Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Letalis on April 28, 2012, 08:01:26 PM

Title: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Letalis on April 28, 2012, 08:01:26 PM
After some thought I got together a list of WWII aircraft that fit AH inclusion criteria.  My formula was simple; I tried to objectively grade each type on three criteria:  historical significance, fun factor and probable gameplay change.  Each criteria was rated on a scale of 1 to 5.  History and fun factor scores were multiplied by each other (25 pts possible) and the game change factor was then added on top for a total of 30pts possible.  I then rank-ordered the results and included my estimate of ENY. FYI my favorite on the list is the PV-2 Harpoon :rock


Rank  /  Aircraft  /  Type  /   ENY  /  Notes
1   Westland Lysander   Bomber/Attack   15   Ord Options include veh supps, 1 troop, 500lb bomb, 2x20mm, 4x .303s.  Max spd 210.  Think fast Fi156 with teeth.
2   Ju52   Bomber   30   Carries only 5 troops and slower than the C-47 but can also has modest ord options, carries 3x 7.62 guns to spray map room
3   TU-2   Bomber/Attack   10   Fills important Russian bomber gap with something comparable to the Mossie
4   Yak-3   Fighter   10   Air to air terror
5   Beaufighter   Fighter/Attack   20   Versatile allied answer to the Me110
6   Me323   Bomber   Perked (20 pts)   Giant, heavily armed transport aircraft, 15 veh supps/30 troops
7   PBY-5   Bomber   15   Spawns at ports, carries a little ord, can land/takeoff on water in addition to land
8   P-61   Fighter/Attack   Perked (10 pts)   Yeah…
9   A-26   Attack/Bomber   Perked (15pts)   Yep.
10   Firefly   Fighter/Attack   10   British CV-capable attack craft w 4x20mm mmmms.
11   H8K   Bomber   30   Jap amphib transport, spawns at ports, carries 10 troops
12   He111   Bomber   35   Amazing nobody's asked for this before
13   Pe-2   Attack/Bomber   15   Produced in greater numbers than any other aircraft not represented in AH
14   P-63   Fighter/Attack   10   
15   AR-196   Fighter/Attack   10   Amphibious recon aircraft w 20mm cannons, small bombs.  Spawns at Port
16   Boomerang   Fighter/Attack   30   Poor man's Brewster, but hey the Aussies get representation
17   Hs.129   Attack/Bomber   20   German answer to the IL-2
18   D.520   Fighter   30   4x7.5mm guns w 500rds, 1x20mm w 60rds.  Better than the early P-40s.  "Vive le France!"
19   Ki-43   Fighter/Attack   35   Weak Jap fighter, produced in great numbers
20   PV-2   Attack/Bomber   10   Similar performance to A-20 with 2k more ord, rockets and a tail section that actually lets your tail gunner shoot backwards!
21   Westland Whirlwind   Fighter/Attack   20   Twin-Engine Brit fighter with excellent handling and 4x20mms!
22   IL-4   Bomber   15   If the B-17 and He111 were to have a Russian baby...
23   Ki-45   Attack/Bomber   25   Twin-engine Jap fighter
24   Bre.693   Attack/Bomber   30   Fun little turny French tactical bomber
25   Hs.123   Fighter/Attack   40   Rugged German biplane dive bomber
26   P.11   Fighter   40   Look mom, a Polish hangar queen!
27   Ms.406   Fighter   35   France's answer to the Hurricane MkI, also fought with the Finns
28   Sunderland MkIII   Bomber   Perked (50 pts)   British amphib with massive weapons loadouts. ASV radar makes nearby enemy naval groups appear on minimap
29   G.1   Fighter/Attack   40   The Dutch built fighters? 
30   KS750   Vehicle   40   German motorcycle with sidecar.  Used for fast recon. Options include 1xmachine gun, 1xveh supp (on trailer), 1xtroop 
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: 4Prop on April 29, 2012, 12:48:14 PM
oh god... :bhead
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: olds442 on April 29, 2012, 01:12:22 PM
its really bad when i can only pick out 3 aircraft of that list that would even make it in the game
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: TwinBoom on April 29, 2012, 01:41:26 PM
its really bad when i can only pick out 3 aircraft of that list that would even make it in the game

nonsense pure nonsense every plane there can make it if flown correctly
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Karnak on April 29, 2012, 01:54:30 PM
its really bad when i can only pick out 3 aircraft of that list that would even make it in the game
I don't see any units on the list that are untenable.  The ENY/perk/ideas aren't all there, but the units are all viable.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: matt on April 29, 2012, 06:12:40 PM
After some thought I got together a list of WWII aircraft that fit AH inclusion criteria.  My formula was simple; I tried to objectively grade each type on three criteria:  historical significance, fun factor and probable gameplay change.  Each criteria was rated on a scale of 1 to 5.  History and fun factor scores were multiplied by each other (25 pts possible) and the game change factor was then added on top for a total of 30pts possible.  I then rank-ordered the results and included my estimate of ENY. FYI my favorite on the list is the PV-2 Harpoon :rock


