Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: 1Nicolas on October 05, 2011, 01:57:16 PM

Title: Cromwell (Improved Cromwell post from me)
Post by: 1Nicolas on October 05, 2011, 01:57:16 PM
Here is some basic artifacts about a Cromwell, SmokinLoon told me to write it:
                                       Cromwell I
Exactly the same as the Centaur I, but using the Meteor engine. Only 357 produced due to the switch from the 6 pounder (57 mm) to the 75 mm gun.
(http://i1177.photobucket.com/albums/x347/1Nicolas/CromwellPic1.jpg)
Title: Re: Cromwell (Improved Cromwell post from me)
Post by: Tyrannis on October 05, 2011, 02:37:02 PM
You know you could of modified your original post to include this stuff, right?
Title: Re: Cromwell (Improved Cromwell post from me)
Post by: gyrene81 on October 05, 2011, 02:45:28 PM
artifacts?  :headscratch:  you actually have some pieces off a cromwell tank? cool, post some pics.

i'm guessing loon did mention to add the informational facts to your other post...i could be wrong though.
Title: Re: Cromwell (Improved Cromwell post from me)
Post by: SmokinLoon on October 05, 2011, 03:01:34 PM
The Cromwell would be a fine addition to AH, no doubt.  If offers a fast moving tank (some sources say 40mph), but with average at best AP ability.  Its HE capability would be the same as the M4A3 Sherman 75mm (same ammo, different gun).  So... until other gaps are filled the Cromwell might be on the back burner.

The British Valentine tank, with both 2 Pdr and 6 Pdr guns optional would be a great EW/MW fit for AH, imo. 
Title: Re: Cromwell (Improved Cromwell post from me)
Post by: skorpion on October 05, 2011, 03:23:49 PM
Here is some basic artifacts about a Cromwell, SmokinLoon told me to write it:
                                       Cromwell I
Exactly the same as the Centaur I, but using the Meteor engine. Only 357 produced due to the switch from the 6 pounder (57 mm) to the 75 mm gun.
(http://i1177.photobucket.com/albums/x347/1Nicolas/CromwellPic1.jpg)
+1

also, whats up with the "not to be stowed on deck" on the side?