Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: wrag on September 12, 2009, 09:33:36 AM
-
The JU88 had a night fighter and or attack version IIRC
Was armed fairly heavily!
Shouldn't be too hard to bring on in?
Also we need a 198G10 or G14AS or G6AS :)
-
For the sake of scenarios, bring on the HE-111 first.
-
For the sake of scenarios, bring on the HE-111 first.
He's right.
-
Ju88 attack version could come with a model revamp for example :D
-
G6 + mk108 = <3
-
G6 + mk108 = <3
+1 :aok
-
For the sake of scenarios, bring on the HE-111 first.
+1
-
Adding the He111 should be, imo, of high importance for adding into AH for a multitude of reasons.
The Ju88 bombers, along with **many** other aircraft could use an update. I suppose it is safe to say that while they are tinkering with the update, it would be the best time to add another variant. But... only HTC know's their reasoning for things.
-
For the sake of scenarios, bring on the HE-111 first.
:aok
-
The JU88 had a night fighter and or attack version IIRC
Was armed fairly heavily!
Shouldn't be too hard to bring on in?
Also we need a 198G10 or G14AS or G6AS :)
Yes I think I agree but 198G10........... :rofl :rofl you missed it by that much!!
:salute
-
Yes I think I agree but 198G10........... :rofl :rofl you missed it by that much!!
:salute
ahhhhh......................u mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.............. ............................. .......errrrrrrr
NwBie made me do that? :D
-
For the sake of scenarios, bring on the HE-111 first.
You gotta be kidding me.
Who said anything about "scenarios" or the "He-111".
Coulda sworn the guy wanted to discuss the Ju-88.
-
it would be easy to implement the 109 G10, I would like to see the G10 model also..and I would love to see the HE111 and the DO,
-
We already had the G10. It was removed to make room for the K4.
-
We already had the G10. It was removed to make room for the K4.
why tho? as we have loads of varients of spits
-
We already had the G10. It was removed to make room for the K4.
Actually it was a K with 20mm hub and gonds options, If we had a G10 it would be about 25 mph slower then the K but would preform pretty much the same UNLIKE the G14 which takes for ever to get it's speed back and preforms so poorly above 20K.
several suggest that they convert either the G6 or G14 to the AS version and we would have nearly the same thing.
IMHO it would be far more realistic, and show many just how difficult the allies had it. Many of the LW pilots were extremely deadly in the 109s and 190s and the number of allied pilots lost show that.
IMHO In AH the allied rides and flyer's got it EASY compared to what actually happened in WWII and if the allies had NOT had such a great numbers advantage the war would have taken MUCH longer!
AND IMHO Later toward the end of the war the LW pilot ranks had been pretty much depleted of the best pilots and many of the newer pilots just didn't have the experience needed.
As has been shown in such Magazines as Flight Journal through ACTUAL test of P51D vs a 109G10 and a 190 against an F6F show the LW planes a good deal more capable then many have believed!
In fact the ONLY advantage the pony had against the 109 was SPEED according to the testers! And the 190 preformed far better then expected against the F6F and surprised MANY people with it's agility!
Apparently the reports of the superiority of 190s against the spit V when they first engaged were NOT exaggerated and resulted in the upgrade to the spit IX.....
-
A G10 or an AS would definately be welcome.
-
.
-
several suggest that they convert either the G6 or G14 to the AS version and we would have nearly the same thing.
I think that replacing the current G-14 with a G-14A/S would be the best option.
IMHO In AH the allied rides and flyer's got it EASY compared to what actually happened in WWII
How so? In AH there is no great variance in numbers and I dont think any Allied plane has any massive advantages over its appropriate Axis opponent.
Consider the matchup of the P-51D and the 109K4. When Im in a K4, I salivate when I see 51's because there isnt a doubt in my mind that I can win the fight.
As has been shown in such Magazines as Flight Journal through ACTUAL test of P51D vs a 109G10 and a 190 against an F6F show the LW planes a good deal more capable then many have believed!
In fact the ONLY advantage the pony had against the 109 was SPEED according to the testers! And the 190 preformed far better then expected against the F6F and surprised MANY people with it's agility!
Apparently the reports of the superiority of 190s against the spit V when they first engaged were NOT exaggerated and resulted in the upgrade to the spit IX.....
I have not seen the test data to which you refer, but I do have a copy of the RAF report detailing the testing of the captured 190A3 against the V, IX, Typhoon, Mustang Mk I, etc, etc and the report - written by an RAF senior officer and addressed to RAF senior command - can be summed up as "We're in trouble, this is the best fighter in the world, today."
Point being, I dont think that anyone disputes the superiority of the 190A-3/4/5 over the Spit V. As you stated, thats why the IX was rushed into service. The need for IX production to be stepped up is strenuously recommended in the report. I'll try and post a copy of it when I get home tonight, time allowing.
I guess Im wondering what youre trying to argue?
-
IMHO a big part of my argument is there is a hole in the LW lineup that NEEDS ro be plugged.
An AS version of rather then the G14 and or G6 we currently have would probably cure that.
And true while you salivate when you see a pony the best 109 in AH is IMHO operating under a slight, for some and major for others, handycap for MOST AH participants due to the restriction of the 30mm trajectory, velocity, and loadout.
So what I would truly LOVE to see is an AS version of the 14 or 6 or a G10 version with 20mm hub and gonds option. :x :x :x :x