Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: shifty95 on September 20, 2009, 09:26:14 PM

Title: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: shifty95 on September 20, 2009, 09:26:14 PM
I tink thes panes shud be aded cuz they all saww lottttts of acshun durin WW2

de B-29 is awsum cuz it holdz UUber amountz o' bombz, we shud give it a n00k so it can kil bassez :D

de F-86 shud be added cuz itz an US jet, how UUber is that? itz still has guns tho, we shud give it missles :x

de MiG-15 iz super UUber cuz itz an commie jet wit a huge prettythang n00b t00b in te nos tat shoots real faster than oter tatrz.

(P.S., this was a hypothetical thread designed to deter those who think that we should have the B-29, or other jets. please guys, STOP!!!!)
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: BrownBaron on September 20, 2009, 09:29:21 PM
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K
N00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN 00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN0 0KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00 KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00KN00K

edit: This has been your simulation sqeaker, in event of a real squeaker breach, there would be several more lines of "N00k", thank you, now back to our regularly sceduled programing
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: phatzo on September 20, 2009, 09:31:18 PM
what about the German Helicopter that bombed Pearl Harbor
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: BrownBaron on September 20, 2009, 09:35:26 PM
Im still waiting for da Nazi Dragonz tat razed Lodon to da ground, Nd da Jap Kraken that sunk the Enterprise at Midway, Nd the Italian's giant Mozzerela Monster
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Nemisis on September 20, 2009, 09:41:15 PM
Shifty, you have the same problem as everyone else uber strongly opposed to the B-29: You can't even stand a thread because you see it as that one thread possibly being the one that annoys (instead of convinces, which I think is INFINETLY more likely) HT into adding it. At which some will quit, while most will stay and see what happens before realizing that the B-29 is no more uber than the 262 in it's own field of use.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Chalenge on September 20, 2009, 11:10:20 PM
The problem with the B-29 is the nuke. We cant have the B-29 because the same guys posting over and over would never stop about having the nuke. We dont like nukes.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: guncrasher on September 20, 2009, 11:37:23 PM
If we gonna alk about the b29, then lets have those 2 japanese jet planes that saw action at the end of ww2.  I think one of them was called the lighting or thunder or something like that.  cant find any info on them anywhere.  but I read about them in the book about saburu sakai,  he shot down several b29's over japan, inclusing one on the last raid over tokio.

semp
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: CountD90 on September 20, 2009, 11:58:10 PM
IN!
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Masherbrum on September 21, 2009, 12:28:16 AM
I tink thes panes shud be aded cuz they all saww lottttts of acshun durin WW2

de B-29 is awsum cuz it holdz UUber amountz o' bombz, we shud give it a n00k so it can kil bassez :D

de F-86 shud be added cuz itz an US jet, how UUber is that? itz still has guns tho, we shud give it missles :x

de MiG-15 iz super UUber cuz itz an commie jet wit a huge prettythang n00b t00b in te nos tat shoots real faster than oter tatrz.

(P.S., this was a hypothetical thread designed to deter those who think that we should have the B-29, or other jets. please guys, STOP!!!!)

You should be PNG'd.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Spikes on September 21, 2009, 05:56:41 AM
You should be PNG'd.
I concur.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: AKP on September 21, 2009, 11:11:11 AM
Shifty, you have the same problem as everyone else uber strongly opposed to the B-29: You can't even stand a thread because you see it as that one thread possibly being the one that annoys (instead of convinces, which I think is INFINETLY more likely) HT into adding it. At which some will quit, while most will stay and see what happens before realizing that the B-29 is no more uber than the 262 in it's own field of use.

It was only a matter of time...

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l273/woosle_2006/NoB29.jpg)
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Shifty on September 21, 2009, 05:02:14 PM
You should be PNG'd.

I wish he'd just change his name.  :lol
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: jay on September 21, 2009, 05:12:05 PM
where is the grammar police when you need them?
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: branch37 on September 21, 2009, 05:21:55 PM
I wish he'd just change his name.  :lol

 :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: waystin2 on September 21, 2009, 05:22:16 PM
(http://www.fallen-legion.eu/news/data/upimages/DoubleFacePalm.jpg)
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: shifty95 on September 21, 2009, 06:21:25 PM
It was only a matter of time...

