Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: gatt on May 18, 2010, 01:22:15 AM
-
Yes, 2.19 patch 2 and the C.205 is, graphically wise, still butt ugly.
Both cockpit and 3D shape.
When, when, when ?!? :furious
-
Yes, 2.19 patch 2 and the C.205 is, graphically wise, still butt ugly.
Both cockpit and 3D shape.
When, when, when ?!? :furious
2 weeks
:bolt:
wrongway
-
It will be nice to see which ones are next on the list. Good luck, Gatt.
-
Ki-67 remodeled w/the rear 20mms :aok
-
Ki-67 remodeled w/the rear 20mms :aok
I have never seen anything indicating the Ki-67 had 20mm cannons in the tail.
-
late production models but i couldn't kind a cross reference so its at that mercy of wiki :devil
-
That's your first mistake.
-
http://socialmedialawstudent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/vader-fail1.jpg (http://socialmedialawstudent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/vader-fail1.jpg)
Dear Obama,
I hope this form won't fail due the kid going to wikipedia.
Just kidding dude. :lol<S>
Plus, that plane has always been butt ugly.
-
http://socialmedialawstudent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/vader-fail1.jpg (http://socialmedialawstudent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/vader-fail1.jpg)
Dear Obama,
I hope this form won't fail due the kid going to wikipedia.
Just kidding dude. :lol<S>
Plus, that plane has always been butt ugly.
now thats a FAIL, failing to post the picture of the fail.
Did you mean to do this?
(http://socialmedialawstudent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/vader-fail1.jpg)
-
woooo i fail :lol
edit don't call my Ki-67 ugly
-
Instead of outright complaining, go learn how to "coad" so you can lend a hand. I do believe HTC accepts a few good volunteers to help with textures, etc.
I can barely start up and stumble through M$ Excel, I wouldnt want to try and tackle "coading".
But yes, you're right. There are a few planes that are rather... ... outdated in there appearance. ;)