Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: meddog on July 25, 2010, 01:39:48 PM
-
How about relating ammo loads to the number of ammo bunkers that are up some what like they do to the fuel. I would suggest adding ammo bunkers in this case. Maybe 4 (small fields) 6 (medium fields) 8 (large fields). Maybe the max reduction to ammo load could be 50%. Also like having the ability to choose fuel and bomb loads you can choose ammo loads 25, 50, 75 or 100%.
-
-1 :headscratch:
-
You really want to not be able to fly from a field because both ammo bunkers are down and you don't like taking off with no ammo in your plane?
Seriously think about how that would effect gameplay.
How could you defend a field?
-
You really want to not be able to fly from a field because both ammo bunkers are down...?
Well i did say increase the number of ammo bunkers.
-
It dont make sense meddog, i can understand to bombs/rockets, but fewer cannons/mg in a plane, prolly no.
semp
-
How could you defend a field?
Ram 'em ;)
-
It dont make sense meddog, i can understand to bombs/rockets, but fewer cannons/mg in a plane, prolly no.
semp
who says you need that extra ammo? ;) -1
-
Nope.
-
Hello N1K2-Js!
You'd rarely see anything else defending a field.
-
You all are a bunch of naysayers I say negative 1 on the loss of ammo when bunkers are down cause they are always down always some loony porker suicide porking everything. But I think big plus one on the ability to take less ammo up. I fire out excess ammo on some of my rides 400 50 cals is a little over 100 lbs which makes a noticeable difference flying the p39Q the plane really begins to perform well after half the fuel is gone only reason I don't fly with 75 percent fuel as the 39 has such short legs at a full tank it gets almost 25 mins of fuel.
-
-1
Ammo bunkers are for ord, and not bullets. If you want to stop fighters from taking off just take out the fighter hangers.
-
You all are a bunch of naysayers I say negative 1 on the loss of ammo when bunkers are down cause they are always down always some loony porker suicide porking everything. But I think big plus one on the ability to take less ammo up. I fire out excess ammo on some of my rides 400 50 cals is a little over 100 lbs which makes a noticeable difference flying the p39Q the plane really begins to perform well after half the fuel is gone only reason I don't fly with 75 percent fuel as the 39 has such short legs at a full tank it gets almost 25 mins of fuel.
try flying La's in the MA, at leased with the 39 you get a DT lol
-
Try flying La's in the MA, at least with the 39 you get a DT. :lol
Fixed, leased was really bad, sticking out like a sore thumb. Terrible sorry, OCD moment, the thread may continue.
-
Fixed, leased was really bad, sticking out like a sore thumb. Terribly sorry, OCD moment, the thread may continue.
My apologies, too ;)
-
My apologies, too ;)
:noid
:D
-
I suppose I deserve that after staying up all day long and then trying to correct horrid spelling. At least I got the correct base meaning of the word, though. :lol