Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: badace on May 31, 2011, 05:28:24 PM

Title: LANC MODEL
Post by: badace on May 31, 2011, 05:28:24 PM
   Love the Lancaster III, would love to see the model redone. Is this wishlist material?.... Sorry if its not.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Raphael on May 31, 2011, 05:38:14 PM
there are a lot of planes here in need for remodel. almost all of them. but yeah it is wishlist material  :)


HURRI2D!!!!!!!
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Karnak on May 31, 2011, 07:20:11 PM
there are a lot of planes here in need for remodel. almost all of them. but yeah it is wishlist material  :)


HURRI2D!!!!!!!
I believe they are well past the 50% mark on bringing aircraft up to the standards of the Ki-84 and B-24J.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: skorpion on May 31, 2011, 07:29:43 PM
B26...
Hurri...(all models)
B24
Lanc
Ect...


+1
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: curry1 on May 31, 2011, 08:46:38 PM
B26...
Hurri...(all models)
B24
Lanc
Ect...


+1

Lol have you seen the interior of a b24?  So good.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: skorpion on May 31, 2011, 10:17:33 PM
Lol have you seen the interior of a b24?  So good.
have you seen the exterior? IMO it needs a rework...
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: B-17 on May 31, 2011, 10:20:21 PM
P-40 is up there too, with the Hurri, Lanc, B-26, Boston, whatever the other version of that is, and several others.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Pigslilspaz on May 31, 2011, 10:20:39 PM
have you seen the exterior? IMO it needs a rework...
It was one of the first to be redone (2nd gen).
We need to at least bring all the 1st gen models to 3rd first.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Karnak on May 31, 2011, 10:46:27 PM
B-24, Ki-84 and T-34/76 were the first AH2 standard models.  All three of them were new units added in AH v2.00, and yes, the Ki-84 and B-24 are showing their age.  Frankly, I think the canopy framing on the old AH1 A6Ms was better than it is on the Ki-84.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Pigslilspaz on June 01, 2011, 12:04:06 AM
Ki-84 frame looks like it was painted on, lol.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Raphael on June 01, 2011, 12:08:54 AM
P-40 is up there too, with the Hurri, Lanc, B-26, Boston, whatever the other version of that is, and several others.
yes the p40 needs a rework badly
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Karnak on June 01, 2011, 01:04:40 AM
A-20G
Ar234
B-26B
B5N2
Bf110C-4b
Bf110G-2
Boston Mk III
C.202
C.205
D3A1
F4F-4
FM-2
Hurricane Mk I
Hurricane Mk IIc
Hurricane Mk IId
Ju87D-3
Ju88A-4
Ki-61-I-Tei
Ki-67
Lancaster Mk III
LVT(A)2
LVT(A)4
M8
M16
Me163
P-40B
P-40E
Panzer IV H
SBD-5
TBM-3
Tempest Mk V
Yak-9T
Yak-9U
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: B-17 on June 01, 2011, 11:01:30 AM
oh yeah...forgot about the TBM. that would be nice.

i think the two planes that should be updated first of all are the Lanc, and the B-26. I know that most of the fighters/light/medium bombers are looking pretty decent right now. yay for that! so lets see some buffs get updated, maybe?
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Krusty on June 01, 2011, 11:40:27 AM
I'd like to see the Lanc with the british .303 turrets instead of the US .50cal turrets, when remodeled.


P.S. Nothing wrong with the B-24 model. It's what I consider 3rd Generation of graphics detail. Naturally the 3rd generation has improved since then, but it's still a large step above previous models.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: TheDude on June 02, 2011, 01:11:35 AM
all the YAKS plus plz add the the lagg's and yak 3

The Dude
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Raphael on June 02, 2011, 02:12:54 AM
ohhh those wooden laggs would be delicious to shoot down!
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: badace on June 02, 2011, 03:35:07 PM
I'd like to see the Lanc with the british .303 turrets instead of the US .50cal turrets, when remodeled.


They originally had the .303s and were changed because they were useless. You trying to get me killed Krusty?  :neener:
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: skorpion on June 02, 2011, 03:53:22 PM
P.S. Nothing wrong with the B-24 model. It's what I consider 3rd Generation of graphics detail. Naturally the 3rd generation has improved since then, but it's still a large step above previous models.
what have you been smoking? the B-24 is really starting to show some wrinkles and IMO it needs a re-working. the interior looks fine but on the outside its like an old fry left under the fridge...
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: iron650 on June 02, 2011, 04:00:54 PM
all the YAKS plus plz add the the lagg's and yak 3

The Dude

What about the MiGs?
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: Karnak on June 02, 2011, 08:00:21 PM

They originally had the .303s and were changed because they were useless. You trying to get me killed Krusty?  :neener:
The Lancaster's tail turret never carried a quad of .303s.  It had two .50s from the moment it was added when v1.04 was released.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: DemonFox on June 02, 2011, 09:34:37 PM
Now I'm not a fan of the Lanc one bit BUT it is one of the most flown if not the most flown bomber in the game so I agree Lanc needs to have a face lift.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: SDGhalo on June 02, 2011, 11:37:50 PM
i think you should be allowed to choose what tail turret configuration before you sortie.

i found this on wiki

Armament
 
Defensive
 
While eight .303 in (7.7 mm) machine guns were the most common Lancaster armament, twin .50 in (12.7 mm) turrets were later available in both the tail and dorsal positions. A Nash & Thomson FN-64 periscope-sighted twin .303 in machine gun ventral turret was fitted to early aircraft, but fitting was soon discontinued and the turret often removed as it was hard to sight, especially at night. (Similar problems afflicted the ventral turret in the North American B-25C and other bombers).
 
When the threat of attacks from below began to be appreciated in the winter of 1943/1944, modifications were made, including downward observation blisters mounted behind the bomb aimer's blister[8] and official[9] and unofficial mounts for .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns or even 20 mm cannon, firing through ventral holes of various designs. The fitting of these guns was hampered as the same ventral position was used for mounting the H2S blister.
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: B-17 on June 03, 2011, 06:26:52 AM
i think you should be allowed to choose what tail turret configuration before you sortie.

i found this on wiki

Armament
 
Defensive
 
While eight .303 in (7.7 mm) machine guns were the most common Lancaster armament, twin .50 in (12.7 mm) turrets were later available in both the tail and dorsal positions. A Nash & Thomson FN-64 periscope-sighted twin .303 in machine gun ventral turret was fitted to early aircraft, but fitting was soon discontinued and the turret often removed as it was hard to sight, especially at night. (Similar problems afflicted the ventral turret in the North American B-25C and other bombers).
 
When the threat of attacks from below began to be appreciated in the winter of 1943/1944, modifications were made, including downward observation blisters mounted behind the bomb aimer's blister[8] and official[9] and unofficial mounts for .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns or even 20 mm cannon, firing through ventral holes of various designs. The fitting of these guns was hampered as the same ventral position was used for mounting the H2S blister.


i had heard of the ventral gun configuration in the early versions, and i knew that it was taken out, but i didnt know anyof the other stuff. :aok good job...but is wikipedia really a trusted source?  :headscratch:
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: SDGhalo on June 04, 2011, 08:25:50 AM
i alos got a couple books of the lanc in serivce with the RCAF during WW2 with records of the gun systems and if you go on you tube and find the colored video of the only RAF bomber raid video youll see it

and i found this on youtube as well

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D82SrRWrYCg

at 5:521 to 55 seconds shows they had some of them
Title: Re: LANC MODEL
Post by: badace on June 04, 2011, 09:56:57 AM
  While we are throwing all the others in there, I FORGOT B26... I think I love it more than LANC lol....