Aces High Bulletin Board
Special Events Forums => Scenario General => Topic started by: Fencer51 on July 05, 2010, 10:12:03 AM
-
All,
Thanks for your interest in Philippine Phandango.
Please be aware that the AHEvents website has went through a complete ground up modification and even moved to a different server provider.
As such please enter the registration process through the main page at "www.ahevents.org".
Make sure you are logged INTO the site.
Everything is UP now, but the registration is not enabled. Go ahead and look at it and make sure you can see the registration page. If you cannot, post here and we will see what we can do to help.
-
Also if you are using an older version of Internet Explorer you might have problems. When accessing the site at work I get a warning about the IE6 version we have there.
Consider upgrading.. I know.. progress is not always good. But you can trust Bill Gates surely.. :noid
-
working great w/ firefox.
-
Works fine with IE6 "if" you add the "www." to the front of the url.
I have IE6 and all the http://ahevents.org sites or links are not redirected this morning. Firefox had no problem for me either-with or without the www. I have IE8 on my other PCs/laptops but I use this PC for linking to some work sites and IE6 is all we currently use for some supported internal applications remotely.
Thanks for clarifying this Fencer51 :rock
EDIT: I just clicked the link above and it opened with IE6... :rofl :rolleyes: :confused: :headscratch:
-
7:53PM EST
Readying pitchforks and torches.
-
That's only if things don't work :)
It'll work :)
7 minutes to go!
-
I'm in!!!!!
not
-
Its 8:01, links not open....I just sent a bomb to the HTC HQ. :uhoh
-
I am registered.. Refresh is your friend.
Also about 9 other people..
-
One little complaint, the selection boxes need to better linked to their squad. I had a hard time telling which one went to which squad. Then again I'm almost blind so that could also be a problem.
-
Doesn't show who is in just chicken scratches, weird.
-
Seems to have worked for me. Registered and it says I did, but the counts on the pages don't update when you come back?
-
It is taking registrants -- not diplaying names for me, though.
I'll ask to get that fixed later -- just register for now. I don't want the thing taken down right now.
-
One little complaint, the selection boxes need to better linked to their squad. I had a hard time telling which one went to which squad. Then again I'm almost blind so that could also be a problem.
+1
I'm in. Hopefully in the right squad. :D
-
Yeah I hope I'm in too. :D Though I may be flying B24s if I clicked the wrong one. :uhoh
-
One little complaint, the selection boxes need to better linked to their squad. I had a hard time telling which one went to which squad. Then again I'm almost blind so that could also be a problem.
Its because of this code that it looks out of whack...its the rowspan=2 in the first cell when the rest don't have it...the option box is bottom justified and the text is top justified...
It did seem to work but there is no indication it did other than the note at the bottom
<tr>
<td class="sectiontableentry2" rowspan="2"><center><input type="radio" name="gid" value="71"></center></td>
<td class="sectiontableentry2" >345th Bomb Group</td>
<td class="sectiontableentry2" >B-25C / B-25H</td>
<td class="sectiontableentry2" >6</td>
<td class="sectiontableentry2" >4</td>
</tr>
-
+1
I'm in. Hopefully in the right squad. :D
Same.
It was a bit confusing and I could see a few players getting in the wrong squad.
-
Hey I just noticed they added "Fleet Captain" aka boat driver as a group with 1 slot in at the bottom of each Alliance...
Slick and good going...
:aok
-
AAArrrrgh!!!! I click "here to register" and get error 404 or something, logged in and all, trying to reserve Ki84 slot CO perdweeb
-
What are you using to access the site?
Goto the the front page, "www.ahevents.org" choose events, then scenarios, then when the page comes up choose the registration option on the upper right side of the page.
[edit] There seem to be some dead links in there, I know this gets me to the registration page.
-
The 80th Headhunters filled up first for the scenario. :neener:
-
Is there by any chance a way to see who has registered into your squad?
-
Hey I just noticed they added "Fleet Captain" aka boat driver as a group with 1 slot in at the bottom of each Alliance...
Slick and good going...
:aok
Agreed, is most excellent idea to have this slot provided for both sides........
I am registered, had no problems......... although does the COs & XOs have to register for the event, even though they are already pre-selected? just curious......
