'll try to pop in now and then, and play target for yas in my 38.  :aok
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Shuffler on July 24, 2009, 12:33:42 AM
Forget DA squad. DA is not for real squads. However it is a good idea as to setting up fights in there. Only problem is it is not policed. With some of the folks we have on these days it will probably be interrupted. Their idea of fun is to ruin everyone elses fun.

Good Luck Newz <S>
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: gyrene81 on July 24, 2009, 01:44:19 AM
An area where extended running is considered bad form.
I'm looking for like minded individuals who are more interested in the art of the fight
and could really care less about the "kill".

If you're talking about everyone using the exact same plane...cool.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: newz on July 24, 2009, 06:21:53 AM
I know what this is about, since I was there.
LOL if you think this thread was started due to you vultching me and then later hoing me in your mossie nice try.
Happens all the time. The final straw for me was yesterday when 3 p51s engaged my lone f4u1a and all 3 did nothing but
HO.
Forget DA squad. DA is not for real squads. However it is a good idea as to setting up fights in there.

This wouldn't be a "real" squad. Just a way for those who like to fight to be able to communicate effectively
as well as call out any potential non rule abiding tards in the sector.
If you're talking about everyone using the exact same plane...cool.
No I'm not talking about everyone in the same planes. Variety is the spice of life. :aok
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: uptown on July 24, 2009, 07:18:54 AM
You're gonna to have crappy fights in the MA, it's squeaker season afterall. I perfer the MA because of the "come as you are" no rules dogfights. Fighting from a disavantage does have it's rewards. Several times I've won situations like you discribe and that alone makes up for all the crappy fights before that.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: captain1ma on July 24, 2009, 07:32:29 AM
good luck man!!

if i come in there, you'll get nothing but an honorable fight from me!

if you want a good work out, just give JG54 a buzz!

www.ahgreenhearts.org/phpbb (http://www.ahgreenhearts.org/phpbb)
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 24, 2009, 07:42:04 AM
LOL if you think this thread was started due to you vultching me and then later hoing me in your mossie nice try.
Happens all the time. The final straw for me was yesterday when 3 p51s engaged my lone f4u1a and all 3 did nothing but
HO.  



sometimes this can be fun though.

last year, the squad i was in was messing with me. some of them were on another country. i engaged a low190(me in zeek), and next i knew, there were 4 or 5 on me. all of em tried ho'ing any chance they got. i didn't get any of em, but that fight lasted almost 3 minutes till one of em got me. i did smoke the 190 though.
 ironically, the one that got me, didn't get me from a ho, but rather from a rather nice deflection shot. my heart was goin a mile a minute after that fight.  :aok
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Helm on July 24, 2009, 08:21:38 AM
NEWS FLASH: ....HO's actually occurred in WW2!!!! ....get over it


They are mentioned in account after account by WW2 aviators ...from all nations ...in all time periods

......stop whining about HO's  ....that horse is was beat to death 9 years ago ....maybe trying searching the topic???

you would be well advised to follow the advice of boxing referee's ....."Defend yourself at all times"

The "HO" topic is D.O.A.



Helm ...out
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Vudak on July 24, 2009, 08:26:41 AM
Once again, this is already going on...  Just come into the DA, look for people you recognize, and ask what's up.  Sometimes they'll all be in the same plane, other times it'll be any plane, and still others you'll find them fighting 2+v2+...

By all means, join in :aok
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Saurdaukar on July 24, 2009, 08:32:07 AM
You can not legislate social behavior.

The majority of the player base is, unfortunately, populated by twits.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 24, 2009, 08:34:35 AM
NEWS FLASH: ....HO's actually occurred in WW2!!!! ....get over it


They are mentioned in account after account by WW2 aviators ...from all nations ...in all time periods

......stop whining about HO's  ....that horse is was beat to death 9 years ago ....maybe trying searching the topic???

you would be well advised to follow the advice of boxing referee's ....."Defend yourself at all times"

The "HO" topic is D.O.A.



Helm ...out

he's trying to do something to make his gameplay better. let the dude try.

Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: lazydog on July 24, 2009, 08:44:32 AM
easy solution to the HO........MOVE
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 24, 2009, 08:50:29 AM
easy solution to the HO........MOVE

well.......we're ALWAYS moving......generally on the merge, at about 300-400mph cartoon speed.  :x :rofl
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Reaper90 on July 24, 2009, 08:59:51 AM
NEWS FLASH: ....HO's actually occurred in WW2!!!! ....get over it


They are mentioned in account after account by WW2 aviators ...from all nations ...in all time periods

......stop whining about HO's  ....that horse is was beat to death 9 years ago ....maybe trying searching the topic???

you would be well advised to follow the advice of boxing referee's ....."Defend yourself at all times"

The "HO" topic is D.O.A.



Helm ...out

Yeh, so did becoming a POW... so hopefully next time you get shot down near an enemy base and the text bar says "you have been captured," you'll be a POW for the next 4+ years, and we'll have one less HOer effing up gameplay til about 2013 or so.  :)
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Anodizer on July 24, 2009, 09:59:16 AM
Yeh, so did becoming a POW... so hopefully next time you get shot down near an enemy base and the text bar says "you have been captured," you'll be a POW for the next 4+ years, and we'll have one less HOer effing up gameplay til about 2013 or so.  :)

Wow!  LoL I think that's one of the best comments I've seen in a long time..... :lol
Up The Irons!!  <S>
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Shuffler on July 24, 2009, 10:03:11 AM
This wouldn't be a "real" squad. Just a way for those who like to fight to be able to communicate effectively
as well as call out any potential non rule abiding tards in the sector.

Could work..... can't hurt to try.


........ JG54.........

