Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: sandwich on July 19, 2010, 06:05:40 PM

Title: A-20
Post by: sandwich on July 19, 2010, 06:05:40 PM
Can we have the A-20 with the 4 20mm?

Pretty please with sugar on top.  :pray

Hell, even have it as a perked loadout if need be.

It could be something I can spend some bomber perks on other than the 234.



Title: Re: A-20
Post by: ACE on July 19, 2010, 06:17:16 PM
+1 but think all of the people dogfighting in it :)
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Spikes on July 19, 2010, 06:19:18 PM
The 234 is all you need, to spend perks on. It is good in every role. :)
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: ACE on July 19, 2010, 06:19:58 PM
The 234 is all you need, to spend perks on. It is good in every role. :)
The role of shooting is difficult :)
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Larry on July 19, 2010, 06:58:01 PM
When they remodel the A20 Id like to see that version added as a perked ord option. Plus the addition of the ventral gun that should be in game already.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: MachFly on July 19, 2010, 06:59:29 PM
 :aok I see no reason why not.



Just keep in mind that Mossy has 4 20mm in case if you don't want to wait.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Rios on July 19, 2010, 07:12:06 PM
+1  :aok
i love my a-20
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: jolly22 on July 19, 2010, 07:41:42 PM
WHY!?!?! its just like the mossie!!!!!!!   Soory but i would have to say no.
-1
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: MachFly on July 19, 2010, 07:46:39 PM
WHY!?!?! its just like the mossie!!!!!!!   Soory but i would have to say no.
-1

Different engines, can take more fire (I think), slower, looks different, ect...


P.S. I would probably not fly it thought but would enjoy shooting at it  :devil
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: The Fugitive on July 19, 2010, 08:18:46 PM
yup thats all we need a big bellybutton multi-cannon HOin machine!  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Ghosth on July 19, 2010, 08:30:26 PM
With a reasonable perk price for the 4 x 20mm's, absolutely!

Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Larry on July 19, 2010, 08:35:05 PM
yup thats all we need a big bellybutton multi-cannon HOin machine!  :rolleyes:

That would be perked if ever put into the game.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: lyric1 on July 19, 2010, 08:44:26 PM
If not mistaken this would be the version just like the Boston with the non rotating top gun. Also that version did not carry bombs. Make it a P70 instead more of them made plus we get the cool black skins.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Ack-Ack on July 19, 2010, 09:02:16 PM
If not mistaken this would be the version just like the Boston with the non rotating top gun. Also that version did not carry bombs. Make it a P70 instead more of them made plus we get the cool black skins.

More A-20Gs with 4x 20mm cannons were produced than P-70s with 4x 20mm cannons.  Only 59 P-70 were produced with the 4x 20mm cannons, P-70A-1 and later Nighthawk variants were produced with either 6 or 8 .50 caliber machine guns.

Also, the P-70 was a relative failure as a night fighter, think it only had one or two kills total throughout its entire war time service.


ack-ack
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Larry on July 19, 2010, 09:06:23 PM
If not mistaken this would be the version just like the Boston with the non rotating top gun. Also that version did not carry bombs. Make it a P70 instead more of them made plus we get the cool black skins.


from wiki

"A-20G
The A-20G, delivered from February 1943, would be the most produced of all the series - 2850 were built. The glazed nose was replaced by a solid nose containing four 20 mm (.79 in) Hispano cannons and two .50 in M2 Browning machine guns, making the aircraft slightly longer than previous versions. After the first batch of 250, the unreliable cannon were replaced by more machine guns. Some had a wider fuselage to accommodate a power driven gun turret. Many A-20Gs were delivered to the Soviet Union. The powerplant was the 1,600 hp (1,200 kW) R-2600-23. US A-20Gs were used on low-level sorties in the New Guinea theatre."
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Ack-Ack on July 19, 2010, 09:32:00 PM
It's also worth noting that only around 250 A-20Gs were produced with the 4x 20mm cannon weapons package.  Unreliability led the cannons to be replaced with either the 6x or 8x .50 cal nose weapon package.  Also, out of the 250, I think most of them were converted to the .50 cal nose weapon package.

ack-ack
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: cobia38 on July 19, 2010, 10:23:26 PM

 with all the unperked brit/German and ijn cannon rides dont ya think U.S should have one too ?
  and yes i know the 38 has 1 20mm but thats all we have,unless you want to spend perks on a Chog
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Karnak on July 19, 2010, 10:35:31 PM
with all the unperked brit/German and ijn cannon rides dont ya think U.S should have one too ?
  and yes i know the 38 has 1 20mm but thats all we have,unless you want to spend perks on a Chog
The US wasn't big on 20mm cannons due to poor decisions in cannon production methods, as noted in this thread.  The UK, Germany, Russia and Japan had the majority of their fighters armed with cannons, so it is hardly a surprise to see most of their fighters in AH bristling with cannons.

