Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Scotty55OEFVet on November 21, 2012, 10:00:38 PM

Title: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Scotty55OEFVet on November 21, 2012, 10:00:38 PM
I know that the He-111 has been talked about as being the next bomber added to the Axis plane set but I believe that the Soviet plane set is in need of a new addition (aside from maybe the Yak-3 but I can wait lol). I believe that the Tupolev 2 (Tu-2) and/or the Petlyakov 2 (Pe-2 was considered a dive-bomber) would be welcome additions seeing that aside from the IL-2 there are no other Russian Bomber's/Dive-Bomber's. Here are the Spec's for each of them:

Pe-2 General characteristics:

General characteristics (In total, around 11,400 Pe-2s were built)

Crew: Three - pilot, gunner, bombardier
Length: 12.66 m (41 ft 6 in)
Wingspan: 17.16 m (56 ft 3 in)
Height: 3.5 m (11 ft 6 in)
Wing area: 40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Empty weight: 5,875 kg (12,952 lb)
Loaded weight: 7,563 kg (16,639 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 8,495 kg (18,728 lb)
Powerplant: 2 × Klimov M-105PF liquid-cooled V-12, 903 kW (1,210 hp) each
Performance

Maximum speed: 580 km/h (360 mph)
Range: 1,160 km (721 miles)
Service ceiling: 8,800 m (28,870 ft)
Rate of climb: 7.2 m/s (1,410 ft/min)
Wing loading: 186 kg/m² (38 lb/ft²)
Power/mass: 250 W/kg (0.15 hp/lb)

Armament
Guns: **2 × 7.62 mm (0.3 in) fixed ShKAS machine guns in the nose, one replaced by a 12.7 mm (0.5 in) Berezin UB on later versions.
2 × rearward firing 7.62 mm (0.3 in) ShKAS.
From the middle of 1942 defensive armament included 1 Berezin UB machine gun in the upper bombardier's turret, 1 Berezin UB in gunner's ventral hatch and 1 ShKAS which could be fired by a gunner from port, starboard or upper mountings[13]
Some planes were also equipped with DAG-10 launcher, firing AG-2 parachute timed grenades.
Bombs: 1,600 kg (3,520 lb) of bombs
Notes: Designed by Victor Petlyakov during his incarceration at a sharaga, the Pe-2 developed a reputation as an accurate bomber that was capable of escaping German fighters. The Pe-2 played a key role in providing tactical bombing and ground support to the Red Army.


Tu-2 General characteristics (In total, around 2,257 Pe-2s were built)

Crew: 4
Length: 13.80 m (45 ft 3 in)
Wingspan: 18.86 m (61 ft 10 in)
Height: 4.13 m (13 ft 7 in)
Loaded weight: 10,538 kg (23,232 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 11,768 kg (25,944 lb)
Powerplant: 2 × Shvetsov ASh-82 radial engine, 1,380 kW (1,850 hp) each

Performance

Maximum speed: 521 km/h (281 kn, 325 mph)
Range: 2,020 km (1,090 nmi, 1,260 mi)
Service ceiling: 9,000 m (29,528 ft)
Rate of climb: 8.2 m/s (1,610 ft/min)
Wing loading: 217 kg/m² (45 lb/ft²)
Power/mass: 260 W/kg (0.16 hp/lb)

Armament
2 × 20 mm (0.79 in) fixed forward-firing ShVAK cannon in the wings
3 × 7.62 mm (0.30 in) rear-firing ShKAS machine guns (later replaced by 12.7 mm (0.50 in) Berezin UB machine guns) in the canopy, dorsal and ventral hatches.
Bombs: 1,500 kg (3,300 lb) internally and 2,270 kg (5,000 lb) externally

About tu-2

Built from 1944 to 1948, the Tupolev, Tu-2 was one of the best performing, lite-weight WW-II twin engine bombers. About the same size as the North American B-25, this was the USSR's second most important twin-engine bomber (the first being the Pe-2). The design brought Andrei Tupolev back into favour after a period of detention. It was highly effective, being faster and more nimble, as well as having a greater bomb load and range, than virtually all medium bombers in service during the war with any army.

Please, if I missed something feel free to correct it. I just wanted to see more or less if anyone else thinks that 1 of these aircraft should be added.
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: bongboy1 on November 21, 2012, 11:47:01 PM
Post some pictures u tard :D
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Volron on November 21, 2012, 11:51:11 PM
I don't care...  If it's a bomber, it gets an instant +1 from me. :D

+1 on BOTH. :aok
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Wmaker on November 22, 2012, 03:53:34 AM
Tu-2 was one of the best performing, lite-weight WW-II twin engine bombers. About the same size as the North American B-25, this was the USSR's second most important twin-engine bomber (the first being the Pe-2).

TU-2 isn't even close in being the Soviet Union's second most important bomber. That was the DB-3/Il-4 series.
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Scotty55OEFVet on November 23, 2012, 10:48:19 PM
First, to bongboy1, I have so much trouble posting pics in here and I cannot figure out why. To Wmaker, I just copied and pasted what I was able to find that described a little about the 2. I have no doubt that you are correct about it not being one of the Soviets most successful bombers. I just wanted to see what everyone thought about just adding a Soviet bomber/dive-bomber. Just think the Soviets deserve another plane to the set and a bomber would fit in nicely.
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: SmokinLoon on November 24, 2012, 12:10:02 AM
The Tu-2 or IL-4 both would be good to have, I don't care which one comes first.

