Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: macrossMX on October 13, 2011, 09:22:12 PM
-
sorry macrossmx, you still don't get a cookie...necro bumping anything older than 6 months gets it skuzzy locked.
i'm sorry but you do not get any rewards for necro posting on 5 year old discussions... :lol
Considering what Gyrene said, I think it would be better for me to just start a new post on this wishlist.
It does not matter which jet we will get in the future, but the 162 and Meteor would be a nice addition.
I'll let the people vote on which jet they want to add in the future.
The He-162, the German jet equivalent of the timber terror
or the Gloster Meteor, The first operational jet for the allies
I would go for the Meteor just because this and the Me-262 both entered service at the same year.
It would be great to see a dogfight between the world's first generation jets duke it out :rock.
-
See Rule# 3
-
See Rule# 3
invalid ruling twinboom...
-
gyrene is sorta right, that technicaly isnt a current topic considering its over 5-6 years old and was punted here :P my 2 cents(canadian :lol)
-
gyrene is sorta right, that technicaly isnt a current topic considering its over 5-6 years old and was punted here :P my 2 cents(canadian :lol)
gyrene was wrong, there is NOTHING wrong with replying to an old post just so as long as it contributory to the thread.
FYI it was 3 years old.
-
So this means there is no point in posting this topic?
-
gyrene was wrong, there is NOTHING wrong with replying to an old post just so as long as it contributory to the thread.
FYI it was 3 years old.
:neener: no only is flipperk wrong about replying to an ancient discussion but he can't count. :neener: the gloster meteor discussion was started in 2006, the last reply prior to macrossmx posting was in 2006, this is 2011...
-
So this means there is no point in posting this topic?
Macross the wishlist is simply a place to request new features including aircraft for Aces High. It's not a poll and it makes no difference what other people post after you post your wish.
Just about every aircraft that flew in WW2 that's not already in Aces High has already been requested. There is no point in repeating a request. It also seems that some people, I don't mean you, don't realize that HTC already is aware of every aircraft model that flew in WW2.
Occasionally when HTC is considering which aircraft to add next they will post a poll for the players which will pop up when you enter the game.
-
gyrene was wrong, there is NOTHING wrong with replying to an old post just so as long as it contributory to the thread.
FYI it was 3 years old.
opinions change over a 3 year period. you can go back a couple of years and quote me saying ponies suck, and yet I fly them today even though I still think they suck.
semp
-
Macross the wishlist is simply a place to request new features including aircraft for Aces High. It's not a poll and it makes no difference what other people post after you post your wish.
Just about every aircraft that flew in WW2 that's not already in Aces High has already been requested. There is no point in repeating a request. It also seems that some people, I don't mean you, don't realize that HTC already is aware of every aircraft model that flew in WW2.
Occasionally when HTC is considering which aircraft to add next they will post a poll for the players which will pop up when you enter the game.
:salute so all of the m18, me410, and all of the other constant posts thats been going on in forums need this quote but on them? lol this is total screwy post lol i love it.
-
+1 for the he 162, was series production, entered service, saw combat, had kills...AND IT HAS AN EJECTION SEAT!!!!
-
:salute so all of the m18, me410, and all of the other constant posts thats been going on in forums need this quote but on them? lol this is total screwy post lol i love it.
The actual forum description is "Requests for new features." All of the multiple requests for the same new aircraft are basically a waste of time exceeded only by all the people giving + and - posts.
Discussions of new feature requests can be very productive but the real issue is whether the idea will improve Aces High and if it's possible or practical. Popularity among the compulsive posters is not required. Hitech has posted that he already has a long list of features he'd like to add and the list is sorted by importance and ease of implementation.
-
well regardless whos wrong and right the post is here until a mod or admin deletes it or something :P
-
The actual forum description is "Requests for new features." All of the multiple requests for the same new aircraft are basically a waste of time exceeded only by all the people giving + and - posts.
Discussions of new feature requests can be very productive but the real issue is whether the idea will improve Aces High and if it's possible or practical. Popularity among the compulsive posters is not required. Hitech has posted that he already has a long list of features he'd like to add and the list is sorted by importance and ease of implementation.
:salute wouldnt be simpler just to say sorry we are not doing this bird no futher posting will be reviewed so dont post this crap any more? :rofl you guys kill me.
-
He-162 +1
Perked though.
-
:salute wouldnt be simpler just to say sorry we are not doing this bird no futher posting will be reviewed so dont post this crap any more? :rofl you guys kill me.
It might be simpler but it wouldn't be better.
-
well regardless whos wrong and right the post is here until a mod or admin deletes it or something :P
I'm not saying that you shouldn't make pointless posts. I was just pointing out, in answer to a question, that it's unlikely to have the desired effect. :D
-
I'm not saying that you shouldn't make pointless posts. I was just pointing out, in answer to a question, that it's unlikely to have the desired effect. :D
you cynical errm... lets leave it at that at the risk of being scolded by one of the higher ups :lol
-
It might be simpler but it wouldn't be better.
:salute at least it would be honest. dont post this stuff, not happening. honesty always the best. what you worried folks will no longer post anything? there going to do it any no matter how old the post is. lol you guy still kill me. :rofl
-
:salute at least it would be honest. dont post this stuff, not happening. honesty always the best. what you worried folks will no longer post anything? there going to do it any no matter how old the post is. lol you guy still kill me. :rofl
Where do you get this idea that they have decided not to add a particular aircraft in the future? You imagine that they made decisions they haven't made. You imagine people are worried when they're not, and you seem to imagine that you're being clever when you're not. Feel free to post nonsense but don't expect anybody to take you seriously.
-
Where do you get this idea that they have decided not to add a particular aircraft in the future? You imagine that they made decisions they haven't made. You imagine people are worried when they're not, and you seem to imagine that you're being clever when you're not. Feel free to post nonsense but don't expect anybody to take you seriously.
:rofl you kill me nonsense must have hit the nail on the head.
-
Where do you get this idea that they have decided not to add a particular aircraft in the future? You imagine that they made decisions they haven't made. You imagine people are worried when they're not, and you seem to imagine that you're being clever when you're not. Feel free to post nonsense but don't expect anybody to take you seriously.
Not that I wanted to make this post feel like it.
But if that is the case, then I seriously apologize for posting this in the first place.
Hope I'm not offending anyone by making such a selfish request. :salute
-
Not that I wanted to make this post feel like it.
But if that is the case, then I seriously apologize for posting this in the first place.
Hope I'm not offending anyone by making such a selfish request. :salute
Macross when people quote somebody in their response it's to indicate that the response is for that person specifically. My response to bortas had nothing to do with anything you posted. The only response I made to your post was this:
Macross the wishlist is simply a place to request new features including aircraft for Aces High. It's not a poll and it makes no difference what other people post after you post your wish.
Just about every aircraft that flew in WW2 that's not already in Aces High has already been requested. There is no point in repeating a request. It also seems that some people, I don't mean you, don't realize that HTC already is aware of every aircraft model that flew in WW2.
Occasionally when HTC is considering which aircraft to add next they will post a poll for the players which will pop up when you enter the game.
Please post any ideas you have to improve Aces High. Just keep in mind that the crew at HTC have been doing this for 20+ years. They haven't run out of ideas, they just don't have time to do everything right away.
-
Macross when people quote somebody in their response it's to indicate that the response is for that person specifically. My response to bortas had nothing to do with anything you posted. The only response I made to your post was this:
Macross the wishlist is simply a place to request new features including aircraft for Aces High. It's not a poll and it makes no difference what other people post after you post your wish.
Just about every aircraft that flew in WW2 that's not already in Aces High has already been requested. There is no point in repeating a request. It also seems that some people, I don't mean you, don't realize that HTC already is aware of every aircraft model that flew in WW2.
Occasionally when HTC is considering which aircraft to add next they will post a poll for the players which will pop up when you enter the game.
Please post any ideas you have to improve Aces High. Just keep in mind that the crew at HTC have been doing this for 20+ years. They haven't run out of ideas, they just don't have time to do everything right away.
:salute rgr my whole point was eveyone does it why say this now? lol no offense your a great trainer.
-
I'm not being a critic but, why do we need more jets? We've got two, the Me 262 and the Me-163. We don't need to complete jets at the moments.
What we need to do is finish off the Early War and work our way up to jets, we don't need to randomly select. I know something are needed to balance the game, but it's already somewhat balanced. Just up something equal to it.
-
:salute rgr my whole point was eveyone does it why say this now? lol no offense your a great trainer.
Sorry if I missed your point. If you read back I was answering Macross's question. I don't expect anything to change
but I like to think that occasionally somebody learns something. :D
-
Sorry if I missed your point. If you read back I was answering Macross's question. I don't expect anything to change
but I like to think that occasionally somebody learns something. :D
:salute :aok rgr thank im all for learning new differant aspects of the equipment we use on this game and well what really happened in the war. still get amazed why soldiers do what they do. how the aircraft, tanks ect.... worked or failed. my problems is i cant remember crap lol.
-
I'm not being a critic but, why do we need more jets? We've got two, the Me 262 and the Me-163. We don't need to complete jets at the moments.
Me-163 is a rocket not a jet.
-
Meteor definitely. Ticks all the boxes. The only argument against it is that it didn't score an A2A victory - but that was down to the Luftwaffe not being around and not the aircraft's fault. I think it would be a less effective but more noob friendly version of the 262.
The 162's supposed combat record is a bit sketchy. Would still like to see it as a perk ride for a bit more variety.
Both are certainly more interesting than a new P-40 ;)