 :rofl
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Dinan on July 24, 2009, 11:55:41 AM
How come we don't see you in the MW anymore snuffler?
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Anaxogoras on July 24, 2009, 12:07:01 PM
Half the reason why someone can even come up with the question "does MA gameplay got you down?" is because they play too much.  I know I've totally overdone it in the past, but I enjoy the time I fly a lot more by only flying about twice a week.  Yes, there's lots of lame crap in the arenas, but everyone's notion of what's fun in a free-for-all arena is different.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 24, 2009, 12:12:41 PM
How come we don't see you in the MW anymore snuffler?
i see him in there quite a bit. in fact, he was just helping me the other day.

 good guy.......i hadn't asked for help, and recieved it anyway......which is awsome. he was in perfect position to steal my kill, should he have desired. he didn't he covered my arse, and gave me a few tips here n there. kinda like "coaching" me.

 i'd wing up with shuffler any time that he'd have me.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Shuffler on July 24, 2009, 02:24:14 PM
How come we don't see you in the MW anymore snuffler?

Fly in MW some. Too much dweebery as of late. I flew LW mostly last month because MW fights have gone downhill a bit.



Cap is welcome on my wing anytime or I'll be his wing.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Wolfala on July 24, 2009, 02:49:44 PM
 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,267269
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: lazydog on July 24, 2009, 03:04:26 PM
Quote from: Shuffler link=topic=269525.msg3369917#msg3369917 date=124846

[hr

Cap is welcome on my wing anytime or I'll be his wing.
ok CAP your up left or right ankle
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Shuffler on July 24, 2009, 03:07:17 PM
ok CAP your up left or right ankle

 :rofl   :P
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Helm on July 24, 2009, 06:48:01 PM
Yeh, so did becoming a POW... so hopefully next time you get shot down near an enemy base and the text bar says "you have been captured," you'll be a POW for the next 4+ years, and we'll have one less HOer effing up gameplay til about 2013 or so.  :)

another clueless noob  ....12 on 12 gun solutions are a fact of life ....get over it ....If you had any skills at all you would realise how to beat sombody going for a HO ....It is not hard at all  ....I'm sure it will take you to 2013 to figure it out .   :lol


Helm ...out
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 24, 2009, 06:50:13 PM
ok CAP your up left or right ankle


 :noid :rofl
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 24, 2009, 06:53:00 PM
another clueless noob  ....12 on 12 gun solutions are a fact of life ....get over it ....If you had any skills at all you would realise how to beat sombody going for a HO ....It is not hard at all  ....I'm sure it will take you to 2013 to figure it out .   :lol


Helm ...out

hhmm........that leads to a good idea.

why don't you have a clinic in the Ta on basic ho avoidance?

follow that up with advanced ho avoidance, and taking advantage of the bad position that the ho'er put himself in.


it would be helpful to a lot of us that have(according to you) absolutely no skillz.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Helm on July 24, 2009, 07:08:35 PM
hhmm........that leads to a good idea.

why don't you have a clinic in the Ta on basic ho avoidance?

follow that up with advanced ho avoidance, and taking advantage of the bad position that the ho'er put himself in.


it would be helpful to a lot of us that have(according to you) absolutely no skillz.


haha ...you joking  right? ...avoiding a HO is very easy ....you really need a manual? ....and by the way ....I didn't mention your name at all ...was responding to someone telling me to be a POW for 4 years ...you might want to improve your reading comprehension ..

Helm...out
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 24, 2009, 07:19:08 PM

haha ...you joking  right? ...avoiding a HO is very easy ....you really need a manual? ....and by the way ....I didn't mention your name at all ...was responding to someone telling me to be a POW for 4 years ...you might want to improve your reading comprehension ..

Helm...out

i know.


you sound as if you forget what it's like to be new here though. the majority of the ho'ers i come across are vets. i've very rarely ever been ho'd by a noob. they'll have no clue how to avoid it.
 i'm only average....probably on the low side of that.....and i'm maybe 50-50 avoiding it. i fly the 38 a lot, and i've been picking my fights differently. in a furball......well, they're expected, as ya take what ya can get. in a 1-1? not so much. i wa in a fight with llgaf. he was 1 vs many. really only i was chasing him. never once did he even come close to trying a ho. he was in it for the right reason. he was having fun(i think).
 i'm finally starting to pick up who the "other guy" might be based on what he's flying, and how he merges. i then know whether or not to expect it.

 the other thing you have to remember, is that there's guys that seemingly practice nothing but ho's. they seem prepared for any avoidance maneuver you may try. then of course, they'll claim it wasn't, because you didn't have a guns solution.

 me personally? i'll do it if it's done to me. i'll do it if i'm outnumbered. i want a fight. i don't just want to see hit sprites, then a big boom as you blow up. if i only wanted that, i'd fly something with new jets where i could engage BVR.

on the other hand....it could be fun to know that the guy that likes his realism is getting zapped by a tens or something as his plane is getting shot. or since he wants it, he doesn't have to be a pow.....he can spend the night making his way back to friendly territory.  :D
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: newz on July 24, 2009, 07:48:29 PM
I perfer the MA because of the "come as you are" 
Who doesn't?
That's exactly what I'm trying to promote....a "come as you are" mentality. :aok

Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: j500ss on July 24, 2009, 07:49:57 PM
Beating a HO, hmmmmm,  not real tough, but as CAP says, not exactly easy either. In my experiences, beating a " any given angle frontal shot" damn near impossible. Especially from the " more seasoned sticks" as it were.   :furious

Heres a thread where the OP actually has a legit idea, wants to make the effort to provide something positive to the "game players" and the best, the majority who have posted have is, " Oh thats a terrible idea"  :( . It'll never work,   suppose someone told Wilber and Orville that?  Man, what if they would have listened   :huh

Maybe the bigger problem with the game ( and according to many there is a problem ) isn't the people, but maybe their attitudes!

Newz, I like the idea, not sure the DA is the place, but ya know what? NO ONE! will know for sure until it is tried, so by all means I say go for it. And yea I'll give it a go, what do I have to lose?  Thats right NADA!!!!