-
Is there any reason F6F is not included? Was really looking forward to flying it.
-
Yes COs and XOs have to register.
-
Is there any reason F6F is not included? Was really looking forward to flying it.
Ditto.
-
Is there any reason F6F is not included? Was really looking forward to flying it.
Yes there was. They were not present during the battle. The F6Fs at the time we are depicting were just not used on the Escort (CVE) Carriers in theater.
The F6Fs were on the Fleet Carriers (CVs and CVLs). During this time (depending on which frame) the Fleet Carriers were either off pounding Luzon (Northern most Island of the Philippines) or off at one of the captured atolls refitting and getting ready for the next big push.
F6Fs had deployed to CVEs in this time period, but these carriers had yet to make it out to the western Pacific. This is all confirmed by actual top secret US Navy documents which are now available publically.
I had considered putting them in the CVEs anyway, but there seemed no interest in them in the last event (The Final Battle).
-
Is there a way for the COs to see who is signed for which group on their side? I have GLs with squaddies and not seeing names is problematic (for me especially) if they failed to communicate their wishes or in one case right now, a GL is requesting a ride for he and his squaddies, but I do not know which group to tell him to pick as there are folks registered in the sister flight! There might be another GL, that I am unaware of, signed into that flight already.
I have also Registered as well. :D (I went with .... AXIS) :rofl
-
Yes there was. They were not present during the battle. The F6Fs at the time we are depicting were just not used on the Escort (CVE) Carriers in theater.
The F6Fs were on the Fleet Carriers (CVs and CVLs). During this time (depending on which frame) the Fleet Carriers were either off pounding Luzon (Northern most Island of the Philippines) or off at one of the captured atolls refitting and getting ready for the next big push.
F6Fs had deployed to CVEs in this time period, but these carriers had yet to make it out to the western Pacific. This is all confirmed by actual top secret US Navy documents which are now available publically.
I had considered putting them in the CVEs anyway, but there seemed no interest in them in the last event (The Final Battle).
rgr that, no problem, wasn't sure if they were present in the locale where our scenario is taking place. I appreciate the quick explanation, and look forward to flying the F4U-1A. :salute
-
Is there a way for the COs to see who is signed for which group on their side? I have GLs with squaddies and not seeing names is problematic (for me especially) if they failed to communicate their wishes or in one case right now, a GL is requesting a ride for he and his squaddies, but I do not know which group to tell him to pick as there are folks registered in the sister flight! There might be another GL, that I am unaware of, signed into that flight already.
I have also Registered as well. :D (I went with .... AXIS) :rofl
We hope that we will be able to see who registered where soon, the Website guys will get to it when they can.
We will be sending both COs spread sheets with the information for all their pilots.
-
We hope that we will be able to see who registered where soon, the Website guys will get to it when they can.
We will be sending both COs spread sheets with the information for all their pilots.
Awesome and thank you Fencer51.
-
TY sir, got it, had to find a new link :salute
-
I hope you are in the right one too Beefcake - only one slot is taken in B24s and I'm hoping that's me! :). I was tired last night and went to bed early leaving my husband to register for me, so nhopimg he got it right. Would be good to see some names. :)
-
I hope you are in the right one too Beefcake - only one slot is taken in B24s and I'm hoping that's me! :). I was tired last night and went to bed early leaving my husband to register for me, so hoping he got it right. Would be good to see some names. :)
Oops duplicated post - meant to edit post above!
-
BTW, to add to what I posted originally, it does show numbers in each squad but there was a delay in the display. Should be FLS, Gazoom1 and I in the 80th.
-
91 people registered after 19 hours. Thanks all for your interest. :aok
-
Many thanks to all those who have chosen to join the AXIS this trip. Looks like an excellent group, for sure.
Many of you have flown with me or against me in one form or another and I hope this will be a whole lot of fun!!
I was impressed with the overall attitude of those who have joined and stepped up to GL or just fly.
This time of year is a bit difficult due to vacations etc. to get people to sign up. Please make sure you hit the MA and all other arenas with a message to join us in our endeavor to strike a blow to the Allied forces. Recruiting is our friend and whether it be Rook, Knit or BISH, we need their help and I yours.
I am still looking for GL's should anyone have the desire.
I have named Redtail7 XO for this event.
