Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: stealth on September 04, 2011, 01:20:18 AM
-
Modern Warfare 3 Mutiplayer Trailor http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L0de1PqK7I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L0de1PqK7I)
Now The reason you should like or hate the new MW3 is because it feels exactly like MW2, but it balanced everything out in term of pro vs noob for the most part.
Modern Warfare 3 Official Short Film [HD] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0RwcRh731M (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0RwcRh731M)
Information Vids
Robert Bowling Interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJUJcoCq37I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJUJcoCq37I)
COD-XP http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjxuILcVkFk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjxuILcVkFk)
Modern Warefare 3 Mutiplayer Gameplay Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJWJK59FXw8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJWJK59FXw8)
Modern Warfare 3 Multplayer Gameplay Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCBgGpnRTy4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCBgGpnRTy4)
Optic Gaming Vs Infinity Optic wins $400,000 prize.
-
I thought they were done making map packs for MW2? ...wait...
-
Modern Warfare 3 Mutiplayer Trailor http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L0de1PqK7I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L0de1PqK7I)
Now The reason you should like or hate the new MW3 is because it feels exactly like MW2, but it balanced everything out in term of pro vs noob for the most part.
Modern Warfare 3 Official Short Film [HD] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0RwcRh731M (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0RwcRh731M)
Information Vids
Robert Bowling Interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJUJcoCq37I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJUJcoCq37I)
COD-XP http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjxuILcVkFk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjxuILcVkFk)
Modern Warefare 3 Mutiplayer Gameplay Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJWJK59FXw8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJWJK59FXw8)
Modern Warfare 3 Multplayer Gameplay Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCBgGpnRTy4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCBgGpnRTy4)
Optic Gaming Vs Infinity Optic wins $400,000 prize.
No thanks. 4 yr old Gaming engine with outdated graphics and the same horrible gameplay that was in mw2 with barely anything changed.
Match that with the fact that Battlefield 3 has the new frostbite 2.0 engine, Better Graphics, closer realism, and from the vids just looks all around better then mw3, I see no reason to buy this COD.
Also, the "Elite" yearly fee of $49 is a big turn off.
-
I thought they were done making map packs for MW2? ...wait...
I guess not. :(
-
Treyarch ruined the entire series. Treyarch and Activi$ion.
Will only be renting this cruddy game to finish the fluff'n storyline to see what happens to Soap and Mactavish.
Or was it Soap and Price? Or Price and Mactavish?
Don't flippin know.
-
:rofl Look when the first American soldier gets killed. Whats floating above his body? dogtags
Treyarch is so out of ideas for COD that their ripping off Battlefields Dogtag collection gameplay :rofl :rofl :rolleyes:
-
COD sucks, every single one except world at war. that was the only good one. why i wasted cash on black ops? no idea. all i know is that it sucks.
-
COD sucks, every single one except world at war. that was the only good one. why i wasted cash on black ops? no idea. all i know is that it sucks.
:huh
WaW had some of the worst balancing of any COD game. especially spawn points in MP. Only good thing to come from it is Zombies.
Cod stoped being good after MW1. WW2 was cod's best theater. MW1 had the best MP COD could provide, after that, it went to hell
-
:huh
WaW had some of the worst balancing of any COD game. especially spawn points in MP. Only good thing to come from it is Zombies.
Cod stoped being good after MW1. WW2 was cod's best theater. MW1 had the best MP COD could provide, after that, it went to hell
im talking about campaign here. zombies was the 1 thing WaW had over every other FPS game out there and IW couldnt beat that. the multiplayer is ok i guess, spawn points in MP are fine. the only bad thing is that treyarch stopped caring about WaW and let all the hackers into MP.
-
im talking about campaign here. zombies was the 1 thing WaW had over every other FPS game out there and IW couldnt beat that. the multiplayer is ok i guess, spawn points in MP are fine. the only bad thing is that treyarch stopped caring about WaW and let all the hackers into MP.
Wolfenstein says Hi.
The Mp was always broken. The spawn points were easily span camped, the MP40 was as OP in WaW as the Ump40 was in mw2 and the Famas/ak74/aug are in Blops. What makes it worse was the many glitches on all their maps. People found ways to glitch up into mid-air, glitch into walls, under the map, etc,etc. And treyarch never did fix any of these problems.
-
Wolfenstein says Hi.
The Mp was always broken. The spawn points were easily span camped, the MP40 was as OP in WaW as the Ump40 was in mw2 and the Famas/ak74/aug are in Blops. What makes it worse was the many glitches on all their maps. People found ways to glitch up into mid-air, glitch into walls, under the map, etc,etc. And treyarch never did fix any of these problems.
have you noticed that all of those got fixed? nobody glitches into the air, nobody gets under the map, nobody gets into the walls, and the mp40 got nerfed. i dont think you have played much lately.
-
have you noticed that all of those got fixed? nobody glitches into the air, nobody gets under the map, nobody gets into the walls, and the mp40 got nerfed. i dont think you have played much lately.
What system?