 :salute
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: newz on July 24, 2009, 08:52:11 PM

The "HO" topic is D.O.A.

Thanks for the tip!
I'm only interested in communicating with other like minded individuals who are looking
for solutions within the framework HTC has provided. If you had read you would have seen
that it is not "just another HO whine thread".

It attempt's to offer a solution.

To the folk who have offered well wishes and <S>s, thanks! <S>
Could work..... can't hurt to try.
Thanks Shuffler, I think I might have to do a little more explaining before some folk'l come around.
For example, I'm confident we can find 28 people in this community who do not need policing.
They know to log on and fly for lower number side.
They subscribe to the theory... if in doubt about ho? ....guns cold and go around.
Simple, plain, common sense.
I should probably expand on this in the "squad area" but who would read it?
This is more an attempt to create a H2H room in the DA.
Any helpful suggestions from any interested parties are welcome.



Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Guppy35 on July 24, 2009, 08:59:08 PM
NEWS FLASH: ....HO's actually occurred in WW2!!!! ....get over it


They are mentioned in account after account by WW2 aviators ...from all nations ...in all time periods

......stop whining about HO's  ....that horse is was beat to death 9 years ago ....maybe trying searching the topic???

you would be well advised to follow the advice of boxing referee's ....."Defend yourself at all times"

The "HO" topic is D.O.A.

Helm ...out

News Flash.  People risked really dying when they took a HO shot in WW2 as well.  Not a factor here, so the 'it happened in WW2" excuse comes up short.  It's not a justification for using it in AH.  In a one life event, go for it.  But when your life doesn't matter and you get a new plane if you miss, its just an easy way out of actually working for the shot
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: R 105 on July 24, 2009, 10:04:22 PM
A HO is the John Wayne merge face to face guns blazing.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: newz on July 24, 2009, 10:19:50 PM
Half the reason why someone can even come up with the question "does MA gameplay got you down?" is because they play too much. 
Exactly the opposite. I'm finding I log on less and less and for shorter duration. :uhoh
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Anaxogoras on July 24, 2009, 11:31:46 PM
Yeah, but I looked at your stats, and you've spent more than 24 hours in the late war main arena this month (I didn't check other arenas).  Despite the insane number of hours we spend playing AH, that's still a lot when you compare it to other hobbies you might have.  As you state, this is less time than what you usually spend playing the game, so to me it's no wonder that you're burnt out.

Since I've cut my AH time way back from what it used to be, the ho'ing, ganging and other crap just doesn't bother me that much.  It's there, but I laugh at it or shrug it off much more easily than I used to.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 24, 2009, 11:43:27 PM
ok, here's the deal.


i was one of the ones that was guilty of taking this too seriously. waaayyy too seriously.

 then my sciatica flared up. it was bad this time 'round. really bad. at one point, i couldn't work for more than 15-20 minutes at a time, and then i had to lay on the floor to let everything "unknot". this went on for almost two full months.
 the little time i was able to get in here, this game helped me forget that pain. even if it was only 1/2 hour.

 as it started easing off, my toe got infected.....so here i am, just about back to normal, and WHAMO!! another knockdown punch. now i could hardly walk, it was so bad. got that handled last night at the docs office....as mentioned in that thread i was trying to kill.

 my point? although relatively minor, compared to problems others have, these 2 things almost brought me to a halt. they showed me what i SHOULD be worried about. real life. that's why i'm able to laugh at them now.(the doc asked me"do you REALLY want to take a picture of that?", and laughed his arse off when i said yes.) that's why i come in the game, and do whatever makes it fun for me. i don't worry about what anyone else thinks i should be doing, or what anyone else wants me to do. if what i'm being asked to do sounds fun, then i'll do it...otherwise, i'll continue doing what i was.


 so.....newz.......you do what you want. you're trying to make things better...even if it's only one little part. don't give up. come to mw sometime. don't worry about the naysayers. ignore them, and do whatever makes this game fun for you.

 :aok  :salute
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: lazydog on July 25, 2009, 08:29:16 AM
newz if this gets off the ground i'm IN sounds like fun........CAP your always talking about furballs in midwar ......news flash those are far from furballs your calling a base take with a few uppers and you guys picking them off that's called VULCHING big difference remember i flew with the knits since the split and ya i do know the way they do things and that is 1 of the reasons i switched  ........and avoiding the HO yes it is easy to avoid 9 out of 10 times can be done no problem  :salute
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 25, 2009, 08:38:27 AM
newz if this gets off the ground i'm IN sounds like fun........CAP your always talking about furballs in midwar ......news flash those are far from furballs your calling a base take with a few uppers and you guys picking them off that's called VULCHING big difference remember i flew with the knits since the split and ya i do know the way they do things and that is 1 of the reasons i switched  ........and avoiding the HO yes it is easy to avoid 9 out of 10 times can be done no problem  :salute
noooooooo........furballs are where there's lots of enemy, and lots of friendlies. they do happen. if i can't find one against the knights, then i go join one between the rooks n bish.

 and FYI......i don't vulch, although i HAVE been vulched many many times.  :aok
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: RipChord929 on July 25, 2009, 08:39:13 AM
Exactly the opposite. I'm finding I log on less and less and for shorter duration. :uhoh


Yep, I logon hardly at all anymore... For a while it was fun to be a single guy and deny the base capture to a gaggle of 10..
But being pummeled constantly gets to be a drag after a while too..
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: lazydog on July 25, 2009, 08:50:59 AM
sorry over this not hijacking newz post anymore ..........
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: trigger2 on July 25, 2009, 10:20:54 AM
NEWS FLASH: ....HO's actually occurred in WW2!!!! ....get over it

Although it is reported all over during WWII, it wasn't apart of the "how you engage" for anyone other than the AVG.
So honestly, I don't care if you HO, as long as you keep it accurate.
P-40
a6m
ki
b5n

Good luck.  :aok
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: The Fugitive on July 25, 2009, 10:44:35 AM
NEWS FLASH: ....HO's actually occurred in WW2!!!! ....get over it


They are mentioned in account after account by WW2 aviators ...from all nations ...in all time periods

......stop whining about HO's  ....that horse is was beat to death 9 years ago ....maybe trying searching the topic???

you would be well advised to follow the advice of boxing referee's ....."Defend yourself at all times"

The "HO" topic is D.O.A.