The following have already PM'd me about GL slots and they are confirmed.
OOZ662, Brooke, perdue3, USRanger and SF. (Reassignment for some will be necessary)
5 GL Slots still available are:
1-A6M5b, 1-KI-61, 2-KI-84, 1 N1K2-J
Please PM me if you are interested and have wish to lead a small group.
Thank you again for your interest in this Historical event and your support.
:salute
-
hey fencer just want to remind you that i am not "Wildcat1" in-game. i should of clarified that in the comments box, but it should be "swede91" in VC-81, not "Wildcat1"
Thanks :salute
-
The following have already PM'd me about GL slots and they are confirmed.
OOZ662, Brooke, perdue3, USRanger and SF. (Reassignment for some will be necessary)
So GL's can be reassigned?
-
So GL's can be reassigned?
Since Registration was blind, initially, I have sent a PM to clarify this and I would assume that they will be in the "plane" they chose, but the group might need to be altered and since GL is voluntary (due to shortages) it may be necessary to switch someone. I am aware that the Registation page noted No changing and that is why I sent the PM - to get it resolved..
I have no issue with the Allied GLs being reassigned, if it is necessary due to the Blind Registration. (Even if it involves a whole squad - but they must fly the same plane they signed up for)
-
Since Registration was blind, initially, I have sent a PM to clarify this and I would assume that they will be in the "plane" they chose, but the group might need to be altered and since GL is voluntary (due to shortages) it may be necessary to switch someone. I am aware that the Registation page noted No changing and that is why I sent the PM - to get it resolved..
I have no issue with the Allied GLs being reassigned, if it is necessary due to the Blind Registration. (Even if it involves a whole squad - but they must fly the same plane they signed up for)
I would be curious what the answer will be.
I am also curious if you consider a 1d and a 1a both F4u's and let pilots switch between them.
-
I would be curious what the answer will be.
I am also curious if you consider a 1d and a 1a both F4u's and let pilots switch between them.
Same w/475's 38s.
-
I would be curious what the answer will be.
I am also curious if you consider a 1d and a 1a both F4u's and let pilots switch between them.
I am curious as well because I have 2 GLs signed up for KI 67's and the specific squads I am most concerned about arrangements made with me before registration was even open. (KI-84's) Sadly, the cloaking device was enabled on the site making it a guess - and I do understand that confusion. Certainly, where possible, we want folks to have fun and fly as a squad, if they desire.
I think the F4U's are splitting hairs and I would want to stay neutral on that decision. With a reasonable explanation, I can see both sides and can go with the CM decision(s). Once the frames start, it's a lock, IMHO.
Same w/475's 38s.
I'd think that is a No. Yet, there were early posts concerning the placement of radio buttons and all, starting on page 1 of this thread by Beefcake and echoed by others. I'd rather allow re-registration to occur than to have players end up with a sour taste in their mouth because of the Registration experience. As with any issues that arise, as long as it's pre-forum/Registration Close ... I am good with the CM/CO decisions that are agreed upon. (to be fair)
:salute
-
I agree with K-Ken here...once Frame 1 starts it's solid so this way we can switch people around and what not. But once Fr 1 starts it's set the whole scenario.
It seems reasonable.
K, per the orders the only time the 475th will be split up is once or twice the four frames...so why would it be a big deal to be able...it's even closer than the 1D's and 1A's considering it's the same exact plane...J/L.
-
I agree with K-Ken here...once Frame 1 starts it's solid so this way we can switch people around and what not. But once Fr 1 starts it's set the whole scenario.
It seems reasonable.
K, per the orders the only time the 475th will be split up is once or twice the four frames...so why would it be a big deal to be able...it's even closer than the 1D's and 1A's considering it's the same exact plane...J/L.
Brooke mentioned that they were discussing just this when I PM'd him a few weeks ago...
The argument being that the whole reason for the beta from a players management perspective was to work out issues with the groups as they had been assigned and crafted.
Makes total sense and does not violate the intent of the provision while still affording management the flexibility it needs to fine tune their force.
Oneway
-
I would be curious what the answer will be.
I am also curious if you consider a 1d and a 1a both F4u's and let pilots switch between them.
