Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: ink on September 20, 2012, 09:02:31 AM
-
http://www.reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20120322010-obama-protest-bill.html
not gonna say anything just laugh :rofl
-
Wow. just....wow. :rolleyes: :bhead
-
Wow. just....wow. :rolleyes: :bhead
:rofl
yup that was about the same response I had :rofl
-
Why would this benefit anyone. :old:
In the UK you can protest seven days a week, no one listens to you anyway :old:
What positive reason is there for such a law.?
So if a federal agent is not present its fine to protest, if a agent is present is it not entrapment?
I am going to have a dirty protest to gain solidarity with the colonials :old:
Are federal agents monitoring this site? :uhoh :cry
-
Why would this benefit anyone. :old:
In the UK you can protest seven days a week, no one listens to you anyway :old:
same here haha(well in the past anyways
What positive reason is there for such a law.?
there is none except controlling the people
So if a federal agent is not present its fine to protest, if a agent is present is it not entrapment?
I am going to have a dirty protest to gain solidarity with the colonials :old:
Are federal agents monitoring this site? :uhoh :cry
probably
-
I don't find it funny.
(http://rlv.zcache.com/bill_of_rights_void_poster-rf7c0e8e86c0244b9880129166246dedd_2vb4_400.jpg)
-
I don't find it funny.
(http://rlv.zcache.com/bill_of_rights_void_poster-rf7c0e8e86c0244b9880129166246dedd_2vb4_400.jpg)
I know there is no sarcastic fonts...... I was being extremely sarcastic....its not funny at all.......although I need to laugh at it....
-
The right of peaceful protest is being slowly snuffed out in many capitalist democracies.
Freedom of speech is a now heading towards privilege and not a right.
lots of examples, whether you agree with the protest/er or not is not important.
"our society is run by insane people for insane objectives,
I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and
I think I am liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.
That's what's insane about it."
John Lennon.
-
What should I do Klam the CIA are going to probe me.........Again :cry
-
well considering that it came from a political website, can somebody post a link to what the law actually says?
found it here
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr347/text
‘Sec. 1752. Restricted building or grounds
‘(a) Whoever--
‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so;
‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;
‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted building or grounds; or
‘(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical violence against any person or property in any restricted building or grounds;
so the bit about "where the secret service is" is kind of like almost lying :)
semp
edit: and it passed the house by 388 to 3. that was 244 republicans and 164 democrats. I dont think the senate was really any different.
-
(http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd313/natorino/imagesCAMH4UCH_zpsfa5a887e.jpg)
CobraJet
-
(http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd313/natorino/imagesCAMH4UCH_zpsfa5a887e.jpg)
CobraJet
:rofl :rofl I bet that one gets this shut down. That was awesome though! :aok
-
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_RZxlYx1u9Jc/TMGfNyiBfWI/AAAAAAAAB78/Gv3hHFbVNTI/s1600/tinfoil+hat.jpg)
-
You should also point direct your "ire" at the Republicans because one of the guys that created this bill is a Republican and the bill had the support of both parties as it made its way through Congress.
The majority of "Yeah" votes were Republican. 223 Republicans voted in favor of the bill compared to 176 Democrats with only 3 Republicans voting No.
ack-ack
-
lol, can't believe the guys who took the bait on that one...so much misinformation...there is always "the rest of the story".
-
diddly people, do some diddlying background work before posting inflamatory BS. This is why there are so many ignorant diddlys looking the wwrong way in life. Don't exacerbate the brainless toejam by posting garbage.
IMHO of course.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/mar/30/andrew-napolitano/andrew-napolitano-chain-email-say-barack-obama-si/ (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/mar/30/andrew-napolitano/andrew-napolitano-chain-email-say-barack-obama-si/)
-
oops hit wrong button.
-
uplift people, do some uplifting background work before posting inflamatory BS. This is why there are so many ignorant uplifts looking the wwrong way in life. Don't exacerbate the brainless toejam by posting garbage.