Rank  /  Aircraft  /  Type  /   ENY  /  Notes
1   Westland Lysander   Bomber/Attack   15   Ord Options include veh supps, 1 troop, 500lb bomb, 2x20mm, 4x .303s.  Max spd 210.  Think fast Fi156 with teeth.
2   Ju52   Bomber   30   Carries only 5 troops and slower than the C-47 but can also has modest ord options, carries 3x 7.62 guns to spray map room
3   TU-2   Bomber/Attack   10   Fills important Russian bomber gap with something comparable to the Mossie
4   Yak-3   Fighter   10   Air to air terror
5   Beaufighter   Fighter/Attack   20   Versatile allied answer to the Me110
6   Me323   Bomber   Perked (20 pts)   Giant, heavily armed transport aircraft, 15 veh supps/30 troops
7   PBY-5   Bomber   15   Spawns at ports, carries a little ord, can land/takeoff on water in addition to land
8   P-61   Fighter/Attack   Perked (10 pts)   Yeah…
9   A-26   Attack/Bomber   Perked (15pts)   Yep.
10   Firefly   Fighter/Attack   10   British CV-capable attack craft w 4x20mm mmmms.
11   H8K   Bomber   30   Jap amphib transport, spawns at ports, carries 10 troops
12   He111   Bomber   35   Amazing nobody's asked for this before
13   Pe-2   Attack/Bomber   15   Produced in greater numbers than any other aircraft not represented in AH
14   P-63   Fighter/Attack   10   
15   AR-196   Fighter/Attack   10   Amphibious recon aircraft w 20mm cannons, small bombs.  Spawns at Port
16   Boomerang   Fighter/Attack   30   Poor man's Brewster, but hey the Aussies get representation
17   Hs.129   Attack/Bomber   20   German answer to the IL-2
18   D.520   Fighter   30   4x7.5mm guns w 500rds, 1x20mm w 60rds.  Better than the early P-40s.  "Vive le France!"
19   Ki-43   Fighter/Attack   35   Weak Jap fighter, produced in great numbers
20   PV-2   Attack/Bomber   10   Similar performance to A-20 with 2k more ord, rockets and a tail section that actually lets your tail gunner shoot backwards!
21   Westland Whirlwind   Fighter/Attack   20   Twin-Engine Brit fighter with excellent handling and 4x20mms!
22   IL-4   Bomber   15   If the B-17 and He111 were to have a Russian baby...
23   Ki-45   Attack/Bomber   25   Twin-engine Jap fighter
24   Bre.693   Attack/Bomber   30   Fun little turny French tactical bomber
25   Hs.123   Fighter/Attack   40   Rugged German biplane dive bomber
26   P.11   Fighter   40   Look mom, a Polish hangar queen!
27   Ms.406   Fighter   35   France's answer to the Hurricane MkI, also fought with the Finns
28   Sunderland MkIII   Bomber   Perked (50 pts)   British amphib with massive weapons loadouts. ASV radar makes nearby enemy naval groups appear on minimap
29   G.1   Fighter/Attack   40   The Dutch built fighters? 
30   KS750   Vehicle   40   German motorcycle with sidecar.  Used for fast recon. Options include 1xmachine gun, 1xveh supp (on trailer), 1xtroop 
add them all now :headscratch: :rofl
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Lusche on April 29, 2012, 06:28:25 PM
No Do 217.

Bad list.  :P
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: mthrockmor on April 29, 2012, 06:51:16 PM
I see 4 or 5 I'd like to see starting with D.520, He-111  and P-61.

Boo
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Slade on April 29, 2012, 07:22:02 PM
Quote
nonsense pure nonsense every plane there can make it if flown correctly

Yep +1
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Raphael on April 29, 2012, 07:54:20 PM
good list! but the He111 not beeing asked for before? u trollin'? LOL we all would love to see it in the game.

again, great list!
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Letalis on April 29, 2012, 08:45:39 PM
good list! but the He111 not beeing asked for before? u trollin'?

That was 100% tongue in cheek ;)
If Lusche were to do a pie chart for most requested aircraft I'm betting the He111 would be in the top 5 easy.  Sorry I forgot about the Do217 Lusche, my bad.  :uhoh
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on April 29, 2012, 08:57:13 PM
perhaps 3 or 4 of them would be used quite frequently the  rest would be hangar queens.


now the motorcycle thingy, that I would use everyday  :pray :pray :pray :pray.



semp
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: olds442 on April 29, 2012, 09:39:56 PM
nonsense pure nonsense every plane there can make it if flown correctly
I don't see any units on the list that are untenable.  The ENY/perk/ideas aren't all there, but the units are all viable.
now boys and girls let us take a look
first thing i see
ME321 hmm dont think that is useful *toss*
H8K why? no subs
Breguet 693 why? again tell me why we need this
Hs.123 yep i bet it would get used almost as much as the sbd dived by 2!!!!!!
ar 196 what would this add?
IL4 waste of resorces we need to Pe2 FIRST
sunderland hmm a lanc that dose not have the one thing that makes a LANC a lanc
p61 hmm mabey but not now.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Karnak on April 29, 2012, 10:10:18 PM
now boys and girls let us take a look
first thing i see
ME321 hmm dont think that is useful *toss*
H8K why? no subs
Breguet 693 why? again tell me why we need this
Hs.123 yep i bet it would get used almost as much as the sbd dived by 2!!!!!!
ar 196 what would this add?
IL4 waste of resorces we need to Pe2 FIRST
sunderland hmm a lanc that dose not have the one thing that makes a LANC a lanc
p61 hmm mabey but not now.