My cousin has it for his 360, He was playing it just 2 weeks ago. And there was still everything wrong with it that you say is "fixed"
Only "fix" that was noticable was The board they put over the top of the stairwell on the dome map to prevent people from camping the top of the stairs.
I played it last 4 months ago on ps3, saw no "Fixes" ether.
-
What system?
My cousin has it for his 360, He was playing it just 2 weeks ago. And there was still everything wrong with it that you say is "fixed"
Only "fix" that was noticable was The board they put over the top of the stairwell on the dome map to prevent people from camping the top of the stairs.
I played it last 4 months ago on ps3, saw no "Fixes" ether.
xbox 360. only time ive seen someone go into a wall/underground/into the sky was when i first got the game 2 years ago. the glitches are fixed, not the hackers. your cousin probably saw one of the guys using a hack he found on some dudes youtube channel.
-
I never bought MW2 but the first COD:MW was probably the best FPS modern shooter ever IMO. The stuff I read about MW2 prior to it's release for the PC kinda ticked me off so I boycotted it, but I'm in a wait & see mode on MW3 or BF3.
I did just grab the per-release/beta of Red Orchestra 2 to hold me over, because the original had the best tank action out of any other game I ever played. The FPS part wasn't great but seems they have improved it quite a bit with this new version.
-
TBH, I'm not too hype on MW3 with the invisible sniper crap either.
finally! i can use this pic!!!!!! OMG you do not know how long ive waited to do this :rofl
(http://i1088.photobucket.com/albums/i336/igotafro/000000invisisniper.jpg)
-
Killzone 2 gave their sniper class an Invisibility Perk Which was nicely Balanced When prone, and still, the snipers body was invisible(But their suits red/blue eye slits would still remain visible and glowing) And if you looked in a hiding snipers general Direction their name would pop up in Red. The sniper was mostly invisible, But the Invincibility gave a bluish tint to the snipers vision, which made it a bit more difficult to aim with the ability on.
Combine that with the fact that KZ2 combined the sniping ability with the SIXX-AXIS control.(Your sniper rifle's accuracy was effected by how well you held your controller in real life. Meaning if you shook your controller, the rifle would shake, If you tilted your controller up, Your rifle would tilt up, etc etc) And the sniper class was both fun, and balanced, at the same time.
Sadly tho they listened to the COD whineboys, Took out half the things that made the sniper class balanced in KZ3(like the SXXAXIS) and worse of all, Gave the sniper class the Helghan assault rifle.
So at the begining of the MP, You'd have snipers camping corners with assault rifles and invisibility turned on. Was a nightmare. GG patched it to be a little better by giving the invisible perk a shorter lasting time and a longer recharge time. But the best way to balance it would be to take the AR away from that class.
-
So..............Your not buying MW3?
I think Modern Warfare is gonna be pretty cool. Also if you didn't know the dogtag stuff is just a game type, like domination or SnD. So you don't have to deal with it the whole game. Yes, BF3 is tacticaly better and all that good stuff but MW3 Campaign is gonna be better I belive, much better story. COD I belive is the game that brought emotional kinda stuff to video games. Just don't comapre BF3 vs MW3 there completely diffrent games besides that there both FPS, Spec Ops, Campaign, Game socialing website. Besides that though there diffrent.
Question Is Makrov the son of Reznov from WaW and Black ops?
-
My kids bought MW for me a few years ago. I was interested, so I installed it.
Went online to play, as soon as I spawned in... dead.
Over and over. Finally, I had enough. I uninstalled same day.
It is different from BC 2. MW sucks, as there's no way to break spawn camping.
At least in BC2, campers either get booted, or killed.
:cheers: Oz
-
Bad Company 2.
-
i like battlefield because of the ways of killing a sniper....
COD:kill the sniper in his tower!!!!
BF3:theres a sniper in the tower! bring the tower down!
*tower comes crashing down*
BF3:hes dead!
-
Yes, BF3 is tacticaly better and all that good stuff but MW3 Campaign is gonna be better I belive, much better story.
:headscratch: I must have missed something in the gameplay...
-
Bad Company 2.
This.
-
I can't wait until both come out. I'll be playing both for sure, but I'm still partial to CoD.
-
I'll probably buy both MW3 and BF3. I know BF3 will be offer the better multiplayer. I also know many of my friends will only buy MW3.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhb44o4Dd48
Beats them ALL
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhb44o4Dd48
Beats them ALL
i wish BC3 has the ability to use TrackIr like The Arma1 and 2 had.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhb44o4Dd48
Beats them ALL
Project Reality says Hi. ;)
-
No thanks. 4 yr old Gaming engine with outdated graphics and the same horrible gameplay that was in mw2 with barely anything changed.
Match that with the fact that Battlefield 3 has the new frostbite 2.0 engine, Better Graphics, closer realism, and from the vids just looks all around better then mw3, I see no reason to buy this COD.
Also, the "Elite" yearly fee of $49 is a big turn off.
