Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: JBJB710 on September 20, 2010, 12:48:30 AM
-
What do you say, do you think there should be Submarine Aircraft Carriers in Aces High as well,
like the I-400 class submarine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-400_class_submarine)
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/I400_2.jpg)
but can only carry Aichi M6A Seiran (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aichi_M6A).
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/M6A1.jpg)
-
I'm glad it saw combat... wait a second...
-
Pretty big wish, first to recode the game to allow submarines to submerge, then a floatplane with
folding everything and a small bombload. Sounds like alot of work.
-
Just happened to find a model of it on Model Warships site, it does look pretty :D
(http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery/ss/ijn/i400-350-cb/i400-01.jpg)
-
Perk the hell out of it!
-
hmmm....yeah..... no im not feeling it
-
dont perk it dont perk it dont perk it....wait a sec.... perking a n1k or a6m2 fro upping off a cv sub
-
The only combat it saw was as torpedo practice for the US Navy. After the war was over I might add. -1
-
negatory.
never saw combat, excluding the times popeye the sailor attacked them with his sucker punch
-
It was a good idea, desinged to bomb targets in the US, but it was just one of those great things thought up in WW2 that never made it, however, they did have tanker submarines, which were use to refuel float planes on there way to bombing pearl harbour, so, in a compromise, once we even get opperational subs in AH, as well as floatplanes ie H8K2 there could be room for TG like subs that you could refuel from at sea, you have lots of unique ideas, and with a little refinement and a bit more research, I foresee that you will start to put out some unique ideas that no one has thought of before
-
Heard of U boat Milk Cows, didn't know about Japanese models.
(http://www.uboataces.com/photos/200727191824899.jpg)
(http://www.uboat.net/types/illustrations/xiv_2d.gif)
-
Noo don't wanna see any of those stupid things
-
dont perk it dont perk it dont perk it....wait a sec.... perking a n1k or a6m2 fro upping off a cv sub
English please.
-
If we're gonna wish, why not have the French Surcouf? French stuff is non-existant anyway...
(http://polarcoordinate.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/lesurcouf.jpg)
A sub with 8" guns, ya, surface offshore, fire a few rounds, kill a shore battery, then submerge!!
Course, the only way to kill it is to run over it with a surface ship, the way the real Surcouf died :salute, or to have your crew mutiny and country-hop to another side.
Tongue planted firmly in cheek (that means I'm not being serious)
J
-
I take it they could only submerge once the aircraft took off. What a piece of c***.
-
I presume that you are inferring that the aircraft is stowed on the deck. Wrong. The aircraft is hangared with wings folded. The sub surfaces, and the aircraft can be launched within 15 minutes.
Piece of crap, no, as the U.S. Navy took serious interest in them immediately after WW2. Much of what they learned about the I-400 class was used on the Grayback class Regulus missile submarines in the 50s.
However crazy this request is, the I-400 was not a piece of crap.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't a modified I-400 lanch midget subs on Pearl before the air assult?
-
ssly, for all the things to wish for. . . .
lets try to get some more japanese airplanes before we ask for japanese subs. And russian planes, and italian planes and. . .well you get the idea.
-
I presume that you are inferring that the aircraft is stowed on the deck. Wrong. The aircraft is hangared with wings folded. The sub surfaces, and the aircraft can be launched within 15 minutes.
Piece of crap, no, as the U.S. Navy took serious interest in them immediately after WW2. Much of what they learned about the I-400 class was used on the Grayback class Regulus missile submarines in the 50s.
However crazy this request is, the I-400 was not a piece of crap.
Absolutely correct Herne. The US Navy studied the hell out them, before scuttling them off of the Island of Oahu.
-
you know why they destroyied them??? because the russians also wanted to study them but america didnt want them to
-
Wow - military historians abound I see... :uhoh
Jay, the Russians made no efforts to procure any of the I-400s. They were far too busy rounding up intelligence on the German Type XXI subs and aircraft from the German jet program. The demobilization of war assets was number one on list of priorities in the immediate post-war. When you consider the Bikini Atoll tests and the ships that were expended there (incluing battleships, fleet carriers, etc), scuttling a couple of large enemy subs into deep water was no big deal.