I agree with K-Ken here...<snippage occured>
K, per the orders the only time the 475th will be split up is once or twice the four frames...so why would it be a big deal to be able...it's even closer than the 1D's and 1A's considering it's the same exact plane...J/L.
On the F4u and P38s. We know those planes have different characteristics, loadouts, and performance differences. I believe Fencer51 (The Creator) may have a higher opinion or reason why certain planes were used during a specific time or frame, but I do not know this for sure. If your orders call for the J model, then that should be the only one during that time frame. Maybe it is better that I not try and read into this and let Fencer51 and/or Brooke weigh in on the "reason(s)". The other major difference is that the F4U's (a & d) are actually listed separately on the registration page and the P-38s (J & L) are combined.
-
People can't be switched around, but they can request to be unregistered and then register again.
That is OK if there are still slots open where they want to go, and the risk is upon them that if they unregister then go to register for something that is full. But that's up to them -- no one can hold open spots for them. It's first come, first served. If there is an open spot, you can get it.
But the CO can't move them around.
-
People can't be switched around, but they can request to be unregistered and then register again.
That is OK if there are still slots open where they want to go, and the risk is upon them that if they unregister then go to register for something that is full. But that's up to them -- no one can hold open spots for them. It's first come, first served. If there is an open spot, you can get it.
But the CO can't move them around.
So a GL can only come from that group he registered for and can't be moved about...
Right?
-
People can't be switched around, but they can request to be unregistered and then register again.
That is OK if there are still slots open where they want to go, and the risk is upon them that if they unregister then go to register for something that is full. But that's up to them -- no one can hold open spots for them. It's first come, first served. If there is an open spot, you can get it.
But the CO can't move them around.
So a GL can only come from that group he registered for and can't be moved about...
Right?
WMLute, not sure what or how this was taken by you, but as Brooke stated.. "People can't be switched around, but they can request to be unregistered and then register again." People might mean Pilot, XO, GL etc. In previous Scenarios, CO's were able to move folks afterwords and since registration was just sign up, then pilots were assigned by the CO's/GL's etc.. They have taken that part away from us CO types. The only other option is unregister the player.
It's hard enough to get players for the Axis and keep them if they cannot fly and register as a group. The blind registration didn't help. Just my 2 cents.
:salute
-
Oh, I understand they can re register and IF that group isn't already full they can register in that group and then be the GL. If it IS full then one must pick from the pool of players in the group for the GL slot even if a much better candidate is avail but not registered in that group.
I am being a bit tongue and cheek here as I think the CO's need to have some leeway to move players about.
None of my posts are pointed towards you K-Ken or the Axis, or anything but what I see as a bad idea.
Like you said, it is pretty hard to fill out the slots in the 1st place, and it isn't unreasonable (IMHO) for the CO to move a few players about to created a better command structure amongst their groups. (or even move players to create better groups period)
What WAS the thinking behind this new rule? What was wrong with how it had been done for near 2 decades?
I can only assume that they are trying to remove as much responsibility and decision making from the CO position as possible so there is a larger pool of players who can be CO's in future events.
-
Oh, I understand ...
Like you said, it is pretty hard to fill out the slots in the 1st place, and it isn't unreasonable (IMHO) for the CO to move a few players about to created a better command structure amongst their groups. (or even move players to create better groups period)
What WAS the thinking behind this new rule? What was wrong with how it had been done for near 2 decades?
I can only assume that they are trying to remove as much responsibility and decision making from the CO position as possible so there is a larger pool of players who can be CO's in future events.
The last part of your statement is most correct! It is the only reason I hung my hat in the CO room. I have been doing Scenarios since 1996 in AW and then AH since the first of them here. (AH1) Because it is canned <partially> it does take the "guess-work" out of where to defend, attack, and everything in between...at least from T+1 to T+75 :) It's still a "creative" thing beyond there, IMHO, and even during that period..in a way. I want to remain hopeful and upbeat because Fudgums and I will be the first to try it. I think it still comes down to pilot skills...for the most-part. It should also provide excitement for nearly everyone right up front!! That is the part where folks were really dismayed..like one of my last ride in Mossies capping the CV in The Final Battle. No one came initially and then when the AR234's breezed thru we had no time to even react. I think everyone will get a piece of the action during the whole frame/event. At least, that is my hope for all.