Actually, the engine is older than 4 years old. It's just a heavily modified version of the Quake engine Infinity Ward originally licensed for the first Call of Duty game, not bad for an original 5 million dollar investment for multiple licenses. Even with the old engine, Modern Warfare still outsold Battlefield 2 even though BF2 had the better multiplayer and forecasts for this year so far show that the same thing is going to happen again.
Depends on what you get with the service and what future plans are for it, $49 a year isn't all that bad of an investment but some of the Xbox crowd might not like paying that on top of their gold subscriptions unless MS doesn't make it a gold subscription only thing and allows Activision to offer the service to Silver users.
ack-ack
-
Actually, the engine is older than 4 years old. It's just a heavily modified version of the Quake engine Infinity Ward originally licensed for the first Call of Duty game, not bad for an original 5 million dollar investment for multiple licenses. Even with the old engine, Modern Warfare still outsold Battlefield 2 even though BF2 had the better multiplayer and forecasts for this year so far show that the same thing is going to happen again.
Depends on what you get with the service and what future plans are for it, $49 a year isn't all that bad of an investment but some of the Xbox crowd might not like paying that on top of their gold subscriptions unless MS doesn't make it a gold subscription only thing and allows Activision to offer the service to Silver users.
ack-ack
Battlefield and COD have always been like that.
Battlefield is bar far the better FPS, But COD sells more simply due to advertisement, "shock&awe" moments, and the fact that the game is the easiest fps to pick up&play on the market.
With battlefield, you need skill to do good. With COD, all you need is just to know how to run, pull a triger, reload. simple.
I wouldnt have to deal with the xbox thing tho, seeing how i have a ps3.
-
I bought CODBO's and its been sitting on my puter for months unplayed. Its a lousy game with a slick marketing campaign. B-3 is the only game Im buying this year.
-
To be honest I love video games. Give me a video game I'll play it. It could have 2 frames per second the baddest baddest graphics I don't care. A video game is designed around skill, tactics and the thinking power. If your spawned camped sucks for you that's why there's a leave game button in it. Besides the whole purpouse of a video game is fun not spawn camping noobs. If you don't love video games then you shouldn't play them or you'll scream your mind out like other people, from getting cross the map 360 no scoped.
Battlefield is just a game that gives you more options, Modern Warfare gives you the challenge to be limited by your optins and if you come victious then that's pretty cool. Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3 are totally diffrent, diffrent, diffrent games. Shoot a bullet at a guy in MW3 and BF3 and theres a big diffrence in that alone. Yes you pull a trigger, yes a bullet comes out but what about the other stuff.
If you have a problem with a game and you want to get better. Play the campaign on the hardest difficulty possible and it will be a reflex, to be a killing machine trust me.
-
MW3 has one of the best storyline in a game, definately not the best, but close to it. That'll be the reason why I'll be buying it along with BF3. BFBC2 had way too much "action" scenes (yes, too much can kill it too) in every single mission that there is zero suspense. While IT is cool blowing up guys, it gets repetative if all you see are giant explosions left and right. In CoD, every explosion or slow mo scene has suspense already built up, so you kind of sit back and go "Wow, that's amazing". In BFBC2, it's more like "Wow, that's a bigger explosion than the last".
-
In BFBC2, it's more like "Wow, that's a bigger explosion than the last".
That is called winning :D :ahand
-
i think ill be spending money on bf3... if its like MW2 on steroids im not wasting money.
-
Battlefield and COD have always been like that.
Battlefield is bar far the better FPS, But COD sells more simply due to advertisement, "shock&awe" moments, and the fact that the game is the easiest fps to pick up&play on the market.
With battlefield, you need skill to do good. With COD, all you need is just to know how to run, pull a triger, reload. simple.
I wouldnt have to deal with the xbox thing tho, seeing how i have a ps3.
You need skill in CoD. Trust me, no skill=getting stomped. While BC2 is more realistic, I have a lot more fun playing CoD. I think that might have something to do with why it sells so much too. :eek:
-
I remember when I first bought Black Ops. I was in that nuke town map and the fight pretty much was one side on one side of the street, the other side on the other side of he street, and everyone throwing sticky grenades, shooting rockets, or snipeing each other. Your chances of surviving on the crummy map, to even make it to the other side of the street, was about 0.
Yet these dooshes kept spawning and tossing their GD sticky grenades. The new maps look interesting, I bought the first pack dont ask me why, but still there is no strategy or objective worth my time. And everything happens to fast cause its strictly run and shoot.
At least BC2 has objectives, and Vietnam as a bonus for old timers like me. Even still I havnt played BC2 in awhiles, I just missed flight games to much.
-
If you don't love video games then you shouldn't play them or you'll scream your mind out like other people, from getting cross the map 360 no scoped.
Am I the only that finds this lame/gamey as hell?
-
Skill makes me laugh. You run around, point, and click. A skill is something you do in RL, such as learning how to shoot in RL.
Anyone can play an FPS and do good, just need to put time into getting used to the game mechanics.
-
Am I the only that finds this lame/gamey as hell?
+1. you can tell the COD fanboys in this thread...do i play COD? yea, a little. but it sure as hell aint my first choice of video game :lol.
