Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: TwinBoom on October 24, 2011, 02:37:46 PM
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/jcarlosroc/Breguet.jpg?t=1270094637)
General characteristics
Crew: two, pilot and rear gunner
Length: 9.67 m (31 ft 9 in)
Wingspan: 15.37 m (50 ft 5 in)
Height: 3.19 m (10 ft 6 in)
Wing area: 29.2 m² (314 ft²)
Empty weight: 3,675 kg (8,101 lb)
Useful load: 5,420 kg (11,949 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)
Powerplant: 2 × Gnome-Rhône 14M-6/7, 522 kW (700 hp) each
Performance
Maximum speed: 490 km/h (304 mph)
Range: 1,350 km (839 mi)
Service ceiling: 8,500 m (27,885 ft)
Rate of climb: 9.25 m/s (1,822 ft/min)
Armament
Guns: 1 × fixed, forward-firing 20 mm Hispano-Suiza cannon
2 × fixed, forward-firing 7.5 mm (.295 in) MAC 1934 machine guns
1 × flexible, rearward-firing 7.5 mm (.295 in) MAC 1934 machine gun in rear cockpit
1 × fixed, rearward-firing 7.5 mm (.295 in) MAC 1934 machine gun in ventral position
Bombs: 460 kg (1,014 lb)
-
:huh
:rofl A mutated and Pregnant Beaufighter.
-
:huh what is that thing? :lol
looks like something from a mad max movie...pieced together scraps.
-
French ground attack fighter. Does everyone think French just saw Luftwaffe and just waived white flags ?
We need diversity plane and country wise not the 1945 fast cannon rides.
Some of us guys like the early/mid-war props
:frown:
-
No point Twin. they will have a vote and another LW plane will win.
This plane looks like it could turn pretty well and the fire power is fine for an early bird.
-
you gotta admit, the french made some butt ugly and mostly ineffective aircraft...
ms.406
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/1.gif)
mb152
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/5.gif)
d.520 (looks like a modified mig3)
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/24.gif)
(http://www.aviapress.com/engl/icm/icm48051_3.jpg)
arsenal vg33
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/3.gif)
amiot 350
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/7.gif)
-
10 perkies this will become the new beau-level requested A/C that will generate many whine threads when it's voted out of the poll. ;)
-
10 perkies this will become the new beau-level requested A/C that will generate many whine threads when it's voted out of the poll. ;)
nope, my biggest fight for this craft is that it saw action EVERYWHERE. I don't think this flying egg did.
-
I guess books are a thing of the past
-
(http://aerostories.free.fr/profils/Bre693/img0.jpg)
the flying fish :)
-
good read http://aerostories.free.fr/dossiers/AA/Bre693/ google trad should be able to squeeze something from it. That plane was only used to drop delayed (7s) bombs on german convoys, without much success tho...but it looks like the performance was ok for its time :aok
-
How's the ballistic of that 20mm? Not good I assume?
And if it gets added (big IF), it'll be the second aircraft to have a non-forward fixed gun. :aok
-
How's the ballistic of that 20mm? Not good I assume?
And if it gets added (big IF), it'll be the second aircraft to have a non-forward fixed gun. :aok
It is the same gun as on the Spitfire Mk Vb. 880 meters per second at the muzzle.
-
How's the ballistic of that 20mm? Not good I assume?
And if it gets added (big IF), it'll be the second aircraft to have a non-forward fixed gun. :aok
The 20 mm is a hispano! a MkI with a 60 round drum but still a hispano. As for the nonforward fixed gun??? where does it say that?
I'm all for some early French planes,TB I think your right..... No one reads anymore! :aok
:salute
Edit: sorry Karnak didnt mean to repeat you.
-
1 × fixed, rearward-firing 7.5 mm (.295 in) MAC 1934 machine gun in ventral position
Probably just dead weight in AH, but a nice mix-up.
-
And if it gets added (big IF), it'll be the second aircraft to have a non-forward fixed gun. :aok
read it has 3 forward guns 1 rear dorsal and 1 rear ventral
for a total of 5 guns not to mention 1000lbs of ord
-
read it has 3 forward guns 1 rear dorsal and 1 rear ventral
for a total of 5 guns not to mention 1000lbs of ord
I never said it didn't have any other guns. Why would not read your post but quote it anyway? :lol
Let's make this clear. The Ar-234 is the only plane with rearward firing guns that is FIXED.
If this was added, it would be the second, albeit, firing downward, but still rearward, FIXED gun.
-
I would fly that crate. :aok And the mb.152 is not nearly as awkward looking as the d.520.
-
you gotta admit, the french made some butt ugly and mostly ineffective aircraft...
ms.406
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/1.gif)
mb152
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/5.gif)
d.520 (looks like a modified mig3)
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/24.gif)
(http://www.aviapress.com/engl/icm/icm48051_3.jpg)
arsenal vg33
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/3.gif)
amiot 350
(http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/images12/7.gif)
If it was up to me I would add all of those except the Arsenal which only 12 were delivered :aok
Just because the French were 1 of the early countries taken out they absolutely deserve a spot in this game as do a few other country's
-
Ugly enough to be cool. :aok
-
French ground attack fighter. Does everyone think French just saw Luftwaffe and just waived white flags ?
We need diversity plane and country wise not the 1945 fast cannon rides.
Some of us guys like the early/mid-war props
:frown:
Well the french did plant palm tree's down the highway into Paris, so the Germans would march in the shade.
/Seriously great find, I would vote for it with a side order of He-111 and dessert order of tator tots.
-
read it has 3 forward guns 1 rear dorsal and 1 rear ventral
for a total of 5 guns not to mention 1000lbs of ord
it used 10x50kg delayed fuze bombs
-
This is slightly off target but in looking at those French designs, did not the last one basically look like a Yak? I've seen design specs for a 1960's era jet that Mirage did not build. It was a single engine, high, swing-wing super sonice attack plane. It looks almost identical to the later Mig-23/27 bird. There is almost no chance the Russians/Soviets designed the Mig-23/27 and it just accidentally looks like the French plane. Did the French collaborate with the Russians/Soviets as early as the 1940's?
Boo
-
no colaboration that I know of. One problem doesn't always have many solutions, See mig15 and f86.