Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Angus on August 19, 2011, 03:12:43 AM
-
Hello all ....again ;)
I was wondering if you could help me on a little search.
Some months ago there was a topic on this on the forums. It had a link to an article if I recall correctly. The whole issue was regarding a relatively harmless drug, that has (well it's debated) quite some interesting effects against cancer.
I just can't find the darned thing. It must be there, but I am not very good with search definitions, and the name could be different. It definately should have "cancer" in it, and I am sure that many of you folks would find it within seconds, or even recall it.
Reward? I will tell you what I will do with the info....
-
Google Dichloroacetic acid.
-
Hello
That is the one I was looking for, so thank you!
Now, the reward.
My father in law has cancer, and was on the verge of giving up the fight. The chemical/drug therapy is pretty nasty, and he has to do radiation as well.
However, he has decided to get into the fight. I had read about Dichloroacetic acid, and from all I can see, it is a method that improves the effect of the other therapies with very little negative effect.
I had a doctor read up on this, and he was quite baffled, and confirmed that in theory this should work.
I hope the best, perhaps this will be tested this time.
-
Snopes has this as false.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/cancercure.asp
However that is no reason why not to give it a try.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10971-cheap-safe-drug-kills-most-cancers.html
Marijuana is also known to have cancer fighting properties.
-
there is a cure that is made from urine, but i cant remember the name. It only worked if it was the first treatment, so if the patient already underwent Chemo ro Radiation, it wouldnt work. Ill ask my mom because she was reading about it a couple of weeks ago...
Its was developed back in the 80's but has been successfully blocked by the fda from all the drug companies lobbying's.
-
Good friends Daughter had her 16th birthday last week and died a couple of days later. She had cancer when she was 11 and they got it into remission. It came back about 2 months before her 16th birthday.
Her funeral was this past Wednesday.
-
That is sad. Horrible when the young are taken by cancer, and NB, - cancer is much more fierce in the case of the young. Much faster.
What I made of this acid was actually 2 points. Here:
1: The properties seem to re-engage the normal cell self-destruction mechanism, thus making the cancer sells equally vulnerable as normal cells.
2: This is being silenced by the corporations.
All adds up. A very cheap and simple fighting method against cancer will not make many bucks....
-
Chuck Norris's tears cure cancer, but Chuck never cries.
-
Chuck Norris's tears cure cancer, but Chuck never cries.
Ludicrously inappropriate. Come back once you've found some class.
-
Ludicrously inappropriate. Come back once you've found some class.
Out of all the crap you usually spill on other topic. i dont think your the one to be saying what is "Ludicrously innappropriate".
:bolt:
-
there is a cure that is made from urine, but i cant remember the name. It only worked if it was the first treatment, so if the patient already underwent Chemo ro Radiation, it wouldnt work. Ill ask my mom because she was reading about it a couple of weeks ago...
Its was developed back in the 80's but has been successfully blocked by the fda from all the drug companies lobbying's.
flight that was bs back then and it still is now.
semp
-
That is sad. Horrible when the young are taken by cancer, and NB, - cancer is much more fierce in the case of the young. Much faster.
What I made of this acid was actually 2 points. Here:
1: The properties seem to re-engage the normal cell self-destruction mechanism, thus making the cancer sells equally vulnerable as normal cells.
2: This is being silenced by the corporations.
All adds up. A very cheap and simple fighting method against cancer will not make many bucks....
a simple cure for cancel will sell because you would own the patent and how much would you pay to cure cancer if you had it? 100 bucks, 100,000? If I had cancer and you had a cure I would give you every single penny I had or i would borrow or steal whatever was needed. the so simple that it wont make money cure is bs. always has, always will be.
semp
-
That is sad. Horrible when the young are taken by cancer, and NB, - cancer is much more fierce in the case of the young. Much faster.
What I made of this acid was actually 2 points. Here:
1: The properties seem to re-engage the normal cell self-destruction mechanism, thus making the cancer sells equally vulnerable as normal cells.
2: This is being silenced by the corporations.
All adds up. A very cheap and simple fighting method against cancer will not make many bucks....
werent you one of the ones that said i was paranoid when i said that they will never cure it, as there is no money in curing......only in treating?
that being said....good luck, and i truly hope it works for ya.
-
there is a cure that is made from urine, but i cant remember the name. It only worked if it was the first treatment, so if the patient already underwent Chemo ro Radiation, it wouldnt work. Ill ask my mom because she was reading about it a couple of weeks ago...
Its was developed back in the 80's but has been successfully blocked by the fda from all the drug companies lobbying's.
No way that is true.
-
EBC-46
-
No way that is true.
Agreed
-
Snopes has this as false.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/cancercure.asp
However that is no reason why not to give it a try.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10971-cheap-safe-drug-kills-most-cancers.html
Marijuana is also known to have cancer fighting properties.
Here's a good one: http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/05/dichloroacetate_dca_and_cancer_deja_vu_a.php
-
Here's a good one: http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/05/dichloroacetate_dca_and_cancer_deja_vu_a.php
that is posted as false in the snopes message that you are quoting.
semp
-
Angus,
As a cancer survivor myself, stage 3A adenocarcinoma lung cancer, treatment ended June 2004, I have an idea of what your family is going through and I wish your Father-in-law success in his fight. And a fight it will be. Chemo and radiation concurrent treatment will make him sicker than he has likely been in his whole life. He may feel that the treatment will get him before the cancer. I urge you to do what you can to keep him at it all the way through treatment. Mine was 6 months with a 6 week break from chemo in the middle. I also recommend he seek a good acupuncturist/herbalist. The chemo and radiation take a lot out of you and I'm convinced that my acupuncturist along with the herbs ,many mushroom based (mushrooms in Chinese herbal medicine are believed to have anticancer qualities) helped me to maintain energy enough to stick with it.