Skill makes me laugh. You run around, point, and click. A skill is something you do in RL, such as learning how to shoot in RL.
Anyone can play an FPS and do good, just need to put time into getting used to the game mechanics.
also +1
-
+1. you can tell the COD fanboys in this thread...do i play COD? yea, a little. but it sure as hell aint my first choice of video game :lol.
also +1
I play COD, BF etc., but I'm not loyal to the extent of defending one game over the other. Every game has certain lame things about it, some more than others, I just accept the fact that every game I play online is going to have it's share of lameness. That being said, I'm still partial to Halo 3 multiplayer. It is what you make of it, although I do enjoy playing coop games online more than the standard team deathmatch kind of stuff.
-
your right, every game has its lamespots, but in all honesty and bashing aside, COD has more lamespots then most FPS'. many things are exploited, and i understand it isnt made to be the "real" thing, but take some of the gamey things out like quickscoping.
-
You need skill in CoD. Trust me, no skill=getting stomped. While BC2 is more realistic, I have a lot more fun playing CoD. I think that might have something to do with why it sells so much too. :eek:
Ive played every COD except reflex and 2, And hold a 46 wins, 1 loss at 1v1's in MW2.
And from that experiance i can say that COD takes little to no skill.
The only skill it takes is predicting where campers will be or how to dodge spawn camping.
-
To be honest if your to return or delete or some form of get rid of a COD game because you get upset at one game is a little weak. Unless of course you a total noob with the PS3 or Xbox360 controller then that would make sence. COD is based on tactics maybe even a little more then Battle Field belive it or not. The whole point of a game though is to play it with other people like friends. If you didn't do that on your last COD exprience try and get some console gaming buddys.
Now back to MW3 and not if you like BF3 or MW3. What you guys gonna love more Spec ops, Campaign or Mutiplayer. Plus if you didn't know. If you level up in Spec Ops survival mode in MW3 it also ranks you up in mutiplayer. Once you die with a certain type of class it doesn't reset. Basically have a support class get 18 kills and your a tank a tank with a riot shield that can survive predator missiles.
If you ask me I would love to play a private match game of President protecting him with Juggernaunt. You gotta realize more then 30% of the COD gamers play it for the private match gameplay. Make little games within the game.
MW3 has no commando, no second chance(it is a deathstreak however though unlocked at Level 37) and all those other perks you guys HATE like me so much. I know every single thing that could possibly be known about MW3 right now(besides the stuff they didn't reviel at COD-XP)
If you have any questions please ask them and I'll tell you. It's gonna be a good year of gaming everywhere I'll tell you that.
-
You know what cracks me up. In their trailer you see parts of original MW maps frankensteined in with a bit of touch up so they are not too noticeable. After the original modern warfare game its been down hill.
-
Ive played every COD except reflex and 2, And hold a 46 wins, 1 loss at 1v1's in MW2.
And from that experiance i can say that COD takes little to no skill.
The only skill it takes is predicting where campers will be or how to dodge spawn camping.
No matter how much either of say one way or the other, it doesn't make it so. Let's agree to disagree, and enjoy whatever game we choose.
EDIT: Just had a Guppy moment... Sorry, won't let it happen again. :uhoh
-
To be honest if your to return or delete or some form of get rid of a COD game because you get upset at one game is a little weak. Unless of course you a total noob with the PS3 or Xbox360 controller then that would make sence. COD is based on tactics maybe even a little more then Battle Field belive it or not. The whole point of a game though is to play it with other people like friends. If you didn't do that on your last COD exprience try and get some console gaming buddys.
Now back to MW3 and not if you like BF3 or MW3. What you guys gonna love more Spec ops, Campaign or Mutiplayer. Plus if you didn't know. If you level up in Spec Ops survival mode in MW3 it also ranks you up in mutiplayer. Once you die with a certain type of class it doesn't reset. Basically have a support class get 18 kills and your a tank a tank with a riot shield that can survive predator missiles.
If you ask me I would love to play a private match game of President protecting him with Juggernaunt. You gotta realize more then 30% of the COD gamers play it for the private match gameplay. Make little games within the game.
MW3 has no commando, no second chance(it is a deathstreak however though unlocked at Level 37) and all those other perks you guys HATE like me so much. I know every single thing that could possibly be known about MW3 right now(besides the stuff they didn't reviel at COD-XP)
If you have any questions please ask them and I'll tell you. It's gonna be a good year of gaming everywhere I'll tell you that.
i hope you mis typed something in the bold... if thats the case i am in no way buying the game. why in Gods forsaken name should a riot shield keep me safe from a predator? worst thought i think ive heard about a video game...talk about gamey and no fun.
-
i hope you mis typed something in the bold... if thats the case i am in no way buying the game. why in Gods forsaken name should a riot shield keep me safe from a predator? worst thought i think ive heard about a video game...talk about gamey and no fun.
the riot shield protects against everything. the only way to kill him is to get behind him or actually "stick" a semtex to him. also, riot shielders take 2 hits from the shield to kill. and if they have commando then there doing it from a even more unrealalistic range. my advice, dont buy the game.