You need to do more research on some of those.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: 321BAR on April 29, 2012, 10:26:32 PM
 :rolleyes:
now boys and girls let us take a look
first thing i see
ME321 hmm dont think that is useful *toss*
H8K why? no subs
Breguet 693 why? again tell me why we need this
Hs.123 yep i bet it would get used almost as much as the sbd dived by 2!!!!!!
ar 196 what would this add?
IL4 waste of resorces we need to Pe2 FIRST
sunderland hmm a lanc that dose not have the one thing that makes a LANC a lanc
p61 hmm mabey but not now.

:rolleyes: :bhead
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Fencer51 on April 29, 2012, 11:54:02 PM
You missed an important criteria. Available flight test data.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on April 30, 2012, 12:43:18 AM
You missed an important criteria. Available flight test data.

what we cant duplicate the bike with the side car and the mg42?  the hell you say.  i see them around los angeles everyday.  it's what people use for safety reasons.


semp
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: R 105 on April 30, 2012, 11:21:23 AM
 The HS.129 anti tank aircraft. The JU-52 may be good for WWII scenarios. The HE-111 has been on a wish list since I been playing. (5 Yrs) The Yak-3 was voted down in favor of our newest target drone the ME-410. But I don't see much else there.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Reaper90 on April 30, 2012, 11:23:03 AM
Westland.
Freakin.
Whirlwind.

/thread
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: mthrockmor on April 30, 2012, 11:43:03 AM
Reaper, I am popping in here during a 5-min slow down at work, meaning I don't have time to dig up the Whirlwind. I've seen pics of it, looks intriguing. Could you post a quick snapshot of its combat record?

Thanks in advance!
Boo
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Reaper90 on April 30, 2012, 01:01:39 PM
Boo,

Two squadrons operated Whirlwinds for most of the war before they eventually converted to Typhoons. Most of their work was done air-to-ground, primarily against shipping and trains, but they did have quite a few scraps with 190's and 109's, and often those went in the Whirlwind's favor. I'll scan and post it later, but one passage from the book I mentioned earlier described (if I remember correctly) a flight of 4 Whirlwinds returning to base after a mission against shipping, flying on the deck, then they were bounced by a group of 109F's, 6 109's initially, joined by 12-15 more 109's higher within minutes. The Whirlwinds were badly outnumbered and in a bad spot, but immediately went on the offensive (based on these pilots' accounts, they were not afraid to go Head-On with the 109's and 190's due to their superior firepower and having 2 engines!). End result, 2 109's down, 2 smoking, the rest bugging out back to France and all 4 Whirlwinds made it home.


Their missions were "real" NOE across the water, often so low that the prop tips kicked up sea spray so much the pilots had difficulty seeing out of the front of the canopy. The cast framework that held the 4 Hizooksa in the nose was particularly prone to corrosion due to all the seawater blown up into the nose and belly during flight.

The Whirlwind was a joy to fly according to its pilots, and really loved. I've read quotes from quite a few who really bemoaned the Whirlwind being taken out of service and them being forced into Typhoons.

Think of the Crikey as a love child of the Hurri IIc and the Mossie fighter.....
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: HighTone on May 01, 2012, 09:34:26 AM
Not enough Japanese A/C on this list. No J2M, no Ki-44, no Ki-100. Blahhhh... To much German/American A/C.

Wouldn't  it be nice for some different A/C for folks to fly their Spit16, P-51, and K4's against.


Wait here comes the hanger queen argument, which basically means "I'm not good enough to fly that plane in the MA, so nobody will."
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Butcher on May 01, 2012, 10:55:56 AM
Not enough Japanese A/C on this list. No J2M, no Ki-44, no Ki-100. Blahhhh... To much German/American A/C.

Wouldn't  it be nice for some different A/C for folks to fly their Spit16, P-51, and K4's against.


Wait here comes the hanger queen argument, which basically means "I'm not good enough to fly that plane in the MA, so nobody will."

You forget 80% in the game play arcade style, very few actually read history or know anything other then "zomg p51 best fighter EVER!!!"
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: titanic3 on May 01, 2012, 11:09:06 AM
I think really cool additions that wouldn't be hangar queens would be:

Me-262 with R4Ms
H8K Emily
Ki-43
Ki-84 Otsu
Ki-100
D4Y2 Judy
Ki-44 Tojo
He-111 (definitely won't be a hangar queen if we ever get the Fritz rocket)
A-26
Ju-188
Ju-87G
Il-10
Tu-2
He-162
P-63
Do-335
Do-217 (maybe)
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on May 01, 2012, 01:32:13 PM
You forget 80% in the game play arcade style, very few actually read history or know anything other then "zomg p51 best fighter EVER!!!"

you forget we arent here to learn history, we are here to play a game.  as cool as it would be to fly some of them, they would suck big time against what we already have in the game except for a few.  so if we gonna add something, let's add something we actually gonna use otherwise what is the point.  see how everybody wanted the b29 and some of the p40's?  I go weeks without seeing one.


