Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Perrine on November 02, 2010, 12:45:40 AM
-
How about giving it perk pts AND make it available ONLY in LARGE AIRFIELDS?
-
but I really want to see the whines when people crash their perk ride on take off!
-
Personally I have a demented enough sense of humor that I want HTC to put the B-29 in game but have all the runways in the MA bases be too short to actually take off before hitting the trees/hill at the other end of the runway. :t :D
-
heck, i think most 4 engined strategic bombers (think b17, b24, lancaster) should only be available in large airfields
and 2 engined tactical bombers (think ju88, b25, g4m, mosquito) should only be available in large and medium airfields
and single engined tactical bombers (think ju-87 IL-2, TBM etc) should be available in large/medium/small airfields
-
heck, i think most 4 engined strategic bombers (think b17, b24, lancaster) should only be available in large airfields
and 2 engined tactical bombers (think ju88, b25, g4m, mosquito) should only be available in large and medium airfields
and single engined tactical bombers (think ju-87 IL-2, TBM etc) should be available in large/medium/small airfields
Heavies would see little to no use then, it's a good idea, but needs some tweaking. My thought is Heavies from Med and up and Med and Light Bombers from any.
-
Personally I have a demented enough sense of humor that I want HTC to put the B-29 in game but have all the runways in the MA bases be too short to actually take off before hitting the trees/hill at the other end of the runway. :t :D
Brilliant :aok
-
Personally I have a demented enough sense of humor that I want HTC to put the B-29 in game but have all the runways in the MA bases be too short to actually take off before hitting the trees/hill at the other end of the runway. :t :D
Soulyss just because you can't get your P38 off the runway doesn't mean everyone else has to suffer. ;)
-
Personally I have a demented enough sense of humor that I want HTC to put the B-29 in game but have all the runways in the MA bases be too short to actually take off before hitting the trees/hill at the other end of the runway. :t :D
Hek I can take a lancaster off a carrier full load, I will get a b-29 off a runway :D
-
Just in case...
http://www.zenoswarbirdvideos.com/B-29.html
-
From what I heard that a ton of folks voted for the me410
-
i hope you are right because it only takes 10-12 people to make a ton :lol that leaves the rest to vote for real rides :neener:
-
What if they put puffy ack on the base that would only target bombers over 20k?
-
The longest diagonal runways in AH are just under 7,400 ft in length and the sea level take off run of a fully loaded B-29 was 8,000 ft. However I can't see why anyone would load more than 25%-50% fuel in a B-29 in the MA so it shouldn't be a problem. Maybe HTC could just disable higher fuel loads in the B-29 the MA. For scenarios needing full fuel a special airbase could be built fairly easily.
Personally I'd think it even funnier if we got the version of the B-29 with all the turrets removed...... :devil
-
Personally I'd think it even funnier if we got the version of the B-29 with all the turrets removed...... :devil
muuuhhaaaa noo nook for joo!!!! :noid
-
WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO ALL THE CATS ACROSS THE WORLD!?!?!?!?
-
Soulyss just because you can't get your P38 off the runway doesn't mean everyone else has to suffer. ;)
:lol
-
Hek I can take a lancaster off a carrier full load, I will get a b-29 off a runway :D
How in the world can you launch a lancaster off a CV without clipping its wings on the command tower? I do not think you will be able to do the same on the B-29, wingspan 141 ft 3 in. lancaster wingspan 102 ft.
-
You can launch a lanc off the cv in game. Your wheels come very close to the edge of the flatdeck.
You can even rearm on the cv.
Yes it is ummm gamey.
-
You can launch a lanc off the cv in game. Your wheels come very close to the edge of the flatdeck.
You can even rearm on the cv.
Yes it is ummm gamey.
i thought that change when we got the CV upgraded. Thanks. :salute
-
Well you may be right. I have not tried it in a long time.
The last time the 80th did any kind of flight work based around a cv it was landing 163s on it. One who shall remain unnamed actually landed going in the wrong direction.
Who'd a thunk. :rofl
-
Well you may be right. I have not tried it in a long time.
The last time the 80th did any kind of flight work based around a cv it was landing 163s on it. One who shall remain unnamed actually landed going in the wrong direction.
Who'd a thunk. :rofl
:rofl
-
The longest diagonal runways in AH are just under 7,400 ft in length and the sea level take off run of a fully loaded B-29 was 8,000 ft. However I can't see why anyone would load more than 25%-50% fuel in a B-29 in the MA so it shouldn't be a problem. Maybe HTC could just disable higher fuel loads in the B-29 the MA. For scenarios needing full fuel a special airbase could be built fairly easily.
Personally I'd think it even funnier if we got the version of the B-29 with all the turrets removed...... :devil
Naw, leave the full fuel loads and let people find out the hard way.... :salute
-
......could also bring back the trees right AT the end of the runway :devil
elfy