-
the riot shield protects against everything. the only way to kill him is to get behind him or actually "stick" a semtex to him. also, riot shielders take 2 hits from the shield to kill. and if they have commando then there doing it from a even more unrealalistic range. my advice, dont buy the game.
sounds like its gonna be worse then MW2... not spending my money on it.
-
the riot shield protects against everything. the only way to kill him is to get behind him or actually "stick" a semtex to him. also, riot shielders take 2 hits from the shield to kill. and if they have commando then there doing it from a even more unrealalistic range. my advice, dont buy the game.
Commando isn't in MW3.
-
Commando isn't in MW3.
ah. i thought it would have been, seeing it was so popular in MW2
-
ah. i thought it would have been, seeing it was so popular in MW2
commando better not be, no reason to take it out for one game only to put it back in. although BO still has some stupid long lunges that shouldnt be made... whatever.
-
commando better not be, no reason to take it out for one game only to put it back in. although BO still has some stupid long lunges that shouldnt be made... whatever.
also, dolphin diving? what the hell is that crap about? why on earth would you jump onto a hard concrete surface in the freezing cold IRL when nobody's around.
-
also, dolphin diving? what the hell is that crap about? why on earth would you jump onto a hard concrete surface in the freezing cold IRL when nobody's around.
why the hell not? :lol pretty cool diving through a window and then shooting someone on the way down though. or, shooting someone as they dive through a window.
-
why the hell not? :lol pretty cool diving through a window and then shooting someone on the way down though. or, shooting someone as they dive through a window.
for me its all just to gamey. its just the dropshot type thing that came up in MW.
-
for me its all just to gamey. its just the dropshot type thing that came up in MW.
Well...it is in fact a video game. :eek:
-
I knew it someone made me $5 richer I beted my friend here that someone one would complain about juggernaut. Well the sad fact is if you actually played COD you would use it like a noob. (Predator Missiles can take down Juggernaunts)
To stop some confusion you might get from this forum. No dolphin diving(On moon it's a Astro Dive) on MW3 just like MW2. Also after awhile on MW3 the riot shield begins to break down aim for the glass.
Everybody can play COD and get a pretty high rank in MW3. Unlike MW2, because MW2 was all about kills. In MW3 you get points for everything. You get small little unlockables for everything. take down a killstreak thats 1 point.
Now unless your like 30 or older then obviously this game isn't for you. (can't teach an old dog new tricks)
Modern Warfare 3 though is as good as you can get though on COD.
Everything you guys say that sucks about MW3 I can counter it. Except Last Stand being a deathstreak That I can't.
This Video will show you everything you need to know about MW3.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGv7ljrf-rI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGv7ljrf-rI)
-
I knew it someone made me $5 richer I beted my friend here that someone one would complain about juggernaut. Well the sad fact is if you actually played COD you would use it like a noob. (Predator Missiles can take down Juggernaunts)
To stop some confusion you might get from this forum. No dolphin diving(On moon it's a Astro Dive) on MW3 just like MW2. Also after awhile on MW3 the riot shield begins to break down aim for the glass.
Everybody can play COD and get a pretty high rank in MW3. Unlike MW2, because MW2 was all about kills. In MW3 you get points for everything. You get small little unlockables for everything. take down a killstreak thats 1 point.
Now unless your like 30 or older then obviously this game isn't for you. (can't teach an old dog new tricks)
Modern Warfare 3 though is as good as you can get though on COD.
Everything you guys say that sucks about MW3 I can counter it. Except Last Stand being a deathstreak That I can't.\
\
This Video will show you everything you need to know about MW3.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGv7ljrf-rI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGv7ljrf-rI)
oh how wrong you are...
-
oh how EXTREMELY wrong you are...FIXED.
cod stopped being good at WaW. that was the line for CoD greatness.
-
cod stopped being good at MW1. that was the line for CoD greatness.
Fixed.
-
Fixed.
cod stopped being good at WaW. that was the line for CoD greatness.
WaW was much better than MW1 IMO. MW1 was only good for its campaign. i didnt like the multiplayer that much because the maps just werent all that great to me.
-
WaW was much better than MW1 IMO. MW1 was only good for its campaign. i didnt like the multiplayer that much because the maps just werent all that great to me.
I would of torn into you if you hadent put that. Your spared.
-
I would of torn into you if you hadent put that. Your spared.
so you were going to shove your way down my throat over a game? sad.
-
so you were going to shove your way down my throat over a game? sad.
I was just going to point out all the flaws in WAW that makes it one of the worst Cod's to ever be made, then laugh at your petty attempts to defend it. thats all.
-
I was just going to point out all the flaws in WAW that makes it one of the worst Cod's to ever be made, then laugh at your petty attempts to defend it. thats all.
im sure my "petty" attempts would have been fine. as you havent played it for a long time and dont know what you would have been talking about if you actually had played it on live where all those "glitches" are actually fixed.
back to MW3. im definately not spending any cash on it, WaW drew the line for me and im sticking with that until the morons that make CoD get back into their right minds.