semp
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Tracerfi on May 01, 2012, 03:53:42 PM
Yokosuka MXY8 Ohka "BAKA

(http://i47.tinypic.com/352grhh.jpg)
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: 321BAR on May 01, 2012, 04:18:04 PM
Yokosuka MXY8 Ohka "BAKA

(http://i47.tinypic.com/352grhh.jpg)
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Butcher on May 01, 2012, 04:26:34 PM
you forget we arent here to learn history, we are here to play a game.  as cool as it would be to fly some of them, they would suck big time against what we already have in the game except for a few.  so if we gonna add something, let's add something we actually gonna use otherwise what is the point.  see how everybody wanted the b29 and some of the p40's?  I go weeks without seeing one.


semp

And people VOTED on the B-29 and it never gets used, here is the difference: we didn't vote on the P-40 far difference.
The P-40 has more history behind it then anything you are going to come up with, regardless or not Aces high still has to stick with history, ask for a prototype and see what happens.

Kudo to HTC for sticking to authentic and realistic aircraft, imagine if we had prototypes? Where would it end? Next thing you know we have B-29s dropping nukes on runways.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: HighTone on May 01, 2012, 04:30:44 PM
you forget we arent here to learn history, we are here to play a game.  as cool as it would be to fly some of them, they would suck big time against what we already have in the game except for a few.  so if we gonna add something, let's add something we actually gonna use otherwise what is the point.  see how everybody wanted the b29 and some of the p40's?  I go weeks without seeing one.


semp

Well not all of us fit into that category. I for one love a good challenge. If I never lost a fight I wouldn't play this game.

This game is still 90% pilot and 10% plane. Way to much is put on the A/C's top speed when the pilots choices have way more to do with success in this game than needing the next plane added to be fast and well armed.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Tracerfi on May 01, 2012, 05:59:52 PM
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

 What?
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Banshee7 on May 01, 2012, 06:50:53 PM
its really bad when i can only pick out 3 aircraft of that list that would even make it in the game

You have almost earned yourself a spot in the Wishlist Filter Committee!  Keep working hard, and someday you, TOO, will be one of us.  :salute

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,262068.0.html (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,262068.0.html)
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Butcher on May 01, 2012, 09:07:03 PM
Well not all of us fit into that category. I for one love a good challenge. If I never lost a fight I wouldn't play this game.

This game is still 90% pilot and 10% plane. Way to much is put on the A/C's top speed when the pilots choices have way more to do with success in this game than needing the next plane added to be fast and well armed.

Yep, anyone can land 2 kills in a late war fighter, try to see how hard it is in an early war vs late war fighter. To me its more perks to land 2 in a 30 eny plane then it is in a P51..

If I wanted to scoretard, sure I'd pick a tempest for an entire tour, few tours ago I managed #1 in fighters in a C.205 and P38J by luck Bruv decided to ignore it to capture his #1 overall rank.

I am looking forward to aircraft like the D.520 and Ki-43, interesting challenge :)
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on May 02, 2012, 05:31:56 AM
Yep, anyone can land 2 kills in a late war fighter, try to see how hard it is in an early war vs late war fighter. To me its more perks to land 2 in a 30 eny plane then it is in a P51..

If I wanted to scoretard, sure I'd pick a tempest for an entire tour, few tours ago I managed #1 in fighters in a C.205 and P38J by luck Bruv decided to ignore it to capture his #1 overall rank.

I am looking forward to aircraft like the D.520 and Ki-43, interesting challenge :)

and yet there are lots of us who couldnt care less about the perks or the points.  we fly the planes we fly because we have fun with them.  we already have enough airplanes that are slow as hell with little to no guns.  why add more that will hardly get used?  I would rather see the a26 and the bike with the side car and a machine gun.  now those 2 would be fun to have.

btw the c205 is by far not one of the hardest airplanes to get kills on.  I have flown it before and it's pretty easy to get kills.




semp
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: titanic3 on May 02, 2012, 07:45:04 AM
and yet there are lots of us who couldnt care less about the perks or the points.  we fly the planes we fly because we have fun with them.  we already have enough airplanes that are slow as hell with little to no guns.  why add more that will hardly get used?  I would rather see the a26 and the bike with the side car and a machine gun.  now those 2 would be fun to have.

btw the c205 is by far not one of the hardest airplanes to get kills on.  I have flown it before and it's pretty easy to get kills.




semp

Hell, any plane added is a good one. Just because one person don't use it doesn't mean it shouldn't be in the game. No one ever flies the B5N2, so Should it be removed from the game? No.
Likewise, if people won't fly a Ki-43, D.520 or Ki-27, should it never be added to the game?
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: ink on May 02, 2012, 02:14:30 PM
and yet there are lots of us who couldnt care less about the perks or the points.  we fly the planes we fly because we have fun with them.  we already have enough airplanes that are slow as hell with little to no guns.  why add more that will hardly get used?  I would rather see the a26 and the bike with the side car and a machine gun.  now those 2 would be fun to have.

btw the c205 is by far not one of the hardest airplanes to get kills on.  I have flown it before and it's pretty easy to get kills.




semp

of course it is when they are sitting on the runway :bolt:
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on May 02, 2012, 02:39:26 PM
of course it is when they are sitting on the runway :bolt:

ah shut up before i make you run again  :D. 


semp
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Volron on May 02, 2012, 02:50:03 PM
Hell, any plane added is a good one. Just because one person don't use it doesn't mean it shouldn't be in the game. No one ever flies the B5N2, so Should it be removed from the game? No.
Likewise, if people won't fly a Ki-43, D.520 or Ki-27, should it never be added to the game?

