Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: Glunz on March 22, 2001, 12:21:00 PM

Title: Poll...
Post by: Glunz on March 22, 2001, 12:21:00 PM
What WW2 plane would you fly in real combat, in one-life-only arena ?

Title: Poll...
Post by: funked on March 22, 2001, 12:23:00 PM
P-47N
I'd climb up there where nobody could catch me, and not engage anybody.  Ta 152 might scare me but I'd just wait until he ran out of fuel.   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
Title: Poll...
Post by: AKSeaWulfe on March 22, 2001, 12:23:00 PM
A5M Claude
-SW
Title: Poll...
Post by: Sturm on March 22, 2001, 12:25:00 PM
HE-219 A/7 or Me-410 with any of the R packs cept the BK-5 version.

------------------
Sturm6 StaffelKapitän
JV44 Platzschutzstaffel
Airfield Defense Squadron
Title: Poll...
Post by: Vermillion on March 22, 2001, 12:26:00 PM
easy... Me262

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure
Title: Poll...
Post by: J_A_B on March 22, 2001, 12:27:00 PM
Including only mass-produced designs:  P-51D

If ANY produced plane is allowed, then I'd go for either the F8F or the P-51H

The jets run outta gas too quickly.

J_A_B
Title: Poll...
Post by: Reschke on March 22, 2001, 12:42:00 PM
Very tough question m8.

I guess I would have to fly either a P-38 (late model) or maybe an Fw-190F.  Always two of my favorite planes and both were somewhat rugged for their designs.

------------------
ObstLt. Reschke
2/LJK Staffelkapitan
Kommandeur Jagdbomber
LuftJagerKorps (http://www.luftjagerkorps.com)
Title: Poll...
Post by: Raubvogel on March 22, 2001, 12:51:00 PM
Assuming engine reliabilty isnt modeled, it would have to be the Me262.
Title: Poll...
Post by: M.C.202 on March 22, 2001, 01:58:00 PM
A late P-38 or a P-47N. For late/low production a P-51H or F7F.

Or I might go for a B-29 :-) At 30,000 feet.



------------------
M.C.202
Dino in Reno
Title: Poll...
Post by: Ripsnort on March 22, 2001, 02:09:00 PM
Any aircraft that could engage, and disenage the enemy at will.  In Aces High, that would be at least the following:

P51D Mustang
Tempest
LA7

------------------
Ripsnort =CO= VMF-323

"Anytime you can engage, and disengage the enemy at will,
you have already won 1/2 the battle before merging.."
[/i]

[This message has been edited by Ripsnort (edited 03-22-2001).]
Title: Poll...
Post by: TheWobble on March 22, 2001, 02:15:00 PM
OSTI   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)
Title: Poll...
Post by: R4M on March 22, 2001, 04:22:00 PM
Fw190D-9.

Title: Poll...
Post by: -ammo- on March 22, 2001, 05:19:00 PM
P-47M
Title: Poll...
Post by: Regurge on March 22, 2001, 05:22:00 PM
Fiesler Storch and a sniper rifle.

I'd fly around real low where noone would EVER find me, land near an enemy base and pop some poor sucker in the head while he's starting his engine  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

'course we'd need some infantry modeling for that.
Title: Poll...
Post by: Lephturn on March 22, 2001, 06:24:00 PM
P-47M

Hands down, not contest.  Decent gas mileage.  Extremely fast.  Great diving ability.  Superior high-alt performance.  Can disengage from almost anything.  Tough as nails.

------------------
Sean "Lephturn" Conrad - Aces High Chief Trainer

A proud member of the mighty Flying Pigs
http://www.flyingpigs.com

Check out Lephturn's Aerodrome (http://users.andara.com/~sconrad/) for AH articles and training info!
Title: Poll...
Post by: Widewing on March 22, 2001, 07:12:00 PM
 
Quote
Originally posted by Lephturn:
P-47M

Hands down, no contest.

Yep, that would be the choice. Virtually untouchable from 20,000 ft on up. What's that? You won't be going up that high? No problem, the M Jug will be right down for a brief visit. One pass and zoom back up. Sooner or later, he's gonna get ya.

Above 30,000 ft there's two types of aircraft: P-47Ms and targets.

My regards,

Widewing
Title: Poll...
Post by: LLv34_Camouflage on March 22, 2001, 07:45:00 PM
Brewster Model 239 Buffalo. Or maybe a 109 G-2. Tough choice.  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

Camo

------------------
Camouflage
XO, Lentolaivue 34
 www.muodos.fi/LLv34 (http://www.muodos.fi/LLv34)

Brewster into AH!

