Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: scottak on March 06, 2012, 06:17:55 PM

Title: H8k emily
Post by: scottak on March 06, 2012, 06:17:55 PM
this should be in the game because it was the most important and best japanese long-range maritime patrol aircraft during ww2 and around 150 were produced. the specs are as follows:

Type Reconnaissance flying boat  
Crew 10    10    
Engine (Type)    4: Mitsubishi MK4B Kasei 12  4: Mitsubishi Kasei 22 piston
4: Mitsubishi MK4Q Kasei 22    
Cylinders   Radial 14    
Cooling     Air    
Net HP      1,850 each    
Propeller blades    4 each    
Fuel capacity  4,250 gallons        
Dimensions        
Span     124' 8"
38 m1    
Length     92' 3", 92' 4"
28.13 m1, 28.14 m    
Height     30'
9.14 m2, 9.15 m  
Wing area      1,141 ft
106 m2    
Weight          
Empty   34,000 lb
15,422 kg  40,520 lb, 40,521 lb
18,360 kg    
Loaded    68,343 lb
31,000 kg  54,013 lb 71,650 lb
32,500 kg    
Performance        
Speed     290 mph
467 kph1    
Speed @ 16,400' /
5,000 m      290 mph
467 kph    
Speed @ 16,405'     290 mph    
Cruising speed      185 mph
298 kph    
Climb     1,575'/minute
480 m/minute    
Climb to 13,120' /
4,000 m      8 minutes    
Service ceiling       29,035'
8,760 m    
Range     3,000 miles, 4,445 miles
4,828 km2    
Maximum range      4,460 miles, 4,461 miles
7,777 km2, 7,180 km    
Armament     5: 20 mm
5: MG3  1: 20 mm
1: 12.7 mm MG  
Bow turret  1: 20 mm    1: 20 mm    
Dorsal turret  1: 20 mm    1: 20 mm    
Tail turret  1: 20 mm    1: 20 mm  
Beams 2: 20 mm    2: 20 mm    
Cockpit 1: 7.7 mm MG        
Beam hatches  2: 7.7 mm MG2    4: 7.7 mm MG    
Bombs 4,408 lb
2,000 kg    4,400 lb
2,000 kg    
OR        
Torpedoes 2: 1,764 lb
2: 800 kg    2: 1,760 lb
2: 800 kg  

 oh ya from a special request: H6K Mavis
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: EagleDNY on March 06, 2012, 06:21:26 PM
Only asked for in about 20 threads already over the last few years....

Search is your friend.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Volron on March 06, 2012, 07:36:38 PM
Hmm, I ran an advanced search and ran into only ONE wishlist thread made for specifically for the Emily.  It's almost a year old.  So in this case, scott is in the green.  There were a few threads about float planes in general, yes, but only one about the Emily specifically.

Found this a little funny though...

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,11953.0.html

  :lol

Toss in the H6K Mavis as well, but this gets a +1 from me regardless. :aok
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: scottak on March 06, 2012, 08:13:34 PM
Hmm, I ran an advanced search and ran into only ONE wishlist thread made for specifically for the Emily.  It's almost a year old.  So in this case, scott is in the green.  There were a few threads about float planes in general, yes, but only one about the Emily specifically.

Found this a little funny though...

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,11953.0.html

  :lol

Toss in the H6K Mavis as well, but this gets a +1 from me regardless. :aok
what about the FW200 condor? asking now so i dont wast space with a needless post.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Ack-Ack on March 06, 2012, 08:35:24 PM
The Condor would be a waste of resources to add to the game as it brings absolutely nothing to the game that existing planes already provide and do it better.

An Emily would be nice but there is one major component missing, water for it to land and take off in.  HTC would need to redo the water to make it, well water.

ack-ack
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: scottak on March 06, 2012, 08:37:37 PM
The Condor would be a waste of resources to add to the game as it brings absolutely nothing to the game that existing planes already provide and do it better.

An Emily would be nice but there is one major component missing, water for it to land and take off in.  HTC would need to redo the water to make it, well water.

ack-ack
ya but other than that, it just needs to be created into the game.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Mitsu. on March 06, 2012, 10:30:29 PM
+1

Here is my old H8K2 information post. (10 years ago!)

Photos are already dead link though.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,60283.0.html

(http://www.ops.dti.ne.jp/~gotha/KMAC/Photo/Image/type2fb.jpg)
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Karnak on March 06, 2012, 11:58:34 PM
I still have the photos from that thread, Mitsu.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: 4Prop on March 07, 2012, 01:29:11 AM
stop wishing
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Mitsu. on March 07, 2012, 04:24:07 AM
Karnak, it sounds good.  :aok
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: MK-84 on March 07, 2012, 10:22:27 AM
I still have the photos from that thread, Mitsu.

Pics or you don't have em :D
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Dragon on March 07, 2012, 11:46:43 AM
The Condor would be a waste of resources to add to the game as it brings absolutely nothing to the game that existing planes already provide and do it better.

An Emily would be nice but there is one major component missing, water for it to land and take off in.  HTC would need to redo the water to make it, well water.

ack-ack


Is well water easier to land on than sea water?  Would we need to get Timmy modeled so he can guide us in for a landing?
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Arlo on March 07, 2012, 11:48:57 AM

Is well water easier to land on than sea water?  Would we need to get Timmy modeled so he can guide us in for a landing?

