Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: Citabria on October 30, 2001, 12:29:00 AM
-
in vvs markings please :)
why vvs? because they loved their p-39s
the americans hated them
-
!
-
I almost always find myself in agreement with Cit's posts, but this one I would change slightly -
I'd love to see the P-39Q in US colors for a New Guinea campaign, but at the same time introduce the P-63 in VVS colors. The planes would share an awful lot of artwork.
One thing the US planeset doesn't have is a big-gun ground attack A/C. P-39 fills the bill nicely.
-
Originally posted by Citabria:
in vvs markings please :)
download the IL-2 demo ; it has P-39's with red stars ...
Goner
-
I too would love to see either a P39 or a P63 in Aces High.
I think the P63 would fit our MA better, and get more use, but the P39 would fill the scenario role better.
:)
-
Give the russkies the P-39.
Give the US the P-61!!!!! :D
-
I'm easy with what Vermillion said.
Westy
-
Originally posted by Citabria:
in vvs markings please :)why vvs? because they loved their p-39s
the americans hated them
Agreed........
Unfortunately the P63 recorded one kill in WWII.... VVS downed a Japanese AC over one of Japans north islands in the last few days. Both the air cobra and the king cobra should have VVS markings.........
Tilt
-
How about a P-400 in USAAF colors, and a P-39N or Q in VVS colors?
I really like the P-63 too. I know the "Fred" didn't see much combat but with water injection it was a HOT airplane and would be a very entertaining addition to the perk list. It should clearly have VVS markings - only combat use of the KingCobra was with the VVS.
If you are a USAAF P-39 fan you should read this book, "Angels Twenty": http://www.senet.com.au/~mhyde/burbanks_books_ww2.htm (http://www.senet.com.au/~mhyde/burbanks_books_ww2.htm)
[ 10-30-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]
-
P39 would be nice in AH.
P63 would be nice perk plane.
Wtf was a P400?
-
P-400 (http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p39_5.html) was basically a P-39D (not P-39D-1 or P-39D-2, these are different planes) with a Hispano replacing the 37 mm. It was used interchangeably by USAAF P-39D squadrons in the Pacific. I think overall the USAAF got about three P-400's for every four P-39D's. They had the early -34 and -35 engines with the 1150 hp rating. The true Iron Dog. :)
[ 10-30-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]
-
R4M said:
>Wtf was a P400?<
>"Grünherz"<
Why, A P-40 with a Zero on it's tail :D
It was a P-39 built to a Brit order, and diverted to U.S. use in the pacific. Lots of little bugs, and a nonstandard O2 system.
-
ahhhhhh that was the P39 model tested by the brits?
(and wich was rejected after a couple of months of operative use? ;))
-
Yes RAM. It's arguably the crappiest model of the P-39 to see service. :)
I think it would be a blast to fly these against A6M2 and Ki-43 in scenarios.
USAAF used a couple hundred of them in North Afrika as well. Bring on your Me 109F. :D
[ 10-30-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]
-
LOL MC202...I had already read that joke before, but didnt know what the P400 was in fact :).
Funked, you really REALLY want to fly that thing against a Zero?...against a Ki43 I can understand it (two peashooters wont even scratch the paint of the plane after all)...but against a Zero?.
You are masochist or what? :D