"The really good pilots use their superior judgement to keep them out of situations
where they might be required to demonstrate their superior skill."
Title: Poll...
Post by: F4UDOA on March 22, 2001, 08:10:00 PM
The Fairy Swordfish!!

But if I can't get one of those I would try the F4U-4.

Faster than those that can out turn it, and turns better than those that are faster. Great range, lotsa ordinance and takes a beating.
Title: Poll...
Post by: Nath-BDP on March 22, 2001, 08:37:00 PM
P47M you say?? Its max speed is 470 mph at 30k, it was primarily designed to counter German V-1s, thus performance over 30k wasn't very much required, however, the Ta 152 would still be superior above 35k. Only 130 P47Ms were made.

------------------
Nath_____
9./JG 54 "Grünherz"
(http://pobox2.zyan.com/~nath/haha.jpg)

"He just slapped me around like a yard dawg. First time Ive ever been shut out in a ladder, here or WB's. Tha Bastige!" -hblair
Title: Poll...
Post by: Mathman on March 22, 2001, 09:22:00 PM
I think I would go with the Fw 190D-9.  I like what it has to offer.  Turns good enough for me, climbs well enough for me, and hauls enough bellybutton for me.  Suffice it to say, I like this plane.  Plus, it actually looks vicious, gotta love that!

-math
Title: Poll...
Post by: Tac on March 22, 2001, 09:24:00 PM
Me-262

Its one life. Hell, i wanna be able to RUUUUN like hell and have 4 cannons too.

 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)
Title: Poll...
Post by: juzz on March 22, 2001, 10:59:00 PM
Pity the P-47M never flew a single mission in it's "design role"...
Title: Poll...
Post by: Widewing on March 22, 2001, 11:11:00 PM
 
Quote
Originally posted by Nath-BDP:
P47M you say?? Its max speed is 470 mph at 30k, it was primarily designed to counter German V-1s, thus performance over 30k wasn't very much required, however, the Ta 152 would still be superior above 35k. Only 130 P47Ms were made.

First, we need to understand that the P-47M was a development of a 1943 aircraft at Republic that was a sister to the XP-47J. This aircraft explored using the same engine installed on the XP-47J in a standard P-47C airframe. Republic logged over 2,000 hours on this airframe, which also pioneered the wing inserts later incorporated on the P-47N. When the Brits began to howl about the V-1s, the AAF asked the major fighter manufacturers if they could offer a solution by producing an aircraft that had the speed to quickly overhaul a V-1. Republic rolled out their high-speed P-47C, dusted it off and said, "what kept ya?" Shortly thereafter, three P-47D aircraft were pulled from the production line and fitted with the R-2800 C series engine and the YP-47M was born. When these aircraft finally began to arrive in the ETO, most of the V-1 launch facilities had already been over-run. The net result was that the aircraft never chased "Doddlebugs". It did, however, set the standard for speed in the theater.

Finally, let's discuss its real maximum speed. Straight from the factory floor, the M could pull 475 mph at 32,000 feet. Once it was in the hands of the 56th FG mechanics, the waste gates received the same treatment as those on the D models. Speeds climbed as high as 490 mph using water injection. This is fairly well documented by a great many of the group's pilots.

With respect to the Ta 152: I give the M the edge for several reasons. First and foremost is that even though the Ta 152 could reach altitudes up to 48K, so what? What can it do up there? If the 152 is going to have a use, it must come down and engage the bombers and the fighter escort. Remember, the air war is fought where the bombers fly. Down at 30K, the M is faster, rolls quicker, climbs better and dives faster. At 30k, the M is still climbing at 2,260 per minute, which is marginally better than the 152. In fact, the M climbs better than the Ta 152 at all altitudes below 39,000 ft.

Where performance counts, and that is where the bombers fly, the P-47M out-performs the Ta 152 in virtually every category. Not by much, I'll grant you, but by enough to make it no more of a factor than the Fw 190D-9 was to the P-51D. Add to this the Thunderbolt's tank like durability, and the choice become clear to me.