Helm ...out



NEWS FLASH !  THIS ISN'T WW2 !!   :rolleyes:

To me, and I hope to many others, this is a flight sim game. The idea is to fly in accurately model WW2 aircraft to engage in air combat with other players. A HO is not COMBAT, its a crap shoot. Anyone that HOs should be ridiculed until they stop, or quit the game. Anyone who condones, or encourages the HO lives by the HO themselves and should also be branded a skilless fool.

Of course I might be going a bit over board, but the "community" has it well in its power to to stop this foolishness and increase the quality of the fights. Years ago in a game far, far away (AWIII) after a kill was recorded the majority of the players would post a "kill macro" in the text buffers. These were short, individual comments. Most were very funny, and all were identifiable to the player that posted them. When AW was killed and the mass move to AH happened it was frowned on here to have a macro. It was considered "childish" by a more serious community. How often do you see a macro these days?
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: NCLawman on July 25, 2009, 11:10:00 AM
If you're a HO/Vultch "artist" read no further.

I'm hoping to turn part of the DA into an "honorable" furball area, until such time as
subscriber rooms(like old H2H),become available. An area where HOing and jumping in
on engaged parties is forbidden(unless said "squadie" says it's ok to gang him) .
An area where extended running is considered bad form.

The idea is to create a DA "squad" where members know they are going into engage
other "squadies" without the slightest fear of being hoed or ganged.

We simply stake out a portion of the DA and conduct our fights there. If outsiders want to
try to ruin our fun we have options.


Please forgive my misunderstanding, this is not meant to be a slam or a smartazz remark.....  When you say you want a furball area, but are only interested in one-on-one for the fights, I get a bit confused.

I think I get that you want to have a group of people flying in the area so that you can then mutually engage in one-on-one or 2-2 combat.  But isn't that what the DA already is?  It is my understanding that the DA is strictly for people who have pre-arranged fights with each other.  I thought it was already bad form to randomly engage a target in the DA (all though admittedly, I do not spend much time in the DA).  So, as it sounds, you are essentially trying to re-invent the wheel when all it really takes that one person to ask the random idiot who is not following the basic understanding, to NOT engage or find somewhere else to pick.

By calling it a "furball area" that generally constitutes a gaggle of planes in a quasi free-for-all.  In a furball, one is expected to engage targets in a target rich environment -- that is what a furball is.  But I do see your point in cutting vulches and worse --- the cheap shot HO (i.e. wait till the opponent is low and slow with or finishing another enemy, then diving in and HOing him/her down.  To me there is nothing worse than, and no excuse for, the plane with the advantage going for a HO).

If I have misunderstood your post, please forgive me.  I think you have a good idea, but I don't see how what you are asking is any different than the DA already is.  <salute>



Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Reaper90 on July 25, 2009, 07:58:43 PM
another clueless noob  ....12 on 12 gun solutions are a fact of life ....get over it ....If you had any skills at all you would realise how to beat sombody going for a HO ....It is not hard at all  ....I'm sure it will take you to 2013 to figure it out .   :lol


Sorry to burst your bubble, but this 'clueless noob' already knows how to avoid the HO, and does so about 90% of the time. Your sad attempt at an insult doesn't change the fact that 1)your weak rationalization for a pretty crappy form of gameplay "they did it in WWII" doesn't hold water, 2)it sucks that HOers will purposefully try to HO as a means to an easy kill, and run instead of turning to engage when it doesn't work, and 3)you're being a real pr!ck for coming into newz's thread and crapping on his idea. Thanks for setting us all straight oh exalted uber Helm.  :huh

I'm with Fugative. Intentional HOers should be publicly ridiculed and shunned.

The only thing worse than a HOer is a veteran HOer that whines on 200 when he gets a face full of lead from somebody that shoots back, whom he just tried to HO. Happened just a couple days ago to me, with someone whom I understand is a very veteran Rook. We were merging head on, and I immediately put my finger on the trigger and zoomed my gunsite, just to see if he would squeeze. Sure enough, his guns lit up, I kicked the rudder and then kicked it back and fired back, and killed him. He IMMEDIATELY went on a rant on 200, calling me noob and BS and all sorts of crap. All cause his attempt at a HO got him killed. :rofl

Helm, if you love the HO, more power to ya, bud. It's your $15. If you don't want to read another "HO whine thread" where everyone agrees HOers are worthless piles of excrament, don't click on the thread, man. Just move along. :)

/thread hijack off

Newz, do it man. I don't frequent the DA since I prefer to wing with my squaddies, but your plan can only serve to help improve the environment even if it's justa tiny amount. Every bit helps.  :aok
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: slyguy on July 25, 2009, 11:44:04 PM
To the OP, this is one fantastic idea.  This will be a great way to get the "fencing" crowd out of the war where all they seem to do is blow CV positions and get them killed, pork no bases, run no supplies, carry no troops, bomb no GVs, kill no town.  They take part in 1/10th of the game in the arean and act like they own it and everyone else is wasting their time.  Pathetic bunch.

Good riddance.  Score the DA while you're at it HTC and bring back H2H.  That will keep the score dweebs and the "fencers" out of the war as well.  They can "touche" and <S> until the cows come home.  Two birds with one stone.

Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: jododger on July 26, 2009, 12:21:09 AM
To the OP, this is one fantastic idea.  This will be a great way to get the "fencing" crowd out of the war where all they seem to do is blow CV positions and get them killed, pork no bases, run no supplies, carry no troops, bomb no GVs, kill no town.  They take part in 1/10th of the game in the arean and act like they own it and everyone else is wasting their time.  Pathetic bunch.

Good riddance.  Score the DA while you're at it HTC and bring back H2H.  That will keep the score dweebs and the "fencers" out of the war as well.  They can "touche" and <S> until the cows come home.  Two birds with one stone.


I'm late to this post, but at some point don't people have to fight??
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: SIK1 on July 26, 2009, 01:33:49 AM
I'm late to this post, but at some point don't people have to fight??


No, some just sneak around taking undefended bases and running away at the first sign of opposition. Others enjoy flying with 40 or 50 of their closest friends so they can fight over who stole who's kill.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: stodd on July 26, 2009, 02:05:29 AM
Good idea Newz ill join.  :aok

Also Helm's meltdown is funny. :lol
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: newz on July 26, 2009, 11:01:33 AM
Please forgive my misunderstanding, this is not meant to be a slam or a smartazz remark..... 
Not at all. In fact your post shows that I haven't explained well enough. Perhaps if I had
called it a "controlled furball" it would have hit closer to the mark.
Let's say 6 guys have decided to try this experiment. The 2 opposing groups gain visual on each other.
Guys in the center engage, guys to the east engage, and guys to the west engage. For clarity let's say
they have chosen to fight from rook and knight bases. We'll call the "rook" players R1,R2, and R3, and the
"knit" players K1,K2, and K3. R1 shoots down K1 and K3 shoots down R3. R1 and K3 are now free to engage
one another. Meanwhile K1 and R3 are back ib to engage who ever happens to be free when they get there.
Hopes this helps a little.
The idea is to try and create a more dynamic feel to the fights where combatants
may be in different aircraft and at different e states rather than the standard 1v1 DA encounter.
<S>
To the OP, this is one fantastic idea.  This will be a great way to get the "fencing" crowd out of the war where all they seem to do is blow CV positions and get them killed, pork no bases, run no supplies, carry no troops, bomb no GVs, kill no town.  They take part in 1/10th of the game in the arean and act like they own it and everyone else is wasting their time.  Pathetic bunch.

Good riddance.  Score the DA while you're at it HTC and bring back H2H.  That will keep the score dweebs and the "fencers" out of the war as well.  They can "touche" and <S> until the cows come home.  Two birds with one stone.
Wow you must really despise guys like me who couldn't care less if the "war" is won LOL. You're right I don't carry ords, pork fields, kill towns ect. For the most part I'm only here to engage
in Air to Air combat. Yep, how pathetic of me  :rolleyes:. While I'm all for HTC bringing back H2H for subscribers you can kindly keep score out of the DA. It only leads to timid flying, HOing, and
vultching.

Sounds like there is some interest in giving this experiment a try so I'll go ahead and write up a manifesto (may take couple of days to get the wording just right) and post in the squad area.
Stodd and lazydog keep an eye out for it, glad to hear you're interested! :aok

Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Shuffler on July 26, 2009, 11:34:27 AM
To the OP, this is one fantastic idea.  This will be a great way to get the "fencing" crowd out of the war where all they seem to do is blow CV positions and get them killed, pork no bases, run no supplies, carry no troops, bomb no GVs, kill no town.  They take part in 1/10th of the game in the arean and act like they own it and everyone else is wasting their time.  Pathetic bunch.

Good riddance.  Score the DA while you're at it HTC and bring back H2H.  That will keep the score dweebs and the "fencers" out of the war as well.  They can "touche" and <S> until the cows come home.  Two birds with one stone.



This guy is a member of the 10% club or as we refer to them... "Dirt Farmers".
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Helm on July 26, 2009, 11:34:47 AM
I do not advocate using HO's at all ....In actuality since I don't give HO's 97% of the time...... I  am not very good at giving them ......mostly because have so little practice doing them.  I don't think I fired on 12 on 12 gun solution the first 5 years i was here ...i guess because i bought into the "hype" over it

.....but now If I'm being engaged by 3 or more planes that are continuously HO'ing me I may eventually shoot back.....


I am frankly tired of the endless belly aching about HO's ...here's a few reasons why:

1) at least 30% of what many folks say is a HO is in fact a front 1/4 shot ...I have seen many many great pilots accused of a HO ...once I watched the film I would see that the pilot hit a nice front 1/4 shot .... yet he was accused ....lame

2)  I don't not find avoiding a HO and turning the situation to my advantages that difficult.  If the opposing pilot goes for a true HO ..and fully commits to the HO, they generally put them self at a disadvantage coming out of that merge.   So why is there so much complaining?

3)   I had to actually listen to a HO whine BEFORE I even joined ACES HIGH.  I played Air Warrior....EA bought gamestorm and Air Warrior had the stench of death on it.  I realised that I need to find a new game to go to, so I began looking around.  It turns out one of my Air Warrior squaddies had tried a brand new game called Aces High.  Quite excitedly I asked about it,  hoping to hear about improved flight models ...better graphics ....etc etc...here is what I got.... and I quote:   "...yeah it looks nice ...but all anyone does is HO you and kill you with rockets"   I had not even joined the game, and somebody was allready complaining to me about HO's!!
  If I had listened to that bozo I would not even be here! ....the real truth is I Rarely get HO'd and in 8+ years here I have NEVER been shot down by a rocket.