:salute
-
The reason for the new rules comes from something that happened before I was a CM back during Dawn of Battle. I don't know all the details and it is water under the bridge anyway.
Brooke is highly opinionated that people shall fly what they want to fly, period. I don't think anyone can disagree with that.
Due to real life commitments, he has asked me to handle this, and K-KEN is going to get me some info to handle his problem.
It is my opinion that both COs must be left some leeway for leadership positions and errors in registration.
The register/unregister/reregister process, as cumbersome as it is, is how we are going to handle it now. But when it comes down to it, IF two people want to swap spots and BOTH people agree, I am not going to have any heartburn about it happening.
There is going to be a meeting between myself and the command teams next week, and I will discuss this and we will proceed with both sides coming to an agreement on how this will work.
We are making some changes to scenarios and there will be rough spots, please understand that and give us some time to work through them.
[edit] The main thing to remember is that wholesale swapping of people from one set of planes to the next or from one unit to the next just because the CO wants them there isn't going to happen anymore.
-
:aok
-
[edit] The main thing to remember is that wholesale swapping of people from one set of planes to the next or from one unit to the next just because the CO wants them there isn't going to happen anymore.
:headscratch: I don't recall that ever happening...though I tend to mostly pay attention to my own unit.
I find it kinda strange that the argument (until now) has been that everyone is permanently locked in place, but the registration page tells pilots to be ready in case they're moved.
-
:headscratch: I don't recall that ever happening...though I tend to mostly pay attention to my own unit.
I find it kinda strange that the argument (until now) has been that everyone is permanently locked in place, but the registration page tells pilots to be ready in case they're moved.
We will try and make sure you are informed of everything that happens in the future. ;)
Well again, as I said above, we are trying new things. The registration page is the original and was transfered over to the new site. When there is time it will be updated after we review what we want on there.
-
It's a new thing to try: you fly what you register for. That way, people know exactly what they are getting and with whom they will be flying. There is less flexibility for the CO, but on the other hand, in real WWII, groups and squadron CO's got the people HQ sent them and made it happen with the guys they got. So, you could think of this as an added bit of realism.
The lack of names at the beginning was a bug in the registration system as a result of a total redo of the whole ahevents.org site a little prior to this. It wasn't intentional, and it was fixed the next day.
We try new things in scenarios from time to time, to see what people think and to see how it goes. I figured that the majority of players would like it this way better, flying what they register for and knowing whom they will be flying with. It makes it possible for people to get what they want (if they register early enough) and for squad mates to make sure they are flying together (again, if they register early enough). But we'll see what people think. This one perhaps isn't the best test of the idea because of the bug in the beginning, though.
-
I am registered under JRjolly, my very first account because that is the time i made the aces high special events account, BUT i am now Jolly01. Just a heads up, not sure if it will be a big deal.
-
I am registered under JRjolly, my very first account because that is the time i made the aces high special events account, BUT i am now Jolly01. Just a heads up, not sure if it will be a big deal.
Use the User Menu>My AH Events Profile>Edit: Update Your Profile button to change your GameID. That way when the CMs output the spreadsheet to the COs, your name will show up properly. At least, it should if their coading is sound. :p
-
Thanks to All involved for fixing the instances where Registration had an adverse effect initially.
The new page looks great and should enhance the Registration process. I am very pleased at the way this was resolved and the quick response.
Again, Thank you to All...
:aok :rock :salute
-
is it just me or is registration extremely slow?
-
We are over half filled up after 5 days. I think that is pretty darn good.
-
Thanks to All involved for fixing the instances where Registration had an adverse effect initially.
The new page looks great and should enhance the Registration process. I am very pleased at the way this was resolved and the quick response.
Again, Thank you to All...
:aok :rock :salute
...and thank you K-KEN for getting this resolved quickly. Much respect sir!
:salute
-
Sorry if I missed this but when do the squadron forums get set up?
I don't want to miss them :)
-
when do the squadron forums get set up?
When Skuzzy gets around to it.
-
When Skuzzy gets around to it.
maybe we should get him one..... http://www.passco.com/tuit.htm. :D
-
maybe we should get him one..... http://www.passco.com/tuit.htm. :D
(http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff255/OOZ662/wut2.jpg)