Warphoenix - Close. The subs that launched on Pearl were the I-20 and I-16, of the Ko-hyoteki class. The I-400s, to put them into perspective were as large as a Fletcher Class destroyer. I wrote an article for Proceedings (Naval Historical Center) about 15 years ago on the history of submarine launched aircraft. Somewhere in this mess I call an office, I have original sketches of an I-400 that were done by a US Naval Commander, since no photos were allowed to be taken at that immediate time.
-
Interesting stuff Jherne.
-
ssly, for all the things to wish for. . . .
lets try to get some more japanese airplanes before we ask for japanese subs. And russian planes, and italian planes and. . .well you get the idea.
M-18 :noid
-
LOL Bar - I'm with ya. :salute
-
LOL Bar - I'm with ya. :salute
:D :noid
-
you know why they destroyed them??? because the Russians also wanted to study them but America didn't want them to
They should destroyed all but one, by faking the sinking of one of those subs and hiding it from the Soviets so they could study it, do you agree?
-
They should destroyed all but one, by faking the sinking of one of those subs and hiding it from the Soviets so they could study it, do you agree?
Soviet Union spies is why they didn't do that
-
Why keep a foreign military asset around, soaking up resources in both manpower to maintain it, guard it, study it, etc., when you already have the information you need from it? In 1945, no one wanted anything that was Japanese or German to be sitting around.
All of the useful technology, construction design, etc., research was done by the time they were scuttled.
-
I say don't bother with the subs, just add in the Aichi M6A Seiran. And that plane can only be upped at Ports, but will be unavaible if the VHs are knocked out.
-
Wow - military historians abound I see... :uhoh
Jay, the Russians made no efforts to procure any of the I-400s. They were far too busy rounding up intelligence on the German Type XXI subs and aircraft from the German jet program. The demobilization of war assets was number one on list of priorities in the immediate post-war. When you consider the Bikini Atoll tests and the ships that were expended there (incluing battleships, fleet carriers, etc), scuttling a couple of large enemy subs into deep water was no big deal.
Warphoenix - Close. The subs that launched on Pearl were the I-20 and I-16, of the Ko-hyoteki class. The I-400s, to put them into perspective were as large as a Fletcher Class destroyer. I wrote an article for Proceedings (Naval Historical Center) about 15 years ago on the history of submarine launched aircraft. Somewhere in this mess I call an office, I have original sketches of an I-400 that were done by a US Naval Commander, since no photos were allowed to be taken at that immediate time.
As I recall, one of these subs actually did launch their aircraft off the west coast of North America late in the war, where it dropped a couple incindiary bombs on a forest somewhere near Seattle. It was the only direct air attack against the US mainland during the war. Something like three subs of this class and configuration were made operational before the war ended, and they did see combat (after a fashion). In fact, there was also a Clive Cussler novel ("Black Wind", IIRC) that revolved around a ficitional (though plausible) plot to use this weapon system to deliver a bio weapon against the US west coast cities. In real life, the primary practical purpose for the aircraft were not as attack aircraft (there were too few); rather, they could serve as a scouting platform to help the sub locate targets for its torps and guns. This was the same reason cruisers and battleships carried aircraft. (Modified) In 1944, plans were drawn up to use them to attack the Panama Canal, as only a few bombs could cause extensive damage. The plan called for two I-400 subs and two smaller fleet subs, carrying a total of 10 aircraft. (End Modified entry)
In regards to the tanker subs, they were used for refueling recon flying boats and float planes. During the run up to the Battle of Midway, a Japanese recon mission float plane was supposed to meet up with a tanker sub, so they could scout Pearl and confirm that the American flattops were still there. A USN ship happened along, forcing the Jap sub to submerge, and causing the cancellation of the recon mission. The rest is, as they say, history.
-
I-25 was the sub that launched the aircraft that 'fire-bombed' Oregon. Considerably smaller than the I-400s.
-
I-25 was the sub that launched the aircraft that 'fire-bombed' Oregon. Considerably smaller than the I-400s.
Ah, thanks for looking that up. Thought it was the I-400 type, but that just goes to show that CRS is starting to set in. Got the state and the sub wrong. :bolt:
It was definitely I-400 types in the Cussler novel, so I guess that's what mixed me up. :salute