In either M4A3(75) vs Panzer IV H or T-34/76 vs Panzer IV H the Panzer completely dominates the fight. Going to the M4A3(76) vs Panzer IV H or the T-34/85 vs Panzer IV H just reverses that and the Panzer IV H is now dominated by the American and Soviet tanks.
The only tanks the M4A3(75) has any chance against in a head on engagment is a panzer or another M4A3(75). both T-34's have no possible frontal shots, and neither does the tiger
After some thinking, I can only reinforce my point: Do not look too desperate for a fair 1v1 equivalent. Use different tanks with adjusted numbers to get an overall fair & balanced mix..
--------------------------------------------------
German | vs | Western ....| Eastern
Panzer .| vs | M4(75/76*) | T34/76
Tiger ....| vs | Firefly .......| T34/85**
---------.-----------------------------------------
* Using the M4 75s and 76s in a 2 to 1 ratio vs the Panzer
Are you saying that the M4/76 is too much vs the Panzer?
You can tell I'm not a GV guy, but I do listen to you guys.
I think we're getting some agreement.
From the posts so far, I’m getting these lineups for AHv2.19p4:
--------------------------------------------------
German | vs | Western ....| Eastern
Panzer .| vs | M4(75/76*) | T34/76
Tiger ....| vs | Firefly .......| T34/85**
---------.-----------------------------------------
* Using the M4 75s and 76s in a 2 to 1 ratio vs the Panzer
** Using a slight numbers advantage for the T34/85 over the Tiger
Anyone else care to comment, or offer clarifications?
Thanks to all who contributed their input. :salute
And yes, either my sights are screwed up, or most of my engagments are at under 1200 yds.
On the Panzer, T-34s, and the Tiger,
It's curious, in the previous versions, I considered the Firefly vs Tiger and even match up, but even with the new change to the Sherman's mantle armor, no one is saying the Firefly is weaker compared to the Tiger.
And if the T-34/85 were free, likely it would overtake the M4A3 is usage and kills.Even if that were to happen, which I don't think it would, so what. I doubt it would have three times the kills over the M4A3(76) as the M4A3(76) has over the Panzer IV H.
I'm impressed. You guys must be way more skilled than me in choosing to pit tanks that must close to less than 1K (T34/85) or point blank (T34/76) against Tigers. I salute your skills, but somehow I think mundane players, like me, will be slaughtered in our T34s.
Eagle, why do you give the M4(75)'s a numbers advantage in the wooded terrain, where they will be able to get within effective firing range MUCH easier? Swap the numbers for M4(75) vs Panzer, and it will be better.
And here it is... the current tank vs tank k/d matrix for LW, after 10 days of current tour:The Sherman 75 shows a 1.1 kill per death ratio against the T-34/76.
(http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/2884/tankmatrix.jpg)
I will do this again after the tour has been completed. Some numbers may shift considerably due to the relatively low number of engagements between certain types.
The Sherman 75 shows a 1.1 kill per death ratio against the T-34/76.
The shows T-34/76 a 1.1 kill per death ratio against the Sherman 75.
Shouldn't one of these be a 0.9? Or am I reading the chart wrong?
Not quite as rare as you think.
No, you are not reading it wrong, yet my numbers are (were) correct. ;):lol
No how can this be possible? It took me a few minutes to compiled the data, and even though I did that at the time with least action in the MA's, there must have been a tank fight between those two types, which is extraordinary rare.
When I looked up the M4 numbers, it was 17-16, a few minutes later (when I came to the T-34) it was 17-19 - 3 M4(75)'s had been killed by a T-34/76. With numbers that low, it caused a shift in the k/d balance. :)
This was the only fight during compilation that had any influence on the numbers, though.
So if I've interpreted Lusche's table right then, not accounting for terrain, base numbers for each scenario would be:
M475 2 - Panzer 1
M476 1 - Panzer 2
Firefly 1 - Panzer 4
T34/76 2 - Panzer 1
T34/85 2 - Panzer 3
M475 0 - Tiger 0
M476 8 - Tiger 1
Firefly 3 - Tiger 2
T34/76 0 - Tiger 0
T34/85 3 - Tiger 1
Eagle, 5 M476's will sufice. The tiger's edge over it isn't THAT great, especially in wooded terrain. Hell, I've snuck up on one when rolling over an open field.
The sad thing is - you can't take the K/D numbers and simply convert it that way. In typical MA gameplay, a Tiger may kill 8 M4(76)W's before finally being killed, but those are mostly 1-2 Shermans facing the Tiger at a time (Tiger sitting on Vbase, defending against one or two guys rolling in repeatedly). Now if you would really have 8 Shermans fighting the Tiger at the same time, the Tiger would hardly have a chance to kill 'em all...
(wrote this before you modified your posting coming to the same conclusion :) )
No problem easyscor. And is there any chance that we will see tanks in the scenarios again?That would be a Brooke question, but since he started this thread, perhaps he's thinking about it.
No problem easyscor. And is there any chance that we will see tanks in the scenarios again?
Yes. There is a special project in the works which will enable alot of possibilities. After all I am not doing all those skins for the MA!
The question is are there enough people interested in staffing a vehicle only event?