Aces High Bulletin Board
		General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Saxman on June 04, 2010, 11:45:44 AM
		
			
			- 
				A New York woman was fired (http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/fashion/2010/06/04/2010-06-04_she_flaunted_her_assets_but_fired_citi_gals_duds_not_over_top.html) by Citibank for being "Too Hot." Despite wearing conservative designer clothing that were perfectly acceptable in a business environment, she was terminated because her male coworkers found her bombshell looks too distracting.
 
 I'd like to know what the heck is she doing working in a BANK in the first place?!
 
 (http://images.nymag.com/images/2/daily/2010/06/20100602_dlorenzana_250x420.jpg)
 
 She should be doing magazines.
- 
				I imagine she will get quite a bit of compensation in a legal case
			
- 
				I'd let her come work with me.  :D
			
- 
				I'd let her come work with me.  :D
 
 
 Hell, I'll pay her just to sit around!!! And of course, she can always make herself a little more comfortable...
- 
				Don't get me started on Human Resources departments...
			
- 
				Some of the ladies at my bank would give her a good run  :O
			
- 
				She's a divorced mother too! Wow...
			
- 
				She's a divorced mother too! Wow...
 
 
 No shes carrying them with her  :D    :neener:
- 
				Shes using her looks to make Money....
			
- 
				Shes using her looks to make Money....
 
 
 How so?
- 
				How so?
 
 
 Really?  She is Using Her looks and her Body as a Tool to get Compensation.
 
 Kam
- 
				I'd like to make a deposit please. :bolt:
			
- 
				Skirt: good to go; make-up: check; jewelry: a-ok; blouse: no-go.  Yup, if she showed up to work as an employee at either my wife's firm or my plant with that blouse, she would be required to leave and change it or take a day without pay.  That is entirely to much decolletage exposed, does not matter what designer name is on it or even if Paris or Milan consider it haute couture'; my wife's rule is (for work anyhow) is that it must be able to be fully covered by an 8.5"x11" piece of paper, my rule is that I must be able to cover it with both my hands.....
			
- 
				Skirt: good to go; make-up: check; jewelry: a-ok; blouse: no-go.  Yup, if she showed up to work as an employee at either my wife's firm or my plant with that blouse, she would be required to leave and change it or take a day without pay.  That is entirely to much decolletage exposed, does not matter what designer name is on it or even if Paris or Milan consider it haute couture'; my wife's rule is (for work anyhow) is that it must be able to be fully covered by an 8.5"x11" piece of paper, my rule is that I must be able to cover it with both my hands.....
 
 
 Well I doubt that they took that picture at her work.  :rolleyes:
- 
				Skirt: good to go; make-up: check; jewelry: a-ok; blouse: no-go.  Yup, if she showed up to work as an employee at either my wife's firm or my plant with that blouse, she would be required to leave and change it or take a day without pay.  That is entirely to much decolletage exposed, does not matter what designer name is on it or even if Paris or Milan consider it haute couture'; my wife's rule is (for work anyhow) is that it must be able to be fully covered by an 8.5"x11" piece of paper, my rule is that I must be able to cover it with both my hands.....
 
 
 What makes you think the blouse in the pic I linked is the what she was wearing at the office? The article described her as wearing turtlenecks.
- 
				How bout a link to the article then?
			
- 
				Maybe she continuously turned the thermostat to 80 and we've just got a big misunderstand.  :P
			
- 
				How bout a link to the article then?
 
 
 It's in the OP.
- 
				Really?  She is Using Her looks and her Body as a Tool to get Compensation.
 
 Kam
 
 
 Or it's a legitimate complaint. We lack the details to be certain, but honestly, I have heard of dumber things than this.
- 
				Really?  She is Using Her looks and her Body as a Tool to get Compensation.
 
 Kam
 
 
 Wtf is up with your capitalization, v :headscratch:dude...?
- 
				she needs one of these
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZFY2I-EWQY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZFY2I-EWQY)
 
- 
				she needs one of these
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZFY2I-EWQY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZFY2I-EWQY)
 
 
 :rofl ; no, wait....  :O  ; i mean.....  :x ; no, i was right the 1st time....  :rofl
- 
				she needs one of these
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZFY2I-EWQY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZFY2I-EWQY)
 
 
 
 Why do you know where to find that?
- 
				I find it funny, that this is news and she *happens* to have professionally done photos....publicity stunt anyone?
			
- 
				I find it funny, that this is news and she *happens* to have professionally done photos....publicity stunt anyone?
 
 
 I assumed the photo's were taken after the fact by the publication that did the article.
- 
				Why do you know where to find that?
 
 
 saw the add last night and as i was reading i though it fitting