Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: BowHTR on January 15, 2011, 03:54:48 PM
-
(http://englishrussia.com/images/weird_tanks/16.jpg)
Discuss
-
Thats one hell of a KV 1/2/3-t-20/m5
-
Puh-lease.
Luft 46 next?
(Does look like nice workmanship though.)
-
When it leaves the tranport ship they unload it pointing in the direction of the city they want to capture, and hope the plans don't change til the war is over....... :joystick:
-
(http://englishrussia.com/images/weird_tanks/16.jpg)
Discuss
that thing looks like it would be very easy to drop a 500lber on.
-
With all those guns, it looks like it could killshoot itself.
-
All that and its still easily knocked out by a hit to the tracks. Far better to have 3 or 4 tanks moving independently than that thing.
-
I prefer ones that actually existed, like the T-35.
(http://media.moddb.com/images/groups/1/3/2074/t35_006.gif)
-
What a waste.. all that weight spent on turrets couldve gone into putting one big bad gun on that thing :)
-
When it leaves the tranport ship they unload it pointing in the direction of the city they want to capture, and hope the plans don't change til the war is over....... :joystick:
:lol
-
I prefer ones that actually existed, like the T-35.
(http://media.moddb.com/images/groups/1/3/2074/t35_006.gif)
what about the SMK T-35C?
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/SMK-T-35C-Russian-Tank.jpg)
Specs:
Armor: 20-60 mm
Primary weapon:45 mm gun M1932 (front), 76.2mm gun L-11 (rear)
Secondary weapon: 3×7.62 mm DT MG
Engine: GAM-34BT 850 hp
-
Both are big enough that they would get stuck all over the place.
The first one is so long that if there is more than a 5% grade change it would break its own back traversing it.
On the second one that 45mm gun in front is not worth the weight it adds.
-
(http://englishrussia.com/images/weird_tanks/16.jpg)
Discuss
Already posted this in Wishlist. I think it was a "NO" :D
-
Already posted this in Wishlist. I think it was a "NO" :D
it wasn't a real tank.
-
it wasn't a real tank.
It wasnt a real wish.
-
It wasnt a real wish.
:rofl
-
Both are big enough that they would get stuck all over the place.
The first one is so long that if there is more than a 5% grade change it would break its own back traversing it.
On the second one that 45mm gun in front is not worth the weight it adds.
In the context of the times in which it was produced, the 45mm AT gun was hardly worthless. But obviously a multi-turreted configuration was ultimately a dead end.
-
needs a flak gun section and a trailer
-
Waiting for someone to post a rendering of the Ratt
-
Soviet T-28 Medium tank. The prototypes had a 45 mm gun installed, with 2 smaller turrets with 7.62 mm DT MGs.
(http://www.timemoneyandblood.com/images/TanksRussian/t28_2.jpg)
-
what about the SMK T-35C?
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/SMK-T-35C-Russian-Tank.jpg)
Specs:
Armor: 20-60 mm
Primary weapon:45 mm gun M1932 (front), 76.2mm gun L-11 (rear)
Secondary weapon: 3×7.62 mm DT MG
Engine: GAM-34BT 850 hp
Not much more absurd than the M3 Grant...
(http://www.2blowhards.com/Grant%20tank.jpg)
-
BowHTR did you make it? Nice kit bash if you did.
Would take for ever to turn though. :)
-
Soviet T-28 Medium tank. The prototypes had a 45 mm gun installed, with 2 smaller turrets with 7.62 mm DT MGs.
(http://www.timemoneyandblood.com/images/TanksRussian/t28_2.jpg)
i may be bad at telling nationality from faces but that soldier looks sort-of chinese.
-
Not much more absurd than the M3 Grant...
(http://www.2blowhards.com/Grant%20tank.jpg)
looks like the tank that Humphrey Bogart used to drive around the Sahara in. Movie was on the other day.