Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: cooldued on December 19, 2010, 12:07:39 PM

Title: Gloster Meteor
Post by: cooldued on December 19, 2010, 12:07:39 PM
It commenced operations on 27 July 1944 with 616 Squadron of the Royal Air Force.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloster_Meteor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloster_Meteor)

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_gloster_meteor_WWII.html (http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_gloster_meteor_WWII.html)

http://www.military-aircraft.org.uk/jet-fighter-planes/gloster-meteor-jet-fighter.htm (http://www.military-aircraft.org.uk/jet-fighter-planes/gloster-meteor-jet-fighter.htm)

all three pages say that it ran in the 616 Squadron of the Royal Air Force.

stats


      Crew: Pilot

      Length: 44 ft 7 in

      Wingspan: 37 ft 2 in

      Height: 13 ft 0 in

      Wing area: 350 ft²

      Empty weight: 10,684 lb

      Loaded weight: 15,700 lb

      Engines: Twin 3,500 lbf (15.6 kN) Rolls-Royce Derwent 8 turbojets

      Maximum speed: 600 mph

      Range: 600 mi

      Rate of climb: 7,000 ft/min

Armament:   

      Four 20 mm Hispano cannon
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: JOACH1M on December 19, 2010, 02:51:17 PM
+1
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: fbWldcat on December 19, 2010, 03:04:13 PM
Would be cool. But ultimately, this is just beating a dead horse.... Again.... And again.... And again.

I'm not against it, but it has been asked for before.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: ACE on December 19, 2010, 03:10:26 PM
Put it this way it would be more useful than a M-18.   :D
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: phatzo on December 19, 2010, 03:13:27 PM
but would it be as useful as the beaufighter?
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Guppy35 on December 19, 2010, 03:22:16 PM
but would it be as useful as the beaufighter?

No  :)
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Shifty on December 19, 2010, 07:36:50 PM
Would be cool. But ultimately, this is just beating a dead horse.... Again.... And again.... And again.

I'm not against it, but it has been asked for before.

It worked for the B-29.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: jolly22 on December 19, 2010, 08:07:38 PM
It worked for the B-29.
NOOOOOOOOOOOO dont let anyone see that!!!!!!!!1
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: THRASH99 on December 20, 2010, 01:29:04 AM
It commenced operations on 27 July 1944 with 616 Squadron of the Royal Air Force.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloster_Meteor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloster_Meteor)

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_gloster_meteor_WWII.html (http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_gloster_meteor_WWII.html)

http://www.military-aircraft.org.uk/jet-fighter-planes/gloster-meteor-jet-fighter.htm (http://www.military-aircraft.org.uk/jet-fighter-planes/gloster-meteor-jet-fighter.htm)

all three pages say that it ran in the 616 Squadron of the Royal Air Force.

stats


      Crew: Pilot

      Length: 44 ft 7 in

      Wingspan: 37 ft 2 in

      Height: 13 ft 0 in

      Wing area: 350 ft²

      Empty weight: 10,684 lb

      Loaded weight: 15,700 lb

      Engines: Twin 3,500 lbf (15.6 kN) Rolls-Royce Derwent 8 turbojets

      Maximum speed: 600 mph

      Range: 600 mi

      Rate of climb: 7,000 ft/min

Armament:   

      Four 20 mm Hispano cannon
It would be nice to have something match the 262 in the skies of AH, +1
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Bruv119 on December 20, 2010, 01:40:43 AM
have to give a  +1 for this wish,

Yes there are plenty of other planes that are more worthwhile but dogfighting those pesky 262's in a British jet has so much potential.   :t

If we can do B29's we can have the meteor!

Plus it will be easier to catch than a 262 so not nearly as annoying.  

As for squadron service it meets that criteria, It's main role was killing buzz bombs which were very much a nuisance for the people of kent and london!

Being banned from flying over Germany of course it wouldn't have any kills but I bet it would have done the businesss!
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: oakranger on December 20, 2010, 01:49:32 AM
It will be one of these low, low priority AC to be added. 


If we can do B29's we can have the meteor!
 

There is a outrageous difference of having the B-29 vs Gloster Meteor. 
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: phatzo on December 20, 2010, 02:02:03 AM
Yes there are plenty of other planes that are more worthwhile but dogfighting those pesky 262's in a British jet has so much potential.   :t

this is the important bit
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Bruv119 on December 20, 2010, 02:05:02 AM
It will be one of these low, low priority AC to be added.  