Ha!  That's not entirely true.  I still up the Kate from time to time, AND do torpedo runs on enemy cv's in it.  Now seeing them fly in numbers, THAT is so rare that you would probably hit the lottery 3 times in a row before you are likely to see more than 4 Kates wing up at the same time in the MA's. :lol



I hope we get more ew fighters and bombers.  It would be real nice to actually do a Battle of France Scenario/FSO ya know.  Hell, if lucky enough, we may see a Spanish Civil War and the Invasion of Poland Scenario/FSO because of this.  What of the Japanese invasion of China?  Another good one to be in.  The Winter War (The Winter War, not the Continuation War) would also be a nice one to do as well.  What of the early Italian's push in North Africa against the British, or the German's push into Greece?  What of the Japanese invasion of Malaysia?  While it is still fun to participate, having to fly a subbed plane takes some of the immersion out of it.  Who cares if they will be a Hanger Queen in the MA's?  And?  Your point is?  Don't give me that bullocks about it being a "waste of resources". :)  I find a game that gives me more options to play in much better than one that doesn't.  It's fun to key up on squad vox and say, "Hey guys!  Let's do a Spit 1/109 E fighter sweep!", with everyone jumping on board like it was certain death to stay behind. :D  Sure, we may all get greased, but we have fun doing it.  Best of all, we had the OPTION to do it. :aok
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: ink on May 02, 2012, 03:26:27 PM
ah shut up before i make you run again  :D. 


semp

 :ahand
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Karnak on May 02, 2012, 04:07:21 PM
and yet there are lots of us who couldnt care less about the perks or the points.  we fly the planes we fly because we have fun with them.  we already have enough airplanes that are slow as hell with little to no guns.  why add more that will hardly get used?  I would rather see the a26 and the bike with the side car and a machine gun.  now those 2 would be fun to have.

btw the c205 is by far not one of the hardest airplanes to get kills on.  I have flown it before and it's pretty easy to get kills.




semp
Neither the A-26 nor the bike with the side car would see much use.  The A-26 because it will be perk limited and the bike with the side car because it is far, far, far less capable and useful than the Ki-43 that you deride so much.

I am sorry that history doesn't matter to you, but some of us do care about it.  The Ki-43, and other aircraft that you dismiss, would see some use.  Just because you've never heard of a J2M or Ki-44 doesn't mean they are useless and shouldn't be added.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Butcher on May 02, 2012, 05:30:37 PM
Neither the A-26 nor the bike with the side car would see much use.  The A-26 because it will be perk limited and the bike with the side car because it is far, far, far less capable and useful than the Ki-43 that you deride so much.

I am sorry that history doesn't matter to you, but some of us do care about it.  The Ki-43, and other aircraft that you dismiss, would see some use.  Just because you've never heard of a J2M or Ki-44 doesn't mean they are useless and shouldn't be added.

Normally I'm first to argue any comment Karnak makes, but its suppose to be a full moon soon so I agree for once  :airplane:

I think the J2M and Ki-44 would be an interesting addition to the game, far different then the turny a6m as they were both interceptors, built for speed and climb rate over turn radius.

Speed.... if you account for it being early war and an interceptor of course.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on May 02, 2012, 05:41:23 PM
Neither the A-26 nor the bike with the side car would see much use.  The A-26 because it will be perk limited and the bike with the side car because it is far, far, far less capable and useful than the Ki-43 that you deride so much.

I am sorry that history doesn't matter to you, but some of us do care about it.  The Ki-43, and other aircraft that you dismiss, would see some use.  Just because you've never heard of a J2M or Ki-44 doesn't mean they are useless and shouldn't be added.

listen the reason the Japanese had some really good success with crappy airplanes was because the other guys either didnt have any airplanes or had even worst planes than the Japanese.  Once we started bringing better airplanes we kicked the butts all the way to Japan.  as cool as it would be to have every single airplane out there.  the fricking a26 was used with more success than some obsolete Japanese bomber that were only able to bomb because it had no opposition.  as soon as there was opposition guess what, they all got shot down.

as for the bike with the side car.  that would be a squad event.  I'll bet it would even be racing events.  I know we would.

semp

Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Butcher on May 02, 2012, 05:57:00 PM
listen the reason the Japanese had some really good success with crappy airplanes was because the other guys either didnt have any airplanes or had even worst planes than the Japanese.  Once we started bringing better airplanes we kicked the butts all the way to Japan.  as cool as it would be to have every single airplane out there.  the fricking a26 was used with more success than some obsolete Japanese bomber that were only able to bomb because it had no opposition.  as soon as there was opposition guess what, they all got shot down.

as for the bike with the side car.  that would be a squad event.  I'll bet it would even be racing events.  I know we would.

