Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: brastinson on September 18, 2009, 11:05:28 PM

Title: balloons
Post by: brastinson on September 18, 2009, 11:05:28 PM
What if there were barrage balloons above the towns. And I have searched and nothing came up.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: RTHolmes on September 19, 2009, 07:25:47 AM
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,216687.0.html (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,216687.0.html)
 :rofl

btw i searched for "barrage balloon" and got 2 pages of posts ...

edit: I got 2 pages of results when I used advanced search, none using quick search. quick search is broken.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: waystin2 on September 19, 2009, 10:51:08 AM
A +1.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 19, 2009, 11:39:01 AM
Depends, if you are going to have them over everything, then no. Not if they trigger the bombs to explode. As long as you can kill them and all they do is keep you from dive bombing untill they are dead or unless you are an AMAZING pilot and can dodge the ballons all while aiming.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 19, 2009, 12:50:25 PM
But.... It would be catastrophic!

(http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/1125/hab.jpg)
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 19, 2009, 01:48:55 PM

But.... It would be catastrophic!




and yet so much fun. Imagine seeing a pony or fw diving to the ground because you outturned :uhoh  him and now his killing streak is in danger   :rofl :rofl :cry :cry :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 19, 2009, 03:14:24 PM
Depending on the number of ballons up, I could probably dodge them, but not while aiming my bombs....Not a chance in hell.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 19, 2009, 03:31:54 PM
...Not a chance in hell.
What about heaven? :D
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 19, 2009, 03:33:31 PM
Why of course. Of course if I had devine powers, then you would all be restricted to C-47's untill you fell into my graces again.....
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: MachFly on September 19, 2009, 06:19:02 PM
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,216687.0.html (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,216687.0.html)


 :rofl :rofl :rofl at most of the pics
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: branch37 on September 19, 2009, 06:39:10 PM
Hahaha....flying cigar :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: phatzo on September 19, 2009, 06:45:17 PM
(http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt118/phatzo/dull.jpg)
sorry had to do it
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 19, 2009, 06:46:05 PM
hehehehehe
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 20, 2009, 01:23:01 AM
(http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt118/phatzo/dull.jpg)
sorry had to do it

dude I dont think our glorious squad leader ace pilot likes his name used for your amusement.  Consider yourself banned for life  :rofl

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Ghosth on September 20, 2009, 06:05:45 AM
Ever consider what those balloons would do to frame rates for 50% of AH Pilots?

Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 20, 2009, 12:51:18 PM
Put a bullet between the frame rate's eyes?
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 20, 2009, 07:25:18 PM
Ever consider what those balloons would do to frame rates for 50% of AH Pilots?



maybe ah can hire those guys that do south park, pretty sure they would have some ideas to improve the frame rate.

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 20, 2009, 08:51:17 PM
Like cut almost all animation and turn our game into a slide show?
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 21, 2009, 11:00:14 PM
Where did you get the idea that animators working with $100,000+ equipment would have the knowledge to increase the eye-candy while reducing the hardware requirements? :huh
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 22, 2009, 04:54:45 PM
Where did you get the idea that animators working with $100,000+ equipment would have the knowledge to increase the eye-candy while reducing the hardware requirements? :huh


I got the idea from the definition of sarcasm, look it up in wikipedia  :D

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 22, 2009, 06:28:26 PM

I got the idea from the definition of sarcasm, look it up in wikipedia  :D

semp

Notice the unreleased laughter lurking beneath the surface of his post..... And off to our left we see Denholm looking up sarcasm on wikipedia.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Strip on September 22, 2009, 06:42:14 PM
Ever consider what those balloons would do to frame rates for 50% of AH Pilots?

Absolutely nothing...

The game currently allows something like this to be done, they would be fixed position tho.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 22, 2009, 11:40:44 PM
Ever consider what those balloons would do to frame rates for 50% of AH Pilots?


maybe ah can hire those guys that do south park, pretty sure they would have some ideas to improve the frame rate.

semp

both of these posts were added as a joke, not to be taken serously.  :rofl :rofl :rofl

semp

Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 23, 2009, 06:13:34 PM
Absolutely nothing...

The game currently allows something like this to be done, they would be fixed position tho.

They would HAVE to be destroyable though. That means each one would have to be updated for each and every player, every time one of them takes a couple of 20mm rounds in a dogfight.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 23, 2009, 06:35:18 PM
if the ballons are made out of rubber, wont the bullet/cannon rounds bounce and kill the attacker?

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 23, 2009, 06:39:15 PM
Well 20mm shells are explosive, some of them anyway, so no. It would explode, and blow a hole in the ballon, and the .50's and even 303's, 7.62mm, and .30's would punch right through (they go through the metal skins on our plane, and if the rubber were thick enough to stop it, then we would have bouncy balls.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Strip on September 23, 2009, 06:52:37 PM
The game doesn't work like that....