If a US cannon bird were really needed I'd vote for the P-61B.  At least it is interesting.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: cobia38 on July 19, 2010, 10:42:06 PM
The US wasn't big on 20mm cannons due to poor decisions in cannon production methods, as noted in this thread.  The UK, Germany, Russia and Japan had the majority of their fighters armed with cannons, so it is hardly a surprise to see most of their fighters in AH bristling with cannons.

If a US cannon bird were really needed I'd vote for the P-61B.  At least it is interesting.

 would be far easer to just update a ride that allready came with them, then it would be to put a new ride in the game.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Karnak on July 19, 2010, 10:46:29 PM

 would be far easer to just update a ride that allready came with them, then it would be to put a new ride in the game.
Yeah, but as noted earlier in this thread it would be highly unrepresentative of that aircraft, the A-20, to be cannon armed and yet the cannon version would be the one encountered by far the most frequently.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: cobia38 on July 19, 2010, 10:51:29 PM
Yeah, but as noted earlier in this thread it would be highly unrepresentative of that aircraft, the A-20, to be cannon armed and yet the cannon version would be the one encountered by far the most frequently.

   some of us prefer a tin can over a plywood box to do our dirty work,so yes there would be a lot of them flying around.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Ack-Ack on July 20, 2010, 02:39:34 AM
Yeah, but as noted earlier in this thread it would be highly unrepresentative of that aircraft, the A-20, to be cannon armed and yet the cannon version would be the one encountered by far the most frequently.

I also believe that operationally, a small amount of the cannon armed A-20Gs saw service and I think those were the ones deployed to the SWP area for combat evaluations.  I have to agree with Karnak.

ack-ack
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: 321BAR on July 20, 2010, 05:54:05 AM
Different engines, can take more fire (I think), slower, looks different, ect...


P.S. I would probably not fly it thought but would enjoy shooting at it  :devil
somehow i can fly an A20 better than a mossie... those Pratt & Whitney R-2600-23 radials seem to have a nice climb/stall character the mossie doesn't :aok and those 6 .50s are amazing
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: cobia38 on July 20, 2010, 06:03:58 AM
Yeah, but as noted earlier in this thread it would be highly unrepresentative of that aircraft, the A-20, to be cannon armed and yet the cannon version would be the one encountered by far the most frequently.


  you speak of   " highly unrepresentative"  lets take the ta-152 for instance,only 42 built. this compared to 250 quad 20mm nose mount Havocs.
     allso only 200 C hogs built.  so maybe these aircraft are also not worthy in the game.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Ghosth on July 20, 2010, 07:20:41 AM
Early war US versions of the Hispano 20mm cannons had several problems. One of the biggest was not designing tight enough tolerances for the ammunition. By the time they got the bugs figured out they had settled into using 6 or more  .50's  for most planes.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: RTHolmes on July 20, 2010, 08:50:45 AM
A20 really doesnt need more firepower, and given only a small % were produced with 20mm, and most of those didnt work so were retrofitted with .50s I say

 -1
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Tupac on July 20, 2010, 12:58:11 PM
+1
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Yeager on July 20, 2010, 01:13:16 PM
the A20 we have in game is already a stellar energy dogfighter with the lethal .50 package.  Giving her C-hog lethality is the definition of overkill.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Imowface on July 20, 2010, 01:17:18 PM
It is like the three cannon LA-7, they were extremely rare in WW2, but in AH almost all LA7's in the sky are using the 3 cannon package
so I give a -1
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: sandwich on July 20, 2010, 04:28:31 PM
the A20 we have in game is already a stellar energy dogfighter with the lethal .50 package.  Giving her C-hog lethality is the definition of overkill.
4 20mm and 2 50 cal is not overkill.  17.2 50 cal

4 20mm and 2 30mm is overkill.  36.0 50 cal

50 cal = 1.0

20 mm = 3.80

Mg151/20 20 mm = 3.3

30mm = 11.4

Alright, maybe 17 50 cal is a bit overkill.
Look at the 110 G2 though.  :O

That's overkill.

I have no problems with the 6 50 cal loadout but the 20mm just make it so much better. Of course it will come with a perk price, limiting it's usage. F4U-1c levels maybe?

And 8 50 cals would be nice to have too. Perk it at 2 or 3 if it even requires a perk at all.

Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Karnak on July 20, 2010, 05:50:48 PM

  you speak of   " highly unrepresentative"  lets take the ta-152 for instance,only 42 built. this compared to 250 quad 20mm nose mount Havocs.
     allso only 200 C hogs built.  so maybe these aircraft are also not worthy in the game.
Yet the Ta152 we have is not unrepresentative of the Ta152s that were built, thus mooting your point.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Big Rat on July 20, 2010, 08:40:23 PM
OK, OK, I'll take the 8 .50's in the nose and I'll call it good enough  :lol

 :salute
BigRat
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: TOMCAT21 on July 21, 2010, 08:28:33 AM
The P-70, which was the nightfighter version of the A-20, had the 4 x 20mm. to my knowledge and even those saw very limited service.
Title: Re: A-20
Post by: Larry on July 21, 2010, 03:34:30 PM
Yet the Ta152 we have is not unrepresentative of the Ta152s that were built, thus mooting your point.

Three gun La-7.