My regards,

Widewing  

Title: Poll...
Post by: Nath-BDP on March 22, 2001, 11:22:00 PM
I thought we were talking about AH...
Title: Poll...
Post by: Spatula on March 23, 2001, 12:20:00 AM
P51-H when we get it.
Title: Poll...
Post by: Glunz on March 23, 2001, 12:46:00 AM
Me 262 would be my choice.
Title: Poll...
Post by: Jochen on March 23, 2001, 12:50:00 AM
First choice Ta 152H-1, second choice Fw 190D-9.

------------------
jochen Gefechtsverband Kowalewski

Units: I. and II./KG 51, II. and III./KG 76, NSGr 1, NSGr 2, NSGr 20.
Planes: Do 17Z, Ju 87D, Ju 88A, He 111H, Ar 234A, Me 410A, Me 262A, Fw 190A, Fw 190F, Fw 190G.

Sieg oder bolsevismus!
Title: Poll...
Post by: Citabria on March 23, 2001, 01:34:00 AM
P-38 if in the Pacific

P-51 if in Europe
Title: Poll...
Post by: Nashwan on March 23, 2001, 06:38:00 AM
I've always thought the P-47M was fast at high alt, but not very quick down low, where the V-1s flew. Does anyone have the figures for it's speed at various altitudes, and especially around 5,000ft?
Great plane, but I want to know if it would have been any good at chasing V-1s
Title: Poll...
Post by: nonoht on March 23, 2001, 07:12:00 AM
D.520

 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
Title: Poll...
Post by: -ammo- on March 23, 2001, 10:30:00 AM
 
Quote
Originally posted by Nath-BDP:
I thought we were talking about AH...


We got a P-47M in AH now? Woohoo!! Im loggin in to fly (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

 (http://home.nc.rr.com/ammo/public.html/unw_sig.jpg)  (http://www.jump.net/~cs3)
Title: Poll...
Post by: maik on March 24, 2001, 06:29:00 AM
I wonder why stupid german mechanics never made field modifications on their planes and stupid german pilots still thought they had good mechanics.

Oh, well americans are usually better in everything, I gotta accept that  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif).

Maik
Title: Poll...
Post by: Sancho on March 24, 2001, 06:42:00 AM
P-47M for all the reasons others have stated above.  To paraphrase Zemke (paraphrase poorly I might add), if you want to look good in a picture you send home to your girlfriend, hop in a P-51.  If you want to get the job done in combat and come home alive fly a P-47.

--
Sancho
63rd FS, 56th FG
"Zemke's Wolfpack"
 (http://www.jump.net/~cs3/sigs/mahurin_sig.jpg)

Aerial combat isn't half of what it is shown to be in the movies... the combat usually takes place at a hell of a speed - the enemy aeroplane is only seen for a few seconds.--Bud Mahurin
Title: Poll...
Post by: Widewing on March 24, 2001, 09:02:00 AM
 
Quote
Originally posted by maik:
I wonder why stupid german mechanics never made field modifications on their planes and stupid german pilots still thought they had good mechanics.

Oh, well americans are usually better in everything, I gotta accept that   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif).

Maik

I'm sure some German mechanics found ways to improve performance in the field. No one has implied otherwise. In the case of the P-47, these mods were introduced by factory representatives from Republic and Pratt& Whitney.

One other factor that goes overlooked is that America was nation of mechanics and tinkerers. I don't recall the specific numbers, but I believe that there were more automobiles in the United States in 1939 than in all of Europe combined. Likewise, the same goes for privately owned aircraft and power boats. Americans did most of their own vehicle maintenence. They still do. Indeed, there were tens of thousands of young American men who had extensive skills at hotrodding large displacement V8 engines. When those men entered military service, what do you think they did with those skills?

My regards,

Widewing

Title: Poll...
Post by: maik on March 24, 2001, 09:21:00 AM
Viva A...., nahh.

no comment!
Title: Poll...
Post by: Glunz on March 24, 2001, 10:34:00 AM
While they were tinkering, the real engineers made the 262.

Title: Poll...
Post by: Wingnut_0 on March 24, 2001, 11:16:00 AM
1 life to live eh?  I'd still stick with either a 190A5 or 109F.  Call me old fashioned  :P


------------------
Wingnut
Luftjagerkorps

 (http://pages.prodigy.net/armis1/.wi_kag_banner3.gif)

The quality of the box matters little.  Success depends upon the man who sits in it  -  Baron Manfred von Richthofen

[This message has been edited by Wingnut_0 (edited 03-24-2001).]
Title: Poll...
Post by: Major Tom on March 25, 2001, 04:36:00 AM
Amateurs!