Do you think it would be any different than a hangar or ack?

Your plane doesn't know the status of every flak in the game at all times.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 23, 2009, 06:59:21 PM
The game doesn't work like that....

Do you think it would be any different than a hangar or ack?

Your plane doesn't know the status of every flak in the game at all times.


Well no, I worded that poorly. I mean every one within whatever range the update is sent out to (I guess that would be what would happen). And there wouldn't be only 5-6 barrage ballons. There would be probably like 20 all at varying alts. That would still be enough to serisouly affect players using borderline machines.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 23, 2009, 10:34:23 PM
Well 20mm shells are explosive, some of them anyway, so no. It would explode, and blow a hole in the ballon, and the .50's and even 303's, 7.62mm, and .30's would punch right through (they go through the metal skins on our plane, and if the rubber were thick enough to stop it, then we would have bouncy balls.
Uhm, it's not as easy as it sounds. Balloons (not dirigibles) are not rigid. This means they rely on the gas within the balloon along with any lines or guidewires to generate the form of the balloon. What does that mean? Quite simple, anything impacting the balloon will practically bounce off. It's basically a suspended bounce-ball.

Although suicide, when pilots of WWI attacked balloons there's a reason they used specialised ammunition.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Strip on September 24, 2009, 10:48:31 AM
Uhm, it's not as easy as it sounds. Balloons (not dirigibles) are not rigid. This means they rely on the gas within the balloon along with any lines or guidewires to generate the form of the balloon. What does that mean? Quite simple, anything impacting the balloon will practically bounce off. It's basically a suspended bounce-ball.

Although suicide, when pilots of WWI attacked balloons there's a reason they used specialised ammunition.

The physics of a bullet impacting a balloon are quite simple, the bullet wins.  Even regular ball ammo will take down a balloon given sufficient time. In practice unless the bullets set the balloon ablaze it was simply winched down and repaired.

HE or incendiary bullets were used to set the fabric on fire, usually meaning its complete destruction.

The primary danger to the attacker was from neighboring flak installations, not the balloon itself.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Strip on September 24, 2009, 10:50:02 AM

Well no, I worded that poorly. I mean every one within whatever range the update is sent out to (I guess that would be what would happen). And there wouldn't be only 5-6 barrage ballons. There would be probably like 20 all at varying alts. That would still be enough to serisouly affect players using borderline machines.

Sorry but they would be no worse than the trees already found in the MA...
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 24, 2009, 12:50:26 PM
The physics of a bullet impacting a balloon are quite simple, the bullet wins.  Even regular ball ammo will take down a balloon given sufficient time. In practice unless the bullets set the balloon ablaze it was simply winched down and repaired.

HE or incendiary bullets were used to set the fabric on fire, usually meaning its complete destruction.

The primary danger to the attacker was from neighboring flak installations, not the balloon itself.
Deflection was more likely when firing on a balloon, thus why pilots out hunting them used specialized ammunition such as the HE rounds or incendiaries you mentioned. Regular ammunition would win every once in a while, but more than less, the balloon would simply deflect the bullet.

As for danger to the attacker, I never said anything about the balloon being the primary source of danger to aircraft.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: OOZ662 on September 24, 2009, 01:01:17 PM
I would assume players' front ends don't have any idea about the "damage level" of nearby objects. More likely, you drop bombs on a hangar, send the host "I just did 1,000lbs of damage to this hangar," and the host returns "You killed it." I believe this is why you see everything smoking when you first enter the arena, even if it's a few seconds from coming up.

That being said, the status of the objects (up/down) would have to be relayed and the server load would be greatly increased by tracking the damage levels and serving the status. That's why destructable terrain is not allowed.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: AKP on September 24, 2009, 01:09:42 PM
Just use the 2D sheep sprite that seems to have taken a hiatus from the new terrain (guess they dont like the new grass), and float them over bases and towns.  If they can flip a tank, they can be inflated and used as barrage balloons.

(http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/11/8/128706598338754114.jpg)

Frame rate problem solved  :D
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 24, 2009, 01:19:09 PM
Genius!
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Skulls22 on September 24, 2009, 02:08:37 PM
Genius!

 :rofl :roflLOL :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 24, 2009, 02:11:38 PM
Just use the 2D sheep sprite that seems to have taken a hiatus from the new terrain (guess they dont like the new grass), and float them over bases and towns.  If they can flip a tank, they can be inflated and used as barrage balloons.

(http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/11/8/128706598338754114.jpg)

Frame rate problem solved  :D

can you add a blond sheep so I can better visualize this enhancement?  greatly appreciated.