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l273/woosle_2006/NoB29.jpg)

hehehe, love it. btw, the guy who corrected my correctness, i did that on purpose, this is a fake thread, or atleast, a rant about those who actually want that stuff.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Nemisis on September 21, 2009, 06:43:47 PM
The problem with the B-29 is the nuke. We cant have the B-29 because the same guys posting over and over would never stop about having the nuke. We dont like nukes.

I agree. You know what? Official announcment:


NO NUKES!!!! DEAL WITH IT!!!

It was only a matter of time...

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l273/woosle_2006/NoB29.jpg)


And of coure now I can't find my video clip. Figures.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: AWwrgwy on September 21, 2009, 07:41:11 PM
If we gonna alk about the b29, then lets have those 2 japanese jet planes that saw action at the end of ww2.  I think one of them was called the lighting or thunder or something like that.  cant find any info on them anywhere. 

semp

A clue?



wrongway
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: StokesAk on September 21, 2009, 07:53:03 PM
No...
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Nemisis on September 21, 2009, 08:14:03 PM
Well I know the japs copied the the Me163, but I think only a couple were made before the war ended. I don't know if they copied the Me262. Those may be what he is talking about.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: ACE on September 21, 2009, 08:25:58 PM
I really wish people would quit talking about a bomber and stupid jet planes. Were not gonna get the b-29, because of the reason chalenge made. Jets our out of the question because a 262 is enough. Jets would make the game unlike it's supposed to be (WWII Flight sim......)
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Nemisis on September 21, 2009, 08:35:38 PM
So you say we won't get the B-29 because everyone won't stop shouting about the nuke? Really I fail to see how it would be any different than the slugging matches that B-29 threads seem to devolve into. Usually it starts with someone saying "Oh god, why are we even bringing this up? We all KNOW it will never get into the game" or some squeaker going "we ned teh b29 cause it was super awessome :rock". The problem is some people won't disscus, and instead they SHOUT, or try to close off the subject.

As for the jet thing, if they had before whatever deadline HT has set, or saw enough action, and was fielded by a country in the conflict, then technicaly it would qualify for being in our "(WWII Flight sim......)"
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Denholm on September 21, 2009, 10:52:38 PM
From the last time we had the B-29:

(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1424/stugs.jpg)


A perfect reproduction by our favorite Furball:

(http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/6303/nookiejl1.gif)

And here comes Ranger, to sum it all up:

(http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/5402/nukeg.gif)



Alright. I must admit, I feel sorry for the feller that started this thread. He's about to grow hair where there was none before....

*Shouts* RELEASE HIM!

(http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/4762/clowntokillnm5.gif)
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: ACE on September 22, 2009, 07:57:44 AM
Still gets old hearing it.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: usvi on September 22, 2009, 08:16:22 AM
(http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/ThisGuyIsFalling.jpg)
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: shifty95 on September 22, 2009, 04:34:46 PM
From the last time we had the B-29:

Alright. I must admit, I feel sorry for the feller that started this thread. He's about to grow hair where there was none before....

*Shouts* RELEASE HIM!

well, did you read the first post, or the other one i made? THIS IS A HYPOTHETICAL THREAD, MADE TO IMPERSONATE THE PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY SAY THIS STUFF, AND POSSIBLY DETER THEM FROM DOING IT AGAIN. sorry for the caps.
Title: Re: B-29, F-86, MiG-15
Post by: Nemisis on September 22, 2009, 06:35:36 PM
From the last time we had the B-29:

(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1424/stugs.jpg)


Hehe, that almost looks like it came outa the game.

well, did you read the first post, or the other one i made? THIS IS A HYPOTHETICAL THREAD, MADE TO IMPERSONATE THE PEOPLE THAT ACTUALLY SAY THIS STUFF, AND POSSIBLY DETER THEM FROM DOING IT AGAIN. sorry for the caps.

I agree. I'm not trying to turn this into a "We need the B-29 thread". I'm trying to find out why everyone is so sure it will end the world, while a jet stalks the LW arenas, killing everything that it can get a burst onto, and outruning all but the other jet (it might outrun that too. Not sure, never really checked since I can't fly either.)  when in level flight.

But if you guys want a "We WON'T get the B-29, so deal with it" thread, then go start one.