Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Guppy35 on April 04, 2010, 11:54:38 PM

Title: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 04, 2010, 11:54:38 PM
With all this talk of 20mm Mustangs and long range tanks, I thought I'd better make sure I was accurate.  Turns out I was wrong.  I found some references to an obscure variant of the P51 better known as the P51VLR(20mm)

Apparently prior to the capture of Iwo Jima there were concerns about escorting the B29s all the way to Japan.  North American went to work on the basic Mustang design and came up with this beauty.

Specifications were: 

P51VLR(20mm)
-Pressurized cockpit for high altitude flight
-Wings lengthened and strengthened to take 300 gallon DTs. 
-Wings also sealed up to "wet wing' configuration so that all internal space outside of guns and ammo housed more fuel.  Test flights of up to 16 hours were flown.
-4 20mm cannon.  There had been concerns with the hitting power of 6 50cals against bombers up high so this was tested out.  Improved Tempest style Hispanos were used.
-Ability to carry 2000 pound bombs in place of drop tanks.
-10 rockets on zero length rocket rails outboard of the 300 gallon DTs or 2000 pound bombs.
-Auto-pilot so that pilots could rest on the way to a target
-Radar pod on the end of the right wing.  This was similar to what Marine Corsair and Hellcat night fighters had.  This was to help the pilot spot E/A earlier for intercept.

Due to all the modifications there was talk of changing the name to "Scorpion" but it was thought that this might cause problems with modifying existing Mustang contracts so the Mustang name was retained.

While I admit introducing this bird into Aces High might bring fear to a lot of people, I only thing it fair that in the interest of history and providing for a better game envirionment, that we should have the P51VLR(20mm)

(http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s199/guppy35/P51VLR20mm.jpg)

Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Krusty on April 04, 2010, 11:58:32 PM
Guppy.... I get it, but I fear so so SO many others and others from years hence, will only use this to endlessly request it over and over and over.


What have you done?!?!?!  :bolt:

P.S. You made the barrel housings too short as compared to the 3-plan sketch I saw not too long ago. They should be about 50% longer. Even though they are the shorter barrel Hispano Vs (technically, the US equivelant, can't recall the name), they were still mounted a little more forward because the wing was only so thick.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: uptown on April 05, 2010, 12:02:41 AM
o dear  :uhoh now you've started something. Am I correct in assuming that these never seen combat?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Rino on April 05, 2010, 12:08:55 AM
     It's just a 51D with a little plastic surgery done  :D  Just wondering if those are droptanks or floats?  :aok
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: gpwurzel on April 05, 2010, 12:11:35 AM
Sits back, grabs popcorn and waits for the inevitable to happen.

Wurzel
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: SIK1 on April 05, 2010, 12:41:45 AM
 :rofl  :aok
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 1701E on April 05, 2010, 01:00:13 AM
Careful not to get stung by that evil looking Scorpion. :D
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: mensa180 on April 05, 2010, 01:17:48 AM
LOL
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: guncrasher on April 05, 2010, 01:20:11 AM
a pony that can run faster than the others   :airplane:.  and some dweeb will fly it and complain about getting killed by spits  :noid

semp
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Steve on April 05, 2010, 01:28:46 AM
a pony that can run faster than the others   

Well, there's no mention of an improved power plant. seems to me that this pony would be somewhat slower and heavier, have a worse roll(longer wings and turn rate(heavier).  The pwny is a pig already. This VLR might attract a few people I guess, but they would be less dangerous than if they were in a run of the mill D-pwny....IMHO
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 05, 2010, 01:35:48 AM
Well, there's no mention of an improved power plant. seems to me that this pony would be somewhat slower and heavier, have a worse roll(longer wings and turn rate(heavier).  The pwny is a pig already. This VLR might attract a few people I guess, but they would be less dangerous than if they were in a run of the mill D-pwny....IMHO

This wasn't meant as a turn fighter.  Flying for a long time at high alt either as a bomber escort, or interceptor.  With the extra weight it apparently went downhill really well and with the 4 20mms it could drop from the heavens, shoot a badguy in the face and zoom right back up there.

Naturally in it's ground attack role, loaded with 2 2000 pound bombs and 10 rockets it could really do some damage while shooting up airfields.  Again, a long dive to gain speed, let loose the rockets and bombs and shoot anyone trying to take off in the face before zooming back up to altitude for the long cruise home.

The biggest problem discovered in testing was that the pilot's couldn't take the up to 16 hours in the cockpit.  Legs and backsides went to sleep.  It was recommended that pilots used the autopilot inverted so they could get the weight off their backsides and get the blood flowing again.

With the capture of Iwo Jima, this was no longer an issue as more reasonable flights of 6-7 hours were flown.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Steve on April 05, 2010, 01:40:27 AM
This wasn't meant as a turn fighter.  

So it would be even less nimble and slower than a D Stang... forgive me for being obtuse, I still don't understand how it would be more dangerous(air to air) than a vanilla D-Stang. The 6 .50 configuration is more than enough to drop any plane, buffs included in the one pass you mention.  

That said, bring it into the game. Too many people misuse my beloved pwny as it is.  [/haughty]    :D



10 rockets and two 2k bombs .... that is a lot of punch.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 01:47:54 AM
+1 I like the idea
but I cannot find proof of that thing
-2

end total: -1
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: stealth on April 05, 2010, 02:01:39 AM
Come on people a P51 with 20mm,might as well put jets in here and we'll all use missiles.We need a P51 that first has a good ENY value that would be used on this game and one with more then 4 50 cals like the P51b.Something that's just like a p51b just more guns and ammo,but that's just me.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: EskimoJoe on April 05, 2010, 02:20:59 AM
+1 I like the idea
but I cannot find proof of that thing
-2

end total: -1

My great-uncle flew one as ground attack he bombed the germans you know the same ones that attacked peral harbor anyway he bombed them just like the fishy said he dove from really high and blew the germans up and flew back up and shot down the bombers really high and flew back home he said they flew for long times sometimes and it was really hard holding in the icky stuff so they shortened the flights
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 02:27:07 AM
My great-uncle flew one as ground attack he bombed the germans you know the same ones that attacked peral harbor anyway he bombed them just like the fishy said he dove from really high and blew the germans up and flew back up and shot down the bombers really high and flew back home he said they flew for long times sometimes and it was really hard holding in the icky stuff so they shortened the flights

you on dope? the japanese bombed pearl harbor, not the germans
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Larry on April 05, 2010, 02:29:27 AM
o dear  :uhoh now you've started something. Am I correct in assuming that these never seen combat?

You are not correct. Lt. Paul Hinds even recorded a few kills in it making him an ace.


+1 I like the idea
but I cannot find proof of that thing
-2

end total: -1

Just because you cant find any info on it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Dan has many, many books on WWII aircraft and I'm betting that's where most of his information came from.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Steve on April 05, 2010, 02:30:21 AM
you on dope? the japanese bombed pearl harbor, not the germans

Fish on!
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 02:30:41 AM
You are not correct. Lt. Paul Hinds even recorded a few kills in it making him an ace.