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: AKP on September 24, 2009, 03:16:39 PM
Hows this for a better representation?

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l273/woosle_2006/SheepBaloons.jpg)
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 24, 2009, 04:24:55 PM
I always knew those sheep were out to massacre anything that flies.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 24, 2009, 06:28:24 PM
Uhm, it's not as easy as it sounds. Balloons (not dirigibles) are not rigid. This means they rely on the gas within the balloon along with any lines or guidewires to generate the form of the balloon. What does that mean? Quite simple, anything impacting the balloon will practically bounce off. It's basically a suspended bounce-ball.

Although suicide, when pilots of WWI attacked balloons there's a reason they used specialised ammunition.

I doubt they were using rubber thick enough to stop or bounce a bullet on baloons during WW2.

HE or incendiary bullets were used to set the fabric on fire, usually meaning its complete destruction.

That right, FABRIC. Bullet v.s fabric = bullet wins.

Deflection was more likely when firing on a balloon, thus why pilots out hunting them used specialized ammunition such as the HE rounds or incendiaries you mentioned. Regular ammunition would win every once in a while, but more than less, the balloon would simply deflect the bullet.

Were they armored? Armor plate doesn't float up with hot air.

I always knew those sheep were out to massacre anything that flies.


AA...OPEN FIRE!!!!!!!
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 24, 2009, 06:36:01 PM
I doubt they were using rubber thick enough to stop or bounce a bullet on baloons during WW2....
Precisely why I know you're misguided.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 24, 2009, 06:40:58 PM
Even now rubber doesn't bounce back a bullet. Unless the laws of physics or the composition of rubber has GREATLY changed since 1944, then a bullet won't be stoped or bounced back by rubber. Sure ENOUGH will stop a bullet, but by that point you've got a single 8'x3' patch that can stop a bullet with the rest being 1/8 inch thick.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Strip on September 24, 2009, 08:24:15 PM
The balloons were not even made of rubber....

Under no circumstances would a bullet have "bounced" or "deflected" off of a WWI or WW2 aerial ballon.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Scherf on September 24, 2009, 09:52:30 PM
Hows this for a better representation?

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l273/woosle_2006/SheepBaloons.jpg)

Now that's some funny *&^%.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 24, 2009, 11:44:27 PM
before you guys start arguing for the next two weeks about the probability of bullets bouncing off ballons and or killing sheep with lazer beams, ( the blond sheep is kindda hot btw).  Do you guys realize that the statement about bullets bouncing off ballons was added as a joke, not to be taken serously.  jumping sheep on the other hand is a great idea that could be used to distract all the dang bombatards.

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: phatzo on September 25, 2009, 12:44:11 AM
before you guys start arguing for the next two weeks about the probability of bullets bouncing off ballons and or killing sheep with lazer beams, ( the blond sheep is kindda hot btw).  Do you guys realize that the statement about bullets bouncing off ballons was added as a joke, not to be taken serously.  jumping sheep on the other hand is a great idea that could be used to distract all the dang bombatards.

semp
umm I was just getting ready for two weeks of nonsensical rubbish about bullets bouncing off balloons
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 25, 2009, 07:04:10 PM
The balloons were not even made of rubber....

Under no circumstances would a bullet have "bounced" or "deflected" off of a WWI or WW2 aerial ballon.


Thats what I've been saying.



And Crasher, don't ruin the fun.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 26, 2009, 12:24:19 PM
what if the ballon is made out of the same fiber as the uniform that elastic woman uses?  I believe that a round would be easily deflected.

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Strip on September 26, 2009, 01:25:07 PM
Dont feed the troll.....
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 26, 2009, 02:49:58 PM
I remember watchin the show on tv about a guy that got killed.  It seemed that a round shot at a shooting range, (and dont quote me exactly since i saw it a couple of years ago) was shoot to high missed the target, the dirt wall behind the target, went thru a wall in a building that was behind the shooting range. bullete went up when it hit the wall then of all the things hit an accousting ceiling tile, now this is where it gets weird, it skated (for lack of a better word) on the tile and it it arched down  go thru another wall and hit a guy, that was seating on a chair, in the head.  now this is an exception since bullets dont just change directions (up) when hitting a wood/drywall wall and specially will go thru a ceiling tile instead of bouning off of it.  but it just ilustrates the point that bullets sometimes do strange things.

