Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: dirtdart on October 05, 2011, 10:33:52 AM

Title: Lancaster Question
Post by: dirtdart on October 05, 2011, 10:33:52 AM
Disregard. 


Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: SmokinLoon on October 05, 2011, 11:02:01 AM
Not quite, once the Lancaster dropped its ordnance it could not be recalled. 
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: SEraider on October 05, 2011, 11:21:34 AM
psych...   :bolt:
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: dirtdart on October 05, 2011, 11:39:23 AM
Lolz...

My boost was stuck at .5 for some reason and I was stuck at 230 kts.  It took 6 sectors to get back up to speed, no idea what caused it.  Still managed 47K and change though....

Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: FBCrabby on October 05, 2011, 11:41:43 PM
Disregard. 

Yes, a lancaster IS a bomber....
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: Tyrannis on October 06, 2011, 12:53:24 AM
Yes, a lancaster IS a bomber....
It be better off being catagorized as a Divebomber. in AH atleast.
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: dirtdart on October 06, 2011, 05:39:20 AM
So, since this keeps getting commented in... has anyone ever experienced, or accidentally pressed something, that would kill your boost, in a Lanc?  Right now I am pulling 5Lbs at the same altitude I only managed .5 yesterday.
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: SEraider on October 06, 2011, 10:50:35 AM
Goes to show you can turn absolutely nothing into a topic.  So here it goes.

How long did you take to get to 47k?
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: dirtdart on October 06, 2011, 12:16:13 PM
47k damage points. Had the same thing happen today. If you let your airspeed fall under 140 or so at that altitude it takes the engines forever to spin back up to boost. It seems very wired because the rpm are maxes out Nd boost stays at .5   To get the boost spooled back up you need to pull a shallow dive. I wish o could figure ou the reason behind it. When I get home I will post a screen shot.
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: SEseph on October 06, 2011, 01:13:16 PM
Goes to show you can turn absolutely nothing into a topic. 

(http://adistantsoil.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/political-pictures-al-gore-internet-211x249.jpg)
Welcome to the Al Gore's interweb.
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: dirtdart on October 07, 2011, 08:38:09 AM
(http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/4fde9972c09b95b75d9f0b996eef4ede9a67060a7fd0734e4f80e329c4c107b86g.jpg)

This is at ful throttle.  I tried RPMs, reducing RPMs reduced boost even further.
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: SmokinLoon on October 07, 2011, 08:47:28 AM
(http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/4fde9972c09b95b75d9f0b996eef4ede9a67060a7fd0734e4f80e329c4c107b86g.jpg)

This is at ful throttle.  I tried RPMs, reducing RPMs reduced boost even further.

You need to adjust the "more cowbell" lever.
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: dirtdart on October 07, 2011, 09:34:35 AM
I would require a Walken tool to adjust it...sorry, fresh out. 
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: Raptor05121 on October 07, 2011, 02:02:34 PM
Maybe its time for an overhaul? Whats the TBO on those engines?
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: guncrasher on October 07, 2011, 02:32:11 PM
(http://adistantsoil.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/political-pictures-al-gore-internet-211x249.jpg)
Welcome to the Al Gore's interweb.

tired of you posting that.  read this.  :salute

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

semp
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: WYOKIDIII on October 08, 2011, 01:30:54 AM
tired of you posting that.  read this.  :salute

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

semp


what do you expect from snopes they are incredibly leftist
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: Karnak on October 08, 2011, 02:10:26 AM
 

what do you expect from snopes they are incredibly leftist
:huh
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: guncrasher on October 08, 2011, 03:25:51 AM
I created my kids in a sense thereford according to you I invented babies.   create and invent are two different things.


semp
Title: Re: Lancaster Question
Post by: PR3D4TOR on October 08, 2011, 06:24:48 AM
Loss of ram-air effect?