Just because you cant find any info on it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Dan has many, many books on WWII aircraft and I'm betting that's where most of his information came from.
ok well I searched the entire interned and got nothing
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 05, 2010, 02:31:08 AM
+1 I like the idea
but I cannot find proof of that thing
-2

end total: -1

Actual real live books are wondrous things.  Suggest getting a copy of Robert Greunhagen's` book on the Mustang.  It covers all the variants and production models.  William Hess did a nice book on the Mustang a while back too.  Roger Freeman's "Mustang at War" is nice.  There are some recent books on different aspects of WW2 Mustang action including one specifically on the VLR Mustangs.

You'd be surprised what you might learn from a good book :)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: MachFly on April 05, 2010, 02:34:13 AM
ok well I searched the entire interned and got nothing


Try this

http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=P-51+VLR (http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=P-51+VLR)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Larry on April 05, 2010, 02:42:20 AM
ok well I searched the entire interned and got nothing


Man I wish I could search the whole internet in a matter of hours. How about actually searching instead of just saying you did.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Chalenge on April 05, 2010, 03:49:39 AM
Ha! Cant stand your reputation taking hits Guppy? Bias proven.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Bronk on April 05, 2010, 05:42:55 AM
Scorpions wrong color they need to be red.

 :noid
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: uptown on April 05, 2010, 06:52:06 AM
You are not correct. Lt. Paul Hinds even recorded a few kills in it making him an ace.



:rofl I have been had  :rofl  

Sneaky SAPP guys  :furious
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 05, 2010, 08:55:48 AM
Ha! Cant stand your reputation taking hits Guppy? Bias proven.

What are you talking about?  I'm supporting your position.  I've found proof that I was wrong and you've been right all along.

That proves my bias? 

As for my reputation.  If my being a parts distributing, 38G augering disaster as a cartoon pilot reputation is taking hits, I'm not sure that's a bad thing.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Delirium on April 05, 2010, 08:59:20 AM
Ha! Cant stand your reputation taking hits Guppy? Bias proven.

His reputation and respect far exceeds your own.

Heck, aside from robbing a bank in a speedo, I'm not sure what he could do to bring him down to your level.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: gyrene81 on April 05, 2010, 09:26:17 AM
OMG...kingcobradude, keep trying and you may one day master the google:

Quote
***excerpt from the book - Very Long Range P-51 Mustang Units of the Pacific War (Aviation Elite Units) (Paperback)**

The 'Tokyo Club'

It was a simple task to become a member. All you had to do was strap yourself into a heavily loaded P-51 Mustang, take off from Iwo Jima (a postage-stamp sized volcanic island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean), fly 650 miles north over the sea - often through monsoon storms - in your single-engined aircraft to Japan, attack a heavily defended target in the vicinity of the enemy's capital city and then turn around and fly home while fretting over your shrinking fuel supply and perhaps battle damage as well. If your gas held out and you were not blown off-course on your return trip, you landed back at 'Iwo' after an eight-hour flight. Do it once and you earned membership in the club. Do it 15 times and you earned a trip home. But make one mistake or have one touch of bad luck, and you had a very good chance of ending up dead.
 
Three Mustang-equipped Very Long Range fighter groups of the USAAF's Seventh Fighter Command - the 15th, 21st and 506th FGs - based on Iwo Jima


But I haven't found any evidence that those planes had hispano cannons in them...whatever a P-51D-20 was...a lot of info and pics here:

http://www.506thfightergroup.org/506thsquadrons.asp#pilots (http://www.506thfightergroup.org/506thsquadrons.asp#pilots)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: caldera on April 05, 2010, 09:39:05 AM
You are not correct. Lt. Paul Hinds even recorded a few kills in it making him an ace.


Did the Japanese even have planes that could reach 35K?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: gyrene81 on April 05, 2010, 09:44:36 AM
Did the Japanese even have planes that could reach 35K?
Supposedly the N1K2-J had a service ceiling of 35,000 ft.
The Ki-43 I think could get to 36,000 ft.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Megalodon on April 05, 2010, 10:12:30 AM
OMG...kingcobradude, keep trying and you may one day master the google:


whatever a P-51D-20 was

Why we dont have them in varients is beyond me. didnt get the dorsal fin till -10 ...didnt get the k14 sight till -20 ...didnt have rockets till the -25/-30

http://www.mustangsmustangs.com/p-51/p51variants/P-51D.php (http://www.mustangsmustangs.com/p-51/p51variants/P-51D.php)

OH! and thats a very large hook spit it out.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2010, 12:52:30 PM
you on dope? the japanese bombed pearl harbor, not the germans

Are you sure about that?

I see a German plane in that picture, not a Japanese one.
(http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm94/Ack-Ack/over-germans-bomber-pearl-harbor-an.jpg?t=1270489879)


ack-ack

Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2010, 12:54:02 PM
With all this talk of 20mm Mustangs and long range tanks, I thought I'd better make sure I was accurate.  Turns out I was wrong.  I found some references to an obscure variant of the P51 better known as the P51VLR(20mm)

Apparently prior to the capture of Iwo Jima there were concerns about escorting the B29s all the way to Japan.  North American went to work on the basic Mustang design and came up with this beauty.

Specifications were: 

P51VLR(20mm)
-Pressurized cockpit for high altitude flight
-Wings lengthened and strengthened to take 300 gallon DTs. 
-Wings also sealed up to "wet wing' configuration so that all internal space outside of guns and ammo housed more fuel.  Test flights of up to 16 hours were flown.
-4 20mm cannon.  There had been concerns with the hitting power of 6 50cals against bombers up high so this was tested out.  Improved Tempest style Hispanos were used.
-Ability to carry 2000 pound bombs in place of drop tanks.
-10 rockets on zero length rocket rails outboard of the 300 gallon DTs or 2000 pound bombs.
-Auto-pilot so that pilots could rest on the way to a target
-Radar pod on the end of the right wing.  This was similar to what Marine Corsair and Hellcat night fighters had.  This was to help the pilot spot E/A earlier for intercept.

Due to all the modifications there was talk of changing the name to "Scorpion" but it was thought that this might cause problems with modifying existing Mustang contracts so the Mustang name was retained.

While I admit introducing this bird into Aces High might bring fear to a lot of people, I only thing it fair that in the interest of history and providing for a better game envirionment, that we should have the P51VLR(20mm)


I see that it already has Chalenge's scorpion logo, though the color should be red.  How was fuel consumption at 35,000ft?


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 05, 2010, 12:56:39 PM
+1 I like the idea
but I cannot find proof of that thing
-2

end total: -1
LOL. Caught one.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Steve on April 05, 2010, 12:57:04 PM
I love the  recommendation for the pilots to fly inverted ...lol
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 321BAR on April 05, 2010, 01:08:14 PM
With all this talk of 20mm Mustangs and long range tanks, I thought I'd better make sure I was accurate.  Turns out I was wrong.  I found some references to an obscure variant of the P51 better known as the P51VLR(20mm)

Apparently prior to the capture of Iwo Jima there were concerns about escorting the B29s all the way to Japan.  North American went to work on the basic Mustang design and came up with this beauty.

