Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Mitsu. on July 08, 2011, 08:47:07 PM
-
I was away from Aces High long time, and now I am back.
But, Japanese planes are not enough in the game. :)
I'd like to see Ki-43, Ki-44, Ki-100 and J2M, H8K in Aces High! :) :D
Thanks,
Mitsu
-
Agreed, the Ki-43 (multiple versions please) is a particularly large hole in the planeset.
That said, since AH2 was released, 75% of new Axis aircraft have been Japanese, the Ki-84, G4M1 and A6M3 against the Bf109G-14 for the Germans and nothing for the Italians.
The Allies have fared much better with the I-16 for the Russians, the Spitfire Mk VIII, Spitfire Mk XVI and Mosquito Mk XVI for the British and the B-24J, B-25C, B-25H, B-29, F4U-1A, P-38G, P-38J, P-39D, P-39Q, P-47M and P-47N for the Americans.
-
Mitsu I agree!
The Ki-100 definately has a place in this game.
-
+1
How about the Ki-45?
-
:aok
-
Mitsu I agree!
The Ki-100 definately has a place in this game.
Now you've done it, you mentioned the Ki-100. <grabs a lawn chair>
-
I was away from Aces High long time, and now I am back.
But, Japanese planes are not enough in the game. :)
I'd like to see Ki-43, Ki-44, Ki-100 and J2M, H8K in Aces High! :) :D
Thanks,
Mitsu
Agreed :aok
The Ki-45 as well. :cheers:
-
I was away from Aces High long time, and now I am back.
But, Japanese planes are not enough in the game. :)
I'd like to see Ki-43, Ki-44, Ki-100 and J2M, H8K in Aces High! :) :D
Thanks,
Mitsu
Mitsu! Welcome back! Does this mean we're going to see an update of your sound pack?
ack-ack
-
Welcome back Mitsu!!
I agree more Japanese planes ...please!
Helm ...out
-
+1
Yes more Japanese planes please.
-
Ki-100 +1
Ki-45 +1
-
I'm waiting for Ki-100 from Aces High I Beta...hehe. :D
It will be slow but you would like to go into the furball. ;)
It's time to release soon, isn't it? :cool:
P.s
Hajo, Helem, I'm finally back to the game. thanks. :)
Ack, I'm start to make new poor sound collection now.
There are lots of things for update, hang on! :)
-
I was away from Aces High long time, and now I am back.
But, Japanese planes are not enough in the game. :)
I'd like to see Ki-43, Ki-44, Ki-100 and J2M, H8K in Aces High! :) :D
Thanks,
Mitsu
I've always liked you. :aok
-
Welcome back Mitsu!
-
This is just a personal preference, but I've always liked the idea of the earlier Ki-61 armed with 4x 12.7mm guns. The Ki-61 probably needs to be re-modeled with a better flight model at the moment, but I've always though the guns could be improved.
Nose 20mm, wing 12.7mm is what we have now and it's very nice.
Nose 12.7mm and wing MG151/20 would be interesting (but not necessary)
Nose 12.7mm and wing 12.7mm would give an earlier version of the craft, plus it would be kind of fun.
I like flying wildcats, ponies, and so forth with 4x50cal, so personally I'd like to fly around with 4x12.7mm in the Ki. :D
-
This is just a personal preference, but I've always liked the idea of the earlier Ki-61 armed with 4x 12.7mm guns. The Ki-61 probably needs to be re-modeled with a better flight model at the moment, but I've always though the guns could be improved.
Nose 20mm, wing 12.7mm is what we have now and it's very nice.
Nose 12.7mm and wing MG151/20 would be interesting (but not necessary)
Nose 12.7mm and wing 12.7mm would give an earlier version of the craft, plus it would be kind of fun.
I like flying wildcats, ponies, and so forth with 4x50cal, so personally I'd like to fly around with 4x12.7mm in the Ki. :D
I've found the Ki.61 gun package to be very good, but would also like to see the different configurations, esp curious about the 4x12,7mm. But I suspect what we have now is the best of the bunch, and the one I'd choose most often.
-
Ki-102b "Randy", 207 built. Probably won't even have to perk it.
General characteristics
Crew: 2
Length: 37 ft 7 in (11.45 m)
Wingspan: 51 ft 1 in (15.57 m)
Height: 12 ft 2 in (3.70 m)
Wing area: 366 ft? (34 m?)