semp

It wasn't the planes that made a difference, it was the pilots. Look at the Japanese Navy before and after the battle of midway, it disappeared. They failed to train pilots, and if you look further in the Guadalcanal campaign, most of the aces of the tainan air group were far better pilots then anything the american's had or any other country besides Germany at the time. The constant combat over Guadalcanal / Moresby which was hundreds of miles away, the stress of combat and losses took its toll. Eventually the Japanese could not replace its losses and ended up putting rookies in the fighters.
Before Midway the US navy couldn't touch the Japanese one on one, fact the KB was far to strong and the American's simply didn't have the training to match the Japanese even with an equal carrier battle.
The Japanese were not looking for a perlonged war either, they hoped with the smashing of the Pearl Harbor battleships (and carriers) the U.S. would be more interesting in sidelining in which the Japanese would of been able to build more carriers / battleships.
Germany as well - had trained pilots, but at the time the Me-109 was not exactly the worlds most "advanced" fighter, the D.520 and Spitfire gave it to much trouble in france. You can look at Russia and laugh at the fact the poor Pilot quality was a major problem.

Japanese bombers were obsolete huh? why not read up on the Prince of Wales and Repulse, those "crappy" bombers sank the prize of the Royal Navy.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Ack-Ack on May 02, 2012, 06:13:51 PM
Japanese bombers were obsolete huh? why not read up on the Prince of Wales and Repulse, those "crappy" bombers sank the prize of the Royal Navy.

Or those crappy Japanese dive bombers at Pearl Harbor.

ack-ack
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Karnak on May 02, 2012, 06:40:47 PM
listen the reason the Japanese had some really good success with crappy airplanes was because the other guys either didnt have any airplanes or had even worst planes than the Japanese.  Once we started bringing better airplanes we kicked the butts all the way to Japan.  as cool as it would be to have every single airplane out there.  the fricking a26 was used with more success than some obsolete Japanese bomber that were only able to bomb because it had no opposition.  as soon as there was opposition guess what, they all got shot down.

as for the bike with the side car.  that would be a squad event.  I'll bet it would even be racing events.  I know we would.

semp


The US pilots who test flew the J2M after the war was over spoke of its handling in glowing terms.  As you may have noticed in AH, the Japanese fighters aren't exactly junk.  Once again, reading some history might be instructive to you, or perhaps you need to take off those nationalistic glasses.

There are many reasons we beat the Japanese, later plane quality being one small factor.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on May 02, 2012, 06:58:22 PM
It wasn't the planes that made a difference, it was the pilots. Look at the Japanese Navy before and after the battle of midway, it disappeared. They failed to train pilots, and if you look further in the Guadalcanal campaign, most of the aces of the tainan air group were far better pilots then anything the american's had or any other country besides Germany at the time. The constant combat over Guadalcanal / Moresby which was hundreds of miles away, the stress of combat and losses took its toll. Eventually the Japanese could not replace its losses and ended up putting rookies in the fighters.
Before Midway the US navy couldn't touch the Japanese one on one, fact the KB was far to strong and the American's simply didn't have the training to match the Japanese even with an equal carrier battle.
The Japanese were not looking for a perlonged war either, they hoped with the smashing of the Pearl Harbor battleships (and carriers) the U.S. would be more interesting in sidelining in which the Japanese would of been able to build more carriers / battleships.
Germany as well - had trained pilots, but at the time the Me-109 was not exactly the worlds most "advanced" fighter, the D.520 and Spitfire gave it to much trouble in france. You can look at Russia and laugh at the fact the poor Pilot quality was a major problem.

Japanese bombers were obsolete huh? why not read up on the Prince of Wales and Repulse, those "crappy" bombers sank the prize of the Royal Navy.

sorry but ww2 was not a pilot makes the plane thing.  it was the plane saves the pilot's butt.  once the f6f started then the Japanese knew they couldnt compete as their airplanes werent up to par.  and once the b29 were over japan then the Japanese air force or whatever you call it knew it was over.  my grandpa flew f6f in the pacific and before then p40's.   he thought the p40's were the biggest piece or crap ever created and once he got his hands on an f6f he knew it was over for the Japanese.

so to be honest, yes I wish every single plane in ww2 was available for some of you guys who like to fly "lower" eny.  but to be honest when the tough gets going most of you guys jump on the top of the line just like the rest of us.


semp
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Ack-Ack on May 02, 2012, 07:27:22 PM
sorry but ww2 was not a pilot makes the plane thing.  it was the plane saves the pilot's butt.  once the f6f started then the Japanese knew they couldnt compete as their airplanes werent up to par.  and once the b29 were over japan then the Japanese air force or whatever you call it knew it was over.  my grandpa flew f6f in the pacific and before then p40's.   he thought the p40's were the biggest piece or crap ever created and once he got his hands on an f6f he knew it was over for the Japanese.



semp

The USN flew P-40s? 

Anyway...what your grandfather failed to point out was that the P-40 was one of the planes that broke the Japanese air force's back in the early part of the war (1942-1943) in the SW Pacific.  Of course, it also goes without saying that the AVG was quite successful in that "biggest piece of crap" of a plane.