Specifications were: 

P51VLR(20mm)
-Pressurized cockpit for high altitude flight
-Wings lengthened and strengthened to take 300 gallon DTs. 
-Wings also sealed up to "wet wing' configuration so that all internal space outside of guns and ammo housed more fuel.  Test flights of up to 16 hours were flown.
-4 20mm cannon.  There had been concerns with the hitting power of 6 50cals against bombers up high so this was tested out.  Improved Tempest style Hispanos were used.
-Ability to carry 2000 pound bombs in place of drop tanks.
-10 rockets on zero length rocket rails outboard of the 300 gallon DTs or 2000 pound bombs.
-Auto-pilot so that pilots could rest on the way to a target
-Radar pod on the end of the right wing.  This was similar to what Marine Corsair and Hellcat night fighters had.  This was to help the pilot spot E/A earlier for intercept.

Due to all the modifications there was talk of changing the name to "Scorpion" but it was thought that this might cause problems with modifying existing Mustang contracts so the Mustang name was retained.

While I admit introducing this bird into Aces High might bring fear to a lot of people, I only thing it fair that in the interest of history and providing for a better game envirionment, that we should have the P51VLR(20mm)

(http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s199/guppy35/P51VLR20mm.jpg)


You want a new pony? Shove the 51A in :aok
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Banshee7 on April 05, 2010, 01:12:12 PM
Are you sure about that?

I see a German plane in that picture, not a Japanese one.
(http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm94/Ack-Ack/over-germans-bomber-pearl-harbor-an.jpg?t=1270489879)


ack-ack



Should we tell him about the German helicopters that were there?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 05, 2010, 01:26:13 PM
You want a new pony? Shove the 51A in :aok

Nah, I don't want another Mustang.  I just was trying to be considerate of the need more range, and 20mm cannon crowd.  When I came across the info on the P51VLR(20mm) it only seemed right to post it.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 321BAR on April 05, 2010, 01:36:55 PM
Nah, I don't want another Mustang.  I just was trying to be considerate of the need more range, and 20mm cannon crowd.  When I came across the info on the P51VLR(20mm) it only seemed right to post it.
ok. well then other planes please. shove the a6m6 in then or the a6m3. get an hour and a half in flight
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 03:50:29 PM
Are you sure about that?

I see a German plane in that picture, not a Japanese one.
(http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm94/Ack-Ack/over-germans-bomber-pearl-harbor-an.jpg?t=1270489879)


ack-ack



did you fail history class too? that is photoshopped
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 05, 2010, 04:16:00 PM
did you fail history class too? that is photoshopped
LOL!
Ack ack you should enter the Bass Master's Classic!
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2010, 04:32:10 PM
did you fail history class too? that is photoshopped

Wow.


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2010, 04:33:01 PM
LOL!
Ack ack you should enter the Bass Master's Classic!

First time I caught a fish without even dropping a line. 


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Bronk on April 05, 2010, 04:35:56 PM
(http://api.ning.com/files/psoEOiPz006BRvZjijCN7GBTswKI1wl4ZYyY5zEZNlTy1ZjlnyEmNuNsYUS7Ln5Ywbj1z6nZA*DGLeuh*nLP8OsJS65w2*u5/JohnBelushi.jpg)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 05, 2010, 04:37:37 PM
First time I caught a fish without even dropping a line. 


ack-ack
Or a net even. :)

Was like droppin a beer can in the water.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 04:45:28 PM
LOL!
Ack ack you should enter the Bass Master's Classic!
Actually I think id be better suited for that
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Beefcake on April 05, 2010, 04:50:44 PM
Man Ack Ack, they're just jumping into the boat.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Plazus on April 05, 2010, 05:17:38 PM
AKAK should start the "AKAK Fanclub" where all his haterz can say everything they want. Lol.

Joking aside though, I dont really see the need to add another P51. At least not anytime soon. More Axis mid war aircraft are needed, I think.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: THRASH99 on April 05, 2010, 05:36:19 PM
With all this talk of 20mm Mustangs and long range tanks, I thought I'd better make sure I was accurate.  Turns out I was wrong.  I found some references to an obscure variant of the P51 better known as the P51VLR(20mm)

Apparently prior to the capture of Iwo Jima there were concerns about escorting the B29s all the way to Japan.  North American went to work on the basic Mustang design and came up with this beauty.

Specifications were: 

P51VLR(20mm)
-Pressurized cockpit for high altitude flight
-Wings lengthened and strengthened to take 300 gallon DTs. 
-Wings also sealed up to "wet wing' configuration so that all internal space outside of guns and ammo housed more fuel.  Test flights of up to 16 hours were flown.
-4 20mm cannon.  There had been concerns with the hitting power of 6 50cals against bombers up high so this was tested out.  Improved Tempest style Hispanos were used.
-Ability to carry 2000 pound bombs in place of drop tanks.
-10 rockets on zero length rocket rails outboard of the 300 gallon DTs or 2000 pound bombs.
-Auto-pilot so that pilots could rest on the way to a target
-Radar pod on the end of the right wing.  This was similar to what Marine Corsair and Hellcat night fighters had.  This was to help the pilot spot E/A earlier for intercept.

Due to all the modifications there was talk of changing the name to "Scorpion" but it was thought that this might cause problems with modifying existing Mustang contracts so the Mustang name was retained.

While I admit introducing this bird into Aces High might bring fear to a lot of people, I only thing it fair that in the interest of history and providing for a better game envirionment, that we should have the P51VLR(20mm)

(http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s199/guppy35/P51VLR20mm.jpg)


So you want that mustang, but you don't want to perk Spit 16, how does that make sense?! :huh
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 05:40:27 PM
now if you want a pony that hgas massive ownage firepower, but at the cost of maneuverability, give the b25h a try.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Saxman on April 05, 2010, 05:43:54 PM
now if you want a pony that hgas massive ownage firepower, but at the cost of maneuverability, give the b25h a try.

Wow. I'm trying to figure out where the connection of Pony to B-25H even STARTS.  :huh :huh :huh
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: morfiend on April 05, 2010, 05:45:38 PM
I see that it already has Chalenge's scorpion logo, though the color should be red.  How was fuel consumption at 35,000ft?


ack-ack

 Dang Ack ya beat me to this,Dan with all your research and background knowledge I would have thought for sure you'd have gotten the nose art right!   It's a red scorpion,I've seen it in RL.... ooops I must stop before I break the NDA!

   :salute
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2010, 05:48:52 PM
now if you want a pony that hgas massive ownage firepower, but at the cost of maneuverability, give the b25h a try.

Huh?  :headscratch:


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 05, 2010, 05:56:38 PM
I think were gonna have to open a seafood restaurant AKAK.   :D
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 06:01:34 PM
Huh?  :headscratch:


ack-ack

WELL everyone is saying we need this because the forward firepower totally owns, but it wasnt as maneuverable as the usual pony. the b25h fits the bill perfectly
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 05, 2010, 06:03:10 PM
I think were gonna have to open a seafood restaurant AKAK.   :D
Indeed!
WELL everyone is saying we need this because the forward firepower totally owns, but it wasnt as maneuverable as the usual pony. the b25h fits the bill perfectly
Hardly. The 25H isn't maneuverable at all.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 06:08:20 PM
well neither would a pony with all thatextra stuff on it
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: MachFly on April 05, 2010, 06:12:23 PM
WELL everyone is saying we need this because the forward firepower totally owns, but it wasnt as maneuverable as the usual pony. the b25h fits the bill perfectly

do you also think that a tiger fits the perfect requirements?   :uhoh
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 05, 2010, 06:27:39 PM
do you also think that a tiger fits the perfect requirements?   :uhoh
the tiger is a tank, not a plane
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: gpwurzel on April 05, 2010, 06:31:18 PM
This is getting better......need more popcorn however.