4)   Air Warrior had a limiter built in that did not allow you to fire in a 12 on 12 gun solution.....having played there for 5 years I can assure it was lame.  All anyone had to do was turn 12 on 12 and you were as safe as being in your mother's arms.... You would look the other plane right in the face and absolutely nothing could happen to you ...LAME ......people would fly right through you  having no fear what so ever ....continuous stalemating ...wow ...what fun that was!
  ....of course eventually the better pilot/plane would eventually get the advantage .....but you would have to endure this 12 on 12 no shooting crap for many  many many merges ....I went though this day after day ...i can assure you it was not that much fun .....If a pilot/plane of equal skill engages you you could have 30+ 12 on 12 merges ...eventually fuel got low and you disengaged ....wow ...what fun!! ...not really.
    For me I find 12 on 12 gun solutions in here much more exciting.  What goes through your mind at the time? ..."will he shoot"? ...."wont he shoot"? ...."should I shoot" ? ...."should I not shoot"? These are far more exciting and interesting choices then safely 12 on 12 each other with no threat what so ever.  Just the fact that a possible HO could happen forces you to be on your toes...and isn't that more fun/interesting? ...for me it is

5)   When ever I bring up HO's existing in real life combat situations I allways hear the Following: ...."Helm you don't have a real life to lose in here" ....that certainly is true,  but that same logic could be applied every situation in here ....you have a 200mile RTB ahead of you ...over open ocean ...with no hope of rescue ...are you really gonna firewall your throttles in real life? ...or are you going to baby that engine/engines and watch over them like nervous  Virgin on her first date? Your plane is on fire and you continue flying to get the kill? ...not in real life you aint.... yet in here it happens routinely.  In real life you are going to up at that camped spawn point? ....I think not.
  The fact is this many folks define this game in different ways. To some its a simulator to others it's a game.  Where some folks draw the line seems to upset many people.  I define this game as being the closest approximation simulation of Air To Air combat available.... based upon the limitations of computers...players abilities ...training ...free time etc etc.  I also define Air Combat as a 12 on 12 gun solution being just as real as a 12 on 6 solution ....you can't just make it disappear just because you find it unchivalrous.  If you truly feel this way ..then don't shoot ....i did it for years...and in 97% of the situations I find myself in today I still don't shoot.  Anyone who has encounters me in air can attest to this.
   If this is truly just a "Game" ...then why do we have to bother with landing? ...wouldn't it be more fun just to fly through a Super Mario brothers "power up" and get ammo ...fuel... repairs? ...this would give the furballers much more air time ....instead wasting time flying back to some base? ....for me I prefer the simulation aspect of landing.....maybe you would enjoy the "Game" part better? ...once again its how YOU define it.

6)  "All he/she can do is HO" ...I hear this one allot ....truthfully if this is my opponents  main and only skill ...I have little to fear from this person.  So whats the big deal??

7)  "Helm this isn't a War" ...or "This is not World War 2" ....I hear these allot ....once again it boils down to how you define what we do here.  We have naval forces engaging each other ...bombarding towns ...bases ...air fields....factory's ...lauching invasions.....we have planes killing each other ...bombing targets of opportunity ...strafing air Fields ....we have ground vehicles engaging each other ... blowing up towns...factory's ...airfields....and killing planes ... ...we have paratroopers capturing territory etc etc ....this sure sounds like a War to me? ...it sure ain't "Chutes and Ladders"!!
  "This isn't WW 2" .....well if it's not WW2?.. then HTC sure seems to think it is ...just look at the criteria for introducing planes Vehicles into the game? .....It's all based on WW2 .....of course this is not WW2 ...it is a simulation of WW2 based upon the limitations of Computers  .....player base ....training ....free time ...etc etc. ...but it is an attempt to simulate   WW2 based upon these real world limitations.  Once again how do you define Aces High?  If my definition is different then yours...so what.  

8 )  After careful examination I see no mention of the HO's in the games manual.....nor do I see any mention that they are bad form? ...or illegal .....the rule is the same for all ...so it is a level playing field for all. So whats the big deal?  If you define Aces high as a "Game" then whats the big deal if you die anyway?  ...planes are free
    

   In closing I say this:  The real issue is where YOU the player define this game? ...is it a simulation? ...is it game?  If Aces High is a simulation of Air to Air combat,  and the 12 on 12 gun solution exists in real combat,  then it has a proper place in here.  In no way do I advocate HO'ing people, but nor do I deride people who do.  It is just part of the equation.
  If you consider this a "game" then maybe HO's have no place here? ...but if it truly is a "game" then I want to shoot down your Donkey Kong with a Tie Fighter while sinking your battleship..and hopefully you will bail out on Park place where i have 2 Hotels!



Helm ...out
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Wreked on July 26, 2009, 11:48:50 AM

.............. You're right I don't carry ords, pork fields, kill towns ect. For the most part I'm only here to engage
in Air to Air combat.

Well IMHO what would seem to fill the bill for this sort of arcade style play is an arena without anything in it other than a bit of terrain graphics - no acks - no bases - no cv's etc etc - not required and as stated of no interest to you - shouldn't be a problem and if it makes you all happy why not.

... AIR STARTS - say at 7-10k - about 10 miles apart ( 2 only) - no need for more sides is there really? why spend time having to take off and get up to any sort of altitude other than "fighting" altitude. No fuel - you fight till you are killed - no score.

you would only want fighters in it - no ordanance other than unlimited gun ammunition -no buffs - no troopers/supply craft - no GV's of course.

Just straight "line em up and lets charge" style of combat

If THIS is what is needed to quiet the "my way is best" insults and rudeness that seems to go on from both sides of the arcade vs historical styles of play then I'm all for it. This will make a place for each - those who play to "fight only"  and the rest who see value in it's a  "diversity of play".

...works for me - have at it eh!


***note - don't forget - sheep LIE!!
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 26, 2009, 01:41:53 PM
Sorry to burst your bubble, but this 'clueless noob' already knows how to avoid the HO, and does so about 90% of the time. Your sad attempt at an insult doesn't change the fact that 1)your weak rationalization for a pretty crappy form of gameplay "they did it in WWII" doesn't hold water, 2)it sucks that HOers will purposefully try to HO as a means to an easy kill, and run instead of turning to engage when it doesn't work, and 3)you're being a real pr!ck for coming into newz's thread and crapping on his idea. Thanks for setting us all straight oh exalted uber Helm.  :huh

I'm with Fugative. Intentional HOers should be publicly ridiculed and shunned.