The Pe-2 I think should be left on the back burned for quite some time.  Yes, it was an important Soviet bomber, but it would be very similar to having a B25 with no gun package and no bomb sight.  There are multiple aircraft in AH that are a good stand in.  The IL-4 or Tu-2 are their own monsters.   
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Wmaker on November 24, 2012, 06:36:59 AM
I have no doubt that you are correct about it not being one of the Soviets most successful bombers.

It was no doubt a successful bomber, it just came in rather late in the war and small numbers compared to Il-4 and Pe-2.
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: SlipKnt on November 24, 2012, 09:05:17 AM
 :aok
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Scotty55OEFVet on November 24, 2012, 09:16:47 AM
It was no doubt a successful bomber, it just came in rather late in the war and small numbers compared to Il-4 and Pe-2.

See, I kinda figured that just by the low number that were produced considering the Soviet War Indusrty turned out tens of thousands, even hundred's of thousands of tanks, planes, SP's, etc.
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Eric19 on November 24, 2012, 12:36:12 PM
+1 to Soviet Bombers  :D
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Condor11 on November 24, 2012, 01:10:26 PM
It flies :airplane:
I want
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Badger85 on November 25, 2012, 07:26:18 PM
I'm a big fan of adding the Petlyakov Pe-2 "Peshka" to Aces High. I think dive bombing is extremely fun, but the only dedicated dive bomber that the Allies have is the SBD Dauntless. Unfortunately, while I do enjoy flying it, the Dauntless is too underpowered for the Late War arena and has a relatively modest bomb-load (i.e. takes a long time to get to target for a slim payoff). The Pe-2 is 40% faster than the Dauntless and carries 55% more weight in bombs. +1 from me!

As requested above, here are some photos of Pe-2s that I scavenged from the internet:

A classic photo of the Peshkas:
(http://i1275.photobucket.com/albums/y442/historybuff85/1-Pe-2-photo-formation.jpg)

Pe-2 and its airmen:
(http://i1275.photobucket.com/albums/y442/historybuff85/2-Pe-2-photo-airmen.jpg)

Pe-2 in an outdoor museum:
(http://i1275.photobucket.com/albums/y442/historybuff85/3-Pe-2-museum.jpg)

Illustration of a Pe-2:
(http://i1275.photobucket.com/albums/y442/historybuff85/4-Pe-2-illustration.jpg)

Another illustration, in weathered camouflage:
(http://i1275.photobucket.com/albums/y442/historybuff85/5-Pe-2-illustration2.jpg)

A painting of Pe-2s in action:
(http://i1275.photobucket.com/albums/y442/historybuff85/6-Pe-2-painting.jpg)

A Pe-2 cockpit from another flight simulator:
(http://i1275.photobucket.com/albums/y442/historybuff85/7-Pe-2-cockpit.jpg)

Pe-2 in a diving attack in another flight simulator:
(http://i1275.photobucket.com/albums/y442/historybuff85/8-Pe-2-diving.jpg)

Note: My grandfather was a shturman (navigator) in Pe-2s of the Soviet Navy during WWII, but that doesn't make me biased at all  :D :devil :D
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Scotty55OEFVet on November 26, 2012, 02:21:37 PM
"I think dive bombing is extremely fun, but the only dedicated dive bomber that the Allies have is the SBD Dauntless."

Thanks for backing the addition of the Pe-2 to AH, but I think you are very wrong about the SBD being the only dedicated dive-bomber the Allies have. Although first used as a Fighter Escort, the P47 is in my honest opinion one of the best, if not the best dive-bombers in the game. I say this only because it is my #1 choice for ground-attack missions. There are also the P51's, Mossies, A20, Typhoon, and I can add another bunch if I wanted to. I recommend using some of these aircraft in the "Jabo" roll and then making your comparison. Either way, thank u for adding the pics. For some reason I cannot figure out how to add pics to any of my posts. :salute

                                                 RedDevil
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Babalonian on November 26, 2012, 03:00:18 PM
Yes, bring on a real Russian bomber/transport, like the Il-4, DB-3 and the TB-3!

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8c/TB-3_cockpit.jpg)

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Paratroopers_jumping_from_Tupolev_TB-3.jpg)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_8enj6nXqTZE/TA5HnnkubdI/AAAAAAAAA0E/8BqGireWD8c/s1600/tupolev-ant-6-01.jpg)

(http://www.wwiivehicles.com/ussr/aircraft/bomber/tupolev-tb-3-bomber/tupolev-ant-6-tb-3-bomber-02.png)

(http://www.wwiivehicles.com/ussr/aircraft/bomber/tupolev-tb-3-bomber/tupolev-ant-6-bomber-02.png)
Title: Re: Soviet Bomber's
Post by: Badger85 on November 26, 2012, 03:30:22 PM
RedDevil:

I definitely agree with you that there are other great Allied aircraft to use for dive-bombing besides the Dauntless. But none of them (to my knowledge) were specifically designed for those roles. The P-47, for instance, was a fighter that just happened to be equally adept at attacking ground targets. But the Stuka, Dauntless, Val, and Pe-2 were primarily designed to be dive bombers. That’s what I meant by "dedicated" dive bombers. There’s something about dropping those diving brakes before a steep attack that really completes the experience for me :)

On the other hand, the Pe-2 would be a great Soviet plane to fly in support of a tank battle because with two rearward-facing guns (one firing above and one firing below the fuselage) it can defend itself against fighters better than the IL-2.

 :salute