Wurzel
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: SIK1 on April 05, 2010, 06:34:06 PM
So do they always just jump into the boat like this?  :headscratch:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: MachFly on April 05, 2010, 06:34:23 PM
B-25 is a bomber, not a fighter.

Fixed  :aok
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 05, 2010, 06:35:30 PM
Fixed  :aok
Zing!
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on April 05, 2010, 06:42:05 PM
Has any one got any photo's of these 20mm pony's?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2010, 06:43:24 PM
WELL everyone is saying we need this because the forward firepower totally owns, but it wasnt as maneuverable as the usual pony. the b25h fits the bill perfectly

Did you read from Guppy's original post the intended role of the VLR Mustang?  If not, ask your mom or dad to read it very slowly for you.  Then come back and explain to us how the B-25H would be a perfect substitution for the VLR Mustang given its intended role?

ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2010, 06:44:00 PM
I think were gonna have to open a seafood restaurant AKAK.   :D

I just hope the fish are legal size.


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: AWwrgwy on April 05, 2010, 08:45:48 PM
I've just skipped 4 pages to say...

Four days too late....

 :banana:



wrongway
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Banshee7 on April 05, 2010, 10:25:23 PM
This is getting better......need more popcorn however.


Wurzel

I'll share my popcorn if you bring the drinks!
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Banshee7 on April 05, 2010, 10:29:51 PM
I just hope the fish are legal size.


ack-ack

I guess the German Helicopter at Pearl Harbor wasn't as popular as the bombers. 
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: stodd on April 05, 2010, 10:39:59 PM
now if you want a pony that hgas massive ownage firepower, but at the cost of maneuverability, give the b25h a try.
Kingcobra please read bottom of sig.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Captain Virgil Hilts on April 05, 2010, 11:19:27 PM
I just hope the fish are legal size.


ack-ack

I think the creel clerk will make you toss several of them back......................... .......
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: CAP1 on April 05, 2010, 11:37:45 PM
This is getting better......need more popcorn however.


Wurzel

this is like a train wreck. i want to look away, but i can't.

 :rofl :neener:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 5PointOh on April 05, 2010, 11:46:32 PM
Come on people a P51 with 20mm,might as well put jets in here and we'll all use missiles.We need a P51 that first has a good ENY value that would be used on this game and one with more then 4 50 cals like the P51b.Something that's just like a p51b just more guns and ammo,but that's just me.
Hmmm, I thought AH had jets?  ENY 20 on the B-Pony is perfect, if you NEED six .50s to make the kill fly the D.

Aside from all the fishing going on in here, I myself would love to have the P-51A.  There is no need for a 20mm 51.

(http://www.warbirddepot.com/dbimages/109/109-a-1280.jpg)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 05, 2010, 11:53:10 PM
this is like a train wreck. i want to look away, but i can't.

 :rofl :neener:

If you really want to see a train wreck, watch the films of the duel I had with him and then watch the films he made of the fights. 


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: cactuskooler on April 06, 2010, 12:31:52 AM
Sometimes you need to throw the young ones back. :noid
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 321BAR on April 06, 2010, 10:41:04 AM
Wow. I'm trying to figure out where the connection of Pony to B-25H even STARTS.  :huh :huh :huh
BIG GUNS!!!!!!  :D
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 321BAR on April 06, 2010, 10:45:46 AM
Kingcobra please read bottom of sig.
Stodd you're an evil man :aok :rofl i remember that post
Hmmm, I thought AH had jets?  ENY 20 on the B-Pony is perfect, if you NEED six .50s to make the kill fly the D.

Aside from all the fishing going on in here, I myself would love to have the P-51A.  There is no need for a 20mm 51.

(http://www.warbirddepot.com/dbimages/109/109-a-1280.jpg)
Or if you want the merlin 66 over the 61... i fly the P51D with only 4 .50s now. didnt need the 6. and i agree with you on the A model. Posted that i think twice in this thread already  :lol
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Plazus on April 06, 2010, 11:04:43 AM
now if you want a pony that hgas massive ownage firepower, but at the cost of maneuverability, give the b25h a try.

 :huh :headscratch: Your comparison makes no sense. A better comparison would be: P51D vs 190A8 (with full guns loadout).
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Westy on April 06, 2010, 11:39:03 AM
 I got a wiki thingy bookmarked around here somewhere that had a picture of one of
these planes being used as a test mule.  It shows them trying to mate two frames -
one had the port wing cut in half and being bolted up to the starboard half of another.
P-51SFVLR Mustang or something along those lines.... ???
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: flubiu on April 06, 2010, 11:48:00 AM
I agree with earlier posts that without increased power, a heavier pony would be like flying a p40 with 20mm's. Personally, I would love cannons on a pony but I do alright with the 50cals. As long as you are talking about adding a version that saw little if any combat, I would rather see the p51h included. It was 600 lbs. lighter, much larger rudder, even better visibility and had the uprated Merlin V-1650-9 w/ WEP rating of 2,218hp (although non-WEP was slightly lower). This thing would have been a beast and I would be willing to "settle" for 6-50 cals. w/ 1,880 rounds!
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: smoe on April 06, 2010, 01:51:46 PM
According to this site the specs of the P-51H-5-NA: Maximum speed was 444 mph at 5000 feet:

http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/p51_13.html

At that speed this plane would have a huge advantage in the HTC skies.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 06, 2010, 02:05:11 PM
According to this site the specs of the P-51H-5-NA: Maximum speed was 444 mph at 5000 feet:

http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/p51_13.html

At that speed this plane would have a huge advantage in the HTC skies.

We're talking about a really long range Mustang that was built for high alt with the pressurized cockpit and had cannons along with a greatly increased ordinance carrying ability. 

The P51H was a lightweight that didn't even get used in Korea as it was not the fighter bomber the regular P51D was.  Imagine cruising along for hours at 35K in your P51VLR(20mm).   The radar pod on your right wing starts to go off indicating a flight of enemy aircraft ahead.  You sneak up behind em and blast them to bits with your 20mm cannons.  You can't do that in a P51H. You'd have had to return to base for lack of fuel and oxygen.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 06, 2010, 04:41:56 PM
I got a wiki thingy bookmarked around here somewhere that had a picture of one of
these planes being used as a test mule.  It shows them trying to mate two frames -
one had the port wing cut in half and being bolted up to the starboard half of another.
P-51SFVLR Mustang or something along those lines.... ???
which eventally evolved into the twin mustang I believe
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 06, 2010, 04:47:01 PM
Fixed  :aok


well technicly yes it is a bomber, but it can make an awesome buff blaster. '

and wouldnt the role of this new plane be filled already in game by the p38? the b24 is just a more extreme example of reduced maneuverability in exchange for massive ownage guns
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on April 06, 2010, 05:27:42 PM
 :huh :headscratch: :uhoh :bolt:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 06, 2010, 05:29:59 PM
Imagine cruising along for hours at 35K in your P51VLR(20mm).
What are fuel-saving settings at that altitude? I'd assume very good.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Plazus on April 06, 2010, 05:55:48 PM

well technicly yes it is a bomber, but it can make an awesome buff blaster. '

and wouldnt the role of this new plane be filled already in game by the p38? the b24 is just a more extreme example of reduced maneuverability in exchange for massive ownage guns

*Epic facepalm*
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 06, 2010, 05:58:14 PM
which eventally evolved into the twin mustang I believe

Believe me, I am one that loves nothing more than bashing baby seal cubs but for the love of Jeebus, spit out the hook before Westy sets it.  Guppy and I have already had to throw you back in because you're under the legal size.


