Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: oakranger on March 31, 2010, 11:06:22 PM

Title: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: oakranger on March 31, 2010, 11:06:22 PM
I think it is time that Hitech enforce new rules in the MA. So, i made a list of 50 rules that i strongly encourage HiTech to read and consider. 

1)   No spawn camping
2)   No HOing
3)   No picking
4)   No milk running
5)   No camping behind VH or on runway
6)   No vouching
7)   All fights will be 1 vs 1, If one side has assistance, both will be kill automatically.
8)   Go back to rule #7, any perk AC can be out number as long as opponents is not in a perk AC.
9)   All fights have to be equal or close to performance, armor defensive, speed, clime, and turn. 
(Example: A 109K-4 cannot pick a fight with a P-7D-11)
10)   Going to rule number six, if 109 wants to fight the spit V, 109 has to stay within speed of the P-47, cannot get within 600 yards of the P-47 six and 109 cannot use it 30mm if equip with it.
11)   Wirblewinds can only be killed by pnzers.
12)   Tigers can only attack other Tigers
13)   No GVs cannot park in town or around map rooms
14)   No self supply yourself at spawn spot.
(Example: no popping at spawn spot with supplies and dumping them, then up in tank at same spawn spot)
15)   All VHs, FHs and BHs can only be destroyed by Il2 only. 
16)   All air craft that carries orders cannot bomb any GVs regardless.
17)   All 190s, 110s, P-38s, P-51 or P-47 cannot scarf ammo bunker, radar or troops.
18)   All perk AC flies alone and fights alone.
19)   All furballs is limited to 30 players max.  One side can only have five more or less then the other side.
20)   All bombers can only fly 20 k maximum.
21)   Going back to rule #19, if attacking city or HQ, maximum is 30k
22)   Any escorts with bombers can only fly level or 1k above or below bombers.
23)   No Lancaster cannot perform stuka like diving bombing.
24)   No bomber doing barrel rolls or flips.
25)   No bailing out of bomber after releasing bombs.
26)   262s is allowed to land 5 kills maximum per sortie.
27)   All tigers can land 10 kills per sortie.
28)   All task groups can be commanded by perk points.
29)   No calling other player out to the DA because you lost in a fight.
30)   No calling other player dweeb, loser, skil-less, bomb tards, brainless or telling then to “STFU”.
31)   No gaining up on one person on 200 or country channel.
32)   All missions have to be approve by AH staff OR majorities approval in country.
33)   All missions can be NOE only if it has no more than 3 bombers, 5 fighters/attackers or 10 air craft’s total.
34)   All missions have to be 5 k or higher if over 10 or more AC.
35)   If any county out numbers any other counties by 25 players or more. The 25 have to change countries.
36)   No mega squadrons with 20 or more.
37)   No spying.
38)   No landing Non-navy AC on CV.
39)   No engaging any AC that is leaking oil, lost half a wing, fuel leak, or PW.
40)   No sneaking up to other AC with letting them know you are about to engaging them to give them a fair fight. 
41)   No F3 view while in IL2.
42)   No F3 view in bombers.
43)   No hiding in barns with GVs.
44)   No parachuting over town or base to get ack attention while others attacking the base.
45)   No hiding in Map room.
46)   No parachuting near base and remained on ground for hours just to make the base flash
47)   No logging on to see where the CV is at then switching counties just to bomb them.
48)   All squad members have to be on the same country.
49)   No CAP field with no more than five AC.
50)   APRIL FOOLS!   :neener:
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Krusty on March 31, 2010, 11:09:04 PM
Still March 31.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: ariansworld on March 31, 2010, 11:10:18 PM
Lovely, 50 whines recorded :)  :rofl
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: TnDep on March 31, 2010, 11:10:31 PM
I agree you still like a hour but funny write up.   :aok
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: 1701E on March 31, 2010, 11:14:26 PM
Not the 31st on the East Coast....he posted at 12:06 for us  :)
Long list of demands there....hope HTC has a sheet of paper.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: froger on March 31, 2010, 11:16:38 PM
only 50 ? :headscratch:



froger
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Husky01 on March 31, 2010, 11:30:09 PM
I can't beleive I just read all that lol
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Jayhawk on March 31, 2010, 11:38:39 PM
wait wait wait

Only 1v1s but 30 max furball...

Now this just doesn't make sense

 :cool:
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: flatiron1 on March 31, 2010, 11:40:47 PM
That's pretty good Oak, you only misspelled four  words.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Digr1 on April 01, 2010, 12:19:13 AM
all is fair in lust and war. What do you expect a chess game?
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Soulyss on April 01, 2010, 12:35:34 AM
Quote
17)   All 190s, 110s, P-38s, P-51 or P-47 cannot scarf ammo bunker, radar or troops.

