Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Boxboy on April 18, 2010, 04:26:00 AM

Title: IN designator
Post by: Boxboy on April 18, 2010, 04:26:00 AM: I think we should have just a few guys be appointed as the "IN" designators, that way skuzzy can just review their posts and lock all those threads that these guys dislike :banana: :banana: :banana: :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: cobia38 on April 18, 2010, 06:22:14 AM: qualifications should be as follows
1: no less then 2 years of ankle humping experiance
2: able to hump multible ankles at one time
3: able to hump said ankles without drawing to much attention
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: infowars on April 18, 2010, 08:15:25 AM: oh oh oh... Im IN
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: JimmyC on April 18, 2010, 08:31:27 AM: This is an INfomercial.....
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: IrishOne on April 18, 2010, 09:23:38 AM: how could I have got myself INvolved in a thread like this.....
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: BaldEagl on April 18, 2010, 09:32:53 AM: Nothing to see here, move along
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: LLogann on April 18, 2010, 09:52:36 AM: Why don't you just go ask them to be a non-paid intern Box?

Same thing.
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: Mar on April 18, 2010, 02:59:23 PM: Did you forget about the "Report to moderator" button?
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: kingcobradude on April 18, 2010, 03:01:14 PM: what do you mean by in?
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: Bronk on April 18, 2010, 03:13:47 PM: Quote from: kingcobradude on April 18, 2010, 03:01:14 PM
what do you mean by in?
"IN" In the thread before it is locked.
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: minke on April 18, 2010, 03:17:19 PM: INdeed
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: Masherbrum on April 18, 2010, 04:23:07 PM: IN!
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: captain1ma on April 18, 2010, 07:47:50 PM: Quote from: cobia38 on April 18, 2010, 06:22:14 AM
qualifications should be as follows
  1: no less then 2 years of ankle humping experiance
  2: able to hump multible ankles at one time
  3: able to hump said ankles without drawing to much attention

you forgot bad spellINg 2
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: TinmanX on April 18, 2010, 08:09:18 PM: Wouldn't that go against Rule #5? Have I just broken Rule #5 by asking if the OP's idea would violate Rule #5? Shoot, I just broke Rule #5! Arrrgh, I broke it again by pointing out that I broke it! I'm stuck in a Rule #5 Paradox!
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: LLogann on April 18, 2010, 08:12:31 PM: YES....... :lol

Quote from: TinmanX on April 18, 2010, 08:09:18 PM
See rule #5
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: bravoa8 on April 18, 2010, 08:55:24 PM: Poor skuzzy isn't gonna be too happy about this topic...
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: crazyivan on April 18, 2010, 09:11:24 PM: Quote from: bravoa8 on April 18, 2010, 08:55:24 PM
Poor skuzzy isn't gonna be too happy about this topic...
INconceivable!
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: Bosco123 on April 18, 2010, 09:35:59 PM: What an ingenius idea!!
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: jay on April 18, 2010, 09:37:53 PM: OUT :noid
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: froger on April 19, 2010, 01:31:25 AM: IN OUT IN OUT

:banana: repeat :banana:

:neener:
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: stealth on April 19, 2010, 01:49:26 AM: AnythINg besides in.
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: ozrocker on April 19, 2010, 07:30:20 AM: An INtriguing proposition!
:noid :noid :noid

<S> Oz
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: JunkyII on April 19, 2010, 07:50:10 AM: The IN Designator Creed!!!!!

ProcrastINation is not an IN designator word

They strike threads with IN the day they get posted

Competence is their watchword

Their 2 basic responsibilities will be uppermost IN their mind

IN before the lock, and flame squeekers

I am IN, an IN Designator
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: waystin2 on April 19, 2010, 10:05:30 AM: What a bunch of INgrates! :lol
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: RufusLeaking on April 19, 2010, 12:52:23 PM: Quote from: kingcobradude on April 18, 2010, 03:01:14 PM
what do you mean by in?
One's status, prior to being 'outed.'
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: Boxboy on April 19, 2010, 07:14:55 PM: Quote from: bravoa8 on April 18, 2010, 08:55:24 PM
Poor skuzzy isn't gonna be too happy about this topic...

Why not ??? it will make his job easy :D and look at how many applicants :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: 321BAR on April 19, 2010, 07:53:49 PM: I'm too INtelligent to post IN this thread... waaaaiiiitttt a second.... :noid
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: dirtdart on April 19, 2010, 08:13:10 PM: I love the INtercourse this thread has started.....
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: 321BAR on April 19, 2010, 08:22:43 PM: Quote from: dirtdart on April 19, 2010, 08:13:10 PM
I love the INtercourse this thread has started.....
does this INvolve me? :D
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: Chalenge on April 19, 2010, 11:43:53 PM: Quote from: Boxboy on April 18, 2010, 04:26:00 AM
I think

Prove it. :D
Title: Re: IN designator
Post by: Boxboy on April 20, 2010, 10:12:13 AM: Quote from: Chalenge on April 19, 2010, 11:43:53 PM
Prove it. :D

It's OK Chalenge if you divorce her she is STILL your sister :D