The only thing worse than a HOer is a veteran HOer that whines on 200 when he gets a face full of lead from somebody that shoots back, whom he just tried to HO. Happened just a couple days ago to me, with someone whom I understand is a very veteran Rook. We were merging head on, and I immediately put my finger on the trigger and zoomed my gunsite, just to see if he would squeeze. Sure enough, his guns lit up, I kicked the rudder and then kicked it back and fired back, and killed him. He IMMEDIATELY went on a rant on 200, calling me noob and BS and all sorts of crap. All cause his attempt at a HO got him killed. :rofl

Helm, if you love the HO, more power to ya, bud. It's your $15. If you don't want to read another "HO whine thread" where everyone agrees HOers are worthless piles of excrament, don't click on the thread, man. Just move along. :)

/thread hijack off

Newz, do it man. I don't frequent the DA since I prefer to wing with my squaddies, but your plan can only serve to help improve the environment even if it's justa tiny amount. Every bit helps.  :aok

so then does that mean i should mention lofty, and pat1961 here? oo..and myself, as after they both tried to ho me at once(i think pat tagged me), then the spit ho'd me a second time, i did as i said i do, and ho'd back.
 :D
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 26, 2009, 01:45:45 PM
To the OP, this is one fantastic idea.  This will be a great way to get the "fencing" crowd out of the war where all they seem to do is blow CV positions and get them killed, pork no bases,carrying ords makes my already heave p38 even heavier.  run no supplies,can't run supplies in a p38. carry no troops,can't carry troops in a p38 either....besides, they drink all the booze.  bomb no GVs,why would i want to ruin someone's fun in a good gv battle...besides...bombs make the p38 too heavy.  kill no town.  They take part in 1/10th of the game in the arean and act like they own it and everyone else is wasting their time.  Pathetic bunch.no, we don't think everyone else is wasting their time. most of us are in there for fun. we don;'t worry about how others have their fun. although you seem to spend a lot of time worrying about that.

Good riddance.  Score the DA while you're at it HTC and bring back H2H.  That will keep the score dweebs and the "fencers" out of the war as well.  They can "touche" and <S> until the cows come home.  Two birds with one stone.



 :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 26, 2009, 01:46:33 PM
I'm late to this post, but at some point don't people have to fight??
no
what they'll do, is to come at a base. any signs of resistance, they go to another one.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 26, 2009, 01:50:22 PM
I do not advocate using HO's at all ....In actuality since I don't give HO's 97% of the time...... I  am not very good at giving them ......mostly because have so little practice doing them.  I don't think I fired on 12 on 12 gun solution the first 5 years i was here ...i guess because i bought into the "hype" over it

.....but now If I'm being engaged by 3 or more planes that are continuously HO'ing me I may eventually shoot back.....


I am frankly tired of the endless belly aching about HO's ...here's a few reasons why:

1) at least 30% of what many folks say is a HO is in fact a front 1/4 shot ...I have seen many many great pilots accused of a HO ...once I watched the film I would see that the pilot hit a nice front 1/4 shot .... yet he was accused ....lame

2)  I don't not find avoiding a HO and turning the situation to my advantages that difficult.  If the opposing pilot goes for a true HO ..and fully commits to the HO, they generally put them self at a disadvantage coming out of that merge.   So why is there so much complaining?

3)   I had to actually listen to a HO whine BEFORE I even joined ACES HIGH.  I played Air Warrior....EA bought gamestorm and Air Warrior had the stench of death on it.  I realised that I need to find a new game to go to, so I began looking around.  It turns out one of my Air Warrior squaddies had tried a brand new game called Aces High.  Quite excitedly I asked about it,  hoping to hear about improved flight models ...better graphics ....etc etc...here is what I got.... and I quote:   "...yeah it looks nice ...but all anyone does is HO you and kill you with rockets"   I had not even joined the game, and somebody was allready complaining to me about HO's!!
  If I had listened to that bozo I would not even be here! ....the real truth is I Rarely get HO'd and in 8+ years here I have NEVER been shot down by a rocket.

4)   Air Warrior had a limiter built in that did not allow you to fire in a 12 on 12 gun solution.....having played there for 5 years I can assure it was lame.  All anyone had to do was turn 12 on 12 and you were as safe as being in your mother's arms.... You would look the other plane right in the face and absolutely nothing could happen to you ...LAME ......people would fly right through you  having no fear what so ever ....continuous stalemating ...wow ...what fun that was!
  ....of course eventually the better pilot/plane would eventually get the advantage .....but you would have to endure this 12 on 12 no shooting crap for many  many many merges ....I went though this day after day ...i can assure you it was not that much fun .....If a pilot/plane of equal skill engages you you could have 30+ 12 on 12 merges ...eventually fuel got low and you disengaged ....wow ...what fun!! ...not really.
    For me I find 12 on 12 gun solutions in here much more exciting.  What goes through your mind at the time? ..."will he shoot"? ...."wont he shoot"? ...."should I shoot" ? ...."should I not shoot"? These are far more exciting and interesting choices then safely 12 on 12 each other with no threat what so ever.  Just the fact that a possible HO could happen forces you to be on your toes...and isn't that more fun/interesting? ...for me it is