Empty weight: 10,900 lb (4,950 kg)
Loaded weight: 16,000 lb (7,300 kg)
Powerplant: 2? Mitsubishi Ha-112-II Ru 14-cylinder radial engine, 1,500 hp (1,120 kW) each
Performance
Maximum speed: 310 kn, 360 mph (580 km/h)
Range: 1,100 nmi, 1,200 mi (2,000 km)
Service ceiling: 33,000 ft (10,000 m)
Power/mass: 2.4 kg/kW (5.4 lb/hp)
Armament
Guns: * 1? 57 mm (2.24 in) Ho-401 cannon~replaced in the 102a with a 37 mm (1.46 in) cannon, deleted in the 102c
2? 20 mm Ho-5 cannon~replaced in the 102c with 30 mm (1.18 in) cannons
1? 12.7 mm (0.50 in) Ho-103 machine gun~deleted in the 102a and 102c
Bombs: 2 ? 200 L (53 US gal) drop tanks or 2 ? 250 kg (551 lb) bombs
OR......................
The Ki-45 "Nick", predecessor of the Ki-102. About 1700 were built.
General characteristics
Crew: Two
Length: 11.00 m (36 ft 1 in)
Wingspan: 15.02 m (49 ft 4 in)
Height: 3.70 m (12 ft 2 in)
Wing area: 32.0 m? (344 ft?)
Empty weight: 4,000 kg (8,820 lb)
Loaded weight: 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)
Powerplant: 2 ? Mitsubishi Ha-102 14-cylinder radial engines, 783 kW (1,050 hp) each
Performance
Maximum speed: 540 km/h (292 kn, 336 mph)
Range: 2,000 km (1,081 nmi, 1,243 mi)
Service ceiling: 10,000 m (32,800 ft)
Rate of climb: 11.7 m/s (2,300 ft/min)
Wing loading: 171.9 kg/m? (35 lb/ft?)
Power/mass: 0.26 kW/kg (0.16 hp/lb)
Armament
Ko: 1 ? 20 mm, 2 ? 12.7 mm (.50 in), 2 ? 7.92 mm (.312 in)
Otsu: 1 ? 37 mm (1.46 in), 2 ? 12.7 mm (.50 in), 1 ? 7.92 mm (.312 in)
Hei: 1 ? 37 mm (1.46 in), 1 ? 20 mm, 1 ? 7.92 mm (.312 in)
Tei: 1 ? 37 mm (1.46 in), 2 ? 20 mm
Bo: 1 ? 40 mm (1.57 in)
-
(http://en.valka.cz/files/ki-102b_foto_134.jpg)
pics bustr, pics!
-
This is just a personal preference, but I've always liked the idea of the earlier Ki-61 armed with 4x 12.7mm guns. The Ki-61 probably needs to be re-modeled with a better flight model at the moment, but I've always though the guns could be improved.
Nose 20mm, wing 12.7mm is what we have now and it's very nice.
Nose 12.7mm and wing MG151/20 would be interesting (but not necessary)
Nose 12.7mm and wing 12.7mm would give an earlier version of the craft, plus it would be kind of fun.
I like flying wildcats, ponies, and so forth with 4x50cal, so personally I'd like to fly around with 4x12.7mm in the Ki. :D
Agreed, 4x50cal version (Ki-61-I-Otsu aka Ki-61-I-b) would be good selection. :)
oboe, thanks, I'm finally back to the game! :D
-
(http://www.jetmodelplanes.com/images/large/nakajima-kikka-model-airplane_l.jpg)
-
Nah... Never would have happened. They had a few test airframes and they ran up the engines a few times, but even with a year and a half of production time the Germans were still having problems with those jet engines and production. There was not even a snowball's chance in hell the Japanese could build them in production because they couldn't even produce piston engines with the proper tolerances and metals to sustain power. Jet engines have much higher tolerance requirements and engineering precision.
Rockets? Sure... maybe. But Jumo clones? They must have been high to even think of it.
EDIT: You ever notice how it looks a heck of a lot like the Bf 109TL?
(http://www.hyperscale.com/2008/features/images/DSC00024.jpg)
-
Ki-102b "Randy", 207 built. Probably won't even have to perk it.
Wow first I've heard of that bird. Got something new to read up on. :aok
-
That's because it saw no real service. It was stored in caves and underground on the mainland along with other airframes in preparation for the imminent US invasion force.
It was also only 12mph faster than a Bf110C-4, so it's not like it was any better than a Ki-45 or any of the other typical Japanese twins.
-
Wow first I've heard of that bird. Got something new to read up on. :aok
Like you can read :D
-
The Kikka apparently did have one successful test flight.
http://www.aviastar.org/air/japan/nakajima_kikka.php
http://minijets.org/typo3/index.php?id=245&no_cache=1
"A second prototype was then nearing completion and manufacture of 18 further aircraft had started when, on 15 August, the entire programme was abandoned."
It's not impossible that a handful could have been produced had the war not ended when it did.
-
That's because it saw no real service. It was stored in caves and underground on the mainland along with other airframes in preparation for the imminent US invasion force.
It saw some combat at Okinawa as I recall.