IMHO of course.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/mar/30/andrew-napolitano/andrew-napolitano-chain-email-say-barack-obama-si/ (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/mar/30/andrew-napolitano/andrew-napolitano-chain-email-say-barack-obama-si/)
thats funny you post to a site that says its fact....just that it wasn't done in "secret"....... :rolleyes:
:rofl :rofl
What should I do Klam the CIA are going to probe me.........Again :cry
:rofl
-
Guncrasher is wrong we all going to be probed again :old:
Its a conspiracy I am going to ground, they will never get me again :old:
I have not got a gun as well only harsh language :old:
How will this bill affect me in the UK? :cry
-
Guncrasher is wrong we all going to be probed again :old:
Its a conspiracy I am going to ground, they will never get me again :old:
I have not got a gun as well only harsh language :old:
How will this bill affect me in the UK? :cry
I bet you thinking of moving just to get probed.
semp
-
well considering that it came from a political website, can somebody post a link to what the law actually says?
found it here
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr347/text
‘Sec. 1752. Restricted building or grounds
‘(a) Whoever--
‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so;
‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;
‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted building or grounds; or
‘(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical violence against any person or property in any restricted building or grounds;
so the bit about "where the secret service is" is kind of like almost lying :)
semp
edit: and it passed the house by 388 to 3. that was 244 republicans and 164 democrats. I dont think the senate was really any different.
Doh, semp beat me to it. I was gonna say, if you actually read the source, that news article is FLIPPIN HYSTERICAL! :rofl :lol
Ink, I never figured you as one to regularly eat out of any open hand without question... tisk tisk.
(http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd313/natorino/imagesCAMH4UCH_zpsfa5a887e.jpg)
CobraJet
Not gonna lie, :rofl
You should also point direct your "ire" at the Republicans because one of the guys that created this bill is a Republican and the bill had the support of both parties as it made its way through Congress.
The majority of "Yeah" votes were Republican. 223 Republicans voted in favor of the bill compared to 176 Democrats with only 3 Republicans voting No.
ack-ack
Ack, come on, we know better, hard facts/numbers mean NOTHING to them, even when a goole search away these days. :devil
uplift people, do some uplifting background work before posting inflamatory BS. This is why there are so many ignorant uplifts looking the wwrong way in life. Don't exacerbate the brainless toejam by posting garbage.
IMHO of course.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/mar/30/andrew-napolitano/andrew-napolitano-chain-email-say-barack-obama-si/ (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/mar/30/andrew-napolitano/andrew-napolitano-chain-email-say-barack-obama-si/)
/thread
You sir, have won the internets today. :salute
-
thats funny you post to a site that says its fact....just that it wasn't done in "secret"....... :rolleyes:
:rofl :rofl
:rofl
Think about this ink. The fact is that IT IS a new limitation on what used to be a freedom, yes, so you can take pride in that accuracy.
But I thought everyone would be supportive of this, especialy the anti-free-handouts crowd. Previously, it wasn't a good enough excuse to ask protesters to not protest in a certain area because the secret service wanted to close it off to everyone in the public. And we were paying people in court for it because on the books "somebody had the right, and someone didn't".
Maybe most surprising, looking back to just recent discussions/events on this board that very closely relates to this matter, lets revisit the discussion about the right of Military Funeral Protesters exercising their freedoms.
I think we can all agree, there's a time and place for everything, including anti-war protests at military funerals, and protesters being impervious (and getting paid in settlements) to cleared and secured zones.
-
Think about this ink. The fact is that IT IS a new limitation on what used to be a freedom, yes, so you can take pride in that accuracy.
But I thought everyone would be supportive of this, especialy the anti-free-handouts crowd. Previously, it wasn't a good enough excuse to ask protesters to not protest in a certain area because the secret service wanted to close it off to everyone in the public. And we were paying people in court for it because on the books "somebody had the right, and someone didn't".
Maybe most surprising, looking back to just recent discussions/events on this board that very closely relates to this matter, lets revisit the discussion about the right of Military Funeral Protesters exercising their freedoms.
I think we can all agree, there's a time and place for everything, including anti-war protests at military funerals, and protesters being impervious (and getting paid in settlements) to cleared and secured zones.
baa.....one can make dung look good if worded right...... :aok
-
The fact is that IT IS a new limitation on what used to be a freedom
Chip, chip, chip away, huh?
I know what HTC has done with the sheep, they're playing the game.