No. Tight spiral. Counter clockwise in the northern hemisphere.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Karnak on March 07, 2012, 12:27:20 PM
In no particular order:
(http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/9890/h8kdefensivegun4.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/191/h8kdefensivegun4.jpg/)
(http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/1519/h8kdefensivegun3.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/820/h8kdefensivegun3.jpg/)
(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1664/h8kdefensivegun1.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/38/h8kdefensivegun1.jpg/)
(http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/5291/h8kcrewcompartment3.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/h8kcrewcompartment3.jpg/)
(http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/2066/h8kcrewcompartment2.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/269/h8kcrewcompartment2.jpg/)
(http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/2561/h8kcrewcompartment1.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/829/h8kcrewcompartment1.jpg/)
(http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/4299/h8kcoloring.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/201/h8kcoloring.jpg/)
(http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/808/h8kcockpit.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/33/h8kcockpit.jpg/)
(http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/512/h8kattachment.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/838/h8kattachment.jpg/)
(http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/8184/h8kattachment2.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/607/h8kattachment2.jpg/)
(http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/6135/h8k2s.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/594/h8k2s.jpg/)
(http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/6289/h8k2stencil.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/543/h8k2stencil.jpg/)
(http://imageshack.us/thumbnmail.png) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/205/h8k2stencil2.jpg/)
(http://img851.imageshack.us/img851/1438/h8k2interiorphoto11.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/851/h8k2interiorphoto11.jpg/)
(http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/8453/h8k2interiorphoto10.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/831/h8k2interiorphoto10.jpg/)
(http://img851.imageshack.us/img851/8519/h8k2interiorphoto9.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/851/h8k2interiorphoto9.jpg/)
(http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/5482/h8k2interiorphoto8.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/36/h8k2interiorphoto8.jpg/)
(http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/9584/h8k2interiorphoto7.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/696/h8k2interiorphoto7.jpg/)
(http://img840.imageshack.us/img840/3176/h8k2interiorphoto6.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/840/h8k2interiorphoto6.jpg/)
(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7486/h8k2interiorphoto5.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/405/h8k2interiorphoto5.jpg/)
(http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/7246/h8k2interiorphoto4.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/191/h8k2interiorphoto4.jpg/)
(http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/3771/h8k2interiorphoto3.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/163/h8k2interiorphoto3.jpg/)
(http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/3927/h8k2interiorphoto2.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/51/h8k2interiorphoto2.jpg/)
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/5669/h8k2interiorphoto1.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/32/h8k2interiorphoto1.jpg/)
(http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/1971/h8k2drawing.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/441/h8k2drawing.jpg/)
(http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/2038/h8k2drawing2.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/855/h8k2drawing2.jpg/)
(http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/2600/h8k2cutaway.th.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/10/h8k2cutaway.jpg/)
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Volron on March 07, 2012, 01:17:14 PM
Pfffft.  Needs more picture. :D

Judging by the pictures you have posted here, I am to assume you have everything needed if it were to win a vote?  Which, I hope the next vote doesn't have any American planes in it as well.

I am guessing there is something BIG brewing, seeing as it's been a while since the 410 won the vote... :noid
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Karnak on March 07, 2012, 01:53:02 PM
Whether or not those photos are enough for HTC to model it if they choose to do so I cannot say, but that is the entire contents of my H8K2 folder.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: 4Prop on March 07, 2012, 01:55:49 PM

we need gummy bears


I know son, I know
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: scottak on March 07, 2012, 03:28:27 PM
I know son, I know
oh wow i did not say gummy bears. who did that? that's nice.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Arlo on March 07, 2012, 03:31:11 PM
oh wow i was just thinking how gummy bears would be a better thing to ask for. who did that? that's nice.

 :D
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: TDeacon on March 07, 2012, 03:55:24 PM
<snip>
An Emily would be nice but there is one major component missing, water for it to land and take off in.  HTC would need to redo the water to make it, well water.

ack-ack

You could have it settle a bit into the "water" surface when stationary, and when moving be surrounded by a "spray" graphical element.  

MH
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: caldera on March 07, 2012, 04:12:54 PM
That works for the PT Boat.  No need to change the water when it would probably be easier to model the floatplanes accordingly.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Arlo on March 07, 2012, 04:22:02 PM
That works for the PT Boat.  No need to change the water when it would probably be easier to model the floatplanes accordingly.

Well there we go. We want PT boats modeled with wings.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Mitsu. on March 08, 2012, 06:58:57 PM
Thanks, Karnak. :)
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Mitsu. on March 09, 2012, 03:12:36 AM
Quote
Bombs:
16 x 60kg bombs
8 x 250kg bombs
2 x 800kg bombs
2 x 1500kg bombs
2 x 800kg torpedos

The 1500kg bomb load was only plan, was not in the service.
But these load outs are the heaviest of any Japanese bomber.  :rock
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Drano on March 09, 2012, 07:19:06 AM
Well there we go. We want PT boats modeled with wings.

Wasn't that an evil con mission a few years back?
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Arlo on March 09, 2012, 10:04:45 AM
Wasn't that an evil con mission a few years back?

Yeah .... but not one I participated in.  :frown:
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Drano on March 09, 2012, 11:23:55 AM
Thought that was one of em. So many to choose from. The Claw. The sharks with lazers. Good stuff.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Arlo on March 09, 2012, 11:31:40 AM
Thought that was one of em. So many to choose from. The Claw. The sharks with lazers. Good stuff.

Flew Dale's yellow plane armed with a gattling at the 2006 con IIRC.
Title: Re: H8k emily
Post by: Rob52240 on March 09, 2012, 12:10:27 PM
Looks a lot like Mr. Burns's Spruce Moose too me.