Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Flipperk on December 11, 2009, 09:39:37 PM

Title: Me-323
Post by: Flipperk on December 11, 2009, 09:39:37 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqpQ7G0TnyU&feature=related


Why?

Because did you not watch the video?!

I mean if we have the me-163 that didn't do anything why not the me-323?
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: Karnak on December 11, 2009, 10:20:25 PM
Main reason I can see not to add the Me323 is the same reason not to add the H8K2 or B-29, i.e. the sheer amount of developer work needed just to add one of those units compared to the work needed to add other units.
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: Flipperk on December 11, 2009, 10:37:57 PM
Main reason I can see not to add the Me323 is the same reason not to add the H8K2 or B-29, i.e. the sheer amount of developer work needed just to add one of those units compared to the work needed to add other units.


I believe we are in the "WISH" list forum, shooting down every idea is counter productive in this area of the forums.
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: Strip on December 11, 2009, 11:01:34 PM
I was always told the B-29 would upset game play, too much work is a first.

That kinda like the 262, F4U-4, Tempest but some how they are held in check?

 :noid
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: Plazus on December 12, 2009, 01:36:32 AM
The 323 would just be completely slaughtered in the MAs. Only use for them is in scenarios. Yet they will be slaughtered anyways. Just another hangar queen.  :old:
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: oakranger on December 12, 2009, 02:55:01 AM
What would you used the 323 for?  If we can put tanks in it and send them to non spaw areas, that would be great.  As far as scenarios, it has no place.  I never even seen the C-47 used in any of the scenarios.
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: LLogann on December 12, 2009, 12:24:21 PM
EggZackLee!!! 

What would you used the 323 for?  If we can put tanks in it and send them to non spaw areas, that would be great.  As far as scenarios, it has no place.  I never even seen the C-47 used in any of the scenarios.
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: AWwrgwy on December 12, 2009, 02:04:43 PM

I believe we are in the "WISH" list forum, shooting down every idea is counter productive in this area of the forums.

So why not make the forum read only?  No responses?  Don't agree, then say nothing?

Ever wonder why something may not be implemented or a good idea?  Did you think everything through thoroughly?

Asking the developer for input isn't going to work.  Them saying yes or no outright is painting themselves into a corner.  Hence: Development.

It would be like asking your girlfriend or wife what she's thinking right now....

Besides, who shot it down?  I see debate.  Sell your side.


wrongway

Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: Bruv119 on December 12, 2009, 02:09:56 PM
need a gloster meteor  before any other jets!!              :aok
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: Karnak on December 12, 2009, 02:30:35 PM

I believe we are in the "WISH" list forum, shooting down every idea is counter productive in this area of the forums.
I don't think you a) understood my answer and/or b) understand the concept of a forum.
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: Larry on December 12, 2009, 04:01:25 PM
need a gloster meteor  before any other jets!!              :aok

Me-323 isnt a jet.  :D
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 12, 2009, 04:45:57 PM
Me-323 isnt a jet.  :D
:rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Me-323
Post by: oakranger on December 14, 2009, 11:41:35 AM
Me-323 isnt a jet.  :D

 :rofl