It was also only 12mph faster than a Bf110C-4, so it's not like it was any better than a Ki-45 or any of the other typical Japanese twins.
12mph faster than the Bf110C-4b, considering it was a strike aircraft not a fighter, is markedly superior to other Japanese twins.
Very low priority though due to how little combat it saw.
-
Ki-100 looks promising. This story notes it was the best of the Japanese planes during WW2 and would beat the Ki-84 every time. I didn't see if it had self-sealing fuel tanks but I would guess it did.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ki-100
Boo
-
Ki-100 looks promising. This story notes it was the best of the Japanese planes during WW2 and would beat the Ki-84 every time. I didn't see if it had self-sealing fuel tanks but I would guess it did.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ki-100
Boo
It did.
I still bet the pilots had more to do with the Ki100 "beating the Ki84 everytime" than the actuall plane itself.
-
But still a big +1 for the Ki-100
-
I'm all for more Japanese aircraft, but I have a hard time beleiving the Ki.100 is better than the Ki.84.
It seems more likely to me that it'll perform like a Zero that can dive well. The Ki84 will have retain a top speed and rollrate advantage, and probably low speed manueverability edge with its butterfly flaps.
I'd like to see the 100 in game but not convinced about it's superiority over the Frank. Hope we get the opportunity to match them against each other in the game someday though!
-
The aerodynamics don't support it being a better plane.
It was, however, much more reliable. While it was slower, there is some discussion elswhere that the Ki-84s suffered horribly, especially later in their production runs. The best Ki-84s were the first ones, and production and performance and quality declined from there until the end of the war. Planes would not even make de-rated power, ending up running as slow as a Ki-100, in some cases the Ki-100 being faster.
So even though it's not a monster, in some cases the Ki-100 was better than the Ki-84s, depending on the plane (which Ki-84) and the pilots. In AH we don't have reliability problems, so a fully de-rated engine (that we have already) would out-perform the Ki-100. About the same as you could imagine it would out-perform the Ki-61.
-
There was not even a snowball's chance in hell the Japanese could build them in production because they couldn't even produce piston engines with the proper tolerances and metals to sustain power. Jet engines have much higher tolerance requirements and engineering precision.
Rockets? Sure... maybe. But Jumo clones? They must have been high to even think of it.
You know Krusty, your continuing comments implying the Japanese were a race of idiotic inept morons is beginning to border on racism, and I object very strongly to your wording as well as your underlying opinion.
As a matter of interest and fact, and as a counter example to what you are claiming, the licensed Japanese version of the Daimler Benz engine used in the Ki-61 was manufactured to closer tolerances than the German version, their eternal blueprinting and searching for more power from that unit eventually leading to reliability issues.
It was in fact a shortage of a very specific set of materials, both for the German jet engines as well as the Japanese version that limited gas turbine manufacture. These materials, which you continually and ignorantly call simply 'metal' most especially being the high temperature steels needed for the combustion stage, alloys containing cobalt or nickel which was very difficult to obtain.
Why don't you tear your wartime propaganda posters off the wall Krusty, and drag yourself into the present. :rolleyes:
-
I think we need a properly modeled ki61 before adding a ki100.
-
I think we need a properly modeled ki61 before adding a ki100.
May I ask what you feel is wrong with our Ki-61-I-Tei version we have now? Other than needing(in needing I mean I would like it....lol) the updated graphics model.
-
It's overweight.
-
You know Krusty, your continuing comments implying the Japanese were a race of idiotic inept morons is beginning to border on racism, and I object very strongly to your wording as well as your underlying opinion.
So you're the one spreading that lie about me? This is not the first time those words have been thrown at me, but I thought it was another individual rather than you. I have corrected them too many times before. If you don't understand what I'm saying don't slander me and spread lies. Ask me. Because clearly you have it wrong and I've already stated this recently and in previous discussions.
-
You know Krusty, your continuing comments implying the Japanese were a race of idiotic inept morons is beginning to border on racism, and I object very strongly to your wording as well as your underlying opinion.
As a matter of interest and fact, and as a counter example to what you are claiming, the licensed Japanese version of the Daimler Benz engine used in the Ki-61 was manufactured to closer tolerances than the German version, their eternal blueprinting and searching for more power from that unit eventually leading to reliability issues.
It was in fact a shortage of a very specific set of materials, both for the German jet engines as well as the Japanese version that limited gas turbine manufacture. These materials, which you continually and ignorantly call simply 'metal' most especially being the high temperature steels needed for the combustion stage, alloys containing cobalt or nickel which was very difficult to obtain.
Why don't you tear your wartime propaganda posters off the wall Krusty, and drag yourself into the present. :rolleyes:
There's a fine line between what Krusty is talking about, and in fact the Japanese were in no position to Produce and Industrialize Engines or aircraft frames, which is due noted for the main reason they needed to attack Pearl Harbor to gain the Oil and Raw materials to wage war.
