Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: stealth on July 30, 2009, 09:13:34 PM

Title: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 30, 2009, 09:13:34 PM
This planes crew was 3 and it could carry 18 troops. It could also drop a small load of bombs. This plane was a German c47 realy cruise.Speed was 165mph I think we need this plane because mostly it would be a nice plane for aceshigh what about you.:)
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: ACE on July 30, 2009, 09:37:04 PM
nope it would be a lot harder to defend bases
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 30, 2009, 09:41:22 PM
nope it would be a lot harder to defend bases
where do you get this stuff are you just typing this in my post junkers a cool plane we need more bombers
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: ACE on July 30, 2009, 09:44:35 PM
Use better grammer. We don't need 18 troops falling.
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 30, 2009, 09:50:00 PM
Use better grammer. We don't need 18 troops falling.
just telling you what it could carry
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: ACE on July 30, 2009, 09:53:59 PM
Still 18 troops would be waaaaaay to much
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: Saxman on July 30, 2009, 10:14:27 PM
We just had a thread about this. The Ju-52 is about as far down the list of priorities as you can get. Even the B-29 would fill more of a role than the Ju-52.

In the Mains it would see only limited use. It has light defensive armament, but not that much better than a TBM. And in a MUCH slower aircraft. In fact, it's slower than even the C-47.

In scenario use the Ju-52 likewise has limited usefulness, as even C-47s rarely--if ever--see use. Certainly FSO hasn't used C-47s since my squadron has been flying them. Furthermore, I've RARELY seen base capture turned on in AvA when I've popped in, so once again there's not much for it to do there.

Would it be nice eventually for nostalgia? Sure. But there's other aircraft that are FAR more important and useful missing (if you want a German plane, try the He-111).
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: AKP on July 30, 2009, 11:15:53 PM
This planes crew was 3 and it could carry 18 troops. It could also drop a small load of bombs. This plane was a German c47 realy cruise.Speed was 165mph I think we need this plane because mostly it would be a nice plane for aceshigh what about you.:)

Ok Larry... stop it.  Its not funny anymore.  :rofl
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 31, 2009, 01:54:40 AM
Ok Larry... stop it.  Its not funny anymore.  :rofl
IM NO LARRY :mad:
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: Larry on July 31, 2009, 03:53:23 AM
Ok Larry... stop it.  Its not funny anymore.  :rofl

How dare you!!! I cant 'speel' like him even when I try, and come on I'm better then that. I wouldn't flood the forums with useless threads like he is doing. Id make one really good thread that would draw in so many fish that PETA and those whale wars people would be trying to break down my door.
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 31, 2009, 04:07:40 AM
How dare you!!! I cant 'speel' like him even when I try, and come on I'm better then that. I wouldn't flood the forums with useless threads like he is doing. Id make one really good thread that would draw in so many fish that PETA and those whale wars people would be trying to break down my door.

YES THANK YOU SEE IM NO LARRY
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 31, 2009, 04:13:31 AM
Only put out reply's on this if you are gunna put out a reply that deals with the topic please no he's 12 or use grammer.Please thank you have a nice day.
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: frank3 on July 31, 2009, 06:12:48 AM
How dare you!!! I cant 'speel' like him even when I try, and come on I'm better then that. I wouldn't flood the forums with useless threads like he is doing.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,264206.0.html
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,268660.0.html

 ;)
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: Larry on July 31, 2009, 08:42:55 AM
Oh no, two threads that were meant to get laughs that were posted over two months apart. How dare I flood the wishlist forums like that! I should just post eleven threads over, what, four days full of gibberish. Hell I wouldn't even look at the first page I spammed to look if someone has already made a thread asking for the same damn thing.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: shifty95 on July 31, 2009, 08:47:14 AM
Still 18 troops would be waaaaaay to much

actually, in reality, the c47 could hold up to 28 armed troops. we could water it down to hold 10, like we did with the c47.
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 31, 2009, 05:36:32 PM
Oh no, two threads that were meant to get laughs that were posted over two months apart. How dare I flood the wishlist forums like that! I should just post eleven threads over, what, four days full of gibberish. Hell I wouldn't even look at the first page I spammed to look if someone has already made a thread asking for the same damn thing.  :rolleyes:
[/quote maybeif it wasnt for people like you i wouldnt what are you like 30 20 40 IM 12 ACT YOUR AGE just stop with these off topic replys is that realy to much to ask
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: Larry on July 31, 2009, 06:06:24 PM
maybeif it wasnt for people like you i wouldnt what are you like 30 20 40 IM 12 ACT YOUR AGE just stop with these off topic replys is that realy to much to ask


Oh look a wish for the Ju52 ON THE SAME FRICKING DAY you posted your wish. Hell it was only 10 hours old and you thought it was a good idea to make another Ju52 thread. 

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,270207.0.html


I'm 22 and I'm acting my age. I suggest you do the same because all the 12 year olds I know don't write anything like you do. Is it really to much to ask for you to punctuate your sentences and click the 'spell check' button before you post?


Oh and send me another PM and Ill get skuzzy involved. I don't need you to spam my inbox like you spam the rest of the boards.
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 31, 2009, 08:17:40 PM

Oh look a wish for the Ju52 ON THE SAME FRICKING DAY you posted your wish. Hell it was only 10 hours old and you thought it was a good idea to make another Ju52 thread. 

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,270207.0.html


I'm 22 and I'm acting my age. I suggest you do the same because all the 12 year olds I know don't write anything like you do. Is it really to much to ask for you to punctuate your sentences and click the 'spell check' button before you post?


Oh and send me another PM and Ill get skuzzy involved. I don't need you to spam my inbox like you spam the rest of the boards.
is there a problem or something i dont see a rule about posting limits ive read it i check it twice and is there a problem for not useing grammer im just a kid that likes ww2 act yer age and incourage not discourage realy man whats yer problem im just trying to have a nice talk with everybody else thats on topic now can you please stop posting replys like this ive said it nicely like 20 times now
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: Motherland on July 31, 2009, 09:05:39 PM
is there a problem or something i dont see a rule about posting limits ive read it i check it twice and is there a problem for not useing grammer im just a kid that likes ww2 act yer age and incourage not discourage realy man whats yer problem im just trying to have a nice talk with everybody else thats on topic now can you please stop posting replys like this ive said it nicely like 20 times now
Grow up. There are plenty of kids on this board your age that use fine grammar.
Get over yourself. Age is not an excuse.
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 31, 2009, 09:19:30 PM
Grow up. There are plenty of kids on this board your age that use fine grammar.
Get over yourself. Age is not an excuse.
I'm not useing it as it I can use grammer i'll use grammer just not with these off topic reply's it's getting anouying realy is that to much to ask.
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: GhostCDB on July 31, 2009, 10:00:29 PM
This planes crew was 3 and it could carry 18 troops. It could also drop a small load of bombs. This plane was a German c47 realy cruise.Speed was 165mph I think we need this plane because mostly it would be a nice plane for aceshigh what about you.:)

I posted a thread on this already dweeb.  :P
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: stealth on July 31, 2009, 10:04:04 PM
I posted a thread on this already dweeb.  :P
Are you realy picking on a 11 year old o my lions and tigers and bears o my
Title: Re: we need a junkers ju 52/3m
Post by: Saxman on July 31, 2009, 10:44:04 PM
Yes he is, and rightfully so. The gazillions of B-29 threads are bad enough, but for someone to wish for a plane in a separate thread within HOURS of someone else making the same wish first? It's not even like the first thread had even been bumped off the page yet.

Read first, post later.