I fully support this.. nothing drives me nuts like, or ruins my evening faster than an indiscriminate drive-by scarfing.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Jayhawk on April 01, 2010, 12:35:58 AM
all is fair in lust and war. What do you expect a chess game?

You told him.


Oh wait, no, you just didn't get it.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: cactuskooler on April 01, 2010, 12:49:16 AM

17)   All 190s, 110s, P-38s, P-51 or P-47 cannot scarf ammo bunker, radar or troops.

I fully support this.. nothing drives me nuts like, or ruins my evening faster than an indiscriminate drive-by scarfing.

But where will I get my daily amount of ammo bunker, radar or troops nutrients?!!


Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: oakranger on April 01, 2010, 12:59:14 AM
You told him.


Oh wait, no, you just didn't get it.

Thx Jayhawk.   :aok
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: klingan on April 01, 2010, 06:54:39 AM
6)   No vouching


Well that got to suck  :D
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: groundfeeder on April 01, 2010, 07:36:38 AM
 :huh :huh :huh :huh :huh
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: FLS on April 01, 2010, 09:37:50 AM
Nice list but you forgot one.
No WEP unless it really is an emergency.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: oakranger on April 01, 2010, 01:03:08 PM
Nice list but you forgot one.
No WEP unless it really is an emergency.

LOL, never thought of that one.  Thx
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: 321BAR on April 01, 2010, 01:17:27 PM
HAHAHA :rofl
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: oakranger on April 01, 2010, 03:39:26 PM
:huh :huh :huh :huh :huh

Look at rule #50
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: greens on April 02, 2010, 01:02:42 PM
  :old: thered be no more aces high if those rules were in effect  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: crazierthanu on April 02, 2010, 01:24:16 PM
Seems like some people dont understand that this is an April fools joke.  :lol
Nice one by the way, I was expecting someone to put something funny/stupid up for April fools.   :)
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: infowars on April 02, 2010, 03:20:29 PM
Hilarious  :aok
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: kingcobradude on April 02, 2010, 03:21:42 PM
ok if those rules went into effect, youd have to ban me off the bat
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Jayhawk on April 02, 2010, 03:45:54 PM
ok if those rules went into effect, youd have to ban me off the bat

... Put them into effect!!! NOW! 



 :bolt:
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: kingcobradude on April 02, 2010, 05:33:49 PM
... Put them into effect!!! NOW! 



 :bolt:
it wouldnt be much longer before youre taking a hike
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: oakranger on April 02, 2010, 06:17:34 PM
Seems like some people dont understand that this is an April fools joke.  :lol
Nice one by the way, I was expecting someone to put something funny/stupid up for April fools.   :)

Yea, you and a few got it.  thx
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: mantis on April 03, 2010, 12:23:14 AM
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: froger on April 03, 2010, 01:15:13 AM
37)   No spying


froger  <-------spy   :banana:
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: debuman on April 03, 2010, 02:13:55 PM
That's pretty good Oak, you only misspelled four  words.

at least four in the first ten rules if you count grammatical misspellings . . . but still a funny list!  I guess HT should limit the planeset to one type, and limit each arena to one player from each country.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Bino on April 03, 2010, 02:24:38 PM
"New rules that needs to be..."

You omitted any mention of the Rules Of English Grammar, which, in here, seem honored more in the breach than in the observance.  

;)

(Fifteen quatloos to the the first one who names the literary allusion here.)
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: lunatic1 on April 03, 2010, 02:43:44 PM
i feel OAKRANGER is either a sore loser or just plain nuts :lol
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: 321BAR on April 03, 2010, 10:02:40 PM
at least four in the first ten rules if you count grammatical misspellings . . . but still a funny list!  I guess HT should limit the planeset to one type, and limit each arena to one player from each country.
pfft grammar poliece alert! :lol :aok
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Motherland on April 03, 2010, 10:07:29 PM
at least four in the first ten rules if you count grammatical misspellings . . . but still a funny list!  I guess HT should limit the planeset to one type, and limit each arena to one player from each country.
If you wish to criticize someone's grammar, you should probably not forget to capitalize the first word in the post.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: oakranger on April 04, 2010, 06:15:47 PM
i feel OAKRANGER is either a sore loser or just plain nuts :lol

Did you even read all 50 rules?  If you did, your statement shows that you lack humor. 
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Banshee7 on April 04, 2010, 06:31:32 PM
37)   No spying


froger  <-------spy   :banana:

<---00Banshee7
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: Hap on April 04, 2010, 06:32:55 PM
no
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: curry1 on April 04, 2010, 07:14:11 PM
 :rofl
Lol wasn't expecting that.
Title: Re: New rules that needs to be in the MA!
Post by: lunatic1 on April 05, 2010, 12:32:40 PM
your right oakranger---my apologies :cool: