Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Bostrola on March 22, 2011, 05:13:07 AM
-
I know that this aircraft didnt see any combat during the war (because Sweden wasnt a combatant), but its a beauty and something diffrent.
Engine: DB 605, 1475 Hp
Max speed: 400 mph
Climb: 3000 ft/min
Armament: 1 20mm Hispano + 4 13,2mm Hotchkiss
http://www.ipmsstockholm.org/magazine/2000/02/stuff_eng_detail_j21.htm
-
I know that this aircraft didnt see any combat during the war (because Sweden wasnt a combatant), but its a beauty and something diffrent.
Engine: DB 605, 1475 Hp
Max speed: 400 mph
Climb: 3000 ft/min
Armament: 1 20mm Hispano + 4 13,2mm Hotchkiss
http://www.ipmsstockholm.org/magazine/2000/02/stuff_eng_detail_j21.htm
to be in AH a plane has to have seen combat service during the war. and has to have been in squadron strengh.also with a kill record.
-
to be in AH a plane has to have seen combat service during the war. and has to have been in squadron strengh.also with a kill record.
References for all of these facts, please...
-
References for all of these facts, please...
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,306282.0.html
-
geez vonmessa you've been around long enough to have seen the few times someone from htc answered a wishlist post on a plane...although i do question the "field mods" thing.
for sure it's:
no prototypes
squadron strength
used in combat action
anything else that gets quoted is just speculation from what i've seen...some people just don't know or realize that without adequate documentation to work with, nothing gets added.
-
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,306282.0.html
Looking for the part where it says "kill record"
-
geez vonmessa you've been around long enough to have seen the few times someone from htc answered a wishlist post on a plane...although i do question the "field mods" thing.
for sure it's:
no prototypes
squadron strength
used in combat action
anything else that gets quoted is just speculation from what i've seen...some people just don't know or realize that without adequate documentation to work with, nothing gets added.
kinda what i was getting at :D
-
Looking for the part where it says "kill record"
look up any of the topics about the peashooter for that i think.
-
look up any of the topics about the peashooter for that i think.
Remarkable, I searched peashooter. Guess what the query results were...
(http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff107/tymekeepyr/Image1.jpg)
-
Remarkable, I searched peashooter. Guess what the query results were...
(http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff107/tymekeepyr/Image1.jpg)
p26 peashooter, idk why it doesnt show up in topic search, i personally made a topic about it 2 months ago. so idk what to tell ya von
-
kinda what i was getting at :D
right over my head... :lol :joystick: :bolt:
-
look up any of the topics about the peashooter for that i think.
It's not the "kill record" that keeps the P-26 out of the game, it's the fact that it was an insignificant aircraft at the start of the war that played absolutely no role whatsoever other than the very few that flew being a target for Japanese fighters.
ack-ack
-
SAAB cars suck
-
SAAB cars suck
Only in the last 10 or 15 years,they are made by GM now!! as for Saab A/C they make some of the finest A/C to grace the skies and I'd like to see this one added,provided it meets the HTC requirements,whatever they are... :noid
:salute
-
where there any pusher type combat aircraft during WW2 that would meet HTC's requirements?
-
where there any pusher type combat aircraft during WW2 that would meet HTC's requirements?
doubt it... :headscratch:
amazing thing about the op plane...used the same engine as the 109 but in spite of it's obvious heavier weight, it was faster than the 109-G6? :headscratch:
-
There was a SAAB Drakken for sale on ebay a couple months ago caption was "Cruise at mach 2 in style"
-
doubt it... :headscratch:
amazing thing about the op plane...used the same engine as the 109 but in spite of it's obvious heavier weight, it was faster than the 109-G6? :headscratch:
Maybe after they converted it to the jet engines :D Built a model of this one back in 83 or so, that top speed appears
to be quite a bit higher than I remember. The model also claimed that they had the first ejection egress system.
-
where there any pusher type combat aircraft during WW2 that would meet HTC's requirements?
Nope. The only pushers I can remember were the Curtiss Ascender which had cooling trouble and the Japanese
Shinden at the end of the war. Bell made a twin pusher, but I don't think it was accepted for service. Only 13 were
made and it only flew from 1937-40.
Aracuda
(http://www.air-boyne.com/Bell%20Airacuda%20in%20flight.jpg)
-
Remarkable, I searched peashooter. Guess what the query results were...
(http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff107/tymekeepyr/Image1.jpg)
Got a laugh out of that sixth tab. :D
-
im not pushing any saab :neener:
-
doubt it... :headscratch:
amazing thing about the op plane...used the same engine as the 109 but in spite of it's obvious heavier weight, it was faster than the 109-G6? :headscratch:
Less drag? High grade fuel (The swedes had the better fuel available, Germans didnt)? Just a theory..