-
im sure my "petty" attempts would have been fine. as you havent played it for a long time and dont know what you would have been talking about if you actually had played it on live where all those "glitches" are actually fixed.
back to MW3. im definately not spending any cash on it, WaW drew the line for me and im sticking with that until the morons that make CoD get back into their right minds.
Didnt i say earlier that my cousin has the game on his 360 and plays it regularly? Guess you must of missed that part.
-
Didnt i say earlier that my cousin has the game on his 360 and plays it regularly? Guess you must of missed that part.
not really sure you know this...but...if you dont believe it. see it for yourself. i havent seen one of these "glitches" you named in over a year and a half.
-
not really sure you know this...but...if you dont believe it. see it for yourself. i havent seen one of these "glitches" you named in over a year and a half.
I see them every time he plays. I even know how to do the Air glitch on the castle map.
Skorpion, you fail to realize that its Treyarch who is saying they "fixed" the problem. Treyarch is notorious for lieing about game fixes. Especially in Blops.
So shame on you for being so gullible.
-
I see them every time he plays. I even know how to do the Air glitch on the castle map.
Skorpion, you fail to realize that its Treyarch who is saying they "fixed" the problem. Treyarch is notorious for lieing about game fixes. Especially in Blops.
So shame on you for being so gullible.
no shame here. the fact that you say you "see it each time he plays" doesnt mean squat. im 100% sure that out of 4000+ rounds ive played in the 1.5 years and havent seen glitches in more than 200 of those, that they are mostly patched or fixed. unless you have proof, then please, tell me how much is still unfixed.
-
no shame here. the fact that you say you "see it each time he plays" doesnt mean squat. im 100% sure that out of 4000+ rounds ive played in the 1.5 years and havent seen glitches in more than 200 of those, that they are mostly patched or fixed. unless you have proof, then please, tell me how much is still unfixed.
You dont see them that much anymore because.
1. Most of the glitchers have moved on out of the series. Youl only run into 1 every couple of matches.
2. Most of W@W's MP is hacked now. Theres no need for them to glitch when they have their hacks.
3. not everyone in the world knows about the glitching.
Just because you don't see it, doesn't mean its not there. Give me your XBL gametag, i'll have one of my friends add you. They know how to perform ever glitch in the game and he'll show you he can just to prove how wrong you are.
-
You dont see them that much anymore because.
1. Most of the glitchers have moved on out of the series. Youl only run into 1 every couple of matches.
2. Most of W@W's MP is hacked now. Theres no need for them to glitch when they have their hacks.
3. not everyone in the world knows about the glitching.
Just because you don't see it, doesn't mean its not there. Give me your XBL gametag, i'll have one of my friends add you. They know how to perform ever glitch in the game and he'll show you he can just to prove how wrong you are.
first of all, id rather take a data chart instead of having to go around with one of your "friends". unless you have written data/proof provided by actual people and not the guys at treyarch, then i'll believe it.
as for those hacks, its dying off. i havent seen one in a few weeks. there all moving onto bl.ops. to take advantage of the obvious flaws that any moron with half a brain cell could use to their advantage.
honestly, why would i want to waste my time with your friends? i think we all know why.
-
first of all, id rather take a data chart instead of having to go around with one of your "friends". unless you have written data/proof provided by actual people and not the guys at treyarch, then i'll believe it.
as for those hacks, its dying off. i havent seen one in a few weeks. there all moving onto bl.ops. to take advantage of the obvious flaws that any moron with half a brain cell could use to their advantage.
honestly, why would i want to waste my time with your friends? i think we all know why.
first of all, id rather take a data chart instead of having to go around with one of your "friends". unless you have written data/proof provided by actual people and not the guys at treyarch, then i'll believe it.
sooo...You'd rather take a chart that says this stuff is fixed/not fixed instead of being able to see first hand wether its fixed/not fixeD? Whole new level of stupidity right there.
honestly, why would i want to waste my time with your friends? i think we all know why.
Because you know it would prove everything your sayings wrong. And just like in the p47vsf6f thread, Your trying to pass a bluff, Your getting called out, now your coming at me with the "Im not doing this for you" excuse again
Yes we all know why, We all know you'd be proven wrong like you have in the other threads youve started pointless arguments in. And your scared that you will be proven wrong just like the other threads. So your trying to avoid doing it to avoid some embarrassment.
Wont help, were still laughing.
-
sooo...You'd rather take a chart that says this stuff is fixed/not fixed instead of being able to see first hand wether its fixed/not fixeD? Whole new level of stupidity right there.
Because you know it would prove everything your sayings wrong. And just like in the p47vsf6f thread, Your trying to pass a bluff, Your getting called out, now your coming at me with the "Im not doing this for you" excuse again
Yes we all know why, We all know you'd be proven wrong like you have in the other threads youve started pointless arguments in. And your scared that you will be proven wrong just like the other threads. So your trying to avoid doing it to avoid some embarrassment.
Wont help, were still laughing.