It's a shame that you're not talking advantage of the opportunity to learn the history of the planes in the game or about the air war itself. 

ack-ack
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Butcher on May 02, 2012, 07:28:45 PM
sorry but ww2 was not a pilot makes the plane thing.  it was the plane saves the pilot's butt.  once the f6f started then the Japanese knew they couldnt compete as their airplanes werent up to par. 

F6F wasn't entirely better then the Zero in the long run, then again you'd know nothing about the Marianas Turkey shoot.

Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Butcher on May 02, 2012, 07:30:04 PM
The USN flew P-40s? 

Anyway...what your grandfather failed to point out was that the P-40 was one of the planes that broke the Japanese air force's back in the early part of the war (1942-1943) in the SW Pacific.  Of course, it also goes without saying that the AVG was quite successful in that "biggest piece of crap" of a plane.

It's a shame that you're not talking advantage of the opportunity to learn the history of the planes in the game or about the air war itself. 

ack-ack

I recommend he read Fire in the Skies, I have a deep appreciation for what the men and women did during that Triangle of Hell, especially for the pilots themselves dealing with malaria and other tropical diseases that knocked some squads down from 80% activity to less then 20%.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Ack-Ack on May 02, 2012, 07:35:46 PM

so to be honest, yes I wish every single plane in ww2 was available for some of you guys who like to fly "lower" eny.  but to be honest when the tough gets going most of you guys jump on the top of the line just like the rest of us.


semp

Really?  I know it's the case with you but some of us are happy with our mid-war and earlier planes no matter how tough it gets.

ack-ack
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Karnak on May 02, 2012, 07:55:00 PM
Actually, when it gets tough I've been jumping to the A6M3 lately.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Full Metal Jug on May 02, 2012, 07:57:57 PM
My grandfather flew an F6F in the pacific, and before then P-40's.   He thought that the P-40's were the biggest piece or crap ever created, and once he got his hands on an F6F, he knew it was over for the Japanese.
semp
Lie lie lie lie lie!!! P-40's were probably the greatest plane of the war. The P-40 was the most advanced fighter that took off at Pearl Harbor, the rest were P-35s and P-36s (The Biggest Piece of Crap). You do NOT know what you are talking about! The Flying Tigers, look them up, the P-40 could do a lot of things but stay in a sustained turn. They were rugged, fairly quick for their time (one model was as quick as a P-51, but never introduced due to time of war being late). What was your grand father's name, what squadron did he fly with? Did he transfer to the Navy?

I'm not calling you a liar, but the P-40 is not A-PIECE-OF-CRAP.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: HighTone on May 02, 2012, 08:27:50 PM
listen the reason the Japanese had some really good success with crappy airplanes was because the other guys either didnt have any airplanes or had even worst planes than the Japanese.  Once we started bringing better airplanes we kicked the butts all the way to Japan.  as cool as it would be to have every single airplane out there.  the fricking a26 was used with more success than some obsolete Japanese bomber that were only able to bomb because it had no opposition.  as soon as there was opposition guess what, they all got shot down.

as for the bike with the side car.  that would be a squad event.  I'll bet it would even be racing events.  I know we would.

semp




LOL...really semp...even you can not believe this.


The Japanese lost due to a combined number of reasons.....industry, leadership, tactics, training, and logistics just to name a couple.

The didn't lose because of the aircraft they fielded. Any issues in late war plane vs plane matchups with the Japanese can be traced to one of the above.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: caldera on May 02, 2012, 08:36:55 PM
<-  Mediocre hack that could shoot down semp's 51 in every plane on the list.  :)
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on May 02, 2012, 09:48:03 PM
Really?  I know it's the case with you but some of us are happy with our mid-war and earlier planes no matter how tough it gets.

ack-ack

akak a p38 while being midwar is more than adequate to fight any late war airplane.  actually the reason i dont go to midwar is because of the p38.  while it was available then, it really unbalances the game when it flies against other planes while having basically the same eny.

the BAR was really a pre ww1 weapon that went all the way to korea, because it was so much better than anybody what was available.  but you really shouldnt say ww1 weapons were used often in korea as it may be misleading and in your situation that may be true.  but of course you will come up with some other weapon that was invented before jesus was born that is used all the way now.

semp
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Volron on May 02, 2012, 10:05:34 PM
but of course you will come up with some other weapon that was invented before jesus was born that is used all the way now.

semp

A rock. :D
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Karnak on May 02, 2012, 10:29:29 PM
If the P-38 is acceptable to you, then so should those crappy Japanese J2M and Ki-44 be acceptable to you.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Ack-Ack on May 02, 2012, 10:32:24 PM
A rock. :D

And a stick.

ack-ack
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Volron on May 02, 2012, 10:51:52 PM
And a stick.

ack-ack

 :rofl
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: guncrasher on May 03, 2012, 03:10:21 AM
A rock. :D

close really close, that would be a rocket.

:rofl

now that's baseball :).

semp
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: R 105 on May 03, 2012, 07:07:49 AM
 Looks like the big Wish List thread got highjacked lol.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Slade on May 03, 2012, 07:43:53 AM
Quote
...but to be honest when the tough gets going most of you guys jump on the top of the line just like the rest of us.

