Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Pigslilspaz on November 04, 2010, 07:01:49 PM

Title: Please HTC
Post by: Pigslilspaz on November 04, 2010, 07:01:49 PM: For my birthday, can I have the Short Stirling? I've been a good boy, I promise :devil.
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Liberator on November 04, 2010, 07:22:05 PM: +1, I think that would be a good plane to have in the game. :aok
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Guppy35 on November 05, 2010, 12:04:28 AM: Gonna tow gliders?
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Pigslilspaz on November 05, 2010, 01:24:44 AM: Quote from: Guppy35 on November 05, 2010, 12:04:28 AM
Gonna tow gliders?

Probably not seeing as the C-47 in game cant.

Also, fun thing about this plane, it could hold 18,000 lb of ords and later in war it was also used to deploy British Paratroopers
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: MachFly on November 05, 2010, 04:25:20 AM: Another heavy bomber? :O
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Pigslilspaz on November 05, 2010, 10:32:55 AM: Quote from: MachFly on November 05, 2010, 04:25:20 AM
Another heavy bomber? :O

and goonie bird.
this one is EW
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: LLogann on November 05, 2010, 01:03:26 PM: Okay, okay, TimeOut......... This one is more Midwar, #1

#2, you're wishing for a Buff that maximum speed is charted at a higher altitude than it's operational altitude.

#3, all .303's

I want you to go back and think of something better for your birthday bro.

Quote from: Pigslilspaz on November 05, 2010, 10:32:55 AM
and goonie bird.
this one is EW
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Pigslilspaz on November 06, 2010, 02:00:15 AM: Quote from: LLogann on November 05, 2010, 01:03:26 PM
Okay, okay, TimeOut......... This one is more Midwar, #1

#2, you're wishing for a Buff that maximum speed is charted at a higher altitude than it's operational altitude.

#3, all .303's

I want you to go back and think of something better for your birthday bro.

doesnt the lancaster and boston III only have .303's your point is moot.
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: EskimoJoe on November 06, 2010, 03:09:07 AM: Quote from: Pigslilspaz on November 06, 2010, 02:00:15 AM
doesnt the lancaster and boston III only have .303's your point is moot.

You're still Pigslilspaz. Your wish is moot.
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: LLogann on November 06, 2010, 05:55:54 PM: See Rule #4
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: LLogann on November 06, 2010, 06:02:54 PM: See Rule #4
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Pigslilspaz on November 08, 2010, 05:38:10 PM: Don't know why folks are giving it so much hate, just look how beautiful it is! (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Short_Stirling_bomber_N6101.jpg)
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: kvuo75 on November 08, 2010, 06:31:28 PM: Quote from: Pigslilspaz on November 06, 2010, 02:00:15 AM
doesnt the lancaster and boston III only have .303's your point is moot.

the lanc has 2x50's in the tail.
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Pigslilspaz on November 08, 2010, 07:19:47 PM: Quote from: kvuo75 on November 08, 2010, 06:31:28 PM
the lanc has 2x50's in the tail.

there were variants that had 4 x.303's instead
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Pigslilspaz on November 11, 2010, 06:21:30 PM: (http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace/media/militaryaviation1903-1945cutaways/images/10751/short-stirling-cutaway.jpg)

basically just aim in the middle of the wings.
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Wildcat1 on November 11, 2010, 06:28:04 PM: Quote from: Pigslilspaz on November 11, 2010, 06:21:30 PM
(http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace/media/militaryaviation1903-1945cutaways/images/10751/short-stirling-cutaway.jpg)

basically just aim in the middle of the wings.

:eek: that looks juicy!!!
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: 321BAR on November 11, 2010, 08:18:47 PM: Quote from: Pigslilspaz on November 08, 2010, 07:19:47 PM
there were variants that had 4 x.303's instead
IIRC a few years ago our lancs had .303s and not .50s in the tail also
Title: Re: Please HTC
Post by: Pigslilspaz on November 15, 2010, 05:25:31 PM: (http://www.pegelsoft.nl/mk4.jpg)