(http://i1088.photobucket.com/albums/i336/igotafro/Tactical_facepalm.jpg)
lol you make me facepalm. i dont think anyone is laughing at me as much as they are laughing at you. you obviously just make up a response without reading half the post. i never said i wanted the charts from treyarch, like your trying to say. im saying i want it from the actual players, and their actual comments that say they are still there. so, once again, your the stupid one here.
-
I knew it someone made me $5 richer I beted my friend here that someone one would complain about juggernaut. Well the sad fact is if you actually played COD you would use it like a noob. (Predator Missiles can take down Juggernaunts)
To stop some confusion you might get from this forum. No dolphin diving(On moon it's a Astro Dive) on MW3 just like MW2. Also after awhile on MW3 the riot shield begins to break down aim for the glass.
Everybody can play COD and get a pretty high rank in MW3. Unlike MW2, because MW2 was all about kills. In MW3 you get points for everything. You get small little unlockables for everything. take down a killstreak thats 1 point.
Now unless your like 30 or older then obviously this game isn't for you. (can't teach an old dog new tricks)
Modern Warfare 3 though is as good as you can get though on COD.
Everything you guys say that sucks about MW3 I can counter it. Except Last Stand being a deathstreak That I can't.
This Video will show you everything you need to know about MW3.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGv7ljrf-rI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGv7ljrf-rI)
every little thing being a point in some increment makes it easier to get your uber high noob perks. if i gonna get a point for killing the MVP on the other team cause his dumb bellybutton was camping with his back exposed im not gonna be thrilled... if it was an intense little fight between us then ill take the points.
-
i never said i wanted the charts from treyarch
I never said you did ether.
I could throw together a chart right now saying that all the glitches were fixed in WaW. would be a lie, But i could do it.
You would rather see what a chart says something can/cant do instead of seeing for yourself wether you can/cant do it. thats dumb. so very very dumb.
Im done arguing with such a child who's too hardheaded to admit when he's wrong. Just like the p47 thread, Just like the WoT thread, Just like pretty much every thread, You get proven wrong skorpion, yet instead of just saying "Your right, Im wrong, I apologize" You continue to argue and make yourself look so foolish.
Reading your unintelligent dribble is giving me a headache. Im out. Done arguing with you. Youve been proven wrong in enough threads to show that you dont know what your talking about, and your nothing but a hard-headed child who cant admit when he's wrong.
-Poof-
:rolleyes:
-
I never said you did ether.
I could throw together a chart right now saying that all the glitches were fixed in WaW. would be a lie, But i could do it.
You would rather see what a chart says something can/cant do instead of seeing for yourself wether you can/cant do it. thats dumb. so very very dumb.
Im done arguing with such a child who's too hardheaded to admit when he's wrong. Just like the p47 thread, Just like the WoT thread, Just like pretty much every thread, You get proven wrong skorpion, yet instead of just saying "Your right, Im wrong, I apologize" You continue to argue and make yourself look so foolish.
Reading your unintelligent dribble is giving me a headache. Im out. Done arguing with you. Youve been proven wrong in enough threads to show that you dont know what your talking about, and your nothing but a hard-headed child who cant admit when he's wrong.
-Poof-
:rolleyes:
lol you still have to yet proove me wrong. once again, your failing.
-
Am i the only one finding this just a little bit fun to watch? :headscratch: :bolt: :bolt: :bolt: :bolt: :bolt:
-
and your nothing but a hard-headed child who cant admit when he's wrong.
Hello pot, meet kettle. :rofl I don't see why anyone feels the need to defend a damn video game so hard. Some people will like it, others won't. You won't change the other persons mind (as I said, they like it or they don't)
-
I just wish they would release a truly original COD game. When that happens, the turnout is tremendous.
In the ongoing debate of Battlefield vs. COD, I am on them Battlefield, but I still hold to my opinion that COD 4 was the greatest modern (post-2001) fps ever made simply due to the fact that it was original
I mean, think of just how revolutionary the game was, customizable classes, perk rewards, a well-defined ranking system, fantastic graphics, and a great original storyline. If you think about it, no previous fps was like it, and every fps made after it incorporated some aspect of its gameplay.
MW2 was and MW3 will be simply a new, dramatic storyline, new toys, but essentially the same game as COD 4.
That's why COD 4 is the only COD game I own and still play
-
I just wish they would release a truly original COD game. When that happens, the turnout is tremendous.
In the ongoing debate of Battlefield vs. COD, I am on them Battlefield, but I still hold to my opinion that COD 4 was the greatest modern (post-2001) fps ever made simply due to the fact that it was original
I mean, think of just how revolutionary the game was, customizable classes, perk rewards, a well-defined ranking system, fantastic graphics, and a great original storyline. If you think about it, no previous fps was like it, and every fps made after it incorporated some aspect of its gameplay.
MW2 was and MW3 will be simply a new, dramatic storyline, new toys, but essentially the same game as COD 4.
That's why COD 4 is the only COD game I own and still play
Battlefield 2 says Hi. :neener:
Battlefield 2:2005.
Modern warfare 1:2007.
