Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Hardware and Software => Topic started by: fbWldcat on July 28, 2010, 10:14:57 PM

Title: Hewlett Packard
Post by: fbWldcat on July 28, 2010, 10:14:57 PM
I keep getting WINDOWS auto-updater windows asking me if I would like to continue with operations. The one where if you open something and Vista asks you if you would like to proceed. What is going on? Is it a virus or something?
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Krupinski on July 28, 2010, 10:24:33 PM
How often?
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: fbWldcat on July 28, 2010, 10:30:58 PM
About once every two months to my knowledge, but one just popped up and reminded me. It seemed odd.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Krupinski on July 28, 2010, 10:44:24 PM
Your computer is an HP is it not? (Hewlett-Packard). I get these too, probably just an update.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: fbWldcat on July 28, 2010, 11:00:11 PM
Yes, it is an HP. I was just cautious. I had never seen it before we got the new computer, our previous ones were Dells.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Krupinski on July 28, 2010, 11:04:27 PM
Dell and Hewlett-Packard two completely different companies.  :)
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Skuzzy on July 29, 2010, 06:03:19 AM
Hewlette Packard is a virus.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: mipoikel on July 29, 2010, 06:08:00 AM
Quote from: Skuzzy link=topic=293681.msg3742412#msg3742412 date=
Hewlette Packard is a virus.

Nonsense, dont generalize...
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Skuzzy on July 29, 2010, 06:20:06 AM
Alright, here you go.

Hewlett Packard places more bloat for the user to deal with on thier computer than any other OEM computer in the marketplace.  They offer zero help in cleaning it up.   It interferes with many real-time applications.  It causes more support grief than any other computer manufacturer has created to date.

The applications/utilities they force on the consumer are ill chosen and generic.  H-P has no understanding of what it takes to conform thier computer systems to the environment they are going to be placed in.  They refuse to conform thier computers to the users needs/requirements unless you pay them an enormous amount of money for support.  In the OEM world, they are the worst about this.

Of all OEM computers, H-P are the worst ones I have to deal with, on a daily basis.  I feel for users who get suckered into buying them.  I always cringe when I get a call from someone who has one.  They are a nightmare to support.

Personally, I would do without a computer if my only choice was a Compaq or H-P computer.  I do not need the frustration in my life.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: fbWldcat on July 29, 2010, 06:49:43 AM
Wow, thanks, Skuz. I'll remember to buy one next time. This HP isn't as reliable as my old Dells were, it seems. Some features are getting rustic and starting to become sad. (My term for suck).
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: RTHolmes on July 29, 2010, 06:59:20 AM
strange, Ive installed over 20 HP machines over the last 4 years and they dont seem to be any more badly bloated than other OEMs and if anything they seem to be getting better. did 2 workstations last week, only had to remove Office (trial :rolleyes:), Lightscribe (does anyone use this? :headscratch:) and ?antivirus (cant remember what it was, unistalled completely tho). deleted the HP cloud/meeting/whatever stuff too, easy uninstall.

btw these machines (like all the other HP boxes Ive ordered in the last coupla years) came with XP Pro preinstalled and Win 7 installer disks :aok
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: USRanger on July 29, 2010, 07:28:51 AM
Alright, here you go.

Hewlett Packard places more bloat for the user to deal with on thier computer than any other OEM computer in the marketplace.  They offer zero help in cleaning it up.   It interferes with many real-time applications.  It causes more support grief than any other computer manufacturer has created to date.

The applications/utilities they force on the consumer are ill chosen and generic.  H-P has no understanding of what it takes to conform thier computer systems to the environment they are going to be placed in.  They refuse to conform thier computers to the users needs/requirements unless you pay them an enormous amount of money for support.  In the OEM world, they are the worst about this.

Of all OEM computers, H-P are the worst ones I have to deal with, on a daily basis.  I feel for users who get suckered into buying them.  I always cringe when I get a call from someone who has one.  They are a nightmare to support.

Personally, I would do without a computer if my only choice was a Compaq or H-P computer.  I do not need the frustration in my life.

Other than that though, they are ok. :D
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: mipoikel on July 29, 2010, 08:30:24 AM
When we talk about HP products, There is a huge difference between consumer and business products. I think Skuzzy is talking about consumer PCs and laptops? right?

Whatever, you can allways install clean windows (or linux) to HP computer without extra software.

I have 10 years experience of selling and supporting HP products, PC:s, workstations, laptos, printers,  servers, storage and network products (99.99% of them business products) and they have been really reliable systems over the years.


Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Krupinski on July 29, 2010, 08:36:56 AM
Other than HP, what other brands aren't as "congested"?  :noid  :)
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: RTHolmes on July 29, 2010, 08:56:16 AM
When we talk about HP products, There is a huge difference between consumer and business products. I think Skuzzy is talking about consumer PCs and laptops? right?

aww ok, ive only got one consumer HP Win 7 box sitting here, havent had a chance to look at it yet. the business machines are great, only failures we've had have been some older AMD mobos, the intel ones have been rock solid. cheap nextday onsite warranties too :aok
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Skuzzy on July 29, 2010, 09:53:01 AM
Mip, guess what 99.9% of the users in the game use?  Bzzzzt!  Consumer products!
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: gyrene81 on July 29, 2010, 10:29:03 AM
When we talk about HP products, There is a huge difference between consumer and business products. I think Skuzzy is talking about consumer PCs and laptops? right?

