Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Klam on January 22, 2011, 09:05:39 AM

Title: Stuka formations
Post by: Klam on January 22, 2011, 09:05:39 AM
Sorry if it's been asked for before.....probably.

The ability to take up a formation of Stuka's.   


Just wishin'

Klam
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: Denholm on January 22, 2011, 09:10:09 AM
No.

We already have Lancstukas.
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: kvuo75 on January 22, 2011, 09:11:34 AM
why no stukastuka?
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: Beefcake on January 22, 2011, 09:37:28 AM
+1

Along with formations for the SBD, TBM, Val, and Kate.
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: Rino on January 22, 2011, 11:05:21 AM
     Anyone takes the time to climb out a stuka deserves some friends  :D
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: BigKev03 on January 22, 2011, 11:24:42 AM
     Anyone takes the time to climb out a stuka deserves some friends  :D

Hey, i fit that description.  LOL!  Man I love upping a Stuka to attack a carrier.  If (and a big IF) I make it to target once I deploy the dive flaps and kick her over the CV is gonna go boom.  Just wish I could see the look on the faces of the crew..  Now the hard part is getting out once everyone has seen my slow target and all of a sudden every red icon converges on me.  LOL

BigKev
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: E25280 on January 22, 2011, 02:26:27 PM
B-17s, Ju-88s, B-24's, and other heavy bombers generally used a tactic where tight formations and massed firepower were their defense (at least in daytime bombing, which is the only thing we have in the game).  When attacked by enemy fighters, they stayed in formation.  We get this in a small sense with the three plane box.

Stukas, TBMs, and SBDs all had defensive guns, but when attacked by enemy fighters, would disperse and maneuver rather than tighten up and depend on return fire for protection.  As such they do not get a three plane box.

Different tactics, different methods, and not surprisingly, treated differently in the game.
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: DeadStik on January 22, 2011, 02:28:14 PM
+1 in concept. However, as you know, Stukas are dive bombers. As it is now, drones cannot keep up with this function.
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: Pigslilspaz on January 22, 2011, 02:42:32 PM
+1 in concept. However, as you know, Stukas are dive bombers. As it is now, drones cannot keep up with this function.

I've had no problem divebombing in 3 ju-88s and those ARE divebombers
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: BigKev03 on January 22, 2011, 02:50:29 PM
I've had no problem divebombing in 3 ju-88s and those ARE divebombers


Yes I divebomb in the 88 as well.  If left alone it can be deadly.

BigKev
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: Shifty on January 23, 2011, 04:17:21 PM
B-17s, Ju-88s, B-24's, and other heavy bombers generally used a tactic where tight formations and massed firepower were their defense (at least in daytime bombing, which is the only thing we have in the game).  When attacked by enemy fighters, they stayed in formation.  We get this in a small sense with the three plane box.

Stukas, TBMs, and SBDs all had defensive guns, but when attacked by enemy fighters, would disperse and maneuver rather than tighten up and depend on return fire for protection.  As such they do not get a three plane box.

Different tactics, different methods, and not surprisingly, treated differently in the game.

Hmm tell all that to Saburo Sakai who was wounded by TBMs off Guadalcanal.
His words.

" I was in a trap! The enemy planes were not fighters, but bombers , the new Avenger torpedo planes, types I had never seen before. From the rear they looked exactly like Wildcats.
No wonder they tightend their formation. They were waiting for me now I was caught with eight guns aiming at me from the right and an equal number from the left."


Defensive formations with combined firepower for mutual protection was exactly their tactic until the actual dive was in progress. Even torpedo bombers kept a loose formation during the attack phase. Not to mention both US and Japanese Torpedo planes had level bombing sights to be used in the level bombing roll. I have to say Klam is on to something.

+1
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: MarineUS on January 24, 2011, 04:00:43 PM
+11111111111111111111111111111111111111
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: MachFly on January 24, 2011, 05:13:11 PM
-1

Perfect explanation to why it's -1:

B-17s, Ju-88s, B-24's, and other heavy bombers generally used a tactic where tight formations and massed firepower were their defense (at least in daytime bombing, which is the only thing we have in the game).  When attacked by enemy fighters, they stayed in formation.  We get this in a small sense with the three plane box.

Stukas, TBMs, and SBDs all had defensive guns, but when attacked by enemy fighters, would disperse and maneuver rather than tighten up and depend on return fire for protection.  As such they do not get a three plane box.

Different tactics, different methods, and not surprisingly, treated differently in the game.
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: bj229r on January 24, 2011, 05:19:52 PM
I ran into a HUGE formation of Stukas a few weeks ago....alas, I was low, and nearly out of gas after spending nearly 30 min trying to find SOMEthing to shoot at...the profanities echoed through the mountains near my home....
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: AAJagerX on January 24, 2011, 05:40:51 PM
What'd be cool to see is right before you wing over to dive, have some function that puts the drones in a trail or line abreast formation.  That way they could imitate your original dive and hit results, all while giving it a a cool effect of actually diving from a formation.
Title: Re: Stuka formations
Post by: USRanger on January 24, 2011, 06:09:01 PM
(http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/8149/ju87m.gif) (http://img198.imageshack.us/i/ju87m.gif/)