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 06, 2010, 06:00:47 PM
Believe me, I am one that loves nothing more than bashing baby seal cubs but for the love of Jeebus, spit out the hook before Westy sets it.  Guppy and I have already had to throw you back in because you're under the legal size.


ack-ack
LOL
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Baumer on April 06, 2010, 06:03:30 PM
Wasn't this also part of the Project Rainbow testing, to give it a low observability coating?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 06, 2010, 06:05:53 PM

well technicly yes it is a bomber, but it can make an awesome buff blaster. '

and wouldnt the role of this new plane be filled already in game by the p38? the b24 is just a more extreme example of reduced maneuverability in exchange for massive ownage guns

Jeebus...why do you keep comparing the firepower of bombers against that of fighters?  There is no correlation between the two in terms of firepower, when you're comparing firepower of a fighter you need to compare it to another fighter.  For example, the firepower of a Bf 110C-4 is far more lethal than the firepower of a A6M5, or you can say the firepower of a P-38 is more lethal than the firepower of the P-51B, while only more lethal than the P-51D until the 20mm cannon rounds run out.  Those are valid comparisons of firepower.

And by the way...the B-24 doesn't have "massive ownage guns".


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 06, 2010, 06:07:42 PM
Jeebus...why do you keep comparing the firepower of bombers against that of fighters?  There is no correlation between the two in terms of firepower, when you're comparing firepower of a fighter you need to compare it to another fighter.  For example, the firepower of a Bf 110C-4 is far more lethal than the firepower of a A6M5, or you can say the firepower of a P-38 is more lethal than the firepower of the P-51B, while only more lethal than the P-51D until the 20mm cannon rounds run out.  Those are valid comparisons of firepower.

And by the way...the B-24 doesn't have "massive ownage guns".


ack-ack
75 mm cannon vs lancaster. who wins?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 06, 2010, 06:08:15 PM
Any bomber is extremely vulnerable IMO...except for the 234...and even then for the average joe the only defense it has is it's speed.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on April 06, 2010, 06:08:24 PM
Wasn't this also part of the Project Rainbow testing, to give it a low observability coating?
Are we back on topic with the VLR pony's? Not sure any more with this thread.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 06, 2010, 06:10:37 PM
Any bomber is extremely vulnerable IMO...except for the 234...and even then for the average joe the only defense it has is it's speed.
yes the tail guns are not the best compwred to the package of fighters. but I really dont want to be looking down the barrels of a b 25 strafer's nose guns
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 06, 2010, 06:15:28 PM
75 mm cannon vs lancaster. who wins?

Jeebus, are you serious?  Do you even have to ask what would happen to a plane that gets hit from a 75mm cannon round, let alone who would win in such a contest?


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 06, 2010, 06:15:50 PM
yes the tail guns are not the best compwred to the package of fighters. but I really dont want to be looking down the barrels of a b 25 strafer's nose guns
Seriously...what is your fetish with bombers vs fighters? They don't compare, or else they wouldn't be in two different categories. The 234 is probably the only 'exception' to the bomber/fighter category.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on April 06, 2010, 06:16:08 PM
yes the tail guns are not the best compwred to the package of fighters. but I really dont want to be looking down the barrels of a b 25 strafer's nose guns
Now for the first time or maybe since I don't know when?? I can agree with you. Having said that what has the B25H has got to do with this thread? :headscratch: PS: EXCEPT FOR YOUR SPELLING.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 06, 2010, 06:17:59 PM
you guys want planes that you have no need for since you can play those roles with other planes
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 06, 2010, 06:22:55 PM
I don't want any planes. I'm content with whacking guys in my 234, I'm trying to figure out your issue with bombers vs fighters and trying to compare them as one role.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 06, 2010, 06:24:31 PM
I don't want any planes. I'm content with whacking guys in my 234, I'm trying to figure out your issue with bombers vs fighters and trying to compare them as one role.
not bombers vs fighters. b25 strafer vs bomber destroyer
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 06, 2010, 06:28:55 PM
yes the tail guns are not the best compwred to the package of fighters.
not bombers vs fighters. b25 strafer vs bomber destroyer
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: kingcobradude on April 06, 2010, 06:31:35 PM
dude here
http://tinyurl.com/y9nk47n
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on April 06, 2010, 07:04:20 PM
dude here
http://tinyurl.com/y9nk47n
Again this has what to do with VLR Mustangs?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 06, 2010, 08:07:37 PM
you guys want planes that you have no need for since you can play those roles with other planes

How could a B-25H or any other bomber make a suitable substitute for a P-51 as a long range escort?


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 06, 2010, 08:28:52 PM
not bombers vs fighters. b25 strafer vs bomber destroyer

Again, you can't compare them.  Seriously, why do you insist on comparing apples and oranges?


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Spikes on April 06, 2010, 08:36:47 PM
dude here
http://tinyurl.com/y9nk47n
You still don't see the point. You are comparing my 234 JET BOMBER with NO FRONT GUNS (The rear guns would still own ya though) compared to any other fighter...
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: horble on April 06, 2010, 08:37:47 PM
This is the thread that keeps on giving.



A++ would read again
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on April 06, 2010, 08:41:48 PM
This is the thread that keeps on giving.



Started off interestingly enough now it is just keeps on giving....................hea daches.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: MachFly on April 06, 2010, 08:46:48 PM
Again, you can't compare them.  Seriously, why do you insist on comparing apples and oranges?


ack-ack

One of us mentioned on the 1st or 2nd page that P-51 VLR is a lot heavier and less maneuverable than the D model. So the way I see it is that he just does not understand to what extreme.
He basically thinks that the P-51 VLR would perform and handle the same exact way as the B-25.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on April 06, 2010, 08:57:11 PM
One of us mentioned on the 1st or 2nd page that P-51 VLR is a lot heavier and less maneuverable than the D model. So the way I see it is that he just does not understand to what extreme.
He basically thinks that the P-51 VLR would perform and handle the same exact way as the B-25.
I guess from a kids perspective this would make sense.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 06, 2010, 09:18:29 PM
Why do I think it's time to start passing out the clue rakes?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on April 06, 2010, 09:24:45 PM
Wasn't this also part of the Project Rainbow testing, to give it a low observability coating?

Yep. They were using some of the PR blue colors that the RAF tested for high alt recce birds.  That's why the logo was blue instead of red.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: MachFly on April 06, 2010, 09:26:18 PM
Why do I think it's time to start passing out the clue rakes?

