Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: saetta on May 09, 2000, 06:06:00 AM

Title: Macchi 202 and MGs
Post by: saetta on May 09, 2000, 06:06:00 AM

I was wondering some time ago if
the C.202 is faster and more agile
in AH, without the 7,7mm wing guns,
only with 2 x 12,7mm guns.
Pyro, could you help?

thx

Title: Macchi 202 and MGs
Post by: Jochen on May 09, 2000, 06:53:00 AM

Well, if you take weight away from plane I bet it will quite propably be faster. Different thing is how much faster and how much agile. Since they are relatively light MG's, and there are not too many of them, I think it would not make big difference.

------------------
jochen

Geschwaderkommodore (on leave) Jagdgeschwader 2 'Richthofen' (http://personal.inet.fi/cool/jan.nousiainen/JG2) (Warbirds)

Jagdflieger JG 2 'Richthofen' (Aces High)

Thanks for the Fw 190A-5 HTC!

Ladysmith wants you forthwith to come to her relief
Burn your briefs you leave for France tonight
Carefully cut the straps of the booby-traps and set the captives free
But don't shoot 'til you see her big blue eyes

Title: Macchi 202 and MGs
Post by: Westy on May 09, 2000, 07:41:00 AM

 Different engines too between the 202 and the 205, no?

-Westy

Title: Macchi 202 and MGs
Post by: Kieren on May 09, 2000, 08:23:00 AM

Westy-

I think he means he wants to be able to drop the useless 7.9's, especially if it ups the speed and climb. I would agree.  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

Title: Macchi 202 and MGs
Post by: gatt on May 09, 2000, 08:36:00 AM

Yep, from Series VII (if I remember well) all C.202s had 2x12,7mm in the nose and 2x7,7mm added in the wings.

The interesting thing is that almost all pilots removed them. Consider that they fought against P40, Hurricanes and Spitfire MkV (Trop), not exactly paper planes.

FYI, 2x7,7mm + ammo had a total weight of about 80-85Kg.

The 1.02p3 C.202 is faster and climbs better than the 1.02 one. IMHO is still not enuff, but you know, I'm never happy with it  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

Title: Macchi 202 and MGs
Post by: gatt on May 09, 2000, 08:37:00 AM

Saetta, plz take a look at our private Forum, theres something to decide ...  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

Title: Macchi 202 and MGs
Post by: saetta on May 09, 2000, 08:51:00 AM

cc, I tried it now offline
and it seems a little better without
the 7,7mm. However still too light
to shot down fighters , figure out
a b-17...!

p.s. Gatt, non so ne indirizzo ne password
     del newsgroup!

Title: Macchi 202 and MGs
Post by: gatt on May 09, 2000, 09:12:00 AM

Last time I checked there was no big difference between the light and "heavy" (LOL  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)) C.202.
I understand that 80-85Kg are not so much ... perhaps the roll-rate should be a lil' better.

Saetta, check your e-mail box. Dismissed!  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)