True the Japanese closely blueprinted the DB Engine from the Germans, frankly they had no inline engines or any capacity to make them at this point.
And I agree, they could of spared a few rockets from the Me-163 but no way they had any capacity to design or clone the Jumo Engines, perhaps if the war did last longer however it was clearly fantasy for the Japanese to believe they could produce let alone industralize the nation with the Materials they obtained, it was really a matter of do or die, if they didn't get the supplies then the war in China would of severely hammered them down.
Also Krusty will agree on one thing, doesn't matter what the japanese were going to build the Army/Navy would never agree to anything regarding cooperation, and its industry was neither any better.
Perfect example was given in a book called "Fire in the Sky" (I believe i can't recall 100%) a Japanese fighter base at Lae had a few damaged aircraft and 1 completely destroyed aircraft - all the parts from this one destroyed aircraft would repair 3 of the damaged fighters, however the poor japanese maintenance guys had to wait for spare parts rather then ingenuity like the Americans did at Guadalcanal - Torpedo Squadron 8 landed and didn't have 1 flyable aircraft after the battleships bombarded, I forget who did it, but one of the commanders of Torpedo 8 gutted a bunch of planes to piece together a single TBM so it could bomb Japanese artillery positions.
-
Ok Ok Ok ....
(http://www.savagesquadron.com/JPpage/JPFighters/ki100_2.jpg)
The Japanese version of a Lavachian?
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/86/LavochkinLa-9.jpg)
-
So you're the one spreading that lie about me? This is not the first time those words have been thrown at me, but I thought it was another individual rather than you. I have corrected them too many times before. If you don't understand what I'm saying don't slander me and spread lies. Ask me. Because clearly you have it wrong and I've already stated this recently and in previous discussions.
What a typical Krusty reaction. Many people have said similar things, therefore there must be someone coordinating an attack on me & that explains the consistency. (http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/8443/crazy6.gif)
If you've heard those comments many times before and the people who have made such comments have no contact with each other, then that makes you the constant.
Are you really so arrogant that you can't even consider the possibility that what you say can be interpretted this way? I suggest you read back some of your recent posts on Japanese aircraft threads and see if there might be a common theme to your posts that might be giving people this impression.
Something is only slander if it is untrue. Criticising the quality control or availability of equipment is one thing, implying they were unintelligent, incompetent and inferior as a race is unacceptable. Everytime you cross that line, I'll be here to remind you (http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/1504/cruisinforabruisin.gif)
And just the same as your other posts from Krusty's Imaginarium in every technical aircraft discussion that comes up: stating something, no matter how many times, does not make something true. Your single biggest limitation Krusty is that you know or feel you are right all the time.
Butcher I think a shortage of special materials, a constant destruction of equipment, manufacturing installations and skilled labour should not be misinterpreted as stupidity, ineptitude and inferiority. Krusty stated the Japanese couldn't operate essentially the same machine tools that manufacturers in the West had and I gave a counter example.
Also in response to your statement, I respectfully suggest you read about the development of the engines for the Nakajima Kikka. In the end they produced there own axial flow turbojet, the Ishikawajima Ne-20, based on a handful of photographs and a single cutaway drawing of the BMW 003. A remarkable engineering achievement under those working conditions.
For those especially interested in the Ki-100 and Ki-61, here is a recent discussion where three separate literary sources were revealed suggesting the Aces High Ki-61 is overweight, and some discussion of the types and some pictures made in the R.A.F. Museum of the final existant Ki-100:-
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,297618.45.html
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,296722.0.html
-
Also in response to your statement, I respectfully suggest you read about the development of the engines for the Nakajima Kikka. In the end they produced there own axial flow turbojet, the Ishikawajima Ne-20, based on a handful of photographs and a single cutaway drawing of the BMW 003. A remarkable engineering achievement under those working conditions.
I knew I had read that somewhere :aok
-
KI-84lb "might" be an easy addition. :bolt:
-
Yes. Comparitively easy
-
Ki-84-I-b 500 built. 660km/h?
It would be perk plane...
Ki-43 must be added first. :) (I still want to see Ki-100 in AH though)
It was IJAF's main fighter during war.
-
Mitsu san, could you please cite your source for your figure of 500 built. If you have any additional information you would like to share, please pm me.
I know it's not relevant to the Wishlist, but since it came up and out of interest, apparently one Kikka survives and may now be undergoing restoration. Here is a picture and a video where you can appreciate it's diminutive size (compared to the 262). Its empty weight was something like 60% that of a Vought Corsair.
Click on the picture for YouTube vid:-
(http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/k526/rwrk2/5639686592_2dfd5224db_b.jpg) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIdFo-TSNZk)