Because we have been trying to figure out his point for the past 8 pages...?  :headscratch:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Rebel on April 07, 2010, 08:02:21 AM
Again, you can't compare them.  Seriously, why do you insist on comparing apples and oranges?


ack-ack


Don't look now, Akster, but ya got a hook in your mouth, there. ;)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Westy on April 07, 2010, 09:31:18 AM
"Why do I think it's time to start passing out the clue rakes?"

Wait?  All the leaves aint off his tree yet.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Knite on April 07, 2010, 09:55:35 AM
This thread makes my brain hurt and my stomach churn.


No... just my brain hurt... the stomach churn was from too much PBR.  :cheers:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 07, 2010, 12:18:53 PM

Don't look now, Akster, but ya got a hook in your mouth, there. ;)

Believe me, the kid isn't trolling, he's really that stupid.


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: gyrene81 on April 07, 2010, 12:23:43 PM
Believe me, the kid isn't trolling, he's really that stupid.

ack-ack
But he has books that tell him everything he needs to know...they got pictures.





Not that he actually does the full research on anything....  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 321BAR on April 07, 2010, 01:17:52 PM
But he has books that tell him everything he needs to know...they got pictures.





Not that he actually does the full research on anything....  :rolleyes:
like someone else you know about a certain gun eh? :D
How could a B-25H or any other bomber make a suitable substitute for a P-51 as a long range escort?


ack-ack
BIG GUNS!!!!! :x :x :x
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Rino on April 08, 2010, 05:53:56 PM
Wow. I'm trying to figure out where the connection of Pony to B-25H even STARTS.  :huh :huh :huh

     That's easy Sax, they were both made by North American  :D
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Krusty on April 08, 2010, 06:01:35 PM
Oh Guppy, Guppy, Guppy... What have you done?

Years from now, when all the newbies are forced to learn how to search before posting, they will cite this thread and there will be an inundation of requests for the P-51(20mm)VLR!

WHY?!?!?


WHY couldn't you have kept it a secret?
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Squire on April 08, 2010, 07:11:09 PM
Guppy you are a bad man.  :D
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Krusty on April 08, 2010, 07:14:16 PM
Guppy you are a bad man.  :D

Isn't it!

(http://img.youtube.com/vi/fQ9yj_BXRp0/0.jpg)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: WING47 on April 23, 2010, 08:03:42 PM
Well, there's no mention of an improved power plant. seems to me that this pony would be somewhat slower and heavier, have a worse roll(longer wings and turn rate(heavier).  The pwny is a pig already. This VLR might attract a few people I guess, but they would be less dangerous than if they were in a run of the mill D-pwny....IMHO
mustangs no pig try using flaps and the spits will fall
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on April 23, 2010, 08:14:31 PM
mustangs no pig try using flaps and the spits will fall

Are you seriously attempted to tell us that with the use of flaps, the Mustang will out maneuver a Spitfire or just a bad troll?


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: uptown on April 23, 2010, 08:15:13 PM
 :rofl dude.....yeah Steve, use the flaps you nooblet  :lol


Wing47 has killed 4 spits in 2 months in a D pony. I bet he used those flaps.  :rofl
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: uptown on April 23, 2010, 08:17:45 PM
Are you seriously attempted to tell us that with the use of flaps, the Mustang will out maneuver a Spitfire or just a bad troll?


ack-ack
I've killed many spits by using the P51 flaps. Of coarse most of them was AFK...but that's a whole nother thread  :rock

I myself like to use the rudder to deflect spitfire rounds.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: MachFly on April 23, 2010, 08:49:11 PM
mustangs no pig try using flaps and the spits will fall

I fly spitfires, and mustangs are some of the easiest planes to kill in a turn fight.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: CAP1 on April 24, 2010, 08:59:12 AM
THIS is the mustang we really need.  :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oloDe93LRK0
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 321BAR on April 24, 2010, 01:28:32 PM
why oh why must this thread be bumped by a noob? :headscratch:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: CAP1 on April 24, 2010, 01:49:37 PM
why oh why must this thread be bumped by a noob? :headscratch:

i ain't no noob snappy

 :neener:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 321BAR on April 25, 2010, 07:02:44 AM
i ain't no noob snappy

 :neener:
never said you! :D
mustangs no pig try using flaps and the spits will fall
HIM^^^^^^^HIM   (fo course this being only a mini bump but bump none the less... now close your eyes cuz this pic is very disturbing! :aok


(http://banilla.com/xanga/bellybump.gif)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: CAP1 on April 25, 2010, 09:36:50 AM
never said you! :DHIM^^^^^^^HIM   (fo course this being only a mini bump but bump none the less... now close your eyes cuz this pic is very disturbing! :aok


(http://banilla.com/xanga/bellybump.gif)

GGRR!

i should've heeded that warning!!

my eyes feel like they're meeellllltttttiiiiinnnngggggg gg :noid :rofl
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Kenne on April 26, 2010, 10:20:30 PM
dint the Mustang Mk1A have 4 20s??
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: danny76 on May 11, 2010, 07:01:55 AM
now if you want a pony that hgas massive ownage firepower, but at the cost of maneuverability, give the b25h a try.

How come you chose not to take the '25' into your "epic" battle with akak? :lol
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Masherbrum on May 11, 2010, 08:22:21 AM
75 mm cannon vs lancaster. who wins?

Whoever has the better aim.   
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Masherbrum on May 11, 2010, 08:23:11 AM
you guys want planes that you have no need for since you can play those roles with other planes

.....and you're attempting to sound like an "expert".   You're still a Beginner.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Rebel on May 11, 2010, 10:46:55 AM
dint the Mustang Mk1A have 4 20s??

First P51 did (allison powered, nowhere near the performance of the Merlin 'stangs you see in game)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: gyrene81 on May 11, 2010, 11:19:59 AM
Masherbrum must be looking for someone to argue with...had to bump a dead subject.  :lol
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: FlakBait422 on May 11, 2010, 02:31:09 PM
I desire. Make it so oh HiTechy one... make it so   :D
Im sensing picking-palusa  :noid
 :cheers:FlakBait
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: whipster22 on May 11, 2010, 06:29:45 PM
 :furious no Ki-102
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: CAP1 on May 11, 2010, 09:05:57 PM
Are you seriously attempted to tell us that with the use of flaps, the Mustang will out maneuver a Spitfire or just a bad troll?


ack-ack

.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Masherbrum on May 11, 2010, 09:36:54 PM
Masherbrum must be looking for someone to argue with...had to bump a dead subject.  :lol

Sorry Francis, I bumped nothing.   There were posts created today, prior to mine.   So go tell Thorsim "You Bleeeeeeeeew it!" to quote De Niro.   (no smilie needed)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: guncrasher on May 11, 2010, 11:43:48 PM
No way a mustang will out maneuver a spit. It can outurn it at high speed but at low speed full flaps or not pony will die.  Only times I have been killed by ponies is when I make a mistake and stall my plane.


Semp
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: cactuskooler on May 12, 2010, 12:39:41 AM
That's why this P-51 is desperately needed. We need to be able to out turn Spits in 51s.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Karnak on May 12, 2010, 12:46:25 AM
No way a mustang will out maneuver a spit. It can outurn it at high speed but at low speed full flaps or not pony will die.  Only times I have been killed by ponies is when I make a mistake and stall my plane.