Whatever, you can allways install clean windows (or linux) to HP computer without extra software.

I have 10 years experience of selling and supporting HP products, PC:s, workstations, laptos, printers,  servers, storage and network products (99.99% of them business products) and they have been really reliable systems over the years.
Reliable compared to what? Where I work we're 100% HP. The last batch of Intel cpu blade servers we got had 80% memory failures because HP in their infinite wisdom bought Hynix memory to put in their enterprise servers. A week ago we lost a terabyte of data on a SAN enclosure, something that had never occurred since HP started selling the enclosures, 2 bad drives is all it took, and in the past week we have had 6 more drives go bad...the enclosure has only been running 8 months. Over the past 18 months we have had to replace 30% of the hard drives in our SAN enclosures. Their equipment isn't any better than Dell or IBM.

When it comes to HP, reliability is a relative term, relative to the amount of money you want to spend on support. The differences between HP's business and retail systems, is customer support and the amount of useless bloatware that gets installed, nothing else. All you have to do is look at the spares numbers, and the copy of HP supplied parts catalogue I have on my computer shows how many parts are exactly the same between commercial and retail. All the company does is change the spares numbers.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Viperius on July 29, 2010, 10:37:38 AM
When I visited the HP HQ in Switzerland everything I needed to know about their servers was instantly clear when I entered the critical systems datacenter and found only Sun machines  :lol
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: skribetm on July 29, 2010, 02:51:23 PM
does AH2 have a benchmark? some "test" that can easily be reproduced across a broad range of systems.
ideally it could be a set of camera views detailing the FPS per scene. (like Hafl-Life2 benchmark).
it would make it easier to actually compare systems and prices vs. performance.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Skuzzy on July 29, 2010, 03:13:51 PM
It would not help.

Here is the problem.  Take two systems, which have the same exact hardware and run the benchmark.  You can easily end up with radically different results.

A good example is my personal computer at home. It is a lowly Intel E8400 CPU with 2GB of RAM and a lowly ATI 4850 video card, but it runs circles around most of the computers playing this game.  With Shadows on and every bit of eye candy going it never drops (disable v-sync) below 100FPS regardless of what is going on around me.

It is all about the configuration of the software and the applications/utilities installed.  It is not just a matter of what is running in the background.  My computer is tweaked to the extreme, yet more stable than any machine I have ever used before.  How many of you can boot (from the time the boot loader is read off the HD) your computer and get to your Windows desktop in 4 seconds (or less) flat?

One day, I need to write a book.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: morfiend on July 29, 2010, 03:35:05 PM
It would not help.

Here is the problem.  Take two systems, which have the same exact hardware and run the benchmark.  You can easily end up with radically different results.

A good example is my personal computer at home. It is a lowly Intel E8400 CPU with 2GB of RAM and a lowly ATI 4850 video card, but it runs circles around most of the computers playing this game.  With Shadows on and every bit of eye candy going it never drops (disable v-sync) below 100FPS regardless of what is going on around me.

It is all about the configuration of the software and the applications/utilities installed.  It is not just a matter of what is running in the background.  My computer is tweaked to the extreme, yet more stable than any machine I have ever used before.  How many of you can boot (from the time the boot loader is read off the HD) your computer and get to your Windows desktop in 4 seconds (or less) flat?

One day, I need to write a book.


  Wow,I can go put the garbage out and be back before windows finishes loading............ :o
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: Spikes on July 29, 2010, 03:44:12 PM
It would not help.

Here is the problem.  Take two systems, which have the same exact hardware and run the benchmark.  You can easily end up with radically different results.

A good example is my personal computer at home. It is a lowly Intel E8400 CPU with 2GB of RAM and a lowly ATI 4850 video card, but it runs circles around most of the computers playing this game.  With Shadows on and every bit of eye candy going it never drops (disable v-sync) below 100FPS regardless of what is going on around me.

It is all about the configuration of the software and the applications/utilities installed.  It is not just a matter of what is running in the background.  My computer is tweaked to the extreme, yet more stable than any machine I have ever used before.  How many of you can boot (from the time the boot loader is read off the HD) your computer and get to your Windows desktop in 4 seconds (or less) flat?

One day, I need to write a book.
Damn 4 seconds? Takes me about 30 (from windows boot) or so but I do have to type a pw into the box (puts on a few seconds).

I never really messed with the performance of my machine much since it's pretty fast for me (Q9550 @ 3.8-4.0, 2 HD5770s in CfX, 4 Gigs DDR2-800, 5400rpm hdd's). Not the greatest but it works. Skuzzy, I've read through BlackViper a bit but I'm sure I could do a bit more...

Btw I wouldn't consider the 4850 lowly at all sir! :) Compared to today's 5900 series yes but in it's own respect it's a great card.
Title: Re: Hewlett Packard
Post by: skribetm on July 29, 2010, 04:46:29 PM
without a standard benchmark to quantify performance-
it is all meaningless.

point is, if you have similar hardware and mine scores well below the average FPS for that hardware class,
then at least we can point out that there is indeed some settings that need to be fixed on the system.

benchmarks arent just for bragging, ya know.