There is a outrageous difference of having the B-29 vs Gloster Meteor.  

Yep one is a Buff that ended the war early that will not have that capacity in AH,  be perked silly and take forever to get to a decent altitude fully loaded and be killed before you ever get to target in the MA.

The Meteor is an Allied counter balance to the 262 Jet threat that is, at this moment in time, completely un-opposed.

I see the large American heavy bomber force that already exists in game (B17's, B24's and B26's) as more than capable of doing the job of the B29 and do it in half the time.  I mean come on how greedy do the US majority want to be???  Think (He-111, Do 217,  Tu-2,  Pe-2)  all of these deserve to be well ahead of the B29.

Everytime I kill a set of B29's in a 262 I will be thinking to myself   "thank god and HTC, that there are no Meteors in this game!"

Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Debrody on December 20, 2010, 02:06:50 AM
      Maximum speed: 600 mph
      Rate of climb: 7,000 ft/min

Isn't that a post-war meteor? I heard it was a bit slower than the 262, a little bit below 500mph, and im almost sure the '44 meteors couldnt climb at 7000ft/min. Otherwise its a nice plane, but there are much larger holes in the russian planeset (Pe-2, Tu-2, Mig-3, LaGG-3, Jak-3 etc).

Debrődy
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: oakranger on December 20, 2010, 02:10:35 AM
Yep one is a Buff that ended the war early that will not have that capacity in AH,  be perked silly and take forever to get to a decent altitude fully loaded and be killed before you ever get to target in the MA.

The Meteor is an Allied counter balance to the 262 Jet threat that is, at this moment in time, completely un-opposed.

I see the large American heavy bomber force that already exists in game (B17's, B24's and B26's) as more than capable of doing the job of the B29 and do it in half the time.  I mean come on how greedy do the US majority want to be???  Think (He-111, Do 217,  Tu-2,  Pe-2)  all of these deserve to be well ahead of the B29.

Everytime I kill a set of B29's in a 262 I will be thinking to myself   "thank god and HTC, that there are no Meteors in this game!"



I was going by numbers build, time of services and action.  Why bashing the B-29 already when it has not even been place in the game.  Who knows what the out come will be like.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Bruv119 on December 20, 2010, 02:20:08 AM
Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned the B29 but your taking my point out of context.   The B29 and Brewster had been asked and pleaded for, for a long time and HTC is going to make it happen.   Regardless of stats and figures and all common logic so the Meteor can be thrown into the same category.

Facts are the B29 will be awesome, the Brewster is awesome and maybe one day the meteor will be too!
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Shifty on December 20, 2010, 04:56:18 AM
I was going by numbers build, time of services and action.  Why bashing the B-29 already when it has not even been place in the game.  Who knows what the out come will be like.

Going by that we'd need to pull aircraft like the TA-152 and ME-163. The Meteor was credited with 14 V-1 kills as well 46 air to ground kills on the continent. I think the Komet had possibly 7 kills and the TA-152 7-10. The Meteor also served in two versions the Mk I and Mk III, the MK IIIs being the model based in continental Europe. BTW I'm not bashing the B-29 I just mentioned the constant threads asking for it were successful.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: SCTusk on December 20, 2010, 07:53:52 AM
I have an uncle that flew Meteors after the war (also Vampires and F86's) for the RAF. So from a personal viewpoint, this is one addition that would entice me back into the WW2 arenas, at the moment I'm content to stick with WW1. But it does seem to offer major benefits in terms of 'selling' the game, i.e. ability to advertise along the lines of 'AH - now featuring jet on jet action' considering it only requires the addition of one a/c. Bang for buck it just seems to make good sense.

+1
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: olds442 on December 24, 2010, 08:58:05 AM
Would be cool. But ultimately, this is just beating a dead horse.... Again.... And again.... And again.

I'm not against it, but it has been asked for before.
and "beating a dead horse" should be your nickname :lol
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Ruah on December 24, 2010, 09:45:57 AM
no more jets pls

srsly, if th  russian, japanese and italian planest were complete - great, lts get anothr jet - but considering whats not in gam atm. . .yes, but too soon.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: bj229r on December 24, 2010, 10:14:02 AM
There simply ARE no planes left that haven't been begged for in a million threads,,,we just need to assign numbers, and bump them occasionally.