Semp
I doubt a P-51 will out turn a Spitfire at any speed as the Spitfire is always G limited until you get slower.  E.g., both the Spit and P-51 will easily pull into blackouts at higher speed, negating any theoretical advantage of either airframe at speed.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: bravoa8 on May 12, 2010, 12:48:20 AM
That's why this P-51 is desperately needed. We need to be able to out turn Spits in 51s.
:lol Yep. :D
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: gyrene81 on May 12, 2010, 10:39:53 AM
Sorry Francis, I bumped nothing.   There were posts created today, prior to mine.   So go tell Thorsim "You Bleeeeeeeeew it!" to quote De Niro.   (no smilie needed)
:lol  One post by Danny76 dweeb...he bumped a lot of dead horses...you could have left it alone, especially considering your post was a rebuttal to a post from April by kingcobradude who was smart enough to let this topic die...good fail on your part.

Now who Bleeeew it?   :rofl  :huh
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: danny76 on May 12, 2010, 05:50:14 PM
:lol  One post by Danny76 dweeb...he bumped a lot of dead horses...you could have left it alone, especially considering your post was a rebuttal to a post from April by kingcobradude who was smart enough to let this topic die...good fail on your part.

Now who Bleeeew it?   :rofl  :huh


Me apparently, you screw up royally on another post and attack me on this one?

Mine was purely a tongue in cheek post for cobradudeking.

In closing

Wind your neck in. :huh
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: THRASH99 on May 12, 2010, 05:59:46 PM
No way a mustang will out maneuver a spit. It can outurn it at high speed but at low speed full flaps or not pony will die.  Only times I have been killed by ponies is when I make a mistake and stall my plane.


Semp
  :lol Then you haven't seen some of the best pilots who fly a 51 that will indeed out manuver a spit, there's only about 5 that can do it perfectly without stalling. The spit pilots that face them on the other hand are dealing with this :joystick:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on May 12, 2010, 06:02:37 PM
Then you haven't seen some of the best pilots who fly a 51 that will indeed out manuver a spit, there's only about 5 that can do it perfectly without stalling. The spit pilots that face them on the other hand are dealing with this :joystick:

In a fight between pilots of equal skill, the one flying the Spitfire will win 10 out of 10 times in an angles fight against a Mustang, unless the Spitfire driver makes a fatal mistake.


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: uptown on May 12, 2010, 06:17:04 PM
But then again a pilot of equal skill will not make the mistake of engaging in an angles fight with a Spitfire.  ;)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Bronk on May 12, 2010, 06:38:46 PM
But then again a pilot of equal skill will not make the mistake of engaging in an angles fight with a Spitfire.  ;)
Hmmm mk XIV gives 51s fits either way.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: uptown on May 12, 2010, 06:40:51 PM
 
Hmmm mk XIV gives 51s fits either way.
:uhoh yeah...i forgot about that one  :eek:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on May 12, 2010, 10:42:20 PM
You gents forget that the P51VLR(20mm) has extended wings. (Think Ta152).  Once the fuel load gets down to a managable level, with the low wing loading, the P51VLR(20mm) will eat Spits for lunch in a turn fight.  :aok
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on May 12, 2010, 10:43:58 PM
ahh the dreaded double post. :)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on May 12, 2010, 11:03:41 PM
Still would like to see some photo's of these planes.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on May 13, 2010, 01:07:24 AM
Still would like to see some photo's of these planes.
I guess I need to place an order for 6 Garfish & 3 flatheads & a banjo shark.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: phatzo on May 13, 2010, 01:29:06 AM
you might as well. The only time I have seen an a36 with 4 20mm was on the begining of a doco called great planes. This episode was about the p51.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: phatzo on May 13, 2010, 01:34:54 AM
(http://www.fishing-forum.info/images/libary/garfish.jpg)
(http://www.michaelmcfadyenscuba.info/images/shelly-flathead.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2352/2181431903_fa0db84343.jpg)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on May 13, 2010, 02:20:09 AM
Lol throw in a Barramundi too. :aok
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: dhart on May 14, 2010, 04:07:35 AM
Lose the radar pod and i will take 2 of them please. :devil
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: FlakBait422 on May 14, 2010, 12:11:19 PM
Its really simple on the Mustang vs spit debate. If the Mustang Pilot knows how to fly the Mustang better than the spit Pilot knows how to fly the Spit, then the Mustang pilot will win. I've unleashed utter pwnage on some Spitfire's in mt Mustang low and slow, everything has died. Its not a matter of who can turn better, or roll better, its just a debate about who know WHEN to turn and roll  :salute
 :cheers: FlakBait
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: map1177 on May 23, 2010, 05:40:58 PM
a pony that can run faster than the others   :airplane:.  and some dweeb will fly it and complain about getting killed by spits  :noid

semp
  :x
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: uptown on May 24, 2010, 06:50:32 AM
 :rolleyes: Some people tend to forget that the 51s speed can be used for running down planes as well. Especially the ones that fly the spits to make up for their lack of ACM. ;) 
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on October 09, 2010, 10:58:07 PM
Sorry to bump this, but I came across a well built model on Hyperscale today of a postwar version of the P51VLR(20mm) that I thought you gents would like to see.

Too bad it's postwar. No torque with the twin props and clearly larger drop tanks to go with those 4 20mms

(http://www.chukw.com/Hobby/OC10/OC10_025.jpg)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Pigslilspaz on October 09, 2010, 11:33:19 PM
awesome
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: AWwrgwy on October 09, 2010, 11:34:24 PM
Sorry to bump this, but I came across a well built model on Hyperscale today of a postwar version of the P51VLR(20mm) that I thought you gents would like to see.

Too bad it's postwar. No torque with the twin props and clearly larger drop tanks to go with those 4 20mms

(http://www.chukw.com/Hobby/OC10/OC10_025.jpg)

Rabbit season!
Duck Season!!



wrongway
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: cactuskooler on October 09, 2010, 11:40:53 PM
Sorry to bump this, but I came across a well built model on Hyperscale today of a postwar version of the P51VLR(20mm) that I thought you gents would like to see.

Too bad it's postwar. No torque with the twin props and clearly larger drop tanks to go with those 4 20mms

(http://www.chukw.com/Hobby/OC10/OC10_025.jpg)

Also note the streamline canopy. I've read that it's the predecessor to modern day air racer canopies.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: lyric1 on October 09, 2010, 11:50:38 PM
Sorry to bump this, but I came across a well built model on Hyperscale today of a postwar version of the P51VLR(20mm) that I thought you gents would like to see.

