Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: bangsbox on January 30, 2012, 12:03:21 PM

Title: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: bangsbox on January 30, 2012, 12:03:21 PM
http://thebrigade.thechive.com/2012/01/29/intercepters-in-high-res-part-1-25-hq-photos/ (http://thebrigade.thechive.com/2012/01/29/intercepters-in-high-res-part-1-25-hq-photos/)

Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Daddkev on January 30, 2012, 12:16:38 PM
 :O :banana: :banana: :banana: :O Nekked!!!! :banana: :banana:
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: ozrocker on January 30, 2012, 12:47:42 PM
5th one from bottom is :x :x


                                                                                                                                                           :cheers: Oz
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: oakranger on January 30, 2012, 02:19:23 PM
Interesting. 
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: VonMessa on January 30, 2012, 02:27:42 PM
I heard a rumor that there were some pics of aircraft on that page...

 :banana:
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: bangsbox on January 30, 2012, 02:55:38 PM
I heard a rumor that there were some pics of aircraft on that page...

 :banana:

you know when i usually post these kind of links there are 25 pic and only 12 are of aircraft Lil this one is uncharacteristic of me and only has one picture of a non aircraft.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: VonMessa on January 30, 2012, 02:58:41 PM
you know when i usually post these kind of links there are 25 pic and only 12 are of aircraft Lil this one is uncharacteristic of me and only has one picture of a non aircraft.

Well, since she is almost on the ground, I think that I should stand behind her and hold on so there isn't a chance of her falling any further.

For safety's sake, of course.  :aok
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: bangsbox on January 30, 2012, 03:01:37 PM
Well, since she is almost on the ground, I think that I should stand behind her and hold on so there isn't a chance of her falling any further.

For safety's sake, of course.  :aok

wait your turn  :banana:
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: VonMessa on January 30, 2012, 03:09:54 PM
 :furious
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: drfritz on January 30, 2012, 08:42:13 PM
Powered by four turboprop engines, driving contra-rotating four-blade propellers 18 ft across, the Bear is one of the world's noisiest military aircraft.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: titanic3 on January 30, 2012, 09:19:17 PM
I want a Cold War simulator now.  :)
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: curry1 on January 30, 2012, 09:38:21 PM
Wish they were higher resolution
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: VonMessa on January 31, 2012, 07:04:57 AM
Powered by four turboprop engines, driving contra-rotating four-blade propellers 18 ft across, the Bear is one of the world's noisiest military aircraft.

I must have missed that photo...  :noid
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: icepac on January 31, 2012, 09:12:17 AM
Dang....I thought this was a post about the KI44 or J2M.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Slate on January 31, 2012, 11:09:05 AM
  Quite a tail.   :O
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: pembquist on February 01, 2012, 12:06:04 PM
is #10 a saab?
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Pigslilspaz on February 01, 2012, 02:23:42 PM
Don't think so, only Saab I remember with Canards is the Gripen, and the Gripen's tail goes past the engine very noticeably.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: WYOKIDIII on February 01, 2012, 07:39:58 PM
Powered by four turboprop engines, driving contra-rotating four-blade propellers 18 ft across, the Bear is one of the world's noisiest military aircraft.


A pretty plane too . Though not an intercepter I was disspointed not to see a Connie in there . My dad spent many years in Connies up there tracking bears and pointing F-4's and F-15's at them .
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Mace2004 on February 01, 2012, 10:21:37 PM
is #10 a saab?
Yes, it's a Viggen.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Mace2004 on February 01, 2012, 10:28:43 PM
I like number 4.  Shows a Hornet can't go anywhere without a tanker near it.  That's a KA-6 tanker helping it escort a lowly P3skie (IL-38 May).
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: WYOKIDIII on February 02, 2012, 05:18:26 AM
Yes, it's a Viggen.

Does it have a PETA card ?
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: DMVIAGRA on February 02, 2012, 05:31:47 AM
:O :banana: :banana: :banana: :O Nekked!!!! :banana: :banana:
Are you a nudist too?
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: titanic3 on February 02, 2012, 07:59:00 PM
Hmm, I don't have as much knowledge on the Cold War as I should, so this might seem a little silly..but...

Russian bombers flew this close to U.S. airspace? That they had to be escorted out or "intercepted" by NATO fighters?  :eek:
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: USRanger on February 02, 2012, 08:05:57 PM
They still do.  Off of Alaska has always been a playground.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Raptor05121 on February 02, 2012, 08:06:50 PM
Re the last photo with a F-22:

Russia is STILL flying the Bear, and still spying on us? WTF
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: titanic3 on February 02, 2012, 08:09:40 PM
Why are they flying that close?  :headscratch: Old habits? What is there to spy in Alaska? How well our oil diggers are doing?
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Melvin on February 02, 2012, 08:13:40 PM
Just poking the lion.

Checking on response times, etc.

From what I understand it's fairly routine business.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: titanic3 on February 02, 2012, 08:52:26 PM
Just did a quick research, apparently, they get closer to Canada than U.S. airspace. Also found something quite interesting, Canada bought $8.5 billion worth of F-35s to replace their CF-18s. Some wicked stuff.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: MachFly on February 03, 2012, 04:00:53 AM
Thanks for posting.

Question, who's ship is this?

(http://chivethebrigade.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/intercepters-pt1-920-10.jpg?w=920&h=690)
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Melvin on February 03, 2012, 04:10:18 AM
It appears to be a Russian Sovremennyy class destroyer.

As far as I could tell, there are only 4 still active and #672 is not one of them.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: MachFly on February 03, 2012, 04:14:28 AM
How come it does not have any flags?
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: bangsbox on February 03, 2012, 04:22:01 AM
How come it does not have any flags?
only studmuffin$ need flags said the russian destroyer
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Mace2004 on February 03, 2012, 05:51:08 AM
Hmm, I don't have as much knowledge on the Cold War as I should, so this might seem a little silly..but...

Russian bombers flew this close to U.S. airspace? That they had to be escorted out or "intercepted" by NATO fighters?  :eek:
Define "this close".  Truth is, most of these pictures were taken in other parts of the world and nobody went into anyone else's international airspace.  The US Navy typically will intercept and escort any aircraft that comes near a carrier battle group, that's why most pictures of this type have F-14's, F-18's, F-4's, F-8's (and the occasional A-6) escorting them.  It happened all the time, we never let a Soviet (or other aircraft) aircraft anywhere near a CV without an escort.  The reasons are obvious.  The potential for a sneak attack was always there of course but most of it was the aspect of letting them know that we knew they were around.  There were lots of things going on in the cold war that folks didn't know much about and yes, this type of stuff still goes on.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: Mace2004 on February 03, 2012, 05:56:53 AM
How come it does not have any flags?
Because flags are expensive and they wear out.  You'll see big flags when they're in port but at sea, naval ships typically fly much smaller flags (called ensigns) or no flag at all.  Identifying whose ship it is was more a matter of identifying the ship type itself which is much easier and distinctive than getting close enough to see their actual flag.
Title: Re: intercepters...intercepting
Post by: MachFly on February 03, 2012, 07:28:19 PM
Roger