-
I just wish they would release a truly original COD game. When that happens, the turnout is tremendous.
In the ongoing debate of Battlefield vs. COD, I am on them Battlefield, but I still hold to my opinion that COD 4 was the greatest modern (post-2001) fps ever made simply due to the fact that it was original
I mean, think of just how revolutionary the game was, customizable classes, perk rewards, a well-defined ranking system, fantastic graphics, and a great original storyline. If you think about it, no previous fps was like it, and every fps made after it incorporated some aspect of its gameplay.
MW2 was and MW3 will be simply a new, dramatic storyline, new toys, but essentially the same game as COD 4.
That's why COD 4 is the only COD game I own and still play
Team*
Auto complete on this phone really does suck
-
Hello pot, meet kettle. :rofl I don't see why anyone feels the need to defend a damn video game so hard. Some people will like it, others won't. You won't change the other persons mind (as I said, they like it or they don't)
Your post makes sense and has a lot of logic and reasoning behind this. How dare you post something like this??? :old:
-
I would assume that they are working on a new engine for CoD games. I give CoD's current engine one more year before the game itself feels like what wolfenstein is to us today. The graphics are getting old and there is no doubt that BF3 will be the next stepping stone for future FPS. I can imagine in 5 years, Crysis will be Wolfenstein and CoD: MW8/Battlefield 8 will be the Crysis of today.
-
I would assume that they are working on a new engine for CoD games. I give CoD's current engine one more year before the game itself feels like what wolfenstein is to us today. The graphics are getting old and there is no doubt that BF3 will be the next stepping stone for future FPS. I can imagine in 5 years, Crysis will be Wolfenstein and CoD: MW8/Battlefield 8 will be the Crysis of today.
Actually Crisis doesn't have the best graphics out on a Console. Killzone 3 does.
-
homefront could match killzone 3 on a few levels.
-
homefront could match killzone 3 on a few levels.
While im a huge fan of homefront, Graphics wise, Homefront could not come close to Killzone 3.
-
While im a huge fan of homefront, Graphics wise, Homefront could not come close to Killzone 3.
thats why i said on certain levels, like when it comes to the graphics on vehicles. those are somewhat close to killzone 3.
-
thats why i said on certain levels, like when it comes to the graphics on vehicles. those are somewhat close to killzone 3.
lol.no.
-
lol.no.
look at an abrams in homefront and see the details on it, then look at a tank in killzone. both are well designed.
-
I wasn't going to post this, but I can't resist anymore. Sorry plazus, but I have to share it. :)
I find it amusing how Tyrannis and scorpion have been going at it on the forums lately. It's like watching two old ladies with purses swinging at each other- except that they're always missing.
-
look at an abrams in homefront and see the details on it, then look at a tank in killzone. both are well designed.
Look at the EXO in Killzone 3. then look at the Abrams in in homefront. Not even close. Only thing in homefront that gets close to killzone 3's graphics would be the explosians, and thats only on the ps3.
I wasn't going to post this, but I can't resist anymore. Sorry plazus, but I have to share it. :)
I find it amusing how Tyrannis and scorpion have been going at it on the forums lately. It's like watching two old ladies with purses swinging at each other- except that they're always missing.
I find it funny that someone on probation is mocking others for "purse fights"
-
Look at the EXO in Killzone 3. then look at the Abrams in in homefront. Not even close. Only thing in homefront that gets close to killzone 3's graphics would be the explosians, and thats only on the ps3.
I find it funny that someone on probation is mocking others for "purse fights"
Clearly you weren't around when I received the ban hammer, it wasn't anything remotely close a purse fight.
-
Clearly you weren't around when I received the ban hammer, it wasn't anything remotely close a purse fight.
funny how when 2 indivituals disagree, its automactily labeled a "purse fight". Like we all havent disagreed at one point? :headscratch:
But hey, think what you want. Least im not on probation for my "purse fights". :angel:
-
funny how when 2 indivituals disagree, its automactily labeled a "purse fight". Like we all havent disagreed at one point? :headscratch:
But hey, think what you want. Least im not on probation for my "purse fights". :angel:
I can't take you serious at all, I think you're trying to insult me, but holy bad spelling batman! People call it a purse fight (between you two at least), because you're arguing over something relative. You prefer game X, he prefers game Y. You're not going to change each others mind, STFU and play your game and be happy. :aok
-
I can't take you serious at all, I think you're trying to insult me, but holy bad spelling batman! People call it a purse fight (between you two at least), because you're arguing over something relative. You prefer game X, he prefers game Y. You're not going to change each others mind, STFU and play your game and be happy. :aok
Actually, we're arguing over the well known flaws&facts of the games. not mere opinions. therefore the "you like this, he likes that" philosophy does not relate to this "purse fight"
try again. :D
-
COD4, World at War, MW2 and Black Ops are practically the same game with different looking sub par textures.
-
CoD owns sorry just an OP I will not argue.
-
COD4, World at War, MW2 and Black Ops are practically the same game with different looking sub par textures.
Yep, and COD 4 was great because it was first, and at the time the graphics were superb