Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: fullmetalbullet on November 20, 2010, 05:41:56 PM

Title: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: fullmetalbullet on November 20, 2010, 05:41:56 PM
The Pe-8. i did use the search button and found 2 topics, and also did some reasearch on the aircraft. so besides filling a gap in russian planes. would it even be used in the MAs? heck even the better BUFFs get shot down way to easily. so would it even be used?
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Motherland on November 20, 2010, 08:45:34 PM
so besides filling a gap in russian planes.
It wouldn't fill any gaps, it was largely worthless and rarely used. It didn't really fit into VVS doctrine.
The DB-3/Il-4, Pe-2, and Tu-2 were the workhorses of the VVS.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: fullmetalbullet on November 20, 2010, 08:50:52 PM
how would it not fill any gaps? we need more russian aircraft.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: BrownBaron on November 20, 2010, 08:55:52 PM
how would it not fill any gaps? we need more russian aircraft.

It wasn't a Russian workhorse like the above aircraft were.

Pe-2

8 is bigger than 2, so they must have used to way moar!
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Motherland on November 20, 2010, 08:55:59 PM
how would it not fill any gaps? we need more russian aircraft.
Because the Soviets barely ever used it. Only 90 some were built. The only raids it was used on were morale raids where it rarely met enemy fighters. On the occasions it did it was massacred. You can't really build any scenarios around it, it wasn't used in any battles like the other bombers I listed were.
If we get Soviet aircraft, we should get the ones that were used. Not the ones that weren't.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Karnak on November 20, 2010, 09:30:42 PM
I am hoping that the fact the Tu-2 was not on the poll is because it is already in the production queue.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: fullmetalbullet on November 20, 2010, 09:35:11 PM
im not saying add the Pe-8 into the game i was trying to get opinions on weather it would be used if they did add it?
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Motherland on November 20, 2010, 09:39:48 PM
im not saying add the Pe-8 into the game i was trying to get opinions on weather it would be used if they did add it?
It wouldn't have a use in FSO's and I have to doubt it would be extremely popular in the MA's.

I am hoping that the fact the Tu-2 was not on the poll is because it is already in the production queue.
Hadn't thought of that... :aok
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: fullmetalbullet on November 20, 2010, 09:55:20 PM
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

and i see the Pe-8 wouldnt be popular huh? nah the TU-2 i wouldnt fly at all.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Karnak on November 20, 2010, 10:06:12 PM
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

and i see the Pe-8 wouldnt be popular huh? nah the TU-2 i wouldnt fly at all.
1) The US bombers are already very tough.  The Lancaster, also a tough bomber, takes 13 Hispano direct hits to the tail to remove the tail.  The B-17 took, as I recall, 18 hits.  Don't be to reliant on the photos of the beat up aircraft that made it home.  There are no photos of the aircraft that didn't make it and quite often the damage that was fatal did not look nearly as impressive as the photos you are referring to.  Also, remember that a lot of times those photos were taken because they did stand out and were unusual.

2) The Tu-2 would be a pretty useful bomber in AH.  It is fast, carries a heavy load and has not entirely useless defensive guns.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Void on November 20, 2010, 11:05:02 PM
Pe-2 and Tu-2 are my dream birds..
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Scotty55OEFVet on November 20, 2010, 11:37:01 PM
I am hoping that the fact the Tu-2 was not on the poll is because it is already in the production queue.

Heard that Panther WAS actually going to added but gonna be a while...any truth to that?
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Karnak on November 20, 2010, 11:47:28 PM
Heard that Panther WAS actually going to added but gonna be a while...any truth to that?

Somebody who was at the Con would be a better source on that.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: MiloMorai on November 21, 2010, 02:57:29 AM
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

Number of bombers lost by each heavy bomber group in the 8th Air Force during World War II

http://www.taphilo.com/history/8thaf/8aflosses.shtml
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Grendel on November 21, 2010, 03:16:58 AM
how would it not fill any gaps? we need more russian aircraft.

There are many Russian aircraft, that were built in larger numbers and used actively, unlike the rare bird like Pe-8.

93 planes built, primarily used as night bomber and flown in tactical missions, later in strategic night bombing missions by ADD.

But for example Pe-2, Tu-2 or Il-4 would be much more typical example of Soviet bombers, that were used in the frontlines actively.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Imowface on November 21, 2010, 05:54:42 PM
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

and i see the Pe-8 wouldnt be popular huh? nah the TU-2 i wouldnt fly at all.
Yes the Pe-8 would be popular, it is gaigantic, it has cannon for defence and it carries a big bomb load.

would it fill gaps, absoloutly not, after the few missions it flew where it actually dropped bombs, it was moved to transport duties and chartering officials
List of Gap filler VVS planes in AH that we need for it to be "complete"

1. Yak 1/1m/1b
2. Pe-2 or Tu-2
3. MiG-3
4. LaGG-3 + La-5


Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Perrine on November 22, 2010, 03:08:12 AM
1. Yak 1/1m/1b



isn't yak 1m basically a (pre-production) yak-3?
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Imowface on November 22, 2010, 09:11:50 AM
no that would be a Yak-9U which is what we already have in game
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Ack-Ack on November 22, 2010, 01:36:53 PM
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

and i see the Pe-8 wouldnt be popular huh? nah the TU-2 i wouldnt fly at all.

For every B-17/B-24/B-29/B-25/B-26 you saw land with damage so severe that it boggles the mind how it even landed, remember that 1000's more like it never did. 

ack-ack
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Ruah on November 22, 2010, 05:13:31 PM
Yes the Pe-8 would be popular, it is gaigantic, it has cannon for defence and it carries a big bomb load.

would it fill gaps, absoloutly not, after the few missions it flew where it actually dropped bombs, it was moved to transport duties and chartering officials
List of Gap filler VVS planes in AH that we need for it to be "complete"

1. Yak 1/1m/1b
2. Pe-2 or Tu-2
3. MiG-3
4. LaGG-3 + La-5


Yak 3 above all those fighters. NMaby those fighters would be useful in some FSO, but they would almost never be used in MA - which is where the usefulness of a plane is measured imo.  I know you consider yourself a good russian pilot and such, but honestly , can we please get the yak-3 so I can get my NN plane (and get something new that is competative).

But yes, russian bombers would be nice (but if we are gonna hyjack threads to push for fighters. . .)

please?
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Imowface on November 22, 2010, 05:37:50 PM
those were my gap filler planes, If we wanted to go with planes I want the most in AH it would go like:

La-5+ La-5F
Yak-3
Pe-8
1-15  :D

also, one plane I forgot to put on the gap fillers would be the Il-4

and NN used Yak-9T's too so play with that for now  :devil
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: curry1 on November 22, 2010, 08:45:23 PM
 .
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: fullmetalbullet on November 23, 2010, 02:23:05 AM
.

wow thats interesting. lol
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Ruah on November 23, 2010, 02:28:36 AM
yak-9T. . . ew

I love the yak-9U, but I honestly find myself behind a LA7 more often just because I has a lot more killing power and there is someething so very very nic about at big red nose.
Title: Re: opinions on this aircraft.
Post by: Tyrannis on December 02, 2010, 04:51:55 AM
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

and i see the Pe-8 wouldnt be popular huh? nah the TU-2 i wouldnt fly at all.

lol..u should fly with me sometime.

i got some amazing screenshots of me returning in b17s/25s/26s with tails missing, whole stabilizers gone, wingtips sheared off, im honestly suprised i landed them. there tough birds for sure.