Too bad it's postwar. No torque with the twin props and clearly larger drop tanks to go with those 4 20mms

(http://www.chukw.com/Hobby/OC10/OC10_025.jpg)
Is it this time. :neener:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Furball on October 09, 2010, 11:54:04 PM
I heard that with those extended wingtips, that the Mustang VLR (20mm) could out-turn Spitfires too.  Good suggestion Guppy.  Would be great if we could get the B-29 to go with it for scenarios.   :aok
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Larry on October 10, 2010, 05:03:43 AM
We still need the P-51C since it was obviously the best P51 models ever made.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Lusche on October 10, 2010, 06:21:24 AM
.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: TwinBoom on October 10, 2010, 08:48:00 AM
(http://bellsouthpwp.net/t/h/the_mac/My_Escort/homer_surpirsed.gif)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Tupac on October 10, 2010, 09:23:26 AM
No guys we needs the p51z cuz of tha alfabeet z is the last lettr and that makes it the bestest.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Wildcat1 on October 10, 2010, 09:52:31 AM
No guys we needs the p51z cuz of tha alfabeet z is the last lettr and that makes it the bestest.

ya was that te on with te 00ber tatorz? nd heet-sekin mislzz 2!!!
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Tupac on October 10, 2010, 10:53:01 AM
ya was that te on with te 00ber tatorz? nd heet-sekin mislzz 2!!!

Yah i thnk it had teh sidwindrs for killin da jermenz at perl harbirs
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Wildcat1 on October 10, 2010, 01:14:10 PM
Yah i thnk it had teh sidwindrs for killin da jermenz at perl harbirs

stoopid, evry1 nowes te jermenz bomd perl harbirs n 1938, nd the 51z dnt c servc til 1940

 :banana:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Letalis on October 10, 2010, 01:28:04 PM
A Pony with 20mm cannon? Even if perked...NIEN! ;)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: BrownBaron on October 10, 2010, 01:59:16 PM
...NEIN!

<--Interlinguistic Grammar Nazi

This thread gets 2 bananas and one laughing emoticon!

 :banana:  :lol  :banana:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: RoGenT on October 10, 2010, 02:23:38 PM
IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  :aok :aok :aok :aok :aok  :pray :pray :pray
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: phatzo on October 10, 2010, 08:51:51 PM
(http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/0806/grammar-nazis-demotivational-poster-1213469207.gif)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: BrownBaron on October 10, 2010, 08:58:50 PM
(http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/0806/grammar-nazis-demotivational-poster-1213469207.gif)

Contractions displease me. This demotivational poster was obviously made by a layman masquerading as a true Grammar Kommandeur.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 800nate on October 10, 2010, 09:36:41 PM
its gonna be low perk highest 14 perks but add it add it add it :pray :pray :pray :pray :pray :pray :x
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: uptown on October 11, 2010, 12:40:29 AM
 :lol 
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: BrownBaron on October 11, 2010, 12:49:19 AM
its gonna be low perk highest 14 perks but add it add it add it :pray :pray :pray :pray :pray :pray :x

Lol. This is the kind of crowd the P-51's attract. I'm not sure why so many people like it, or why the ENY is so high. If I can get co-e with a P-51 in my K4, he's dead.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Tupac on October 11, 2010, 01:38:28 AM
800nate is not very nice. He cusses like a sailor and has a lesser grasp on the English language than a dead groundhog.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: BrownBaron on October 11, 2010, 02:01:28 AM
800nate is not very nice. He cusses like a sailor and has a lesser grasp on the English language than a dead groundhog.

Which is still more than can be said for a number of other forum-goers.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: JHerne on October 11, 2010, 03:05:14 PM
Don't be bringin' dead groundhogs into this...or it could get ugly...

(http://www.kruufm.com/files/23/groundhog.jpg)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: JHerne on October 11, 2010, 03:06:14 PM
Oh....and while I'm here... Perk the 51LVM!!!  :neener:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ruah on October 11, 2010, 06:47:12 PM
this thread is full of WIN  :banana:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: MrMeanie on October 12, 2010, 02:13:59 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDnXkFVEQ0Y&feature=player_embedded

 :bolt:
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Rino on October 13, 2010, 12:08:44 AM
Lol. This is the kind of crowd the P-51's attract. I'm not sure why so many people like it, or why the ENY is so high. If I can get co-e with a P-51 in my K4, he's dead.

     Depends on who is driving the 51.  Some guys in here would eat my lunch if I had an F-15  :D
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: ozrocker on October 13, 2010, 04:14:45 AM
His reputation and respect far exceeds your own. QFT

Heck, aside from robbing a bank in a speedo, I'm not sure what he could do to bring him down to your level.
:aok :rofl :rofl

                                                               <S> Oz
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Plawranc on October 13, 2010, 07:02:38 AM
Hahaha, If I had a Stinger, that P-51 would go away!
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: MjTalon on October 18, 2010, 06:57:06 PM
oh my gosh, you guys are terrible!

 :lol
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 18, 2010, 07:57:58 PM
Damn Dan, this one is still going on.  WTG!


ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on October 18, 2010, 10:43:59 PM
Damn Dan, this one is still going on.  WTG!


ack-ack

Well, I had help.  That model builder on Hyperscale did such a nice job on the postwar P51VLR(20mm) I couldn't help but share the picture.  Glad we won't ever get that one in here since it's not a WW2 bird.
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Hajo on October 18, 2010, 10:51:52 PM
Dan....can you find another hobby????  ;)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: skorpion on October 23, 2010, 10:22:40 PM
+1 (especially from me)  :aok :x
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: 800nate on October 24, 2010, 10:29:45 PM
amen
+1 (especially from me)  :aok :x
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on October 25, 2010, 12:15:54 AM
I'm gonna have to stock up on Craggenmore Scotch.  Gonna need Hitech to get us a bigger boat...maybe one of those clipper bow BBs I like so much :)
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 25, 2010, 01:44:07 AM
I saw a video of a boat going down some canal and hundreds of carp were jumping out of the water and so many landed in the boat that it almost sank.  This thread reminds me of that video.

ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: phatzo on October 25, 2010, 03:21:06 AM
I saw a video of a boat going down some canal and hundreds of carp were jumping out of the water and so many landed in the boat that it almost sank.  This thread reminds me of that video.

ack-ack
like this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_fUmx-HI0Q
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: AAJagerX on October 25, 2010, 10:26:28 PM
like this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_fUmx-HI0Q

Top Gun theme had me crackin up!   :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: perdue3 on October 26, 2010, 12:17:35 PM
Still talking of this absurd idea?

If they give you Pony dweebs cannons, they better give us Luftwhiners a Do 335.



perdweeb
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: FLOTSOM on October 26, 2010, 12:32:38 PM
Still talking of this absurd idea?

If they give you Pony dweebs cannons, they better give us Luftwhiners a Do 335.



perdweeb

id settle for taters that werent duds
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: JOACH1M on October 26, 2010, 02:31:23 PM
Don't want to see another Allied request until I get my axis planes!!!!
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on October 26, 2010, 04:21:42 PM
Maybe that German carrier that never got finished would be a big enough boat.   I think it was called Graf Zeppelin 
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: perdue3 on October 26, 2010, 04:38:37 PM
No concept planes, just real ones. However the Do 335 never saw "combat" although it ran from a Tempest during a training exercise.


perdweeb

He 111 shhhhh
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 26, 2010, 06:05:22 PM
Maybe that German carrier that never got finished would be a big enough boat.   I think it was called Graf Zeppelin 

Skuzzy should close this thread.  If it stays open I fear that the forums will be over fished and we won't have anything to troll for in the future. 

ack-ack
Title: Re: The Mustang we really need.
Post by: Guppy35 on October 26, 2010, 09:45:28 PM
Considering I got one after the Graf Zeppelin comment, I'm thinking Nimitz Class CV now