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 29, 2009, 09:56:57 PM
I remember watchin the show on tv about a guy that got killed.  It seemed that a round shot at a shooting range, (and dont quote me exactly since i saw it a couple of years ago) was shoot to high missed the target, the dirt wall behind the target, went thru a wall in a building that was behind the shooting range. bullete went up when it hit the wall then of all the things hit an accousting ceiling tile, now this is where it gets weird, it skated (for lack of a better word) on the tile and it it arched down  go thru another wall and hit a guy, that was seating on a chair, in the head.  now this is an exception since bullets dont just change directions (up) when hitting a wood/drywall wall and specially will go thru a ceiling tile instead of bouning off of it.  but it just ilustrates the point that bullets sometimes do strange things.

semp


Well yeah, when it's pretty much spent. But the point is FABRIC DON'T STOP BULLETS!!!!
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: phatzo on September 29, 2009, 11:41:19 PM

Well yeah, when it's pretty much spent. But the point is FABRIC DON'T STOP BULLETS!!!!
You better tell that to the guy in the bullet proof vest
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on September 30, 2009, 01:23:42 AM

Well yeah, when it's pretty much spent. But the point is FABRIC DON'T STOP BULLETS!!!!

guess the point i was trying to make is that ballon may not stop a bullet but it may deflect it just like the ceiling tile did.

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 30, 2009, 07:38:55 AM
Guncrasher, Nemisis just happens to be constructed of the following material:

(http://candidchatter.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/brick_wall1.jpg)

Any attempt to correct or educate seems to come right back at ya.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Strip on September 30, 2009, 07:48:57 AM
 :lol

I was thinking the other way around....

The thought of a piece of clothe (like used in balloon construction) deflecting a bullet is ludicrous.

Strip
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: AKP on September 30, 2009, 08:38:02 AM
Hmmm.... sounds like a job for these guys:

(http://10toes.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/mythbusters.jpg)
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on September 30, 2009, 10:10:59 AM
:lol

I was thinking the other way around....

The thought of a piece of clothe (like used in balloon construction) deflecting a bullet is ludicrous.

Strip
Show me when I said it would repeatedly deflect the bullet. My original comment was stating that shooting down a balloon wasn't as easy as was being portrayed.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: usvi on September 30, 2009, 11:05:23 AM
Sheep dog balloons!
(http://www.philskies.net/images/RATS/PIHABF/10th%20PIHABF/87%20dog%20balloon%20about%20to%20go%20Feb%2010.JPG)
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on September 30, 2009, 04:31:31 PM
Guncrasher, Nemisis just happens to be constructed of the following material:

(http://candidchatter.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/brick_wall1.jpg)

Any attempt to correct or educate seems to come right back at ya.


OK denholm, I won't come right out and say what everyone is thinking by saying you should read previous posts. Oops, already did, well whatever.

And we SHOULD have the mythbusters test if cloth coated in metalic paint (much like WW1 planes. And .30cal bullets didn't really deflect off them so I'm betting that my .50's won't deflect as well.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on October 01, 2009, 12:02:59 AM
:lol

I was thinking the other way around....

The thought of a piece of clothe (like used in balloon construction) deflecting a bullet is ludicrous.

Strip

silk is stronger than ceiling tile, and the ceiling tile deflected a bullet, silk is also stronger than steel (looked it up in the wikipedia).  and I am willing to ask the girl in myth busters to prove it using her blouse.

just about anything can stop or deflect a bullet and it has happened, coins, buttons, cloth, newspapers, bibles, glass, u name it, more than one, probably not.   besides if I can drop eggs from a buff while upside down in here, I see no reason why a ballon wont stop a round from a tiger tank.  but seriously i would like to get back to the original topic of this thread, but I am still busy looking at the sheep ballons. 

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: EskimoJoe on October 01, 2009, 12:42:18 AM
Silk is stronger than steel, eh? Tell me why my steel knife cuts easily through silk, then.
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: phatzo on October 01, 2009, 01:26:30 AM
Silk is stronger than steel, eh? Tell me why my steel knife cuts easily through silk, then.
make a strand of steel the same size as a strand of silk, see which one fails first.
anyway this is how you deal with a balloon

(http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/images/sopwith_camel_pc12_1_500.jpg)
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Denholm on October 01, 2009, 01:43:45 PM
So, who will start the wish for a WWI theater? :D
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: guncrasher on October 01, 2009, 04:40:01 PM
make a strand of steel same thickness as silk, no comparison, silk is stronger, look it up in wikipedia its there :), btw it was a trick question.  kinnda like what weights more a pound of gold or a pond of cotton.  answer is a pound of cotton.  but dont post any replies to it.  its another trick question.  but the idea of a ww1 aren to shoot ballons would be good  :x :x :x :x

semp
Title: Re: balloons
Post by: Nemisis on October 01, 2009, 08:53:04 PM
So, who will start the wish for a WWI theater? :D


No thanks denholm, I like my posting privelages....