<#23! :aok

Bahh, it only flew limited non-comabt sorties in July, 1945!>
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Krusty on December 24, 2010, 10:29:21 AM
Calling the Meteor a counter to the Me262 is absurd.

You don't need a jet to counter the Me262. You can counter it with almost every plane in the planeset. Allies shot them down with P-47s and P-51s. Bombers probably have more kills of 262s than vice versa in this game.

It's a wallowing pig of a plane. It's ability to pull Gs in a "mushy" stall was nerfed some time back negating most breaking snapshots (the best way to get kills on manuvering fighters while flying a 262 in Aces High, back before the nerf).

It's really a lackluster plane. It needs no "counter" as it's already dogmeat in any category except speed. It has to be at full speed and/or high alt to get away most times anyways. If it turns at all or blows any of its E in any way, a Hurricane Mk.I can easily dispatch it.


It needs no counter.

Now, if you want to request the Meteor for other reasons, feel free. "To counter the Me262" just doesn't cut it, though.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: fbWldcat on December 24, 2010, 11:06:06 AM
and "beating a dead horse" should be your nickname :lol

 :headscratch:
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: olds442 on December 24, 2010, 12:11:01 PM
:headscratch:
you use again again and again
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: fbWldcat on December 25, 2010, 01:25:14 AM
It is what it is, my friend.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: spitfreak01 on December 25, 2010, 04:02:37 AM
i don't know...

we already have the me163 and 262 why would be there another jet?

pretty much the same though...
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: danny76 on December 25, 2010, 04:29:01 AM
+ 10000 there should be Meteor in game, if only because of it's historical importance, and I would suggest those who marginalise what they accomplished should try telling any of the brave lads that flew them against ground targets and V1's that what they were doing was not combat
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: fbWldcat on December 25, 2010, 09:05:31 AM
i don't know...

we already have the me163 and 262 why would be there another jet?

pretty much the same though...


No it isn't.

"Comparison with the Me 262

The Gloster Meteor entered service just after the Messerschmitt Me 262. In July 1944 the experimental unit Erprobungskommando 262 (Test Command 262) began to fly experimental interceptions of high flying Allied reconnaissance aircraft. On 25 July one of their Me 262s clashed with a RAF Mosquito, which escaped, allowing its crew to report their first encounter with a German jet. The first operational sortie of the Gloster Meteor came two days later, on 27 July.

The Gloster Meteor can claim to be the first jet fighter to enter operational service, while No.616 squadron of the RAF was the first operational jet fighter in the work. The first fully operational Me 262 squadron, Kommando Nowotny, was not formed until September 1944, under the command of the famous ace Walter Nowotny, flying its first operation on 3 October.

The Me 262 was a more capable aircraft than the wartime versions of the Meteor. Its top speed of 540mph was 50mphs faster than even the Derwent IV equipped version of the Meteor III. However by the end of the war the Meteor IV was almost ready, and had the speed to match the German jet. On the plus side the Meteor was much more reliable than the Me 262, which suffered from famously unreliable engines."

Rickard, J (13 February 2008), Gloster Meteor during the Second World War , http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_gloster_meteor_WWII.html

Different guns, different engines, different speeds, different abilities. you just can't compare the two by saying they are both jets from WWII.

BTW, the ME163 is a ROCKET. That is all.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: SmokinLoon on December 26, 2010, 11:54:25 AM
IMO... there are a number of aircraft that we have, that are not needed, and a lot of resources have been wasted on them.  The AH realm is missing some very major players: the He111, Pe-2, D520, Ki45, Ki-43, etc etc, and a whole host of SIMPLE gv's (M3, SdKfx 251, and M4x variants).

Adding in a jet, regardless of which one, is further wasting resources, IMO.
Title: Re: Gloster Meteor
Post by: Lusche on December 26, 2010, 12:05:15 PM
IMO... there are a number of aircraft that we have, that are not needed, and a lot of resources have been wasted on them.  The AH realm is missing some very major players: the He111, Pe-2, D520, Ki45, Ki-43, etc etc, and a whole host of SIMPLE gv's (M3, SdKfx 251, and M4x variants).

Adding in a jet, regardless of which one, is further wasting resources, IMO.

I'm curious: Which planes do we have that "are not needed"?