My ride would be the Lockheed P-80.  Now that’s a real aircraft.

ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

Hey, and it’s a WWII aircraft to  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

Oh well, in reality I would have flown...
P-47: ETO
P-38: PTO
Title: Poll...
Post by: qts on March 25, 2001, 07:01:00 AM
I'd probably go for the Arado with the ventral and rear guns.


------------------
qts
Title: Poll...
Post by: Wotan on March 25, 2001, 07:43:00 AM
109f

------------------
  Pray not for an end to the slaughter...but for VICTORY!!!
Title: Poll...
Post by: Westy on March 25, 2001, 08:01:00 AM
While they were tinkering, the real engineers made the 262.

 Yeah, Hitler's work on the 262 was superb! (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

 Oh!   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)  New signiature line.

  -Westy

-------------------------------------
"Above 30,000 ft there's two types of aircraft: P-47Ms and targets."

[This message has been edited by Westy (edited 03-25-2001).]
Title: Poll...
Post by: -tronski- on March 25, 2001, 08:19:00 AM
Spitfire IXc

 or

 P-40E/N/M

 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Skyrats/files/spit_ixc.gif)

 -Tronski-

[This message has been edited by -tronski- (edited 03-25-2001).]
Title: Poll...
Post by: pzvg on March 25, 2001, 01:46:00 PM
P-40, in AVG colors (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)
Only ONE life, might as well have style.

------------------
pzvg- "5 years and I still can't shoot"
Title: Poll...
Post by: Sundog on March 25, 2001, 02:08:00 PM
PTO: P-38
ETO: P-47 or Dora

FYI-According to the latest four part series on the Me-262 by J.Richard Smith and Eddie J. Creek the main reason the Me-262 was never produced in larger numbers earlier, wasn't because of Hitler. It was because Willy Messerschmitt didn't want to close the 109 production line down. He thought the 109 would be sufficient to win the war. After all, it would have cost him money and time to switch production over to the 262. Which he eventually did, however, it was too late by then.

I won't argue U.S. Engineers vs German Engineers. Being an Engineer myself, both sides had very talented engineers. To even begin to understand the argument, you would have to look at politics, requirements, etc. I won't argue that in terms of pure R&D the Germans seemed to be fearless (Of course their backs were against the wall, which can be a hell of a motivator).

Another interesting comment about this thread. I spoke with a WW2 Fighter pilot at the Dayton airshow last year. He was with the Confederate air force and was collecting the money for the B-29 cockpit tour. I asked him what he flew in WW2. He joined the RAF in 1940 where he flew:

Hurricane Mk. Ia's and IIa's
Spitfire Mk. I's, III's, V's, IX's

In 43 he was transferred to the USAAF (56th FG)

He flew P-47D's (Obviously)
He also flew P-51D's for awhile and the P-47N. He said he didn't like the P-47N. He told me it was a dog (I was surprised at hearing that). So I asked him, which was his favorite of all of them to fly. He said the Spitfire Mk. V. Just thought you would like to hear that. I know I wrote his name down somewhere, I will try to find it. I keep thinking his first name was Jack, but I will have to look.

Edit:
I think he also said that he flew the P-47N in the PTO (He was transferred there after VE). Also, he said the one thing you had to be careful of when flying the P-47 was how it would 'Mush out' at the bottom of a dive. He said you usually had to pull it out about 50 ft higher then where you wanted to be because of that. He said his wingman went down because he didn't adjust for that on a straffing run. The wingman flew into a static He-177...and lived! (his plane went down, but he survived).

------------------
Sundog
VMF-111 Devildogs (http://www.devildogs.com)
MAG-33 (http://Ripsnort60.tripod.com/M3.html)

'Criticism is always easier than craftmanship.'


[This message has been edited by Sundog (edited 03-25-2001).]
Title: Poll...
Post by: GRUNHERZ on March 25, 2001, 04:41:00 PM
109G
Title: Poll...
Post by: Mitsu on March 25, 2001, 06:55:00 PM
Ki-61.
Ki-100.
Title: Poll...
Post by: Jigster on March 25, 2001, 11:48:00 PM
B-24, B-17, or Privateer doing anti-shipping work over the Atlantic.

 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)
Title: Poll...
Post by: jato757 on March 27, 2001, 08:54:00 PM
IF  i flew fighter, 262, if bomber, FW-200 c-8, 2 good lookin planes  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

------------------
(http://www.user.shentel.net/vonz/jato.JPG)