5)   When ever I bring up HO's existing in real life combat situations I allways hear the Following: ...."Helm you don't have a real life to lose in here" ....that certainly is true,  but that same logic could be applied every situation in here ....you have a 200mile RTB ahead of you ...over open ocean ...with no hope of rescue ...are you really gonna firewall your throttles in real life? ...or are you going to baby that engine/engines and watch over them like nervous  Virgin on her first date? Your plane is on fire and you continue flying to get the kill? ...not in real life you aint.... yet in here it happens routinely.  In real life you are going to up at that camped spawn point? ....I think not.
  The fact is this many folks define this game in different ways. To some its a simulator to others it's a game.  Where some folks draw the line seems to upset many people.  I define this game as being the closest approximation simulation of Air To Air combat available.... based upon the limitations of computers...players abilities ...training ...free time etc etc.  I also define Air Combat as a 12 on 12 gun solution being just as real as a 12 on 6 solution ....you can't just make it disappear just because you find it unchivalrous.  If you truly feel this way ..then don't shoot ....i did it for years...and in 97% of the situations I find myself in today I still don't shoot.  Anyone who has encounters me in air can attest to this.
   If this is truly just a "Game" ...then why do we have to bother with landing? ...wouldn't it be more fun just to fly through a Super Mario brothers "power up" and get ammo ...fuel... repairs? ...this would give the furballers much more air time ....instead wasting time flying back to some base? ....for me I prefer the simulation aspect of landing.....maybe you would enjoy the "Game" part better? ...once again its how YOU define it.

6)  "All he/she can do is HO" ...I hear this one allot ....truthfully if this is my opponents  main and only skill ...I have little to fear from this person.  So whats the big deal??

7)  "Helm this isn't a War" ...or "This is not World War 2" ....I hear these allot ....once again it boils down to how you define what we do here.  We have naval forces engaging each other ...bombarding towns ...bases ...air fields....factory's ...lauching invasions.....we have planes killing each other ...bombing targets of opportunity ...strafing air Fields ....we have ground vehicles engaging each other ... blowing up towns...factory's ...airfields....and killing planes ... ...we have paratroopers capturing territory etc etc ....this sure sounds like a War to me? ...it sure ain't "Chutes and Ladders"!!
  "This isn't WW 2" .....well if it's not WW2?.. then HTC sure seems to think it is ...just look at the criteria for introducing planes Vehicles into the game? .....It's all based on WW2 .....of course this is not WW2 ...it is a simulation of WW2 based upon the limitations of Computers  .....player base ....training ....free time ...etc etc. ...but it is an attempt to simulate   WW2 based upon these real world limitations.  Once again how do you define Aces High?  If my definition is different then yours...so what.  

8 )  After careful examination I see no mention of the HO's in the games manual.....nor do I see any mention that they are bad form? ...or illegal .....the rule is the same for all ...so it is a level playing field for all. So whats the big deal?  If you define Aces high as a "Game" then whats the big deal if you die anyway?  ...planes are free
    

   In closing I say this:  The real issue is where YOU the player define this game? ...is it a simulation? ...is it game?  If Aces High is a simulation of Air to Air combat,  and the 12 on 12 gun solution exists in real combat,  then it has a proper place in here.  In no way do I advocate HO'ing people, but nor do I deride people who do.  It is just part of the equation.
  If you consider this a "game" then maybe HO's have no place here? ...but if it truly is a "game" then I want to shoot down your Donkey Kong with a Tie Fighter while sinking your battleship..and hopefully you will bail out on Park place where i have 2 Hotels!



Helm ...out

helm.....this isn't aimed at you.........


concerning #2. i hear a lot of guys say the same thing. no one(that i recall) has ever posted film of this. can any of you do that? to help those of us that aren't that good at it?

 to me knowing how to do this in a 38 would be particularly helpful.

thanks guys.
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: lazydog on July 26, 2009, 04:37:27 PM
This guy is a member of the 10% club or as we refer to them... "Dirt Farmers".
no thats funny  :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: lazydog on July 26, 2009, 04:45:35 PM
so then does that mean i should mention lofty, and pat1961 here? oo..and myself, as after they both tried to ho me at once(i think pat tagged me), then the spit ho'd me a second time, i did as i said i do, and ho'd back.
 :D
me and akak were flying in mid yesterday and over a bish base and 4 upped 4 tried to ho and 4 died
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: lazydog on July 26, 2009, 04:53:09 PM
oh then i flew into wife ack that's deadly er then any ho :furious :furious :furious
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 26, 2009, 05:19:38 PM
oh then i flew into wife ack that's deadly er then any ho :furious :furious :furious

i don't hafta worry 'bout the wife ack........ :D
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: Reaper90 on July 27, 2009, 11:23:49 AM
so then does that mean i should mention lofty, and pat1961 here? oo..and myself, as after they both tried to ho me at once(i think pat tagged me), then the spit ho'd me a second time, i did as i said i do, and ho'd back.
 :D

I don't consider it a HO if it happens after initial merge.... anything after that is game, unless one plane separates enough and reengages, then yeh, it's a HOing if they fire on the next HO merge. Naybe it is a HO if it happens after the initial merge, but I don't complain about. I just try to keep it guns cold on the initial merge. If I'm shot at, I return fire, and if it's more than 1-on-1 not in my favor (ganged) all bets are off.

And Helm, I agree - 97% of what people whine about aren't HOs but high deflection front quarter shots. I'll take those all day long.

anyway... enough beating the dead horse...... :aok
Title: Re: MA Gameplay Got You Down?
Post by: CAP1 on July 27, 2009, 11:30:42 AM
I don't consider it a HO if it happens after initial merge.... anything after that is game, unless one plane separates enough and reengages, then yeh, it's a HOing if they fire on the next HO merge. Naybe it is a HO if it happens after the initial merge, but I don't complain about. I just try to keep it guns cold on the initial merge. If I'm shot at, I return fire, and if it's more than 1-on-1 not in my favor (ganged) all bets are off.

And Helm, I agree - 97% of what people whine about aren't HOs but high deflection front quarter shots. I'll take those all day long.

anyway... enough beating the dead horse...... :aok

well, rather coincendentlly, i have pics of both of these guys. one was higg, nose to nose....i lowered my nose to go under, and lo and behold....there's the other guy, also tryin to ho. and yes...it was the initial merge.  :aok