I too sought out and tried different things that looked like they may help, mostly nutritional. But I also took something called Pau D'arco for a while. I think however the treatments they have at today's cancer centers are the best bet. If he wants to try other things just be sure he confers with his doctors. I'm sure the radiation doctor wouldn't want him take a lot of antioxidants for instance, mine didn't.
As far as marijuana, for me, it helped immensely with the nausea.
For myself, I believe that one of the most important things I did was to get up everyday, look in the mirror and say, not today cancer, I still fight today.
I wish all the best,
Jenks
p.s. My deepest sympathy to your friend Shuffler.
-
Angus,
As a cancer survivor myself, stage 3A adenocarcinoma lung cancer, treatment ended June 2004, I have an idea of what your family is going through and I wish your Father-in-law success in his fight. And a fight it will be. Chemo and radiation concurrent treatment will make him sicker than he has likely been in his whole life. He may feel that the treatment will get him before the cancer. I urge you to do what you can to keep him at it all the way through treatment. Mine was 6 months with a 6 week break from chemo in the middle. I also recommend he seek a good acupuncturist/herbalist. The chemo and radiation take a lot out of you and I'm convinced that my acupuncturist along with the herbs ,many mushroom based (mushrooms in Chinese herbal medicine are believed to have anticancer qualities) helped me to maintain energy enough to stick with it.
I too sought out and tried different things that looked like they may help, mostly nutritional. But I also took something called Pau D'arco for a while. I think however the treatments they have at today's cancer centers are the best bet. If he wants to try other things just be sure he confers with his doctors. I'm sure the radiation doctor wouldn't want him take a lot of antioxidants for instance, mine didn't.
As far as marijuana, for me, it helped immensely with the nausea.
For myself, I believe that one of the most important things I did was to get up everyday, look in the mirror and say, not today cancer, I still fight today.
I wish all the best,
Jenks
p.s. My deepest sympathy to your friend Shuffler.
My dad just began the fight against Stage 4 colon cancer. The good news is that the colon was operable and nine inches (and a baseball sized tumor) was removed. The bad news is that his liver is badly spotted and the cancer has begun to spread to other places as well. He's still recovering from surgery but won't begin chemo for a few weeks I don't think he has any idea what the chemo is going to do to him as he plans to return to work October 3rd. We'll see how he feels then.
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll keep those in mind should he need them! <S>
-
I'll have a good thought for you dad :salute.
semp
-
I saw this in another forum and remembered this post.
posting it since you never know if it will help:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.burzynskimovie.com/
Watch the full movie here on YouTube for free:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0ibsoqjPac&feature=related
From the website:
ABOUT THE FILM:
Burzynski, the Movie is the story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.
His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski's gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970's called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and could begin the final phase of FDA testing in 2011–barring the ability to raise the required $300 million to fund the final phase of FDA clinical trials.
When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough.
Antineoplastons are responsible for curing some of the most incurable forms of terminal cancer. Various cancer survivors are presented in the film who chose these medicines instead of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation - with full disclosure of medical records to support their diagnosis and recovery - as well as systematic (non-anecdotal) FDA-supervised clinical trial data comparing Antineoplastons to other available treatments—which is published within the peer-reviewed medical literature.
One form of cancer - diffuse, intrinsic, childhood brainstem glioma has never before been cured in any scientifically controlled clinical trial in the history of medicine. Antineoplastons hold the first cures in history - dozens of them. [ANP - PubMed 2003] [ANP - PubMed 2006] [Rad & other - PubMed 2008] [Chemo/Rad - PubMed 2005]
This documentarytakes the audience through the treacherous, yet victorious, 14-year journey both Dr. Burzynski and his patients have had to endure in order to obtain FDA-approved clinical trials of Antineoplastons.
Dr. Burzynski resides and practices medicine in Houston, Texas. He was able to initially produce and administer his discovery without FDA-approval from 1977-1995 because the state of Texas at this time did not require that Texas physicians be required to adhere to Federal law in this situation. This law has since been changed.
As with anything that changes current-day paradigms, Burzynski's ability to successfully treat incurable cancer with such consistency has baffled the industry. Ironically, this fact had prompted numerous investigations by the Texas Medical Board, who relentlessly took Dr. Burzynski as high as the state supreme court in their failed attempt to halt his practices.
Likewise, the Food and Drug Administration engaged in four Federal Grand Juries spanning over a decade attempting to indict Dr. Burzynski, all of which ended in no finding of fault on his behalf. Finally, Dr. Burzynski was indicted in their 5th Grand Jury in 1995, resulting in two federal trials and two sets of jurors finding him not guilty of any wrongdoing. If convicted, Dr. Burzynski would have faced a maximum of 290 years in a federal prison and $18.5 million in fines.
However, what was revealed a few years after Dr. Burzynski won his freedom, helps to paint a more coherent picture regarding the true motivation of the United States government's relentless persecution of Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D.
Note: When Antineoplastons are approved for public use, it will allow a single scientist to hold an exclusive right to manufacture and sell these medicines on the open market—leaving the pharmaceutical industry absent in profiting from the most effective gene-targeted cancer treatment the world has ever seen.