Not all of us.  I see big advantages in NOT jumping in low ENY birds.  Mainly it is more fun (for me) to shoot down uber birds in average planes!  :banana:
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Butcher on May 03, 2012, 08:47:20 AM
I get what semp is trying to say, the majority DO in fact jump into a low ENY ride when they get frustrated, for example I like to do circles in an I-16 around airfields watching pickers auger trying to get me, if someone does gang me I come back with a 262.

heh jerk indeed:)
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Peyton on May 03, 2012, 06:58:16 PM
After some thought I got together a list of WWII aircraft that fit AH inclusion criteria.  My formula was simple; I tried to objectively grade each type on three criteria:  historical significance, fun factor and probable gameplay change.  Each criteria was rated on a scale of 1 to 5.  History and fun factor scores were multiplied by each other (25 pts possible) and the game change factor was then added on top for a total of 30pts possible.  I then rank-ordered the results and included my estimate of ENY. FYI my favorite on the list is the PV-2 Harpoon :rock


Rank  /  Aircraft  /  Type  /   ENY  /  Notes
1   Westland Lysander   Bomber/Attack   15   Ord Options include veh supps, 1 troop, 500lb bomb, 2x20mm, 4x .303s.  Max spd 210.  Think fast Fi156 with teeth.
2   Ju52   Bomber   30   Carries only 5 troops and slower than the C-47 but can also has modest ord options, carries 3x 7.62 guns to spray map room
3   TU-2   Bomber/Attack   10   Fills important Russian bomber gap with something comparable to the Mossie
4   Yak-3   Fighter   10   Air to air terror
5   Beaufighter   Fighter/Attack   20   Versatile allied answer to the Me110
6   Me323   Bomber   Perked (20 pts)   Giant, heavily armed transport aircraft, 15 veh supps/30 troops
7   PBY-5   Bomber   15   Spawns at ports, carries a little ord, can land/takeoff on water in addition to land
8   P-61   Fighter/Attack   Perked (10 pts)   Yeah…
9   A-26   Attack/Bomber   Perked (15pts)   Yep.
10   Firefly   Fighter/Attack   10   British CV-capable attack craft w 4x20mm mmmms.
11   H8K   Bomber   30   Jap amphib transport, spawns at ports, carries 10 troops
12   He111   Bomber   35   Amazing nobody's asked for this before
13   Pe-2   Attack/Bomber   15   Produced in greater numbers than any other aircraft not represented in AH
14   P-63   Fighter/Attack   10   
15   AR-196   Fighter/Attack   10   Amphibious recon aircraft w 20mm cannons, small bombs.  Spawns at Port
16   Boomerang   Fighter/Attack   30   Poor man's Brewster, but hey the Aussies get representation
17   Hs.129   Attack/Bomber   20   German answer to the IL-2
18   D.520   Fighter   30   4x7.5mm guns w 500rds, 1x20mm w 60rds.  Better than the early P-40s.  "Vive le France!"
19   Ki-43   Fighter/Attack   35   Weak Jap fighter, produced in great numbers
20   PV-2   Attack/Bomber   10   Similar performance to A-20 with 2k more ord, rockets and a tail section that actually lets your tail gunner shoot backwards!
21   Westland Whirlwind   Fighter/Attack   20   Twin-Engine Brit fighter with excellent handling and 4x20mms!
22   IL-4   Bomber   15   If the B-17 and He111 were to have a Russian baby...
23   Ki-45   Attack/Bomber   25   Twin-engine Jap fighter
24   Bre.693   Attack/Bomber   30   Fun little turny French tactical bomber
25   Hs.123   Fighter/Attack   40   Rugged German biplane dive bomber
26   P.11   Fighter   40   Look mom, a Polish hangar queen!
27   Ms.406   Fighter   35   France's answer to the Hurricane MkI, also fought with the Finns
28   Sunderland MkIII   Bomber   Perked (50 pts)   British amphib with massive weapons loadouts. ASV radar makes nearby enemy naval groups appear on minimap
29   G.1   Fighter/Attack   40   The Dutch built fighters? 
30   KS750   Vehicle   40   German motorcycle with sidecar.  Used for fast recon. Options include 1xmachine gun, 1xveh supp (on trailer), 1xtroop 





+1 add them all.   Great research.
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: Letalis on May 04, 2012, 01:43:54 AM
A few related vids I found.  I especially liked the PV-2 vid :D

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRYCx_G25ro  (Lysander)
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLs2qeDuuC8  (TU-2)
6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaJReUbnSUQ   (Me323)
15.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnhze7UiGbU  (Ar196)
20. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_3Dt4mMGL8  (PV-2 - - Somebody just try to tell me this isn't sexy!)
30. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8L4eQp_WuU&feature=related
Title: Re: The Big Wishlist
Post by: TwinBoom on May 05, 2012, 08:51:57 AM
A few related vids I found.  I especially liked the PV-2 vid :D


20. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_3Dt4mMGL8  (PV-2 - - Somebody just try to tell me this isn't sexy!)


Id like to see this and add the Lockheed Hudson for the Aussies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJRmNyS_1rc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJRmNyS_1rc)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccZ94HmygSA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccZ94HmygSA)